Page 2 of 2
Re: Satanfurd vs. Oregon
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 1:57 am
by indyfrisco
Suck it, baldy. I was saying what Van says about every shootout. Neither team means more to me than a dingleberry. Funny how you only show your grill in here when Furd does anything of consequence, bandwagon fuck.
Re: Satanfurd vs. Oregon
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 2:09 am
by Mikey
IndyTyke wrote: waaahhhhh
Who gives a fuck?
Re: Satanfurd vs. Oregon
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 2:10 am
by indyfrisco
I've never taken you for the white flag type.
Re: Satanfurd vs. Oregon
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 2:26 am
by Van
Indy, you ass, I don't say that about "every shootout." I say that about Hawaii in the WAC and Houston in C-USA.
Re: Satanfurd vs. Oregon
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 2:29 am
by indyfrisco
I was baiting your ass, Van. I didn't expect to foul-hook Mikey.
Re: Satanfurd vs. Oregon
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 3:56 am
by JMak
Bwaahahahahahaa!!
And now we see that those of you pimping Oregon as one of the best in the nation, shoulda been ranked ahead of Boise, TCU, Cinci, whatthefuckever you were tardin it up by pimping Oregon, should have just shut the fuck up and turtled your favorite SC jersey.
The PAC10 can just sit the fuck down.
Re: Satanfurd vs. Oregon
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 6:11 am
by SoCalTrjn
Van wrote:Methinks that Gerhart fellow is going to be a success in life.
The Gerharts are studs but their dad does some pretty weird things with them. My cousin Jeremys kid (I call the kid my nephew but hes just a second cousin) plays on a travel ball team with the youngest Gerhart kid. They say dad is like a drill sargent and all the kids sit out of school a year before going in to 9th grade. All of them have been straight A students and Toby was the career rushing record holder in California High School football but playd 4 years on the varsity and was 19 before he graduated. Toby has a younger brother who is a lineman at ASU and twin sisters who lead the high school team to a national title last year and are freshman at Stanford now.. The one on my nephews baseball team is a hell of a short stop and hits a home run every 5 or 6 at bats on legit fields
Re: Satanfurd vs. Oregon
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:38 pm
by Mikey
JMak wrote:Bwaahahahahahaa!!
And now we see that those of you pimping Oregon as one of the best in the nation, shoulda been ranked ahead of Boise, TCU, Cinci, whatthefuckever you were tardin it up by pimping Oregon, should have just shut the fuck up and turtled your favorite SC jersey.
The PAC10 can just sit the fuck down.
Funny...the past few years the PAC10 was...allegedly...a shit conference because it was dominated by one team. Now it's a shit conference because the top 6 teams all knock each other off (computer ranking systems say you're full of shit...big surprise...BTW). Any one of those 6 teams could prolly beat any of the three teams you mentioned in a bowl, and
any Little10 team, which they seem to do with great regularity.
Re: Satanfurd vs. Oregon
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 9:20 pm
by Van
Mikey, it's the biggest broken record in the world. When SEC teams beat each other, it means they're all good. When Pac 10 teams beat each other, it means they all suck. When there is a dominant team in the SEC, it's proof of the greatness of the conference. When there is a dominant team in the Pac 10, it just means it's the Pac 1.
College football really sucks.
Re: Satanfurd vs. Oregon
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:27 pm
by Van
"So much superior?" Besides m2 trolling, who ever claimed the Pac 10 was so much superior?
All I said was that no matter what, any argument and any result is used to denigrate the Pac 10 while supposedly proving the superiority of the SEC.
Re: Satanfurd vs. Oregon
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:29 pm
by Mikey
Mace wrote:Why don't you guys lay out the scenario that would show the Pac 10 being so much superior. You know, out of conference wins against good teams.....do it if you can. There will be a much better argument to disprove your point...guaranfuckingteed. When USC has a bad/mediocre team, there is no one in the Pac deserving of being considered a great team.
Nobody's claiming that the PAC 10 is "so much superior".
Sounds like some Big 10 insecurity to me.
:wink:
I guess you didn't really read the posts very well. OK maybe maybe I threw in some bait about beating any Big 10 team (it does seem to happen pretty regularlay in bowl games), but that was for ignorant asshole JMak's benefit. Seems like most years a lot of people out there claim PAC 10 is inferior because of one team's domination. Now there's no one team domination and they're inferior becaus of that. Which way do you roll? You want to have it both ways?
This may not be the be-all and end-all, but it's a lot better than trying to compare based on a few games...
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbc09.htm
What do you think? Is the PAC 10 an inferior conference?