Page 2 of 2
Re: SCOTUS Rules In Favor of First Amendment
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 7:03 am
by Lillian Vernon
That is all beside the point that the federal government should not be dictating to the states what they can and can not do.
If a state wants to treat a corporation like an individual, let them. If they don't let them do that too.
Re: SCOTUS Rules In Favor of First Amendment
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:01 am
by Diogenes
For the record, the case probably hinged on the Obama administration's insistence that they had the right to ban books.
As long as the publisher was incorporated, of course.
Re: SCOTUS Rules In Favor of First Amendment
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:15 am
by Lillian Vernon
Also for the record, mvscal is pulling the typical dodge I described weeks ago in another thread when everyone was lapping his cock about how "nails" he is.
He has kicked his own ass in this thread and I am happy to have been the one who pointed it out.
:lv:
Re: SCOTUS Rules In Favor of First Amendment
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 7:22 am
by OCmike
BSmack wrote:88 wrote:Sorry to disappoint. No cum in the pants and athiests such as myself don't often praise the Lord. As far as animal sacrifices go, I do plan to introduce cow flesh to my barbecue grill in a couple of hours. Would it be appropriate to tip back a glass of wine and be appreciative that the Court did it's job and prohibited Congress from taking fundamental rights away from its citizens?
Corporate personhood will be the end of American liberty.
You just watched "The Matrix" again, didn't you.
Re: SCOTUS Rules In Favor of First Amendment
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 7:32 am
by Mikey
Activist judges.
RACK 'em when they're on our side. Otherwise, string 'em up.
sin,
...oh wait never mind. I promised myself to drop all politics.
Re: SCOTUS Rules In Favor of First Amendment
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 7:35 am
by Tom In VA
Mikey wrote:Activist judges.
Where ?
Re: SCOTUS Rules In Favor of First Amendment
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 7:47 am
by Mikey
Tom In VA wrote:Mikey wrote:Activist judges.
Where ?
They're everywhere, dawg. Just look around you.
But don't let them know I told you. Please?
Re: SCOTUS Rules In Favor of First Amendment
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 7:49 am
by Tom In VA
Coast is clear over here.
But not for long. I'm watching Alex Jones "The Fall of the Republic".
Black helicopters and hilarity will ensue in the next few weeks.
WAR CyberCom
Re: SCOTUS Rules In Favor of First Amendment
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 7:55 am
by Mikey
Right now I'm reading Farewell My Lovely.
Seriously thinking of dropping my current job and becoming a private dick. Marlowe is just so cool.
Re: SCOTUS Rules In Favor of First Amendment
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 8:02 am
by Tom In VA
Re: SCOTUS Rules In Favor of First Amendment
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 11:39 am
by smackaholic
Mikey wrote:Activist judges.
RACK 'em when they're on our side. Otherwise, string 'em up.
sin,
...oh wait never mind. I promised myself to drop all politics.
I like the way libs are spinning this as an "activist judge" decision.
How is it activist? Is it activist simply because SCOTUS has been getting it wrong over the last century?
Maybe THEY were the activists.
I got a kick out of some whiney bitch on the tube last night crying about how this goes against a century of SCOTUS precedent.
is he implying that precedent is the litmus test? how fukking regressive of him.
Re: SCOTUS Rules In Favor of First Amendment
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 1:57 pm
by Diogenes
smackaholic wrote:Mikey wrote:Activist judges.
RACK 'em when they're on our side. Otherwise, string 'em up.
sin,
...oh wait never mind. I promised myself to drop all politics.
I like the way libs are spinning this as an "activist judge" decision.
How is it activist? Is it activist simply because SCOTUS has been getting it wrong over the last century?
Maybe THEY were the activists.
I got a kick out of some whiney bitch on the tube last night crying about how this goes against a century of SCOTUS precedent.
is he implying that precedent is the litmus test? how fukking regressive of him.
What was the precedent for the government banning books again?
I mean U.S. precedent, not Obama's role models.