Page 2 of 4
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 11:13 pm
by SunCoastSooner
Derron wrote:BSmack wrote:Derron wrote:Answer the questions I posed to you and we can then determine if your "business" is actually that, or your "self proclaimed" status as a "business" is valid.
Since your dictionary definition works for you in defining you business, save that it leaves out the payment of taxes and insurance, etc as qualifiers, then I will just redirect the government agencies to that definition when they wonder why I stopped paying my taxes.
I will be awaiting your reply on those questions.
Go ahead. Stop paying your taxes Derron. The net result would only improve the readability of this board.
You still did not answer the questions about your "business".
He was able to run an internet football team into financial ruin in less than five seasons if that counts for anything.
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 12:25 am
by BSmack
SunCoastSooner wrote:He was able to run an internet football team into financial ruin in less than five seasons if that counts for anything.
I thought it was 6 seasons.
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:00 am
by mvscal
88 wrote:I'm guessing MSNBC has lost a viewer.
I'm guessing neither channel lost a viewer. It has been quite amusing watching the wingnuts on both the right and the left contorting themselves in a sad and not particularly convincing effort to try to pin this guy on the other side. This guy said
nothing that I haven't heard here and on other blogs right and left.
What are you pussies so afraid of? This is barely even the tip of the iceberg, but it is the future, so you had best buckle up. If you think you are a free man living in a free country, you are a fucking moron. We are nothing but cattle to be milked and bled dry to sustain the bloated, unresponsive bureaucracy that exists at every level of government.
Mr. Stack blew his and decided he wasn't going to fucking take it anymore. Too bad he was only able to kill two government flunkies. Hopefully, the next individual to snap will be more successful.
Our republic is stone motherfucking dead.
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:14 am
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Ron Paul's next "money bomb" is going to be a few dollars shorter.
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:17 am
by mvscal
Martyred wrote:Ron Paul's next "money bomb" is going to be a few dollars shorter.
I think you mean one bounced check shorter. Hey it's the thought that counts, right?
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:19 am
by Dr_Phibes
mvscal wrote: We are nothing but cattle to be milked and bled dry to sustain the bloated, unresponsive bureaucracy that exists at every level of government.
Actually, that was a popular refrain after Stalin died, introduced under Khrushchev. 'The New Class', the bureaucrats, they're to blame. It's a cop out - but christ, is it hard to argue your way out of
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:21 am
by mvscal
Jsc810 wrote:mvscal wrote:Too bad he was only able to kill two government flunkies. Hopefully, the next individual to snap will be more successful.
Go fuck yourself.
Scared? You should be. Lawyers are part of the problem and, well, I think we all know what the solution is:
Wakey, wakey...
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:22 am
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Why does it seem that Austin, Texas is "kook ground-zero"?
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:24 am
by mvscal
He was just doing his part to "Keep Austin Weird."
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 6:04 am
by JMak
Um, maybe cuz Austin is, well, liberal...where such shit is overlooked so you can stake your claim of tolerance? Kinda like college campuses accepting and tolerating behavior that in the real world draws the attn of law enforcement or otherwise leaves you unemployed.
BTW, I thought Portland was trying to keep it weird?? I don't think has shit on Portland in that respect...
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 6:09 am
by Screw_Michigan
You are fucking retarded.
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 7:57 am
by poptart
Rogue bittermen slamming birds into the sides of buildings to off a couple random IRS workers isn't gonna git'er done, mvscal.
Not sure why you would applaud that stupidity.
Now shooting lawyers might be some change I can believe in, though. :wink:
The only way to force change in Washington is for a mass tax revolt to be organized and carried out.
"You're gonna piss away our money and basically ROB us, fuck you, we ain't playin' anymore."
And a lot of the sheeple will say, "Oh HELL yes! I'm IN.
uhh ...
But you go first."
There'll be a whole slew of politicians painting themselves as fiscal conservatives/reformists this summer and fall.
And the sheeple will fall for their bullsheet and elect a whole new crop of numbnuts into office, who will then proceed to jam the dildo up just a little bit further north for good ol' Mr. Citizen.
There will be a handful of TRUE reformists, such as Peter Schiff, who will come in, but the overall effect won't be much.
It'll be business as usual.
And come '12, the repugnicants will have totally hijacked the tea party movement, and slapped a Sarah Palin (or some other ridiculous sell-out) up as a nominee.
Goobers like Dioqueen and JMak will get with that program, and there are too many of these m0rons, because they're still incapable of thinking for themself.
And as it stands now, a 3rd party candidate just has a HELL of a time gaining any traction in a prez election.
A full blown tax revolt is the only way.
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:50 am
by LTS TRN 2
So...not one of you has a take on the...incident in Austin?
None dares to say what each is thinking?
WAKEY WAKE!!!
"I can only hope that the numbers quickly get too big to be white washed and ignored that the American zombies
wake up and revolt; it will take nothing less. I would only hope that by striking a nerve that stimulates the inevitable double standard, knee-jerk government reaction that results in more stupid draconian restrictions people wake up and begin to see the pompous political thugs and their mindless minions for what they are."
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 7:16 pm
by Dinsdale
JMak wrote:
BTW, I thought Portland was trying to keep it weird?? I don't think has shit on Portland in that respect...
"Keep Portland Weird" is stupidity perpetrated by transplants.
I'm one of the 50 Natives, and like all of us, Portland isn't "weird" -- when I visit other cities... THEY'RE weird.
The next person I see with the moronic "Keep Portland Weird" bumper sticker is getting punched in the face.
I'm about tired of the wannabe "weird" transplants tarding up my town. The best part is when some noob starts trying to explain Portland culture and history to me... always a treat.
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 7:33 pm
by Moving Sale
Dinsdale wrote: The best part is when anyone starts trying to explain anything to me... always a treat.
Not a big fan of FTFY but what the hay. Low hanging fruit and such.
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 7:52 pm
by Dinsdale
Moving Sale wrote:Low hanging fruit
I'll take "Things TVO eats when in an orchard for $1000, Alex."
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:24 pm
by BSmack
Dinsdale wrote:I'm about tired of the wannabe "weird" transplants tarding up my town. The best part is when some noob starts trying to explain Portland culture and history to me... always a treat.
Explaining anything to you must be like climbing Mt. Rumplewife in a winter storm without a GPS beacon.
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:01 pm
by Derron
Dinsdale wrote:Moving Sale wrote:Low hanging fruit
I'll take "Things TVO eats when in an orchard for $1000, Alex."
What is Dinsdale's nut sack slapping Moving Sale in the cheeks while being skull fucked ? (again)
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:48 pm
by Tom In VA
mvscal wrote:
I'm guessing neither channel lost a viewer. It has been quite amusing watching the wingnuts on both the right and the left contorting themselves in a sad and not particularly convincing effort to try to pin this guy on the other side. This guy said nothing that I haven't heard here and on other blogs right and left.
What are you pussies so afraid of? This is barely even the tip of the iceberg, but it is the future, so you had best buckle up. If you think you are a free man living in a free country, you are a fucking moron. We are nothing but cattle to be milked and bled dry to sustain the bloated, unresponsive bureaucracy that exists at every level of government.
Mr. Stack blew his and decided he wasn't going to fucking take it anymore. Too bad he was only able to kill two government flunkies. Hopefully, the next individual to snap will be more successful.
Our republic is stone motherfucking dead.
I respect your study of history. "Our republic is stone motherfucking dead" ? With your knowledge of history and of state and federal response to folks who have had their fill and chose to respond with violence do you
really believe that ?
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:14 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Tom In VA wrote:
I respect your study of history. "Our republic is stone motherfucking dead" ? With your knowledge of history and of state and federal response to folks who have had their fill and chose to respond with violence do you really believe that ?
There's already been one (violent) American revolution...and over a lot less, may I add.
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:43 pm
by Tom In VA
Martyred wrote:
There's already been one (violent) American revolution...and over a lot less, may I add.
Why of course you may add. You'd be correct, there have been others - in varying degrees of violence. The most violent of course being the Civil War.
Through it all the the republic stood firm and true to it's limitations according to the Const ....
Wait a minute, something's wrong here.
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:49 pm
by mvscal
Tom In VA wrote: With your knowledge of history and of state and federal response to folks who have had their fill and chose to respond with violence do you really believe that ?
Yes, of course. The process has begun and the result is inevitable. Government can only take so much from people before they begin to lash out violently and our government is now going to have to take much more from We the People in order to feed and perpetuate itself. The folly of Chimpy's hundred billion dollar deficits is being dwarfed by the insanity of Ojiggaboo's trillion dollar deficits. Who is going to pay for it all? Corporations? They don't pay taxes. The consumers of their goods and services do...ie us. The rich? That won't even begin to put a dent in the debt. Who is going to buy our increasingly worthless T bills and what do you think is going to happen when that bubble bursts?
The more government takes, the less people have to lose. This creates an extremely volatile and dangerous social dynamic and one which has been repeated throughout history many times. We are not exceptional in that regard. It
can happen here and it
will happen here. Feel free to reexamine the French Revolution and contemplate our future.
Wakey, wakey...
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:56 pm
by mvscal
poptart wrote:Rogue bittermen slamming birds into the sides of buildings to off a couple random IRS workers isn't gonna git'er done, mvscal.
Not sure why you would applaud that stupidity.
You've got to start somewhere, right? No doubt there will be more effective strikes as this thing plays itself out.
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:58 pm
by Tom In VA
mvscal wrote:Tom In VA wrote: With your knowledge of history and of state and federal response to folks who have had their fill and chose to respond with violence do you really believe that ?
Yes, of course. The process has begun and the result is inevitable. Government can only take so much from people before they begin to lash out violently and our government is now going to have to take much more from We the People in order to feed and perpetuate itself. The folly of Chimpy's hundred billion dollar deficits is being dwarfed by the insanity of Ojiggaboo's trillion dollar deficits. Who is going to pay for it all? Corporations? They don't pay taxes. The consumers of their goods and services do...ie us. The rich? That won't even begin to put a dent in the debt. Who is going to buy our increasingly worthless T bills and what do you think is going to happen when that bubble bursts?
The more government takes, the less people have to lose. This creates an extremely volatile and dangerous social dynamic and one which has been repeated throughout history many times. We are not exceptional in that regard. It
can happen here and it
will happen here. Feel free to reexamine the French Revolution and contemplate our future.
Wakey, wakey...
All very intriguing stuff I've read and watched from Alex Jones of Prison Planet, Infowars fame. His "Fall of the Republic" video is very sobering.
Thanks for the heads up.
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 7:16 am
by JMak
Dinsdale wrote:Moving Sale wrote:Low hanging fruit
I'll take "Things TVO eats when in an orchard for $1000, Alex."
RACK x 2!
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 7:26 am
by JMak
Dinsdale wrote:Keep Portland Weird" is stupidity perpetrated by transplants.
I'm one of the 50 Natives, and like all of us, Portland isn't "weird" -- when I visit other cities... THEY'RE weird.
The next person I see with the moronic "Keep Portland Weird" bumper sticker is getting punched in the face.
I'm about tired of the wannabe "weird" transplants tarding up my town. The best part is when some noob starts trying to explain Portland culture and history to me... always a treat.
I've seen the bumper stickers and the newspaper articles...pretty fucking stupid! But the place is weird. This whole green living, dread-lock, "no worries" bullshit kinda makes my stomach turn. I saw my share of fuck ups in Detroit, but Portland takes the cake. WTF is wrong with some ppl out here?
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 10:04 am
by Roger_the_Shrubber
JMak,
What is the answer, then?
I want America to be safe, first...and economically independent second. The one with the 'most money when you die' philosophy is now anathema. Being rich is not a bad thing, but it shouldn't be the ONLY thing. If you live long enough, you understand that giving is MUCH more rewarding than taking. Unfortunately, most rich people make their money on the backs and sweat of poor people. I doesn't need to be that way. I am NOT a communist, but unrestrained capitolism is MUCH worse than communism ever was.
We all die. That is is the biggest paradigm and truth. If a person doesn't care what happens after you die, well........that person should never be placed in power at any level. Because if nothing happens after we die.......why should anyone care what they do while they are alive? Morality is for people that believe in life now and after. If there is no after.....then who gives a crap.............and the person that beleives that should NEVER EVER be in a position of power.
Work hard, love hard, be at peace with others, and yourself.......not such a bad philosophy I think. The one with the most toys at death does NOT win.
Simplistic, maybe, but better than anger and hatred and greed.
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:58 pm
by JMak
Rog, the answer is simple and we've known the answer since at least 1776...unfortunately, there are too many people who still insist on stealing the labor of others and using government to interfere in the lives of others.
Part-time state legislatures and abolishing most of the fed govt would be a good start!
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 7:46 pm
by Derron
JMak wrote:
Part-time state legislatures
Yeah..that has worked out well here in Oregon... :doh: :doh: :doh:
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:29 pm
by Mikey
Jsc810 wrote:mvscal wrote:poptart wrote:Rogue bittermen slamming birds into the sides of buildings to off a couple random IRS workers isn't gonna git'er done, mvscal.
Not sure why you would applaud that stupidity.
You've got to start somewhere, right? No doubt there will be more effective strikes as this thing plays itself out.
Fuck you again, and every time you seem to celebrate Americans getting killed by terrorists.
You fucking suck. Take some time to think.
Yeah, I don't see what makes this guy any different than a swarthy Muslim crashing a plane into a different gubmint building. Execpt that he was prolly shouting FUCK YOU instead of Allahu Akhbar when he went in.
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:36 pm
by smackaholic
they aer similar in that they are both batshit crazy, but, there is a big difference. Swarthy muzzie dude ultimately wants to either convert you or lop your fekkin' dome off. from the sounds of it, crazy kamikaze dude just wanted uncle sugar to stop bleeding him fukking dry.
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:38 pm
by Tom In VA
The major difference between this guy and the Muslim is that this guy actually gave a shit about our politicians taking a giant shit on the Constitution of the United States. He wasn't motivated by the delusion of eternity surrounded by 70 virgins.
What he did was against the law. Why he did it, is understood. Same as why the Muzzies do what they do, they'd just like Western Civ to fuck off and leave them alone.
When we finally understand that the Ivy League indoctrinated "leaders" we keep being forced to elect are of the same mental capacity as Prof. Bishop, maybe we'll learn.
I don't think we'll have a choice. The inmates ARE running the assylum and have been for quite some time.
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:42 pm
by smackaholic
Tom In VA wrote:What he did was against the law. Why he did it, is understood. Same as why the Muzzies do what they do, they'd just like Western Civ to fuck off and leave them alone.
uhhhh, not quite, tom. the muzies did not get to be one of, if not the largest religion on the planet by wishing others would fuck off anf leave them be.
they did it by conquering infidels.
if you think anything diferent, you're a dumbass.
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:48 pm
by Tom In VA
smackaholic wrote:
if you think anything diferent, you're a dumbass.
Am not.
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 10:40 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Mikey wrote:
Yeah, I don't see what makes this guy any different than a swarthy Muslim crashing a plane into a different gubmint building.
I'll tell you the difference, because you obviously missed it.
This guy's heart was full of despair, whereas the jihadi's action was purposeful and righteous.
One guy had lost his faith in God. The other guy didn't. Bet you can't can't guess which is which.
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 10:42 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Tom In VA wrote:He wasn't motivated by the delusion of eternity surrounded by 70 virgins.
What he did was against the law. Why he did it, is understood. Same as why the Muzzies do what they do, they'd just like Western Civ to fuck off and leave them alone.
If you think jihadis blow themselves up for imaginary virgins or because they disdain modernity, you are a bigger idiot than I thought.
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 10:54 pm
by Tom In VA
Martyred wrote:
If you think jihadis blow themselves up for imaginary virgins or because they disdain modernity, you are a bigger idiot than I thought.
Ummm no.
Yes many of the actual "grunts" in the Jihadist movement actually ARE motivated by their eternal reward and legacy of being a "martyr" . The 70 virgin thing is just a crass way of saying that.
Further, who said "Western Civ" = modernity ? I didn't. They don't particularly care ... "for our freedoms".
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 10:59 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Tom In VA wrote:
Yes many of the actual "grunts" in the Jihadist movement actually ARE motivated by their eternal reward and legacy of being a "martyr" . The 70 virgin thing is just a crass way of saying that.
I would say the total number of jihadis with "Virgins! Here I come!" on their minds moments before detonation is a number approaching
zero.
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 11:00 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Tom In VA wrote:
Further, who said "Western Civ" = modernity ? I didn't.
It's implied.
Re: Fox News loses a viewer.
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 11:32 pm
by Tom In VA
Martyred wrote:Tom In VA wrote:
Yes many of the actual "grunts" in the Jihadist movement actually ARE motivated by their eternal reward and legacy of being a "martyr" . The 70 virgin thing is just a crass way of saying that.
I would say the total number of jihadis with "Virgins! Here I come!" on their minds moments before detonation is a number approaching
zero.
Well you're an insider to the movement dude, all I get to read is
their propaganda.