Page 2 of 2
Re: (!) WV being investigated for possible violations (!)
Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 9:10 pm
by TheJON
King Crimson wrote:Noj thinks doing "it" from behind is anal.
It's not??? So can you, like, get pregnant from that shit?????
We need a sex ed board for those of us that are married and forget what sex is and how to do it. That way we don't screw up the one night a decade we get laid.
Re: (!) WV being investigated for possible violations (!)
Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 9:26 pm
by Dinsdale
Somewhat well-played.
Re: WV being investigated for possible violations
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 4:26 pm
by PSUFAN
JON, did you post some porn pic without warning in the thread? Don't do that, douchesipper. Next time, I'll restore you to a previous day.
Re: WV being investigated for possible violations
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 8:48 pm
by TheJON
I didn't realize this became a family friendly board.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8aa14/8aa14fa9cfffaa9d81e081df3067e1c2cde98f38" alt="Image"
Re: WV being investigated for possible violations
Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 3:11 am
by King Crimson
pretty good
Re: WV being investigated for possible violations
Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 8:44 pm
by PSUFAN
It's not about the family, douche reflux. It's about being surprised by that shit popping up suddenly.
Re: WV being investigated for possible violations
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 1:51 am
by TheJON
It's not about the family
Fuck you, cunt. Have fun sleeping on the couch tonight.......and for the next month. Ass.
Signed,
Your wife
Re: (!) WV being investigated for possible violations (!)
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:00 am
by M Club
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:apparently he forgot to shred the proof that his program was in compliance with practice regulations.
I never said his program wasn't in compliance with practice regulations while at WVU.
your insinuation was that he shredded something of consequence. apparently....
"We looked into it"
..."doesn't exactly prove their innocence," yes, but taken in context means the head of the WVU AD is suggesting that they possess the necessary documentation to prove they were in compliance with nccaa regulations. so no, it doesn't prove anything, but if they're required to prove anything it sounds like their ducks are in a row. maybe he's calling their bluff.
So who's your leading candidate for your next coach?
ron english, hopefully.
Re: WV being investigated for possible violations
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 4:03 am
by TheJON
As much as I'd like to rip on DickRod, I fail to see what he's done that's such a big deal. What am I missing? Did he make his players work longer than allowed? Yes. Big fucking deal. Tell the pussies to go cry to mommy and daddy. I dunno, I just see the criticism of him off the field being due to Michigan struggling on the field. Shit like this is only okay to people when a team is winning. Nobody ever criticizes a coaches character until they start losing.
Re: WV being investigated for possible violations
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 5:25 am
by M Club
TheJON wrote:Nobody ever criticizes a coaches character until they start losing.
i'm with you on this one right until i recall all your posts about tressell, carroll, et al cheating.
Re: WV being investigated for possible violations
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 12:07 pm
by buckeye_in_sc
yep...Rack the FUCK out of M CLUB
Re: WV being investigated for possible violations
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 1:58 pm
by Screw_Michigan
This seems like an appropriate time for Jon to throw up another porn pic. That or eject.
Re: WV being investigated for possible violations
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 5:51 pm
by TheJON
Umm....I'm openly a Buckeye hater and not a member of the media.
The fact of the matter is fans of the team don't ever give a shit about stuff like this when the team is winning and the media barely brings stuff like this up.
It all changes when you're losing. If DickRod is 20-4 instead of 6-18, nobody is talking about this.
If USC wasn't winning under Petey, Van is on here cursing his name calling him a cheater.
Perfect example is Iowa. In Ferentz' down years it's not okay for players to get a PAULA or a public intox. They hound the shit out of him for that. When the team's winning? It's all good. Nobody gives a fuck.
I'm just saying that if DickRod were winning, Michigan fan wouldn't give 2 shits if dude was overworking his players, and the Detoilet media would barely even mention it. Dude could smoke dope with Tate Forcier on live TV and Michigan fan would respond with "it should be legalized anyways". I'm not singling out Michigan here, this is not exclusive to them. It happens everywhere. You can disagree with that all you want, but just know you're wrong.
Re: WV being investigated for possible violations
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 8:42 pm
by Van
If USC wasn't winning under Petey, Van is on here cursing his name calling him a cheater.
Uhhh, no. I've never been one to label people cheaters when I have no clue what's really going on. I never labeled Tarkanian a cheater, or anyone else for that matter.
Ignorantly tossing out accusations, that ain't my thing. I'll leave that to you.
Re: WV being investigated for possible violations
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 8:52 pm
by TheJON
Maybe I was unfair singling you out, Van, but I was using you as an example.
However, typical USC fan would be doing just that. You can't argue that. If Petey wasn't winning, they'd be crying about what a cheater he was- even if he wasn't actually a cheater. They would jump all over these accusations made in the alleged Reggie Bush scandal and claim he's a scumbag. But because he was winning, everything is fine and the allegations are false. Maybe not you, Van, but 99% of the fans would. You can not dispute that. And like Michigan, it's not exclusive to USC fan........every fan base is like that.
Win and it doesn't really matter to the fans what you do off the field. Lose, and everything you do is wrong.
Re: WV being investigated for possible violations
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 10:03 pm
by Van
Actually, Jon, if Pete hadn't won, I think the very last thing most USC fans - or most anybody else - would have accused him of is being a cheater. They may have wondered why he didn't cheat, since that might have helped him win more, but I highly doubt their first response to losing would be, "Cheater!"
In general, coaches usually aren't accused of being cheaters until they're winning enough to piss some people off.
Re: WV being investigated for possible violations
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 12:01 am
by TheJON
Well, yeah, of course everyone would be pissed that he wasn't winning. But you're trying to tell me that if Pete wasn't winning, USC fan wouldn't be going off on him about the Reggie Bush scandal? Come on now.
Re: WV being investigated for possible violations
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:19 am
by M Club
eh, you've thrown to mutually exclusive things together: pulling reggie bush and losing.