Page 2 of 3
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 4:21 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Bizzarofelice wrote:Storytelling
That's the movie Belle and Sebastian did the soundtrack for. I gotta see it.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2011 5:50 pm
by R-Jack
IndyFrisco wrote:![Image](http://kaseydriscoll.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/caligula_ver1.jpg)
Complete trash. It was terrible enough to watch as a dare.
Of course I saw the edited version.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2011 1:48 am
by Tom In VA
Men Behind the Sun was pretty brutal.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2011 2:09 am
by Invictus
HBJ, Man Behind The Sun was one of the few films I wish I hadn't seen. It was ghastly and the fact that it was based on actual events/experiments is revolting.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2011 4:39 am
by PSUFAN
Lars Von Trier is a sick, sick puppy.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2011 9:16 am
by Tom In VA
Invictus wrote:HBJ, Man Behind The Sun was one of the few films I wish I hadn't seen. It was ghastly and the fact that it was based on actual events/experiments is revolting.
Indeed. We often rail away on the evils done in the name of some religion, Unit 731 stands out as one in which great harm was done in the name of Science.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2011 6:09 pm
by Goober McTuber
Invictus wrote:Human Centipede was actually quite funny. Not as violent or disturbing as I thought it would be.
Salo was quite fucked up. I own Caligula, the 156 unrated version. It's a great date movie.
I had a copy of that for a while. Loved it. Loaned it to some bitch and she never gave it back.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2011 6:39 pm
by Moving Sale
R-Jack wrote:Complete trash. It was terrible enough to watch as a dare.
Of course I saw the edited version.
Not enough pedophilia and incest for ya in the edited version?
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2011 6:43 pm
by War Wagon
Not necessarily a disturbing film per se, but one of those few that whenever I come across it channel surfing, no matter at what point in the movie, I stop surfing.
The Professional
![Image](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/0/03/Leon-poster.jpg/220px-Leon-poster.jpg)
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2011 6:57 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Caught some of that last week, Whitey. Always a good flick. Gary Oldman is hilarious.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 11:20 pm
by Invictus
Goober McTuber wrote:Invictus wrote:Human Centipede was actually quite funny. Not as violent or disturbing as I thought it would be.
Salo was quite fucked up. I own Caligula, the 156 unrated version. It's a great date movie.
I had a copy of that for a while. Loved it. Loaned it to some bitch and she never gave it back.
I bought my VHS from Four Star Video Heaven, one of the best video stores to ever be in existence.
The selection of interesting films they had there made me a frequent visitor.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:43 pm
by Dinsdale
Mikey wrote:[
![Image](http://leighsinger.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/mulholland_drive_ver3.jpg)
I agree that this is a
very disturbing film -- I'm
extremely disturbed that I can't get those 2 hours of my life back.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:44 pm
by Dinsdale
Papa Willie wrote:Videodrome
Cult classic, for sure.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:47 pm
by Truman
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 12:43 am
by Invictus
Dinsdale wrote:Papa Willie wrote:Videodrome
Cult classic, for sure.
I dug seeing Debbie Harry naked, even when she burnt her tit with a lit cigarette.
"Death to Videodrome! Long live the New Flesh!"
I've got that on VHS as well. My collection of movies is eclectic if nothing else.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 5:41 am
by Dinsdale
Invictus wrote:My collection of movies is eclectic if nothing else.
I suss, as per usualm.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 3:41 pm
by King Crimson
Haneke's Funny Games. the orig German one, not the shit US one (that he inexplicably made himself...with Naomi Watts...bleh).
Fassbinder's Bitter Tears of Petra Van Kant. boring, disturbing, creepy but somehow fascinating as such. the most repressed, claustrophobic film ever.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2011 3:55 pm
by Felix
I watched this just the other day
pretty disturbing, especially for the clostrophobic
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 1:27 am
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
KC Scott wrote:![Image](http://www.awardsdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/antichrist2.jpg)
This film is FUCKED.
The scene of that psycho bitch cutting off her clit with a pair of scissors...that's going to take a while to erase from the memory banks. Sweet mother of FUCK.
I can only hope that I can lap up clits with the same passion from here on out.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 1:33 am
by M2
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:The scene of that psycho bitch cutting off her clit with a pair of scissors...that's going to take a while to erase from the memory banks. Sweet mother of FUCK.
AP called that "Friday Night" and that led to much more disturbing things than one can see in a movie.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 1:37 am
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
88 wrote:![Image](http://www.juliesjournal.com/art/blogart/bug_movie1000.jpg)
This movie was disturbing only in the sense that it was fucking awful.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 2:30 am
by Bizzarofelice
lars von trier also made the infinitely funny dancer in the dark.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 6:43 am
by LTS TRN 2
Oh c'mon, Salo, like Happiness, Bug, and Silence, was a black comedy. Great faces and speeches. Remember, De Sade was locked up for his ideas, not his routine rapes and tortures. Audition was disturbing, mostly due to the son's mewling weakness under pressure.
You want disturbing? How about half the female population of North America lining up to see The Hunger Games, a straight up fraud. There's no fucking movie. The thinnest set-up you've ever seen, followed by quick-cut cartoon support characters (Woody Harrelson should just hide his face after this), no quality action scenes, no comprehensible plot, no character development of the principal actress, and the emptiest ending since Ben Hur. Just astonishing--in a disturbing way--that such an obvious second-rate work should shoot out the lights.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 12:31 pm
by Carson
You're just jealous because the girl has two boyfriends,
...but you have to settle for a battery operated butt plug.
Die in a river of rat piss.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:17 pm
by The Seer
A typical shit movie about a cult...that is almost watchable due to some nice skin shots from the youngest of the Olsen girls...
![Image](http://cps-static.rovicorp.com/2/Open/20th%20Century%20Fox/Martha%20Marcy%20May%20Marlene/_derived_jpg_q90_410x410_m0/MarthaMarcyMayMarlene-PosterArt.jpg?partner=allrovi.com)
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:01 am
by MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan
The Human Centipede 2: Full Sequence is much more disturbing than the original. You know all that shit they left to your imagination in the first one? Not this time. I felt sort of violated after watching it. That said, it's available on Netflix streaming if you're looking for a good gross-out.
There's also some German film called Cannibal (allegedly based on a true story) that's pretty fucked up. Some sick fuck places a personal ad explaining that he's a gay cannibal and would like a hot young stud to eat. Someone actually responds. Hilarity ensues. (Not really.)
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:58 am
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Oh c'mon, Salo, like Happiness, Bug, and Silence, was a black comedy. Great faces and speeches.
Call it what you want, but shit-eating and man-on-boy rape is pretty disturbing to most normal individuals.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 1:10 am
by Van
Nah. - JoePa
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:39 am
by bradhusker
Python wrote:Salo.
No film comes close to this one. 120 days of sodom, Is there anything more vile and disturbing than watching Nazi scum abuse and de-humanize children Force them into acts of sheer depravity?
This film is like the Nosferato film. A real vampire was used in the making of the silent classic. And in Salo, 120 days of sodom, Real children were forcibly raped and tortured, forced to eat their own feces and drink their own urine.
The fact that BOTH films got made is astonnishing!! No way could a movie like that be made today, it would be shut down by authorities immediately. The entire cast and crew would be arrested and taken away to jail. Except for Roman Polanski, he gets a free pass.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 6:38 pm
by LTS TRN 2
You pathetic blathering hack, you haven't even seen Salo, have you? Not only is there no actual sex, violence or depravity in the making of the film, but in the convention of Fellini (in his Casanova) and other Italian masters, Pasolini has the actors leave their clothes on during sex scenes. The feces being served in the banquet scene is fake. Gee, what a surprise. And of course no children or adults were in any way actually abused in the filming. Pasolini was attacking the Italians who had collaborated with the Nazis and Mussolini, etc. It's a black comedy--or what, the ending with the guards waltzing in their off time didn't give you enough of a wink?
But guess what, you total fraud, you're actually right about the Watch Captain walking on the murder 2 rap. There's no way they can convict that weasel, even though he's a cowardly murderer. And that's truly disturbing.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:19 pm
by R-Jack
Both of you,
Die of some type of AIDS/cancer hybrid.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:25 pm
by Truman
R-Jack wrote:Both of you,
Die of some type of AIDS/cancer hybrid.
:?
I thought they already
were some type of AIDS/cancer hybrid...
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:27 pm
by LTS TRN 2
Hey R-Jack, you mewling punk. Why don't you look in the mirror ..and just turn away in disgust. If ever there was a case of a little man given a little bit of power--and then becoming a little bitchy prick, well..it's right there in the mirror.
Go die...you..you...
AIDS patient ....oh hell, I need an act...or something....damn, I've got nothing...
![Image](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-yIpHqKjY0mc/T2R9A0fuKiI/AAAAAAAABEc/lCdSh7EYXaY/s1600/mirror_mirror.jpg)
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:34 pm
by R-Jack
I could've said that I hope you both die in a gay orgy gone horribly right. However if that was the case, neither of you could say you went out on top.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 11:44 pm
by mvscal
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Call it what you want, but shit-eating and man-on-boy rape is pretty disturbing to most normal individuals.
Nick Felchco calls it 'Friday Night.'
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 2:10 am
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Salo is pure trash. I can just imagine Nick, the pretentious tool that he is, rejoicing during the shit smorgasbord scene over its "artistic brilliance" and "important message."
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:05 am
by LTS TRN 2
Sorry to break up the Fasci "what if" party, but just because you tedious seething right-wing rats are still pissed that you lost WWII doesn't mean you know shit about films, music, literature, history, philosophy, or the taste of trembling poontang, because you obviously don't. You voted for Sarah Palin!!! You are such utterly disgraced piles of melting ice in a urinal, such reused plastic dog-shit bags, such total cowards as to make the Watch Captain look honorable. Why...do you even try? Just stand on your hind legs, pant and wait for a treat!
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 6:17 am
by Van
Yep, that's our Mgo, a lock-step Palin supporter and longtime right-wing fanatic.
Jesus, Nick.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 11:59 am
by bradhusker
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Sorry to break up the Fasci "what if" party, but just because you tedious seething right-wing rats are still pissed that you lost WWII doesn't mean you know shit about films, music, literature, history, philosophy, or the taste of trembling poontang, because you obviously don't. You voted for Sarah Palin!!! You are such utterly disgraced piles of melting ice in a urinal, such reused plastic dog-shit bags, such total cowards as to make the Watch Captain look honorable. Why...do you even try? Just stand on your hind legs, pant and wait for a treat!
LTS-, Ive seen some pretentious, left wing, nutjob faggotts trying to discuss cinema, BUT YOU? You take the cake!!
Not only are you a lying piece of dogshit, about politics AND cinema, BUT, to an educated cinephile and political history buff such as myself? YOU ARE A TOTAL JOKE!!!!!
I have forgotten more about the greatest motion pictures ever made, than you will ever hope to know. BY THE WAY, I know firsthand about the actual sex acts that never made the final cut of the film, YOU CLUELESS PRICK.
Like most homosexual faggotts, LTS fancies himself an intellectual, HOWEVER, he is a bumbling IDIOT, you are a self-loathing , women-hating gaywad. Just like Hillary Rosen is a self-loathing, FAT dyke jew.
When I brought up Condy Rice as a possible VP candidate, YOU pissed and shit yourself like a scared dickless coward. WHY? Because Condy Rice represents something you will NEVER be, Extremely smart and sophisticated.
LTS is cut from the same cloth as Michael Musto, the creepy weird faggott film critic for the village voice. Michael Musto was a regular commentator on msnbc. Isnt it funny how msnbc gives creepy gay guys a forum to talk? WHAT in God's name could mainstream america learn from creepy gay commentators like Jonathon Capeheart, Julian Epstein and Michael Musto??
Weird sick depraved left wing weirdos like those guys over at msnbc are trying to tell us something?
Sure, if mainstream america wanted to know how to toss a salad or polish a knob, THEN we need to hear from a guy like Charles Blow, a creepy columnist from the N Y Times.
OTHER than that? There is NOTHING that these sick liberals can teach us, which is why they have a job over at msnbc, a network with no ratings.
Re: Disturbing films
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 6:12 pm
by LTS TRN 2
Right....look, Husker, check back with "Dr. Phibes" and maybe he can fill your obviously depleted scrips. Of course I don't roll out any sort of intellectual approach to any subject on this palsied forum, let alone movies
![popcorn :popcorn:](./images/smilies/smileyvault-popcorn.gif)
. Are you kidding? I mean beside your obviously total fakery to begin with :wink: But when it comes to piano playing, Condi takes a back seat to Nixon. She touts some classical training but actually can't play for shit. I think lack of a soul has something to do with it. Her record as National Security Director was of course the worst in American history--and not only for 9/11. Her tenure as Secretary of State was similarly dismal and disgraceful. She is a weak and hapless total fraud who facilitated--if only by passive inaction--the greatest crime in modern history.
Now there's a disturbing flick to be made--"9/11--The Inside Job" Who would play Condi? Whoopi Goldberg?
Here's the starring cast of heinous criminals...what do you think...Ed Asner as Cheney?
![Image](http://www.moscowtopnews.com/image/article/5/0/8/2508.jpeg)