Re: Fearless Forecasts 2010
Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:00 pm
PISC wrote: What's even stupider.........
Duane at his best Duane at his bestPage 2 of 2
Duane at his bestRe: Fearless Forecasts 2010
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 4:58 am
And where are your picks, dickhead? :?
B'more is still the class of the AFC (jets are a fraud) and the Cowboys still have a manageable schedule to where they can go 10-6. Still the most talented team in the league if they can tweak a few things this week and punch the Giants in the mouth next week in Big D.
B'more is still the class of the AFC (jets are a fraud) and the Cowboys still have a manageable schedule to where they can go 10-6. Still the most talented team in the league if they can tweak a few things this week and punch the Giants in the mouth next week in Big D.
Re: Fearless Forecasts 2010
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 2:24 pm
Loss to the Pats and Bengals say what?Yer a Fuckin Jerkoff wrote:B'more is still the class of the AFC
They're not even atop their own division, much less the AFC. The class of the AFC is the Pittsburgh Steelers.
Re: Fearless Forecasts 2010
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 4:07 pm
I'd say the Steelers are the best team in the AFC. B-more looked good yesterday 17-3 lead, then the D collapsed. I'd take the Steeler D over B-more's, and think its as good as the Jets, and I'd take Roethlisberger at QB over Flacco or Sanchez.Yer a Fuckin Jerkoff wrote:B'more is still the class of the AFC (jets are a fraud) .....
Re: Fearless Forecasts 2010
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 4:18 pm
Once Reed is starting for them (next game or so) will you say the same thing?Joe in PB wrote:I'd take the Steeler D over B-more's.
Re: Fearless Forecasts 2010
Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 3:57 am
Head to head says what? Never mind.BSmack wrote:Loss to the Pats and Bengals say what?
1. BAL
2. PIT
3. NYJ
Re: Fearless Forecasts 2010
Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 4:36 am
Head to head says the Ravens needed a last minute drive to beat Charlie Freaking Batch. Nuf said.Screw_Michigan wrote:Head to head says what? Never mind.BSmack wrote:Loss to the Pats and Bengals say what?
1. BAL
2. PIT
3. NYJ
Re: Fearless Forecasts 2010
Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 1:10 pm
Screw_Michigan wrote:Head to head says what? Never mind.BSmack wrote:Loss to the Pats and Bengals say what?
1. BAL
2. PIT
3. NYJ
You have a two loss team (BAL) ahead of a one loss team (NE) that beat the two loss team (BAL) and your criteria for putting the two loss team (BAL) ahead of the one loss team (NE) is head to head?
Re: Fearless Forecasts 2010
Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 2:35 pm
So Batch was playing defense too?BSmack wrote:Head to head says the Ravens needed a last minute drive to beat Charlie Freaking Batch. Nuf said.Screw_Michigan wrote:Head to head says what? Never mind.BSmack wrote:Loss to the Pats and Bengals say what?
1. BAL
2. PIT
3. NYJ
Re: Fearless Forecasts 2010
Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 1:26 am
No matter the order, I think its safe to say that BAL, NE, NYJ, & Pit are the 4 best teams in the league.
Re: Fearless Forecasts 2010
Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 1:40 am
You forgot KC.
Re: Fearless Forecasts 2010
Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 5:26 am
poptart wrote:You forgot KC.