Page 2 of 2
Re: Texas/NU - It's time
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:33 pm
by King Crimson
who doesn't love some Dana X. Bible smack?
i didn't even know he coached at Nebraska. Guy coached every BTPCF team on planet earth...
X stands for Xenophon, btw.
Re: Texas/NU - It's time
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:36 pm
by King Crimson
MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan wrote:
Kinda funny to see a mediocre Tejas team serve Husker Nation a big ol' frosty mug of STFU.
no doubt, i laughed.
Re: Texas/NU - It's time
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 3:43 pm
by H4ever
MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan wrote: What's with Tigerfan swinging from Longhorn nutsack, though? I mean, they obviously know what side their bread is buttered on, but get a freakin' room already...
Yea..everyone talks about Nebraska being Tejas' bitch . This may be true but it's hilarious watching Oklahoma filling the role of fluffer and now Mizzou is jockeying for position to get a lick in on Tejas' sack. Hilarious.
P.S. Mike.... your team REALLY sucks! Texas got over but K-Suck got theirs and Mizzou and Colorado is next. It's a good thing NU receivers dropped 4 touchdown passes and gave Texas the ball inside the 20. Kind of helped that "mediocre" Texas team win ya think? C'mon "knowledgeable" football fans in here....call it like ya saw it and get Texas' cock out of your mouths.
Props to Texas coaches for having their team prepared and calling a good game.
Re: Texas/NU - It's time
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 4:17 pm
by MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan
H4ever,
I beg to differ. Colorado is a mediocre-to-halfway-decent team with a handful of talented players on both sides of the ball. They've managed to scratch their way to a .500 record in spite of their coaching, which does, in fact, REALLY suck. If Hawk is still coaching by the time they roll into Lincoln, it could get ugly, but if Bohn grows a pair and does what he should've done a year ago, I think the Buffs have a puncher's chance to end our little non-rivalry on a high note.
Re: Texas/NU - It's time
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 4:20 pm
by Truman
Just a moment of clarity here, and then I’ll let you two resume your delusion.
MizzouFan was not rooting for Texas.
MizzouFan was rooting against Werebackska.
…Just as we have every week so far this season. And just as we will when Big Rid squares off against the Pokes. And the Clones. And the Aggies. And yes, Mike, even your Buffs. I suppose an errant air raid out of nearby Offutt would be too much to hope for when Nebraskunt plays Kantsas…
You’re out, Quitters. No one-loss team is going to play for the MNC this year. And if losing to an unranked 3-2 team at home is any indication, you Losers might not even make it out of the North. BCS Bowl? Seriously? Second place, bitches. How’s that taste? Get used to it.
Re: Texas/NU - It's time
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 4:55 pm
by King Crimson
maybe just maybe NU fan is reaping a little for the endless moral grandstanding? that you are whining about dropped balls in multiple threads is only the more for ridicule. woulda shoulda coulda. i don't remember Dr. Tom whining like a bitch. If you could actually beat Texas, maybe you wouldn't cry about losing to them all the time?
after OU beats Texas, the Horns are basically my fave team. not really (i do like when they lose), but one loss puts you out of the NC picture most likely. you remember being in contention for the big prize, don't you? Bill Callahan invented the forward pass for your other "breakout" year? it's been a decade since NU was relevant but you have been a great comedy ever since. ouch.
Re: Texas/NU - It's time
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 7:09 pm
by Moby Dick
King Crimson wrote:
after OU beats Texas, the Horns are basically my fave team. not really (i do like when they lose), but one loss puts you out of the NC picture most likely.
Glad someone else feels this way.
I kept feeling dirty about rooting for Texas against nebraska...i like Nebraska...hate Texas...but i coudlnt help but root for Texas.
Why?? Maybe it was cause EVERYONE was saying how bad nebraska was going to whoop up on Texas...i dunno..i kept telling guys i work with there's just no way i could pick against Texas and that they were probably going to win...i'm sure if i werent an OU fan...i'd probably be a Texas fan.
Re: Texas/NU - It's time
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 5:24 am
by At Large
So OU fan was annoyed by NU getting some run in the press for a few weeks? Now you know how everyone else feels about the pundits drooling over OU and Texas on a constant basis. Sorry we were stealing your thunder. It won't happen again... :wink:
Re: Texas/NU - It's time
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 1:02 pm
by indyfrisco
At Large wrote:So OU fan was annoyed by NU getting some run in the press for a few weeks?
I think most were annoyed by NUFan running their mouth for a few months about being run from the XII by t.u., OU and A&M.
Re: Texas/NU - It's time
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 3:42 pm
by King Crimson
At Large wrote:So OU fan was annoyed by NU getting some run in the press for a few weeks? Now you know how everyone else feels about the pundits drooling over OU and Texas on a constant basis. Sorry we were stealing your thunder. It won't happen again... :wink:
what does this even mean? NU fan is king of conspiracy theories.
Re: Texas/NU - It's time
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 5:33 pm
by At Large
I wasn't implying a conspiracy. I've gotten sick of hearing about you guys from the fans and the media for years. I thought it was funny that OU fan got annoyed by it after only a few weeks.
Re: Texas/NU - It's time
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:40 pm
by indyfrisco
At Large wrote:I wasn't implying a conspiracy. I've gotten sick of hearing about you guys from the fans and the media for years. I thought it was funny that OU fan got annoyed by it after only a few weeks.
It wasn't a conspiracy theory. It was the simple fact NU thought it was big fish in little pond in the Big 8 even though your claim to fame coach was the bitch to OU. Then when the XII was formed, you went from REALITY #2 to #4 even though in your own minds you were still #1. And when I say REALITY, I refer to $$$. t.u., OU and A&M bring in more $$$ to the XII than NU. Hell, I think Okie St. brings in more than NU, but I'm not gonna look it up.
Seriously, I imagine Shaz would puke if he saw the way you guys have handled your running here...
Re: Texas/NU - It's time
Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 1:31 am
by At Large
Where did this come from? I was laughing at OU fan for being annoyed at us getting some run recently. Why are you offended?
Here you go though...
1. Texas: $10.2 million
2. Oklahoma: $9.8 million
3. Kansas: $9.24 million
4. Texas A&M: $9.22 million
5. Nebraska: $9.1 million
6. Missouri: $8.4 million
7. Texas Tech: $8.23 million
8. Kansas State: $8.21 million
9. Oklahoma State: $8.1 million
10. Colorado: $8.0 million
11. Iowa State: $7.4 million
12. Baylor: $7.1 million
Re: Texas/NU - It's time
Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 1:51 am
by King Crimson
At Large wrote:Where did this come from? I was laughing at OU fan for being annoyed at us getting some run recently. Why are you offended?
see, here's the thing. you have yet to establish that OU fan is being annoyed for you "getting some run"....instead of just laughing at you. plain and simple.
Re: Texas/NU - It's time
Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:43 am
by Bizzarofelice
I was rooting for Texas cause I was scared of Martinez. Texas made a short film called "How to Put Martinez on the Bench" and for that I am grateful. Hopefully Pinkel watched it. Sure, a major part of that plan is to have the receivers suffer from hangovers, but if that's what it takes...
Yeah, game could have been closer. They needed the special teams TD, but they only needed it because the offense missed easy opportunities. That ain't gonna happen all the time.
At Large wrote:1. Texas: $10.2 million
2. Oklahoma: $9.8 million
3. Kansas: $9.24 million
4. Texas A&M: $9.22 million
5. Nebraska: $9.1 million
6. Missouri: $8.4 million
7. Texas Tech: $8.23 million
8. Kansas State: $8.21 million
9. Oklahoma State: $8.1 million
10. Colorado: $8.0 million
11. Iowa State: $7.4 million
12. Baylor: $7.1 million
these numbers are relatively close. no place to brag there for anyone.
Re: Texas/NU - It's time
Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 5:08 am
by MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan
Bizzarofelice wrote:
At Large wrote:1. Texas: $10.2 million
2. Oklahoma: $9.8 million
3. Kansas: $9.24 million
4. Texas A&M: $9.22 million
5. Nebraska: $9.1 million
6. Missouri: $8.4 million
7. Texas Tech: $8.23 million
8. Kansas State: $8.21 million
9. Oklahoma State: $8.1 million
10. Colorado: $8.0 million
11. Iowa State: $7.4 million
12. Baylor: $7.1 million
these numbers are relatively close. no place to brag there for anyone.
I was thinking the same thing. For as much as tu fans like to pound their chests about how much revenue they bring into the conference, there's not that great of a disparity there.
It also makes me wonder why KU was getting left out in the cold when all the superconference discussion was being bandied about. They have one of the elite hoops programs in the country and they're 30 minutes from KC, which isn't a gigantic market, but it's not exactly small potatoes either. Don't feel like looking it up, but it's gotta be bigger than Lincoln/Omaha or OKC/Norman, right? Or does KC lean more towards Mizzou, despite the proximity to Lawrence?
Re: Texas/NU - It's time
Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 5:47 am
by SunCoastSooner
MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan wrote:Bizzarofelice wrote:
At Large wrote:1. Texas: $10.2 million
2. Oklahoma: $9.8 million
3. Kansas: $9.24 million
4. Texas A&M: $9.22 million
5. Nebraska: $9.1 million
6. Missouri: $8.4 million
7. Texas Tech: $8.23 million
8. Kansas State: $8.21 million
9. Oklahoma State: $8.1 million
10. Colorado: $8.0 million
11. Iowa State: $7.4 million
12. Baylor: $7.1 million
these numbers are relatively close. no place to brag there for anyone.
I was thinking the same thing. For as much as tu fans like to pound their chests about how much revenue they bring into the conference, there's not that great of a disparity there.
It also makes me wonder why KU was getting left out in the cold when all the superconference discussion was being bandied about. They have one of the elite hoops programs in the country and they're 30 minutes from KC, which isn't a gigantic market, but it's not exactly small potatoes either. Don't feel like looking it up, but it's gotta be bigger than Lincoln/Omaha or OKC/Norman, right? Or does KC lean more towards Mizzou, despite the proximity to Lawrence?
Actually as far metro media markets go Kansas City is only very slightly a larger market than central Oklahoma. Less than a 150,000 difference. Oklahoma City's market is also growing at almost twice the pace as Kansas City's (12.06% a decade > 6.24% a decade).
Re: Texas/NU - It's time
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 2:37 pm
by Left Seater
Bizzarofelice wrote:
At Large wrote:1. Texas: $10.2 million
2. Oklahoma: $9.8 million
3. Kansas: $9.24 million
4. Texas A&M: $9.22 million
5. Nebraska: $9.1 million
6. Missouri: $8.4 million
7. Texas Tech: $8.23 million
8. Kansas State: $8.21 million
9. Oklahoma State: $8.1 million
10. Colorado: $8.0 million
11. Iowa State: $7.4 million
12. Baylor: $7.1 million
On a percentage basis there is some difference. Texas brings in 13% more than NU for example. That is pretty substantial, especially when you look at it over multiple years.
these numbers are relatively close. no place to brag there for anyone.
Re: Texas/NU - It's time
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 8:38 pm
by TheJON
I think SunCoastSooner forgot that Kansas City, Missouri borders Kansas City, KS and didn't include those numbers.
Per Wikipedia, the KC Metro is 800,000 people larger than the 1,200,000 population of OKC metro. Both metro areas have grown almost EXACTLY at the same rate over the past decade. See for yourself....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_U ... ical_Areas
Some interesting stats on there too...
I never realized how much growth the state of Utah has had over the last decade. The 2 highest percentage increases on that list were Provo and St. George, UT other than Palm Coast, FL.
Most of the cities with decreased population are in cooler winter climates which means there are a lot of pussies in this country!
Re: Texas/NU - It's time
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 10:04 pm
by SunCoastSooner
TheJON wrote:I think SunCoastSooner forgot that Kansas City, Missouri borders Kansas City, KS and didn't include those numbers.
Per Wikipedia, the KC Metro is 800,000 people larger than the 1,200,000 population of OKC metro. Both metro areas have grown almost EXACTLY at the same rate over the past decade. See for yourself....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_U ... ical_Areas
Some interesting stats on there too...
I never realized how much growth the state of Utah has had over the last decade. The 2 highest percentage increases on that list were Provo and St. George, UT other than Palm Coast, FL.
Most of the cities with decreased population are in cooler winter climates which means there are a lot of pussies in this country!
I wasn't using metro, I was using media area. There is a huge difference in the two.
Re: Texas/NU - It's time
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 10:04 pm
by SunCoastSooner
TheJON wrote:I think SunCoastSooner forgot that Kansas City, Missouri borders Kansas City, KS and didn't include those numbers.
Per Wikipedia, the KC Metro is 800,000 people larger than the 1,200,000 population of OKC metro. Both metro areas have grown almost EXACTLY at the same rate over the past decade. See for yourself....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_U ... ical_Areas
Some interesting stats on there too...
I never realized how much growth the state of Utah has had over the last decade. The 2 highest percentage increases on that list were Provo and St. George, UT other than Palm Coast, FL.
Most of the cities with decreased population are in cooler winter climates which means there are a lot of pussies in this country!
I wasn't using metro, I was using media area. There is a huge difference in the two.