69 years ago today....

It's the 19th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12723
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by mvscal »

OCmike wrote: I categorize it, properly, as both an atrocious act and a necessary one.
What was so atrocious about it? The Japs were the enemy. What the fuck were we supposed to do to them? Give them backrubs and a nice cup of tea?

Oh, FYI, they were military targets. Hiroshima hosted a number of military headquarters and major supply depots. Nagasaki was a major ship building city where (Paul will be happy to note) Mitsubishi Heavy Industries had their naval yard located. It also served as a port.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Moving Sale

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Moving Sale »

Paul wrote:
R-Jack wrote: There is a difference between bad grammer and whatever the fuck it is that your sausage-like fingers mash onto your keyboard.
EPIC job KYOA....chump. :lol:
The pedophile gets punked by one of the dumbest people on this, or any other, board.

:doh: :doh:
User avatar
Truman
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3665
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:12 pm

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Truman »

mvscal wrote:
Missouri never joined the Confederacy, tard. It was a border state along with Kentucky, Maryland and Delaware.
Fuckin' tedious asshat:

Image

As more states joined the Confederacy, more stars were added to the flag. Eventually the Stars and Bars had a total of 13 stars. The thirteen states represented were: South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Texas, Virginia, Arkansas, North Carolina, Tennessee, Missouri, and Kentucky. Note that Missouri and Kentucky never officially seceded, but were slave states, and did have some confederate state governments, although they were in exile for the most part.

http://www.sonofthesouth.net/leefoundat ... e_Flag.htm
Journalism Scholar Emeritus Screw_Marcus wrote:Oh OK, so what's legal and what's not determines if something is right or not?
Moving Sale

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Moving Sale »

Truman wrote:
mvscal wrote:
Missouri never joined the Confederacy, tard. It was a border state along with Kentucky, Maryland and Delaware.
Fuckin' tedious asshat:
That's mvskkal in a nutshell.
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3598
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Mace »

mvscal will be along shortly to admit his mistake. Well, probably not. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Paul
Elwood
Posts: 979
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 10:22 pm

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Paul »

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:I think it would be interesting to see how many gook-made products could be found in Paul's abode. I'm guessing quite a few.
I'll save you the wonderment....I have a lot of things that are made in the Far East, as does all of us. We Americans simply don't have a choice when it comes to things like clothes, TVs, audio equipment, cell phones, most computers, video games, etc. I TRY to buy those things made in the USA but it's just not possible. I can control, however, what I spend my hard-earned $$$ on when it comes to vehicles, lawn care products, house furnishings, and things like that.

I lost a great uncle (killed by the Gooks in the Phillipines in early 42) to them, and when my grandpa was still alive and was telling me stories about the war and his brother came up I could see the hurt and anger in his eyes even to his last days. Quite frankly that's enough for me.
Tiger Woods....ALLEGEDLY wrote:"Hey, it's, uh, it's Tiger. I need you to do me a huge favor. Um, can you please, uh, take your name off your phone. My wife went through my phone. And, uh, may be calling you. If you can, please take your name off that and, um, and what do you call it just have it as a number on the voice mail, just have it as your telephone number. That's it, OK. You gotta do this for me. Huge. Quickly. All right. Bye."
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12723
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by mvscal »

Truman wrote:
mvscal wrote:
Missouri never joined the Confederacy, tard.
Fuckin' tedious asshat:

Image

Note that Missouri and Kentucky never officially seceded...

http://www.sonofthesouth.net/leefoundat ... e_Flag.htm
Good job kicking your own ass, dipshit. It's what KC tard does best.

The only city worth mentioning in Missouri at the time (St. Louis) remained firmly committed to the Union. Troops were raised on both sides all across the border states and in Virginia and Tennessee.

The bottom line remains that Missouri was a slave state not a southern state or a Confederate state.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21734
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by smackaholic »

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:You attributed the post to the wrong person. Two times.

Genius.
multiple quote tags kick my ass on a regular basis. i really should start using that damn preview button.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
Wolfman
Dumpater Artist
Posts: 7315
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:16 pm
Location: SW FL

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Wolfman »

Interesting read. Nagasaki was not the primary target that day.

http://www.cfo.doe.gov/me70/manhattan/nagasaki.htm
"It''s not dark yet--but it's getting there". -- Bob Dylan

Carbon Dating, the number one dating app for senior citizens.

"Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teaches my hands to the war, and my fingers to fight."
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Goober McTuber »

mvscal wrote:The only city worth mentioning in Missouri at the time (St. Louis)
It still is. Some great Italian grub to be had there.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
Atomic Punk
antagonist
Posts: 6636
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:26 pm
Location: El Segundo, CA

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Atomic Punk »

Paul wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:Hey Paul and Wags, as I've lost track of many of you. Is that "KC Paul"? The fat guy? Let me ask you a fair question to either of you... specifically to WAGS and Paul. Is this "Paul" from Kansas City? It's not like Kansas City is known for anything other than the worst and fattest posters... or financial wizards. Just answer me that question. Secondly, do either of you know who Dr. W. Edwards Deming is and why you should know history before talking about "Jap" cars?

People that are intentionally stupid NEED hand grenade enemas.
You truly are a Grade A tard....you don't get it do you? :doh:

I DON'T GIVE A FUCK WHAT ANY OF YOU THINK.

I posted my opinion, and fully expected the ensuing pile-on. Oh, and I give a flying piss who 'Dr. W. Edwards Deming" is....you keep buying that Japanese-owned bullshit, and I'll keep doing my best NOT to.
I've asked you a legit question. Do you know anything about history? Does Dr. W. Edwards Deming not click the mental memory bucket full of KFC gravy that is like a CP retard on Baclofen with a pump into your greased ass every night?

I threw you a softball and you went through KFC drive-thru instead. What a stupid fat fuck you are. Seriously... eject.
BSmack wrote:Best. AP take. Ever.

Seriously. I don't disagree with a word of it.
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21734
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by smackaholic »

Paul wrote: I'll save you the wonderment....I have a lot of things that are made in the Far East, as does all of us. We Americans simply don't have a choice when it comes to things like clothes, TVs, audio equipment, cell phones, most computers, video games, etc. I TRY to buy those things made in the USA but it's just not possible. I can control, however, what I spend my hard-earned $$$ on when it comes to vehicles, lawn care products, house furnishings, and things like that.

I lost a great uncle (killed by the Gooks in the Phillipines in early 42) to them, and when my grandpa was still alive and was telling me stories about the war and his brother came up I could see the hurt and anger in his eyes even to his last days. Quite frankly that's enough for me.
you can buy clothing made damn near anywhere. same goes for audio equipment, cell phones, 'puters, not sure about video games.

so, looks like you are a liar, in addition to being a traitor. nice job pissing on your uncle's grave.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
Truman
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3665
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:12 pm

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Truman »

OCmike wrote:"Hang-wringing"? Really? The Missouri public school system rears its ugly head again.
That would be “HAND-wringing, Miss Landers. Sorry the nuance defeated you and you failed to assimilate the context as I was typing on the fly. I also neglected to add the adjective “brain-dead” to my declarative as well. You are a revisionist, HAND-wringing, BRAIN-DEAD Cali. Happy now, ‘tard?

As for my Missouri public school education...

The Flyover deals in absolutes, Loser, and thankfully, we are not subject to the namby-pamby outcome-based 1+1=3 “education” you Cali limp-wristers are exposed to and claim as “enlightenment”.

Trust me, Loser, most folks in these parts could give a flying rat’s ass to how the Japs feel about getting dumped on.

We only care that we won.

What you call atrocities, we call Scoreboard. Victors write the history, Mike. Score more points, Slants.
Journalism Scholar Emeritus Screw_Marcus wrote:Oh OK, so what's legal and what's not determines if something is right or not?
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Dinsdale »

Hey Puffycoat --


You realize that Japan has dedicated most of its naval resources to support the US in the Persian Gulf, right?


Probably not, since you're a fucking idiot.

And since you live in 1958, I'll let you in on another secret -- war with PRNK is inevitable. And beyond the South Koreans, who do you suppose our biggest ally will be in this impending war?

Take your time, asshat.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Truman
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3665
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:12 pm

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Truman »

mvscal wrote:Good job kicking your own ass, dipshit. It's what KC tard does best.

The only city worth mentioning in Missouri at the time (St. Louis) remained firmly committed to the Union. Troops were raised on both sides all across the border states and in Virginia and Tennessee.

The bottom line remains that Missouri was a slave state not a southern state or a Confederate state.
No, the bottom line remains that you are revisionist burning pile of fuck.

So the Rebs were mistaken when they added the Missouri star to their national flag?

So the inhabitants of the other 69,709 square miles of the State of Missouri never had a say in the matter?

Are you truly that fucking stupid to understand that St. Louis never has been, nor ever will be the pulse of the Show-Me-State?

How bad do you want to be fitted with a clown suit on this topic, Loser? Your ignorance on this subject is simply breathtaking. Go fuck yourself Mission Viejo Southern CALifornia.
Journalism Scholar Emeritus Screw_Marcus wrote:Oh OK, so what's legal and what's not determines if something is right or not?
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12723
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by mvscal »

Truman wrote:No, the bottom line remains that you are revisionist burning pile of fuck.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
So the Rebs were mistaken when they added the Missouri star to their national flag?
Missouri had a star in the Union flag, too, you stupid jackass. So what? It was simply a gesture to honor the regiments from Missouri which fought for the Confederacy.
So the inhabitants of the other 69,709 square miles of the State of Missouri never had a say in the matter?
The vote in the Missouri State Constitutional Convention convened by the Missouri State legislature was 98-1 in favor of remaining in the Union.

Confederate sympathy was particularly strong in the southwestern (web-toed, inbred gene splice) section of the state but, without St. Louis, the Confederate position in Missouri was hopeless. Unfortunately, web toed, inbred gene splices are not particularly quick on the uptake so there was fighting.

Scoreboard: St. Louis
Are you truly that fucking stupid to understand that St. Louis never has been, nor ever will be the pulse of the Show-Me-State?
It is, by far, the largest metropolitan area in the state and, quite honestly, there wouldn't be a Show Me State without St. Louis. The state grew outwards from St. Louis which was the economic and logistical hub that made westward expansion possible. You don't seem to be particularly well informed here.
How bad do you want to be fitted with a clown suit on this topic, Loser?


You may begin by responding to the plain historical facts. Your hyperemotional purse swinging isn't going to get the job done.
Go fuck yourself Mission Viejo Southern CALifornia.
Actually I'm a St. Louis native and have lots of family there. We know all about "you people."
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

No, the bottom line remains that you are revisionist burning pile of fuck.
I chortled
User avatar
Bizzarofelice
I wanna be a bear
Posts: 10216
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:48 pm

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Bizzarofelice »

me and mvscal are brothers
why is my neighborhood on fire
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Dinsdale »

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: Paul was only 5 brain cells away from a decent take.

LEGS, I tell ya.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
War Wagon
2010 CFB Pickem Champ
Posts: 21127
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
Location: Tiger country

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by War Wagon »

Ana Ng wrote:You could've just said that it was the "Wags" of the waterfront, dude.
I'd ask to see your tits if I hadn't already seen them.

:smooches:
User avatar
Truman
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3665
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:12 pm

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Truman »

mvscal wrote:
Truman wrote: So the Rebs were mistaken when they added the Missouri star to their national flag?
Missouri had a star in the Union flag, too, you stupid jackass. So what? It was simply a gesture to honor the regiments from Missouri which fought for the Confederacy.
No it wasn’t, Asshat. Missouri was admitted as the 12th state in the Confederate States of America.
The vote in the Missouri State Constitutional Convention convened by the Missouri State legislature was 98-1 in favor of remaining in the Union.
Yeah, but what you failed to mention, Scumbag, is that while the "conditional Unionist" beliefs held by the Convention did not favor secession, they didn’t support Northern aggression or “coercion” against the Southern states either. We could do this all night, Fuckstick...
Confederate sympathy was particularly strong in the southwestern (web-toed, inbred gene splice) section of the state but, without St. Louis, the Confederate position in Missouri was hopeless. Unfortunately, web toed, inbred gene splices are not particularly quick on the uptake so there was fighting.


Bullshit. Wrong on ALL fronts. Without the St. Louis ARSENAL, the Confederate position in Missouri was hopeless. After the traitorous Federal Capt. Nathanial Lyon (Missouri was neutral, remember?) opened the arsenal’s gates in the dead of night to a band of pro-Union Illinois guerillas, the resulting massacre set off the first serious call for secession by the state legislature.
mvscal wrote:
Truman wrote:Are you truly that fucking stupid to understand that St. Louis never has been, nor ever will be the pulse of the Show-Me-State?
It is, by far, the largest metropolitan area in the state and, quite honestly, there wouldn't be a Show Me State without St. Louis. The state grew outwards from St. Louis which was the economic and logistical hub that made westward expansion possible. You don't seem to be particularly well informed here.
Nice rant, Windbag. Try refuting my point next time. Ever hear of the Santa Fe, California, and Oregon trails? Well guess where they originated, Assface. That’s like me saying that Mission Viejo wouldn’t exist without Independence. Breathtakingly ponderous.
You may begin by responding to the plain historical facts. Your hyperemotional purse swinging isn't going to get the job done.
I'd hope that having your shorts pulled down in public by the three historical facts I listed above to be enough. But I can see you angling for a full-blown wedgie that would leave you hanging from the locker room door...
Actually I'm a St. Louis native and have lots of family there. We know all about "you people."
You actually post this like it “adds” to your credibility. :lol:

If anything, it explains your criminal retardation. Dumbass.
Journalism Scholar Emeritus Screw_Marcus wrote:Oh OK, so what's legal and what's not determines if something is right or not?
User avatar
R-Jack
Non Sequitur Legend
Posts: 4262
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:36 am

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by R-Jack »

Paul wrote:
R-Jack wrote: Did you possibly mean to type "I don't give" or even "I could give", or was this more codespeak for your fellow mensa members? Also, what is the deal with the apostrophe/quotaion combo?

There is a difference between bad grammer and whatever the fuck it is that your sausage-like fingers mash onto your keyboard. You are the typing equivalent to Jamarcus Russell speaking. Seriously, enroll in a class. Unill then, enjoy stretching out that Chinese made "American Pride" t-shirt.
EPIC job KYOA....chump. :lol:
Oh, I'll readily admit to being a victim to 20 years of spell-check features. In a weak defense, at least the words I misspell are phonetically readable and they are arranged in a manner to form a coherent thought. OK, the thoughts may not always be coherent, but at the very least they make sense when worded together. Well, they may not always make sense, but the sentence structure of my rage or alcohol induced rants are solid. You know what? Fuck it. I can't spell for shit. :lol:

Look, both of us can be better off for this situation if we try. Nobody is perfect and we have been able to help each other out in pointing out the things we need to work on. In the spirit of self-improvement, I trust that you will learn basic functions of the English language so not only will you possibly avoid a repeat of last weeks abject failure at reading, but you will also be able to finally place your thoughts into complete sentences that do not resemble desperate attempts by lost tourists scribbling a request for directions on a napkin. In turn, I will replace an "e" with an "a". I think we both win.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Dinsdale »

Truman wrote:Oregon trail
Even 170 years ago, the smart ones left Misery and headed for the U&L.

But I guess someone had to get the short end of Darwin's stick.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
R-Jack
Non Sequitur Legend
Posts: 4262
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:36 am

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by R-Jack »

Paul,
First off, as per our previous discussion.
I have a lot of things that are made in the Far East, as does all of us.
No one is expecting miracles. Just keep trying. I'm working on that spelling thing too pal.

Second, since you actually took the time to offer some insight to your stances, I will at least speak to you like an adult and engage in the topic at hand.
We Americans simply don't have a choice when it comes to things like clothes, TVs, audio equipment, cell phones, most computers, video games, etc. I TRY to buy those things made in the USA but it's just not possible. I can control, however, what I spend my hard-earned $$$ on when it comes to vehicles, lawn care products, house furnishings, and things like that.
No one here has ever called you a dumbfuck solely for your desire of purchasing American made products. Every single thing you listed that is made overseas may not be feasible to produce on this soil anymore, but that due to the choices you(as a metaphor) have made over the years with things like cost, performance and connivance being factors. No issue with that on my end. Almost all of us make those decisions.

A good example is clothing. Hell, I sell and wear jeans made in the good 'ol US of A. They are quality products too. Yeah, there's no TV ad with Brett Favre playing touch football or jacking off a Labrador for them, but they are far superior denim in build and materials than the mass produced Chinese shit he's promoting. I guarantee there is a style that will suit you and last you. The question is, are you willing to pay anywhere from $100 to $300 for them? Are you? Some are and some are not and that is fine. I can't begrudge a man who would rather put that money back into the betterment of his family and settle for some $35 Wranglers, but you have to recognize that you as a consumer are voting with your dollars.

The problem I run into with your desire to avoid foreign cars, Japanese in particular, goes against the grain with both your consumer pattern of being fiscally responsible and your desire to buy products made in the USA. As stated earlier, there is nothing wrong with making a wise financial decision on your goods and services and there is nothing wrong with trying to buy American made products. Bravo on both. You need to know however that over the years, your choice to purchase small goods made overseas in an attempt to be smart with your money has lined the pockets of "the little yellow men" as you put it far more than any long term purchase of a single car made in Japan or any country outside the USA. The even more frustrating kicker to this is that you don't even have to do that. Damn near most of those rice rockets are made here in the states. Compare that to Ford or GM who keeps moving production to Canada and Mexico. Yeah, the CEO of said company isn’t a honkey, but those profits you are scared to give to him are given back to this country in the form of jobs, while the brands you support because of the location of their headquarters are giving you a big middle finger and having every wetback who couldn't find the shaded side of a Home Depot making your "American" car. Personally that sickens me more than anything.

Like I said, I got no problems with your choices as a consumer. All I'm saying is that as a consumer who probably has the best intentions, the auto business actually offers you some ability to have your cake and eat it too. It does get a little frustrating when you try to bait the discussion once a year but you are too stubborn to offer a point of view other than a lame, and grossly inaccurate, tagline. Sorry about your grandfather's brother in WWII, but that comes off like a thinly veiled excuse for your stubbornness given how many dollars on a daily basis you have chosen to give to grandchildren of the gunman. I can only assume you never thought of it like that.
Paul
Elwood
Posts: 979
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 10:22 pm

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Paul »

mvscal wrote:Actually I'm a St. Louis native and have lots of family there.
So THAT finally explains the sheer dumbfuckery and misplaced angst that is mvscal....who knew? :?
mvSTL wrote:We know all about "you people."
Of course you do..."us people" are afterall on the better and CLEANER side of the state.
Tiger Woods....ALLEGEDLY wrote:"Hey, it's, uh, it's Tiger. I need you to do me a huge favor. Um, can you please, uh, take your name off your phone. My wife went through my phone. And, uh, may be calling you. If you can, please take your name off that and, um, and what do you call it just have it as a number on the voice mail, just have it as your telephone number. That's it, OK. You gotta do this for me. Huge. Quickly. All right. Bye."
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12723
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by mvscal »

Truman wrote:Yeah, but what you failed to mention, Scumbag, is that while the "conditional Unionist" beliefs held by the Convention did not favor secession, they didn’t support Northern aggression or “coercion” against the Southern states either.
Oh, you mean they wanted to continue to reap the benefits of remaining in the Union but they didn't want to fight to maintain it? Sounds like a pretty cowardly sack of cunts to me. Sorry guy, but "Conditional Unionism" wasn't an option. Even after their fantasy of neutrality was disabused by the reality of the circumstances, the majority stuck with the Union. Your fake state government skulking in Arkansas couldn't even put together a quorum of former state legislators.

Time to face the facts, douche. The State of Missouri did not leave the Union nor did the majority of its citizens favor secession. This is incontestable.
Without the St. Louis ARSENAL, the Confederate position in Missouri was hopeless. After the traitorous Federal Capt. Nathanial Lyon (Missouri was neutral, remember?) opened the arsenal’s gates in the dead of night to a band of pro-Union Illinois guerillas, the resulting massacre set off the first serious call for secession by the state legislature.
A. Lyon was a Federal officer who acted to secure the Federal arsenal from pro-Confederate militia.
B. The pro-Federal militia who secured the arsenal were from St. Louis not Illinois.
C. The "first serious call for secession by the state legislature" failed.
D. You are a fucking moron.
Nice rant, Windbag. Try refuting my point next time.


I did. St. Louis was and remains the most important city in Missouri. It was the "Gateway to the West." Once again, these simple facts are incontestable.

Go ahead and kick your own ass some more if you'd like. I rarely get bored punting Lost Cause losers around the yard.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Dinsdale »

Sudden Sam wrote:Chrysler/Dodge still builds the shittiest vehicles of any major manufacturer.
As a person who used to repair vehicles for a living, I strongly agree.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
R-Jack
Non Sequitur Legend
Posts: 4262
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:36 am

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by R-Jack »

Outside of my Intrepid, I can go along with that. I test drove a Dodge Caravan when I was buying my wife's breeder-mobile. You aren't supposed to feel the transmission slipping on a brand new vehicle, are you? The less said about the grinding noises underneath my seat the better. When I told the salesperson that this wasn't the right fit for my family, he then asked if I would be more comfortable taking a look at some pre-owned vans. I just walked off the lot and ended up driving an American built Nissan Quest off the lot. I'd say I'm better off for it.

The only thing Dodge has done right in the last 30 years was the Intrepid, and that can be probably be narrowed down to just the ones I bought. My current one has 150K on it so reselling or trading it in is a worthless option, so I'm just going to drive it until it finally dies, then look for a new ride. Outside of a few busted computer sensors and a decaying interior, there have been no problems whatsoever. Shit, this thing may last long enough for my kids to be embarrassed about being dropped off for school in it. :wink:
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Dinsdale wrote:
Sudden Sam wrote:Chrysler/Dodge still builds the shittiest vehicles of any major manufacturer.
As a person who used to repair vehicles for a living, I strongly agree.
I've never repaired vehicles for a living, but I thought this was pretty much common knowledge.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Dinsdale »

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
Dinsdale wrote:
Sudden Sam wrote:Chrysler/Dodge still builds the shittiest vehicles of any major manufacturer.
As a person who used to repair vehicles for a living, I strongly agree.
I've never repaired vehicles for a living, but I thought this was pretty much common knowledge.

They're still in business, aren't they?
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Wolfman
Dumpater Artist
Posts: 7315
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:16 pm
Location: SW FL

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Wolfman »

Shit, this thing may last long enough for my kids to be embarrassed about being dropped off for school in it.

That's the ticket ! The kids will love the penny pinching old man when college time rolls around.
BTW-- if I had money to burn I'd buy me one of those great old MoPars from the late 60's and drive it around down here. I had a '67 Plymouth 383 with posi-traction, heavy duty torsion bar suspension. Would love to own a restored one. MoPar rocked in those days.
"It''s not dark yet--but it's getting there". -- Bob Dylan

Carbon Dating, the number one dating app for senior citizens.

"Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teaches my hands to the war, and my fingers to fight."
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21734
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by smackaholic »

mopar makes 2 types of fwd transaxles. Those that self destruct in the first 30K and those last last forever. Looks like you got one of the latter, jack. I would run that intrepid till the wheels fall off, tack them back on and run it some more. As for the intrepid not being a POS, i think they are no different than all the other mopar products when it comes to trannies. I currently have an '02 caravan also equipped with the latter style of tranny (I hope) that we bought about 2 years ago after my daughter wadded up our mercury villager which is a clone of the quest. that thing was one of the best cars i ever owned. i am fairly sure it would have outlasted me had my daughter not turned right in front of some old dude in a chevy pickup. BTW, if you are gonna turn in front of something, try to find something without a full frame. that chevy hit her in the passenger side rear door and peeled the back wheel off like nothing.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
Truman
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3665
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:12 pm

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Truman »

mvscal wrote:
Truman wrote:Yeah, but what you failed to mention, Scumbag, is that while the "conditional Unionist" beliefs held by the Convention did not favor secession, they didn’t support Northern aggression or “coercion” against the Southern states either.
Oh, you mean they wanted to continue to reap the benefits of remaining in the Union but they didn't want to fight to maintain it? Sounds like a pretty cowardly sack of cunts to me. Sorry guy, but "Conditional Unionism" wasn't an option. Even after their fantasy of neutrality was disabused by the reality of the circumstances, the majority stuck with the Union. Your fake state government skulking in Arkansas couldn't even put together a quorum of former state legislators.


Care to link that one up for us, Spanky? Quorum was neither proven nor contravened, and scores of historians would be fascinated by your irrefutable proof. Most all credible evidence was destroyed in The Battle of Wilson’s Creek. Tell me you knew. Oh, and it was Neosho, Assbreath, not Arkansas.

BTW, speaking of fantasies, that “majority” of yours that faced a “reality of circumstances” consisted of exactly two state officers by the time Lyon took Jeff.
Time to face the facts, douche. The State of Missouri did not leave the Union nor did the majority of its citizens favor secession. This is incontestable.
Ah. The ol’ Why Muddy-Up a Thread with a Whole Buncha Confusing Facts strategy. Incontestable? Funny, I’d imagine the sitting Confederate national government of that era might just disagree. I suppose it all depends on who you ask. What I DO know is that more Civil War battles were fought in the state of Missouri than anywhere else, save Virginia. I’d say that fact “contests” your asinine statement.
mvscal wrote:
Truman wrote:Without the St. Louis ARSENAL, the Confederate position in Missouri was hopeless. After the traitorous Federal Capt. Nathanial Lyon (Missouri was neutral, remember?) opened the arsenal’s gates in the dead of night to a band of pro-Union Illinois guerillas, the resulting massacre set off the first serious call for secession by the state legislature.
A. Lyon was a Federal officer who acted to secure the Federal arsenal from pro-Confederate militia.
Horseshit. Lyon was conniving, seditious pile of shit that disobeyed the direct command of his superior officer, usurped the authority of the sitting governor of the State of Missouri, and distributed stolen State arms to a pro-Union, rag-tag band of marauding bandits.
B. The pro-Federal militia who secured the arsenal were from St. Louis not Illinois.
My ass. What you call a militia, I call terrorists. The Wide Awakes spent the previous fall agitating the electorate in western Illinois. Read FAR-western Illinois. As in, within 10 miles of the fucking river. Their arms, uniforms, officers, and training were all secured from Illinois.
C. The "first serious call for secession by the state legislature" failed.
Well, now, a murdering, marauding seditious terrorist chases Missouri’s freely elected government from its capitol before they can decide the question, and you define that as failure? One would hope that you’d have sense enough to cover up from all that ugly, exposed stupid of yours before going out in public.
D. You are a fucking moron.
...who happens to be dragging your junky ass up and down this thread. I’d hate to see the carnage left in your wake were you to square off against a genius.
mvscal wrote:
Truman wrote:Nice rant, Windbag. Try refuting my point next time.


I did. St. Louis was and remains the most important city in Missouri. It was the "Gateway to the West." Once again, these simple facts are incontestable.
You didn’t. It isn’t. It still is. Correct. Simple facts are incontestable. But your opinion is. Kill yourself.
Go ahead and kick your own ass some more if you'd like. I rarely get bored punting Lost Cause losers around the yard.
Cool. Thanks. Helpful to know. But how well does your attention span hold up while you’re being run out of the gym?
Journalism Scholar Emeritus Screw_Marcus wrote:Oh OK, so what's legal and what's not determines if something is right or not?
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3598
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Mace »

Truman wrote:rag-tag band of marauding bandits.
So what you're saying is that East St. Louis hasn't changed much since 1861?
User avatar
Bizzarofelice
I wanna be a bear
Posts: 10216
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:48 pm

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Bizzarofelice »

east st. louis has changed a ton since 1861. here's a timeline.



east st. louis is prosperous and a hotbed of art and music: 1861-1974

east st. louis is run by blacks and all industry not tied to government subsidies leaves: 1975-present
why is my neighborhood on fire
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 21094
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Screw_Michigan »

Bizzarofelice wrote:east st. louis is run by blacks and all industry not tied to government subsidies leaves: 1975-present
Image
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
User avatar
Bizzarofelice
I wanna be a bear
Posts: 10216
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:48 pm

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Bizzarofelice »

i recall a factoid from michael moore's TV show from the mid 90s:

east st louis has the most funeral homes per capita
why is my neighborhood on fire
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12723
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by mvscal »

Truman wrote: Most all credible evidence was destroyed in The Battle of Wilson’s Creek. Tell me you knew. Oh, and it was Neosho, Assbreath, not Arkansas.
The Senate journal was recovered. Tell me you knew ( :meds: ). Oh and guess what? They "neglected" to record the roll. A very curious omission from a group of individuals who were painstakingly careful in observing all the legal niceties in order to confer legitimacy to their actions.
Now why go through the trouble to line your legal ducks up all in a row and then fail to record the only order of business which would have given your little conference any degree of credibility?

The answer is quite simple. They didn't have a quorum. The Neosho convention was a puppet show for the Confederate Congress and gave them the fig leaf Jefferson Davis was looking for to admit Missouri. Davis wasn't willing to offer much in the way of support unless Missouri joined the Confederacy.

Bottom line reality is the so-called Confederate government of Missouri never controlled jackshit in Missouri. They skulked around in Arkansas and finally drifted down to Texas.
Funny, I’d imagine the sitting Confederate national government of that era might just disagree.


They just might but would anybody be able to hear them all the way down in Marshall, Texas?

What I DO know is that more Civil War battles were fought in the state of Missouri than anywhere else, save Virginia. I’d say that fact “contests” your asinine statement.
In what way? I wouldn't really dignify the small skirmishes and bushwhacking that went on in Missouri with the term 'battles.' It was a guerilla war. As I said earlier, it was necessary to beat you web toed, inbred gene splices into the dust in order show you the error of your ways. And beaten into the dust you were.
Horseshit. Lyon was conniving, seditious pile of shit that disobeyed the direct command of his superior officer, usurped the authority of the sitting governor of the State of Missouri, and distributed stolen State arms to a pro-Union, rag-tag band of marauding bandits.
Harney tried a more diplomatic approach but confirmed Lyon's actions when he arrived in St. Louis. Lyon understood that the "sitting governor of the State of Missouri" was engaged in a treasonous conspiracy with Confederate officials to withdraw Missouri from the Union and arm pro-Confederate militias with the 36,000 weapons stored in the Federal arsenal at St. Louis. Then, as now, an officer of the United States Army is sworn to defend against all enemies foreign and domestic.

Lyon's prompt, decisive actions prevented that from happening and effectively ended any chance whatsoever of Confederate control of Missouri.
The Wide Awakes spent the previous fall agitating the electorate in western Illinois. Read FAR-western Illinois. As in, within 10 miles of the fucking river. Their arms, uniforms, officers, and training were all secured from Illinois.
The Wide Awakes were a national movement, you brainless douche. The St. Louis Wide Awakes were the ones who raided the arsenal.
Well, now, a murdering, marauding seditious terrorist chases Missouri’s freely elected government from its capitol before they can decide the question,
The question had already been decided, idiot. Jackson lost and refused to accept the verdict. He refused to raise troops for Federal service as he was required to do, he demanded the removal of Federal troops from Missouri which he had no authority to do. The country was at war and Jackson was openly pro-Confederate. That made him a traitor. Of course he and everyone who shared his beliefs were run out of town by Brigadier General Lyon per his constitutional duty to defend the nation against foreign and domestic enemies.
...who happens to be dragging your junky ass up and down this thread.


:lol: :lol: :lol:

Oh, OK. Well, if you say so...
You didn’t. It isn’t. It still is. Correct. Simple facts are incontestable. But your opinion is. Kill yourself.
Great take, melty.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by Goober McTuber »

Gotta pity the fool who takes on mvscal on the subject of history.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: 69 years ago today....

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Missouri in 1861 wrote:I know you're Confederate, but what are we?
Post Reply