T1B

trev wrote:
It was partly a memorial and partly honoring the heroes that day. And there were a lot of heroes. Obama did use this to his advantage. But dins needs to cut Sarah a little slack. Obama wasn't accused by half the nation of insighting a mass shooting.

Screw_Michigan wrote:She didn't instigate the murder, but she's helped create the the climate with her violent rhetoric "don't retreat...reload," "2nd amendment solutions," etc.

Only a despicable human being like Palin would take the attempted assassination of a member of Congress and turn it into "I'm a victim!"

War Wagon wrote: Will you celebrate if she gets assasinated?

War Wagon wrote:...ramming their left wing socialist agenda down the throats of the American people without their consent.

Derron wrote: Bullfuckingshit. Pull your head out of your cunt and think a bit. It was a fucking speech by one of the biggest bullshit artist's ever,and all his homies just sucked it up. It was a Presidential, stand up and clap, sing Kumbya, lets get going on this gun control thing NOW ! load of crap. He used the opportunity to get more of his liberal spew to his trembling masses, just waiting to do his bidding.

Oh and you might put up a link to where half the nation has accused her of inciting a mass shooting ????

Typical liberal speak to make up a completely bullshit statement like that. So you can go back to sucking Obamas big black cock and drinking the hate the conservative Kool Aid.

War Wagon wrote:

Screw_Michigan wrote:She didn't instigate the murder, but she's helped create the the climate with her violent rhetoric "don't retreat...reload," "2nd amendment solutions," etc.

The climate you speak of was created by a President and a partisan Congress intent on ramming their left wing socialist agenda down the throats of the American people without their consent.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:


..But of course they're quick to insist they're just being symbolic--while banking millions as the scared and huddled ignorant masses of dumbed down and shuffled out white folk draw to their bombastic displays like moths...and guess what?..

War Wagon wrote:Will you celebrate if she gets assasinated? Be honest, if you're capable.

Rooster wrote:The truly ironic thing about this whole sordid clambake? Arizona has the nation's most lenient CC laws and not one person drew down on this Communist Manifesto reading POS and blew him away after his first shot.

/slaps forehead
Lol, my bad, it was a Democratic Party rally. Heh, no one was carrying any heat! :D

Screw in the Ass in_Michigan wrote:
partisan asshole .... GOP leadership is using violent rhetoric to stir up its base. GOP leadership is advocating violence without implicating themselves in it. That's a fact. Open a fucking newspaper for once in your life and learn how to read between the fucking lines. "The government is going to take my kids away if I don't get them vaccinated." Yeah, nothing there. "2nd amendment solutions." Yep, very peaceful.

Go fuck yourselves, tards.

very interesting take on the 2nd ammendment. Maybe this is
> one of the thoughts the founding fathers had in mind.
>
> "The Gun Is Civilization"
>
> by Maj. L. Caudill USMC (Ret)
>
> Human beings only have two ways to deal with one
> another: reason and force. If you want me to do
> something for you, you have a choice of either
> convincing me via argument, or force me to do your
> bidding under threat of force. Every human interaction
> falls into one of those two categories, without
> exception. Reason or force, that's it.
>
> In a truly moral and civilized society, people
> exclusively interact through persuasion. Force has no
> place as a valid method of social interaction, and the
> only thing that removes force from the menu is the
> personal firearm, as paradoxical as it may sound to some.
>
> When I carry a gun, you cannot deal with me by force.
> You have to use reason and try to persuade me, because I
> have a way to negate your threat or employment of force.
>
> The gun is the only personal weapon that puts a
> 100-pound woman on equal footing with a 220-pound
> mugger, a 75-year old retiree on equal footing with a
> 19-year old gang banger, and a single guy on equal
> footing with a carload of drunk guys with baseball bats
> The gun removes the disparity in physical strength,
> size, or numbers between a potential attacker and a
> defender.
>
> There are plenty of people who consider the gun as the
> source of bad force equations. These are the people who
> think that we'd be more civilized if all guns were
> removed from society, because a firearm makes it easier
> for a [armed] mugger to do his job. That, of course, is
> only true if the mugger's potential victims are mostly
> disarmed either by choice or by legislative fiat--it
> has no validity when most of a mugger's potential marks
> are armed.
>
> People who argue for the banning of arms ask for
> automatic rule by the young, the strong, and the many,
> and that's the exact opposite of a civilized society. A
> mugger, even an armed one, can only make a successful
> living in a society where the state has granted him a
> force monopoly.
>
> Then there's the argument that the gun makes
> confrontations lethal that otherwise would only result
> in injury. This argument is fallacious in several ways.
> Without guns involved, confrontations are won by the
> physically superior party inflicting overwhelming injury
> on the loser.
>
> People who think that fists, bats, sticks, or stones
> don't constitute lethal force watch too much TV, where
> people take beatings and come out of it with a bloody
> lip at worst. The fact that the gun makes lethal force
> easier works solely in favor of the weaker defender, not
> the stronger attacker If both are armed, the field is
> level.
>
> The gun is the only weapon that's as lethal in the hands
> of an octogenarian as it is in the hands of a weight
> lifter. It simply wouldn't work as well as a force
> equalizer if it wasn't both lethal and easily employable.
>
> When I carry a gun, I don't do so because I am looking
> for a fight, but because I'm looking to be left alone. The
> gun at my side means that I cannot be forced, only
> persuaded. I don't carry it because I'm afraid, but
> because it enables me to be unafraid. It doesn't limit
> the actions of those who would interact with me through
> reason, only the actions of those who would do so by
> force. It removes force from the equation... and that's
> why carrying a gun is a civilized act.
>
> By Maj. L. Caudill USMC (Ret.)

Derron wrote:

Rooster wrote:The truly ironic thing about this whole sordid clambake? Arizona has the nation's most lenient CC laws and not one person drew down on this Communist Manifesto reading POS and blew him away after his first shot.

/slaps forehead
Lol, my bad, it was a Democratic Party rally. Heh, no one was carrying any heat! :D

Exactly...had that been a conservative political gathering, there would have likely been more than just a few legally carried concealed weapons that would have been willingly used on that idiot. The Dem's prefer to call 911 and wait for the police to show up, because it is better if we take the guns away from people who might use them.

The last time I called 911 when there was a need for ems and police, it took them 2 minutes to answer the call, let alone dispatch any help.