Then you are blind as well as stupid.poptart wrote:1. I'm not sure it did.mvscal wrote:The ball came out before his hand started moving forward, dumbass.
Props Steelers
Re: Props Steelers
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Props Steelers
Correct, but he's not in the act of passing until his arm begins moving forward with possesion of the football. That was a fumble. You said it was the right call. What exactly are you trying to argue?poptart wrote:If a QB is in the act of passing, it doesn't matter what direction the ball goes when it comes free. It can go forward, backward, sideways ----> and it's still an incomplete pass.
This was not the Brady tuck rule....which was a fumble even by the tuck rule standard as Brady had already brought the ball back in to his chest and was ready to throw.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Props Steelers
I'm not going to hold your hand, toddler.
If you want to know my point, read the the post I put up when I came in the thread.
Do yourself a favor and go back to my post and read the statements from Coleman and Periera - as to what constitutes a TUCK.
Bringing the ball to your chest ain't a tuck, according to them.
In this play, Sanchez pumped at :11 and didn't throw.
He brought the ball to his left hand - which is NOT a tuck, according to the two NFL douchebags.
So if you are saying (which is obviously true) that Sanchez ended that first throwing motion and was getting ready to begin a new one when he lost the ball - then I want to know at what SPECIFIC point you are going to say his first motion ended.
If you declare a point, you will be taken to the woodshed because it will be EASILY shown to be in conflict with what Coleman and Periera said.
THAT is my point.
Take your hand now.
I'm just slapping Coleman and Periera around again - while seeing how many numbnuts here still want to ride their nuts
If you want to know my point, read the the post I put up when I came in the thread.
No, you're a blatantly ignorant fuck.mvscal wrote:This was not the Brady tuck rule....which was a fumble even by the tuck rule standard as Brady had already brought the ball back in to his chest and was ready to throw.
Do yourself a favor and go back to my post and read the statements from Coleman and Periera - as to what constitutes a TUCK.
Bringing the ball to your chest ain't a tuck, according to them.
In this play, Sanchez pumped at :11 and didn't throw.
He brought the ball to his left hand - which is NOT a tuck, according to the two NFL douchebags.
So if you are saying (which is obviously true) that Sanchez ended that first throwing motion and was getting ready to begin a new one when he lost the ball - then I want to know at what SPECIFIC point you are going to say his first motion ended.
If you declare a point, you will be taken to the woodshed because it will be EASILY shown to be in conflict with what Coleman and Periera said.
THAT is my point.
Take your hand now.
I'm just slapping Coleman and Periera around again - while seeing how many numbnuts here still want to ride their nuts
Re: Props Steelers
Am I supposed to give a shit what they say? The Brady tuck was not the "correct interpretation of a bad rule." It was an ass covering, pretzel logic interpretation of a blown call. Brady and Sanchez both fumbled bigger than shit.poptart wrote:Bringing the ball to your chest ain't a tuck, according to them.
I think we're on the same page.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.