Page 2 of 2

Re: this guy gets it

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:04 pm
by indyfrisco
Goober McTuber wrote:
IndyFrisco wrote:So I'm deplorable. I can get over that.
Almost sig-worthy. BTW, you never changed the tag under my username. I’m tired of Noob’s old lady.
My bad. I must have been APed when I said I would change it. What did you want it to be?

Re: this guy gets it

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:17 pm
by Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore.

Noob? All newbies got tagged as “Fucking Noob”.

Re: this guy gets it

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:23 pm
by indyfrisco
done

Re: this guy gets it

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 5:50 pm
by Van
Indy, okay, so first you took it upon yourself to perpetuate the lie that I'm Shmick, using your imprimatur as Admin here to lend your bullshit more ~wink, wink~ weight. Oh, and no, you didn't merely imply that he and I post similar content regarding USC. No, on numerous occasions over the past year you specifically said he was my troll.

Now you're taking Marty's bullshit and running with it while pretending that it has any basis in fact. You're labeling my first wife's death a "fiction," as if you actually know anything beyond what you were specifically told by yours truly following another of your typically clumsy episodes in Chat.

In both cases you aren't guilty of simply perpetuating board legends, which you've apparently decided to adopt as your mealymouthed explanation for backpedaling. Nope, in the first instance you fostered a straight-up lie, entirely of your own doing. In the second, you've taken it upon yourself to serve as a thoroughly dim-witted judge and jury, none-too-brilliantly concluding that noted truth-teller Marty's nonsense carries the day.

Are you deplorable? Well, sure. That goes without saying. The main thing is that you've always shown yourself to be a shallow, conceited dirtbag on these boards, and it seems that now you truly delight in wallowing in it. Hopefully your kids aren't privy to the loathsome example set by their father when he thinks no one is watching.

Fuck, you probably cheat in golf too.

Re: this guy gets it

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 7:29 pm
by indyfrisco
I smell a drama whore.

Re: this guy gets it

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 7:57 pm
by The Seer
IndyFrisco wrote:I smell a drama whore.

Could be, but I'm glad he's back....


Did I just say that?

Re: this guy gets it

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 8:55 pm
by Van
IndyFrisco wrote:I smell a drama whore.
:lol:

Yep, gotta admire the sheer douchitude of a clown who, when called out on his blatant lies, resorts to referring to his accusor as an attention whore. Jesus, what a disingenuous sack of fetid ass you've become.

Re: this guy gets it

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 10:39 pm
by indyfrisco
I feel so beaten down. Someone please make it stop.

Oh, my first dog died last year too. Woe is me.

Re: this guy gets it

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:28 pm
by The Seer
Van wrote:
IndyFrisco wrote:I smell a drama whore.
:lol:

Yep, gotta admire the sheer douchitude of a clown who, when called out on his blatant lies, resorts to referring to his accusor as an attention whore. Jesus, what a disingenuous sack of fetid ass you've become.

Aside from that, how do you see the Pac 12 south shaking out?

Re: this guy gets it

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:12 am
by Van
The Seer, a little while ago Dins posted his prediction for the Pac 12...
Dins wrote:1. Vacant
2. Vacant
3. Stanford
4. Utah
5. Everyone else
While that was at least somewhat meant tongue-in-cheek, I'd say it should be about right, although I'd obviously swap Stanford for Vacant Number Two.

Unless Utah shows surprisingly well, either USC or 'Zona should be the class of the Pac 12 South. More than anything, it's down to experienced QB play. Between Nick Foles and his group of returning stud receivers and the Barkley/Woods combo, those two teams ought to have a major advantage over the rest of the division.

Clearly USC is a total wildcard. Who the hell hell knows how they will respond to Season Two of this deal? Certainly they ought to be better defensively, if for no other reason than the simple fact that this year they're actually tackling during practice. Last year Kiffin tried to save his players by eschewing tackling in practice; as a result, come game time they couldn't tackle JTR. Offensively, as long as Barkley can avoid last season's nagging injuries, they'll have to be better this time around.

Bare minimum, Kiffin owes USC a win in South Bend. That debacle in the Coliseum last season has to be redressed.

Arizona seems to be the program that is on the rise. I respect redass extraordinaire Mike Stoops, and senior leadership at the QB position—particularly when the QB is very good—counts for a whole lot in BTPCF. The Cats could easily pull another 'Zona (or ASU) and fall on their faces amid high expectations, but I don't think they'll tank this time. They get USC at home, and I look for them to win the South.

As always, your team's fortunes ride on that revolving door behind center. Can any of those guys stay upright long enough to build any consistency? Over the past few seasons, no, the Bruins really haven't been able to trot out the same guy long enough to form any sort of offensive identity.

If UCLA does fail again, and assuming it's not due to injuries, Neuheisel must go. He's had too much talent at his disposal to continue along this same path. It's time for his better-than-decent recruiting classes to come to the fore in the form of dominating wins.

It starts with Houston. If UCLA is going to be worth a shit, the Cougs should pose little problem for them. UCLA should be able to put a physical beatdown on a C-USA team. Yes, they're going to give up points to that offense, but their D should also be able to harrass Keenan into turnovers and short fields. Offensively, UCLA should be able to run the ball down their throats.

Nice little barometer game.

I expect little to nothing from Colorado, not this soon. Utah? I don't know enough about them to have much of a worthwhile opinion. Coming out of the Mountain West, I know they're looking at a week-to-week uphill battle, at least compared to what they've normally faced in conference play.

ASU? Second fiddle, even in their own state. Erickson likely isn't long for that spot, not after this season. Slutty coeds and ridiculous new unis will be all they have on which to hang their stupid new myriad of helmets.

I'll be surprised if Oregon loses a conference game, and I'll be equally surprised if Stanford loses in-conference to anyone other than Oregon.

Re: this guy gets it

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:31 am
by Killian
Van wrote:Bare minimum, Kiffin owes USC a win in South Bend. That debacle in the Coliseum last season has to be redressed.
What debacle? Seemed fine to me.

Re: this guy gets it

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 2:10 am
by Van
Yeah, well, since all streaks have to end, I suppose that was a wholly appropriate way for it to happen. That was easily one of the worst-played games I've ever seen...from both teams. Neither squad would've beaten anyone worth a watery shit that night. On top of being barely watchable, of course it ultimately concluded with a cripple of a dropped pass.

Perfect.

2020 can't get here soon enough.

Re: this guy gets it

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 4:48 am
by MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan
Van,
Any chance you might be in Boulder on Nov. 4? I've got a couple SC fan friends here in AZ that I'm trying to talk into going. I'll buy us all a round at the Sink...

Re: this guy gets it

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 9:04 pm
by PSUFAN
Great to see you back, Van. I'll queue up some novella requests for ya.