Page 2 of 2
Re: should a coma patient without insurance be allowed to di
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 3:45 pm
by BSmack
88 wrote:So how does any of that support the notion that Ron Paul does not practice what he preaches (BSmack's original take)? Paul says financing one's health care is an individual responsibility. He had a campaign worker who either chose or could not secure health insurance (I have heard that he was gay, had a pre-existing condition, likely HIV, and was thus not insurable, by the way).
Do you even read what you type? The man COULDN'T get insurance. But you try to pass it off as a failure of personal responsibility? Go fuck yourself.
Where did Ron Paul say that employers were responsible for the health insurance of employees? BSmack laid a giant turd on the floor, stepped on it, got it all over you, and now you want to act like you are not covered in his dumb shit.
I was not referring to Paul's employer-employee relationship with his campaign manager. I was speaking to what Paul said about friends, family and charity bridging the gap when someone is uninsurable. You know, as his close friend and campaign manager was. Obviously Paul's utopian world view got bitchslapped by reality.
Re: should a coma patient without insurance be allowed to di
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 4:47 pm
by Tom In VA
"Taxing the rich" to "give" to the poor via bureaucratic programs seems to be a pretty utopian vision that doesn't reconcile with reality as well.
Re: should a coma patient without insurance be allowed to di
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 8:49 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
From your link...
"He passed away on June 26, 2008 due to complications from pneumonia..."
Pneumonia...no doubt brought on by a weakened immune system (AIDS).
I mean,
look at him:
If this guy wasn't a pro at
lifting and steaming, then I don't know what.
Poo was definitely being pushed, don't kid yourselves.
Re: should a coma patient without insurance be allowed to di
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 8:52 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Don't hate me, guys.
Don't hate me.
Re: should a coma patient without insurance be allowed to di
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 8:55 pm
by Atomic Punk
Martyred wrote:
Pneumonia...no doubt brought on by a weakened immune system (AIDS).
I mean, look at him
If this guy wasn't a pro at lifting and steaming, then I don't know what.
Poo was definitely being pushed, don't kid yourselves.
HAHAHAHAHA!!! Thanks for the 1st laugh of the day here comrade!
Re: should a coma patient without insurance be allowed to di
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 12:48 am
by Bizzarofelice
mvscal wrote:Bizzarofelice wrote:I brought reason.
Link?
the entire thread. you made judgements when I requested facts. you were unable to speak factually. completely unable to accomplish this simple task.
Re: should a coma patient without insurance be allowed to di
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 1:10 am
by Cuda
Martyred wrote:[Pneumonia...no doubt brought on by a weakened immune system (AIDS).
I mean,
look at him:
If this guy wasn't a pro at
lifting and steaming, then I don't know what.
Poo was definitely being pushed, don't kid yourselves.
You sure that's not Florida's Governor?
Re: should a coma patient without insurance be allowed to di
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 1:22 am
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Cuda wrote:
You sure that's not Florida's Governor?
Is he a colon rattler too?
Re: should a coma patient without insurance be allowed to di
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 1:25 am
by Cuda
could be. he looks just like the guy in the picture you posted
Re: should a coma patient without insurance be allowed to di
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 1:32 am
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Cuda, in the interest of full disclosure, I must tell you that Martyred lent me his password and you are actually addressing War Wagon, imo.
Re: should a coma patient without insurance be allowed to di
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 4:08 am
by Mikey
Who is War Wagon, imo?
Is that like War Wagon, esq?
Re: should a coma patient without insurance be allowed to di
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 4:31 am
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Mikey wrote:Who is War Wagon, imo?
Is that like War Wagon, esq?
Please unplug your computer forever.
Re: should a coma patient without insurance be allowed to di
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 5:54 am
by mvscal
Martyred wrote:
If this guy wasn't a pro at
lifting and steaming, then I don't know what.
Lifting? Maybe not so much.
Re: should a coma patient without insurance be allowed to di
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 10:59 am
by smackaholic
Jsc810 wrote:88 wrote:When clacking out your post, did you happen to notice that Mr. Snyder received $400,000 worth of healthcare, even though uninsured?
You do realize that
45,000 American deaths per year are caused by a lack of insurance, don't you?
There is a difference between showing up at the ER and getting enough medical treatment to stabilize a patient, and getting regular ongoing medical care like is possible with insurance.
I wonder how many of those 45K would have actually utilized that free care, were it available?
Re: should a coma patient without insurance be allowed to di
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 12:08 pm
by smackaholic
Goober McTuber wrote:
^^^^^^^^^^^
Comma patient.
EAD
, old man.
Re: should a coma patient without insurance be allowed to di
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 1:00 pm
by BSmack
I see they're 8% of the way to paying off the debt. Real triumph of the libertarian model there. And that guy HAD friends with money. What do you think happens to some poor uninsurable guy who doesn't have rich friends?
Re: should a coma patient without insurance be allowed to di
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 9:01 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
BSmack wrote:What do you think happens to some poor uninsurable guy who doesn't have rich friends?
He ends up hosting 4 hour long Led Zeppelin marathons on T1B Radio.
Re: should a coma patient without insurance be allowed to di
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 9:36 pm
by Cuda