Re: Republicans support the troops...unless they're faggots
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 2:05 pm
Well...maybe Mace and Goobs did. The rest of us aren't that old.bradhusker wrote:...and we all saw the decay of the roman empire.
Sordid clambake
https://mail.theoneboard.com/board/
Well...maybe Mace and Goobs did. The rest of us aren't that old.bradhusker wrote:...and we all saw the decay of the roman empire.
You mean during the time when the Romans had adopted Christianity as their official state religion?bradhusker wrote:You laugh? fine, but Rome started out fine, THEN, torward the end of the roman empire, homosexuality was RAMPANT, in the streets and out in the open, kinda like San Francisco of today.
bradhusker wrote: Rome started out fine, THEN, torward the end of the roman empire, homosexuality was RAMPANT, in the streets and out in the open, kinda like San Francisco of today.
No, it wasn't.bradhusker wrote:THEN, torward the end of the roman empire, homosexuality was RAMPANT, in the streets and out in the open,
Brad's confusing Rome with Lincoln.mvscal wrote:No, it wasn't.bradhusker wrote:THEN, torward the end of the roman empire, homosexuality was RAMPANT, in the streets and out in the open,
Truman wrote:Brad's confusing Rome with Lincoln.mvscal wrote:No, it wasn't.bradhusker wrote:THEN, torward the end of the roman empire, homosexuality was RAMPANT, in the streets and out in the open,
Check the NFL Forum if you want to talk to that guy.brad wrote:ok, so you guys just want to ignore the ELEPHANT in the room
poptart wrote:Check the NFL Forum if you want to talk to that guy.brad wrote:ok, so you guys just want to ignore the ELEPHANT in the room
the majority of rome was PAGAN, dummy. Do you know what a pagan is? I'll tell you. A pagan back then is what the LEFT WING is today.BSmack wrote:You mean during the time when the Romans had adopted Christianity as their official state religion?bradhusker wrote:You laugh? fine, but Rome started out fine, THEN, torward the end of the roman empire, homosexuality was RAMPANT, in the streets and out in the open, kinda like San Francisco of today.
Ive studied rome extensively, not only did homosexuality become rampant, BUT, incest was also on the rise. Torward the end, decay was everywhere, TODAY, here in the american empire, we see the left wing trying to corrupt the very youngest among us, the left wing wants to get to our children and indoctrinate them with their sick ideas and values, its only a matter of time before we fall just like rome fell.mvscal wrote:No, it wasn't.bradhusker wrote:THEN, torward the end of the roman empire, homosexuality was RAMPANT, in the streets and out in the open,
No, you haven't.bradhusker wrote:Ive studied rome extensively,
He was speaking of Jim.mvscal wrote:No, you haven't.bradhusker wrote:Ive studied rome extensively,
Gays don't get court martialed. They receive administrative discharges, you stupid, kiddy-diddling fucktard.Diego in Seattle wrote:brad;
Since in your mind having gays in the military will lead to a "Rome" type environment, perhaps you could easily provide links to 10-20 court martials for fraternization that have involved gays.
TIA
Oh yes?bradhusker wrote:Ive studied rome extensively
Not sure if it's still currently the standard military policy but mvscal is correct about how it was when I was in anyway. Diego you seem to be a bit defensive. I wonder if you are hiding a dirty little secret... or a trap door.mvscal wrote:Gays don't get court martialed. They receive administrative discharges, you stupid, kiddy-diddling fucktard.Diego in Seattle wrote:brad;
Since in your mind having gays in the military will lead to a "Rome" type environment, perhaps you could easily provide links to 10-20 court martials for fraternization that have involved gays.
TIA
Diego in Seattle wrote:brad;
Since in your mind having gays in the military will lead to a "Rome" type environment, perhaps you could easily provide links to 10-20 court martials for fraternization that have involved gays.
TIA
actually diego, I asked a question first, which you and everyone else seems to dodge and avoid, as if the question was loaded with AIDS or the scarlett fever or something.
here it is again,
If the military says its ok to have naked gay men showering right up against naked straight men, THEN why wont the military allow naked women and naked men to shower in very close quarters with one another???
This question that I have repeatedly put forth, has been avoided like roseanne barr's pussy, NO ONE dares touch a question such as this. AND I KNOW WHY, but, I digress, I will wait as long as it takes for anyone to have the balls to answer it.
Its the elephant in the room that no one will acknowledge, well, I am here to say, YOU HAD BETTER ANSWER IT, because if we are really being HONEST here, this question will bring your honesty out in the open for everyone to see.
its really quite simple, I know the answer, and I want to see if anyone else is as honest as I am.
again, if no one sees a problem with naked gay men and naked straight men showering in close quarters with one another, WHAT, may I ask is the problem with naked men and women doing the same?
WHAT? are you a bunch of scared babies? is that too loaded a question for ya?
oh, and mvscal,
yes, I have.
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
mvscal, have you even seen caligula? I have, and the full uncut edition to boot. and let me tell you something, its full of crazed debouchery and sodomy and beastiality and every other unspeakable act of deprivation and things so unspeakable, I will probably burn in hell for having seen it. HOWEVER, I am here to tell you, that as horrible and disgusting as that movie was, NEXT to ROME? It was the little mermaid, finding nemo, and bambi, in comparison.mvscal wrote:No, you haven't.bradhusker wrote:Ive studied rome extensively,
bradhusker wrote:mvscal, have you even seen caligula? I have, and the full uncut edition to boot. and let me tell you something, its full of crazed debouchery and sodomy and beastiality and every other unspeakable act of deprivation and things so unspeakable, I will probably burn in hell for having seen it. HOWEVER, I am here to tell you, that as horrible and disgusting as that movie was, NEXT to ROME? It was the little mermaid, finding nemo, and bambi, in comparison.mvscal wrote:No, you haven't.bradhusker wrote:Ive studied rome extensively,
ya got it now? have I made things clearer for you? you sanctimonious prick.
No dirty secrets or trap doors. That said......Atomic Punk wrote:Not sure if it's still currently the standard military policy but mvscal is correct about how it was when I was in anyway. Diego you seem to be a bit defensive. I wonder if you are hiding a dirty little secret... or a trap door.mvscal wrote:Gays don't get court martialed. They receive administrative discharges, you stupid, kiddy-diddling fucktard.Diego in Seattle wrote:brad;
Since in your mind having gays in the military will lead to a "Rome" type environment, perhaps you could easily provide links to 10-20 court martials for fraternization that have involved gays.
TIA
mvscal wrote:Not yet, anyway. The Spartan military institutionalized pederasty.Martyred wrote:This isn't Sparta.
Yes, it was very clear to me that masturbating to Caligula was the extent of your study of Rome.bradhusker wrote:mvscal, have you even seen caligula? I have, and the full uncut edition to boot.
HOWEVER, I am here to tell you, that as horrible and disgusting as that movie was, NEXT to ROME? It was the little mermaid, finding nemo, and bambi, in comparison.
Diego in Seattle wrote:brad;
Since in your mind having gays in the military will lead to a "Rome" type environment, perhaps you could easily provide links to 10-20 court martials for fraternization that have involved gays.
TIA
Ask that same question n a few years.
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
so basically what you are telling me is that "caligula" and "I claudius" were just made up fiction?mvscal wrote:Yes, it was very clear to me that masturbating to Caligula was the extent of your study of Rome.bradhusker wrote:mvscal, have you even seen caligula? I have, and the full uncut edition to boot.
HOWEVER, I am here to tell you, that as horrible and disgusting as that movie was, NEXT to ROME? It was the little mermaid, finding nemo, and bambi, in comparison.
And your source for this is?
Unfortunately for you, I actually have studied Roman history extensively as part of my curriculum and the most salacious libels of Suetonius don't even come close the pathetically stupid cartoon you're attempting to draw.
Roman attitudes towards homosexuality varied from indifference to active persecution. At no time; however, was it commonly acceptable behavior as it was with the Greeks. The quintessential Roman view of homosexuality is that it was a Greek degeneracy. One of the most vile insults you could hurl at a man would be to imply that he was a catamite (bottom bitch). Roman walls are littered with graffiti claiming that so and so sucks a mean dick. Those insults do not imply acceptance.
The bottom line is that such behavior was considered scandalous which means that it was not appropriate cultural behavior. The Romans did enjoy gossip and greatly loved to be titilated by stories of the allegedly grotesque perversions of the senatorial class. Reality was likely to have been far more dull. Their views on the subject are quite similar to our own and it is fairly clear that our views have descended from theirs.
Rack. I saw them in my dreams and was sure it was true.Ana Ng wrote:I see Brad's point.
I read AND watched "Where the Wild Things Are", and I truly believe that when I sail away to the far off forest and start wild rumpuses and whatsuch, those wild things really DO mean it when they tell me not to go or else they'll "eat me up, they love me so".
Across the face?mvscal wrote:Gays don't get court martialed. They receive administrative discharges
Possibly not, but it also doesn't surprise me that the people who are most bothered by homosexuals, are those who have to sneak up on a glass of water in order to get a fucking drink.Papa Willie wrote:Seriously - does it really surprise any of you that Screwy is sticking up (for) fags?
sorry to burst your bubble honey, BUT, gay men are incapable of controlling their erections. Have you ever been downtown on a friday or saturday night in san francisco? If a gay man cant hook up, they will gladly stick there erect penis in a hole in the concrete.Ana Ng wrote:Possibly not, but it also doesn't surprise me that the people who are most bothered by homosexuals, are those who have to sneak up on a glass of water in order to get a fucking drink.Papa Willie wrote:Seriously - does it really surprise any of you that Screwy is sticking up (for) fags?
Just because someone's gay, doesn't mean they're gay for YOU.
Needs a rack.IndyFrisco wrote:Across the face?mvscal wrote:Gays don't get court martialed. They receive administrative discharges
-Curiousowen
I just threw in the "batman begins" reference for some humor, but seriously, if you dont know about the decay of rome, then, so be it.Ana Ng wrote:Honestly, at this point, I feel trolled even responding to your ridiculousness....B-Rad.
Your "Batman Begins" post out front shoulda told me. :/
AS for the gays in the military issue, my point about the men and women showering together rings true.bradhusker wrote:I just threw in the "batman begins" reference for some humor, but seriously, if you dont know about the decay of rome, then, so be it.Ana Ng wrote:Honestly, at this point, I feel trolled even responding to your ridiculousness....B-Rad.
Your "Batman Begins" post out front shoulda told me. :/
I wont convince you, its something you must learn for yourself.
Okay then...what about "all-gay brigades"?bradhusker wrote: AS for the gays in the military issue, my point about the men and women showering together rings true.
If you cant see the same human dynamic here, then you are either in denial, or just a far left loon.
OK, I'll guess..........Field research?bradhusker wrote: gay men are incapable of controlling their erections.
No...I think he meant he has much better control of gay men's erections than they do themselves.R-Jack wrote:OK, I'll guess..........Field research?bradhusker wrote: gay men are incapable of controlling their erections.