T1B

Sirfindafold wrote:A team that has Kent State, North Texas and Georgia Southern on its schedule should not even be allowed to play in a BCS Bowl, let alone play for the BCS Championship. What a Joke.

Kinda havta agree with this. If you play a D1-AA team, it ought to count against you. No excuses.

Well, in fairness, turns out Georgia Southern might've been the toughest team Bama played all year outside of LSU.

Dinsdale wrote:Dude... there's a new Tailback U on the scene.

What do Reuben Droughns, Maurice Morris, Onterrio Smith, not Terrence Whitehead, Jonathan Stewart, Jerimiah Johnson, LaGarrette Blount, and soon-to-be-LaMike have in common?

Some did better than others (and one became a punchline), but if you start for Oregon, you go to the NFL.

It's become a destination for star RBs.

Psst... Oregon can't hold a candle to Cal when it comes to running backs...

The real Tailback U. is Cal and has been for the last decade.


Cal has had a 1,000-yard rusher in the backfield in nine of the last ten seasons in Joe Igber (2002), Echemandu (2003), Arrington (2004), Lynch (2005, `06), Forsett (2007), Best (2008) Vereen (2010), and Sofele (2011).

Three of those backs ... Lynch (2006), Forsett (2007) and Best (2008) ... were first-team All-Pac-10 choices. Lynch was also the Pac-10 Offensive Player of the Year. Best was a second-team All-Pac-10 selection in 2009, while Vereen was a second-team choice in 2010 after earning honorable mention honors in 2009.






PAC 12 Defensive Player of the Year... Mychal Kendricks #30 Cal ... Speed kills my friend.

Did you have 2 1000 yard rushers in a season?

Happened multiple times at Oregon over the last decade.

Any of your guys win the Doak Walker?

Lead the nation is rushing?


Yeah, that's what I thought.

Wisky was 4 yards short of having three 1,000 yard rushers last year.

Goober McTuber wrote:Wisky was 4 yards short of having three 1,000 yard rushers last year.

Probably have a Doak Walker winner this year, which won't be their first.

I guess Wisky is a better RB school than Kal, too.

Dinsdale wrote:Did you have 2 1000 yard rushers in a season?

Marshawn Lynch and Justin Forsett.

Dinsdale wrote:Lead the nation is rushing?


Yeah, that's what I thought.

JJ Arrington in 2004 lead the nation in rushing with 2018 yards.


Has Oregon ever had a 2,000 yard rusher ???


Yeah, that's what I thought.

Sudden Sam wrote:Has Cal played in a meaningful game in the last 20-30 years?

Of course.


Does Cal play 3 or 4 high school teams every year ???

Not a chance.

I was in Alabama's corner until the coaches' individual polls were released in the press. What the SEC coaches did on Sunday voting was ethically and morally corrupt. I HATE Oklahoma State but they got royally screwed. How do you justify DROPPING Oklahoma State on your ballot after they utterly destroy a top ten ranked team on prime time television. The SEC coaches should not be allowed a single vote in next years Coaches poll after the stunt they pulled.

SunCoastSooner wrote:I was in Alabama's corner until the coaches' individual polls were released in the press. What the SEC coaches did on Sunday voting was ethically and morally corrupt. I HATE Oklahoma State but they got royally screwed. How do you justify DROPPING Oklahoma State on your ballot after they utterly destroy a top ten ranked team on prime time television. The SEC coaches should not be allowed a single vote in next years Coaches poll after the stunt they pulled.

You mean like Saban voting Oklahoma State # 4 on his ballot ???

Yeah, Saban is just as much a scumbag as Mack "Kneepads" Brown.

Pinkel's getting into SEC mode already. He voted Okie State #4 as well.

Alabama had their chance and LOST !!!

AT HOME !!!

Alabama didn't even win their division.

Sudden Sam wrote:

SunCoastSooner wrote:I was in Alabama's corner until the coaches' individual polls were released in the press. What the SEC coaches did on Sunday voting was ethically and morally corrupt. I HATE Oklahoma State but they got royally screwed. How do you justify DROPPING Oklahoma State on your ballot after they utterly destroy a top ten ranked team on prime time television. The SEC coaches should not be allowed a single vote in next years Coaches poll after the stunt they pulled.

The last poll is the only one where the coaches' votes are made public. What makes you think any coaches dropped Oklahoma State?

M2 wrote: You mean like Saban voting Oklahoma State # 4 on his ballot ???

What's wrong with that? Stanford plays some defense. I'm sure he thinks more of them than he does Okie State.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/ ... 51647436/1

Looks to me like most everybody felt the same way. Of 6 SEC coaches, they all voted the same except Saban, who had Stanford ahead of the Pokes. Big fuckin' deal.

Some of the coaches allow their votes to be released in their local newspapers after every week. USA today only releases them wholly on their own the final week. That's how people found out.

Sudden Sam wrote:SCS, where do you see that any SEC coach dropped Okie State? Put up or shut up.

The Pokes gained ground on Bama. If anything , some SEC coaches may have moved OSU up. Goddam, man. Gripe about something legit...like your Sooners pathetic performance in the Bedlam game.

Gene Chizek dropped Oklahoma State from #2 to #3.
Gary Pinkel dropped OSU from 3rd to 4th. And don't feed me he is a BIg 12 coach because his future and his interest lays with the SEC not the Big 12.
Steve Spurrier dropped OSU from 2nd to 3rd
David Cutcliffe from 3rd to 4th. Duke coach but is an SEC man at heart and everyone here knows it.

Oklahoma State made up ground because OTHER coaches moved them up in their poll, some multiple places: Frank Beamer, Art Briles, Dave Christenson, Sonny Dykes, Larry Fedora, Bronco Mendenhall, Jeff Quin, Paul Rhoads, Bob Stoops, Kevin Sumlin, Jeff Tedford, Tommy Tubberville, Kevin Wilson, and Ron Zook.

Anybody notice a trend here? Every coach who dropped Oklahoma State on their ballot had an intricate interest in the SEC. As opposed to every other coach whose votes are released to their local fish wrap who either held Oklahoma State in their previous position or moved them up.

Keep spinning Sam, morally and ethically corrupt. Period.

This is hardly something that's never happened before, conferences lining up lock-step behind their own teams. The whole system is morally bankrupt.

Keep it up guys, this is great.

I can feel it. Sam is...this close...to



Sam, please turn on your webcam.

TIA

Sudden Sam wrote:

Mikey wrote:Keep it up guys, this is great.

I can feel it. Sam is...this close...to



Sam, please turn on your webcam.

TIA

Naw, I'm fine. I'm cracking up at the bullshit SCS is throwing in here.

Okie State made up some ground in the final poll, but there was little hope of them unseating Alabama at #2. Everyone knew that. Now SCS and m2 wanna play this "unethical" card. It's beyond pitiful.

I only wish Alabama could have played Okie Lite and ended this BS real quickly.

Dude you have no clue what Bama would do against a real offense and a balanced attack like OSU has because you haven't faced a single one all season. No different than OSU having not faced defenses like Bama and LSU but you're a fucking moron if you think you automatically win that game. Oklahoma State is far superior on offense and balanced than anything you have faced off against remotely this season.

Sudden Sam wrote:STFU and go cry in your Bears towel. Goddam, y'all...this is fuckin' ridiculous. The 2 best teams, according to the coaches poll, the computers, EVERYBODY are playing January 9. Don't watch the game if you're so upset that a bunch with a porous defense didn't make it.

Uh, no. Four of the six computers had Okie State #2 and Alabama #3.

Sudden Sam wrote:And Okie State hasn't seen a defense anything remotely like Alabama's.

What are you? My retarded Parrot?

Goober McTuber wrote:

Sudden Sam wrote:STFU and go cry in your Bears towel. Goddam, y'all...this is fuckin' ridiculous. The 2 best teams, according to the coaches poll, the computers, EVERYBODY are playing January 9. Don't watch the game if you're so upset that a bunch with a porous defense didn't make it.

Uh, no. Four of the six computers had Okie State #2 and Alabama #3.

Don't confuse Sam with facts, he doesn't handle those very well.

Sudden Sam wrote:
Alabama would move thru the Cowboy defense at will.

It would be ugly.

Just like Utah in the Sugar Bowl, right? Oh wait . . .

Stanford will put the Okie State question to rest on 1/2/12. But then there will remain the quesiton of how much Stanford would have beaten Bama (or LSU) by if given the chance.

SunCoastSooner wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

Sudden Sam wrote:STFU and go cry in your Bears towel. Goddam, y'all...this is fuckin' ridiculous. The 2 best teams, according to the coaches poll, the computers, EVERYBODY are playing January 9. Don't watch the game if you're so upset that a bunch with a porous defense didn't make it.

Uh, no. Four of the six computers had Okie State #2 and Alabama #3.

Don't confuse Sam with facts, he doesn't handle those very well.

Of course, the computers are so fucking smart that three of them have Oklahoma at #6 and two of them say #7.

Papa Willie wrote:Bwahahaha @ SCS. I knew he'd show up crying. Face it, dude - as was said much earlier in the year - OU never belonged. Just deal with it, dumbass. Eat that along with your rampant B12BSHomerisms as well.

Congrats on those squeker wins against Utah State and Samford at home to get bowl eligible. There's a lot for you to be proud of in Allbarn.

They should really take the computers out of the equation and replace them with the AP poll.

Sudden Sam wrote:

Mikey wrote:Stanford will put the Okie State question to rest on 1/2/12. But then there will remain the quesiton of how much Stanford would have beaten Bama (or LSU) by if given the chance.

Stanford would have a much better chance to beat either LSU or Bama. They play defense.

Rushing defense: OSU ranked 84th in the country.
Passing defense: OSU ranked 102nd.

Trent Richardson, Eddie Lacy (bad toe and all), and Jalston Fowler would have run wild.

Against Arkansas, Alabama gave up 100 yards passing under the Razorbacks' average. Weedon hasn't faced pressure like he'd see from the Tide. He hasn't faced DBs like Alabama's.

It would be very nasty for the T. Boone Pickens.

Of course, as I said, this is all just opinion...opinion based on what the two teams have done this year.

Yep, Goobs. The computers did go 4-2 with OSU at #2 over Bama.

Two of the computer rankings actually suggest that OSU's schedule was tougher than LSU's! Wow.

Yet Oklahoma State leads the country in turnover margin . . .

And wow, you mean a computer program might have the audacity to to suggest that Oklahoma State played a difficult schedule beating 6 teams who were ranked at the time of the games and their opponents actually being able to defeat Florida State, Louisville, and La Tech unlike LSU's opponents. The HORRAH HORRAH!!!

We've seen that game ...

Alabama LOST !!!

AT HOME !!!



Speaking of at home...

how is Alabama's NFL team doing ???

opps... I mean MLB team doing ???

my bad... NBA team doing ???

Jesus Christ... I meant NHL team doing ???

Fuck it, how is your sister doing ???

Sudden Sam wrote:We can settle this OSU/Bama thing real quickly and easily.

Alabama was considered one of the top two teams in the country by everyone. No dissenters. Even Mike Gundy agreed.

Now let's simply compare OSU's and Bama's losses. Alabama lost by 3 in OT to the consensus #1 team in the country. Okie State lost to a 4 TD underdog in OT.

Pretty clear, isn't it?

Yes, Sam, but do you really think that Alabama's defense measures up to the Iowa State defense?

I'm a USC grad but know SEC football is the best. I love LSU and Alabama and am in the minority of wanting to see a rematch.
Let me preface why I've never played the CFB "pick 'em" contest. I don't get to see all of the teams play. After about a month I get to see many of the teams that are highly ranked to have an opinion.

I wouldn't even have pre-season polls because they're biased by hack sports writers that haven't seen other teams play. Why not let maybe a month or 2 go by and then start the rankings? This would solve the bitching about a play off system since reasonable people could make rational choices for the rankings and then I would ask them to justify their reasoning if it still looked biased.

Sorry Okie State, but don't bitch. Look at Iowa State's record. Boise State has a better argument than Okie Lite.

Saban voted South Carolina # 6 in the country ???

This scumbag will do anything for votes... move over "Kneepads" Brown... there's a new sheriff in town.

Oh by the way... Spurrier returned the favor and voted Alabama #2 for the first time this year !!!

M2 wrote:Saban voted South Carolina # 6 in the country ???

This scumbag will do anything for votes... move over "Kneepads" Brown... there's a new sheriff in town.

Oh by the way... Spurrier returned the favor and voted Alabama #2 for the first time this year !!!

Get over it mtoo. As long as coaches have votes they SHOULD do all they can to help their program. If Brown or Saban or "I'm 40, I'm a man" isn't voting to help their team or stumping for their team in front of bowl selection committees, then they should be fired.

Now if you want to argue that coaches should have votes that effect millions of dollars, then so be it, but complaining about them doing their job is comical.

Atomic Punk wrote:I'm a USC grad but know SEC football is the best. I love LSU and Alabama and am in the minority of wanting to see a rematch.
Let me preface why I've never played the CFB "pick 'em" contest. I don't get to see all of the teams play. After about a month I get to see many of the teams that are highly ranked to have an opinion.

I wouldn't even have pre-season polls because they're biased by hack sports writers that haven't seen other teams play. Why not let maybe a month or 2 go by and then start the rankings? This would solve the bitching about a play off system since reasonable people could make rational choices for the rankings and then I would ask them to justify their reasoning if it still looked biased.

Sorry Okie State, but don't bitch. Look at Iowa State's record. Boise State has a better argument than Okie Lite.

Why did you edit out the part where you said Georgia should have won the game against LSU?

Sudden Sam wrote:
Do you really think a coach isn't going to do all he can for his team? Good god, you're stupid if you can't fathom that. A coach who's paid millions based on his team's performance and finish is a dumbass if he doesn't help himself.

A very wise man taught me when I was young...

"Values are worth making sacrifices for".

It served him well... as it has myself.


Nick Saban has no values, and the world can see this.


I have zero respect for slime-balls like him.

Goobs, I thought it was still in there when I did an edit. Now I look back and it's not there. Anyway, Georgia was beating them and after some mistakes the team lost momentum. LSU's defense isn't as good as Alabama's. Georgia had them early and just gave up.

So after seeing Georgia who lost to Boise's gimmick offense when they have months to prepare for real opponents, you can see that Fresno State's next head coach and current Alabama OC will have LSU's ass.

Now of course, the local media has Jim McElwain, Mike Martz, and possibly Dennis Erickson taking over for the fired Pat Hill.

Anyway, it's how the teams match up and Georgia exposed LSU's defense. I guarantee you McElwain is watching that game tape.

Atomic Punk wrote:Georgia exposed LSU's defense.

LSU gave up 10 points. Murray threw 16 of 40 passes for only 163 yards including two interceptions. LSU gave up 78 yards rushing. Outscored them 41-0 after the first quarter. You're an idiot.

Atomic Punk wrote:Sorry Okie State, but don't bitch. Look at Iowa State's record. Boise State has a better argument than Okie Lite.

Look at Boise's schedule. Yes, you really are an idiot.

Well, tell you what... you can call me an idiot if LSU beats 'Bama in the NC. Obviously a lot of you fans have never played, let alone coached the game. You just don't see the match ups as you being fans and all.

Hi Python! You used to have a sense of humor. What happened to you?

Atomic Punk wrote:Well, tell you what... you can call me an idiot if LSU beats 'Bama in the NC.

We can call you an idiot no matter who wins the game. Anyone who has slogged through a handful of your posts has earned that right.

Papa Willie wrote:

Sudden Sam wrote:How about linking us to those changed votes, SCS.

That was Chizik, Spurrier, and Cutcliffe who you claim had Alabama (3 point OT loss to best team in country) ranked behind OSU (OT loss to 28 point underdog Iowa State).

Look how HARD he's pulling for Okie State! You'd think that Okie State just pulled off the biggest upset of the year by beating Ovum U.! As always - OU was over-hyped.

You dipshit I sided with Alabama until monday morning you fucking backassward Georgia hick. I didn't have any issue with it until I saw what the SEC coaches did.