Page 2 of 2
Re: Mitt bashing
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:57 pm
by Derron
Mikey wrote:
Not that it would make any difference to such a paragon of masculine intellectualism as yourself.
Nice...getting the fancy words out of the liberal playbook this morning. Take you long to look those up ?
Re: Mitt bashing
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:58 pm
by mvscal
Mikey wrote:If Reagan ran as a Republican today he'd be heckled as a socialist.
Of course he can't, though, because he's dead.
He could still register and vote democrat, though.
Re: Mitt bashing
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:22 pm
by Mikey
Derron wrote:Mikey wrote:
Not that it would make any difference to such a paragon of masculine intellectualism as yourself.
Nice...getting the fancy words out of the liberal playbook this morning. Take you long to look those up ?
This morning? What meds are you on these days?
Re: Mitt bashing
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:59 pm
by smackaholic
Goober McTuber wrote:smackaholic wrote:Yeah, from time to time. usually seems to be BTPCF related, but, I don't think it's a law.
C'mon Nancy, what are ya afraid of?
Not a damn thing. Let's bet some cash.
How 'bout a six of your favorite local micro brew? Thomas Hooker makes some pretty good stuff? I would recommend their munich style lager or octoberfext. And I hear you pimping some sort of local cheesehead swill. Forget the name.
And let's throw in a sig as well.
We can let Bsmack hold the money, or maybe not.

Re: Mitt bashing
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:02 pm
by smackaholic
Mikey wrote:Goober McTuber wrote:smackaholic wrote:Yeah, from time to time. usually seems to be BTPCF related, but, I don't think it's a law.
C'mon Nancy, what are ya afraid of?
Not a damn thing. Let's bet some cash.
~...crickets...~
I know you aren't gonna believe this, but, I was outside.....doing yard work!
No, really, I was.
Re: Mitt bashing
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:03 pm
by Goober McTuber
smackaholic wrote:Goober McTuber wrote:smackaholic wrote:Yeah, from time to time. usually seems to be BTPCF related, but, I don't think it's a law.
C'mon Nancy, what are ya afraid of?
Not a damn thing. Let's bet some cash.
How 'bout a six of your favorite local micro brew? Thomas Hooker makes some pretty good stuff? I would recommend their munich style lager or octoberfext. And I hear you pimping some sort of local cheesehead swill. Forget the name.
And let's throw in a sig as well.
We can let Bsmack hold the money, or maybe not.

Real cash. $100. Don't forget that I live here. Walker's approval rating was hovering around 50 last summer. He's continued to piss off more and more people since then and his approval rating is very near to your IQ (that would be in the 30s).
Edit to add: I will make the bet official when his opponent is named. There is no doubt about there being a recall election. I just want to make sure the Dems don't fuck this up and run the tool he beat in last year's election. That's actually a possibility.
Re: Mitt bashing
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:01 pm
by smackaholic
nahhh, i gotta pass on that one goobs. too rich for my blood.
Re: Mitt bashing
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:37 am
by poptart
Mikey wrote:he's dead.

Re: Mitt bashing
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 4:03 pm
by Ana Ng
R-Jack wrote:You are to dumb...
Ouch.
Re: Mitt bashing
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 2:25 pm
by Goober McTuber
smackaholic wrote:nahhh, i gotta pass on that one goobs. too rich for my blood.
Good move. They needed to collect 540,000 signatures in 60 days to force a recall. They just turned in over a million.
Re: Mitt bashing
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 2:32 pm
by BSmack
Goober McTuber wrote:smackaholic wrote:nahhh, i gotta pass on that one goobs. too rich for my blood.
Good move. They needed to collect 540,000 signatures in 60 days to force a recall. They just turned in over a million.
That's a good start. When submitting any kind of electoral petitions it is SOP to turn in double what is needed. It makes it all but impossible for the other side to challenge their validity. From what I understand they now have 60 days to certify the petitions. Nice to see the heirs of Robert La Follette making use of his legacy .
Re: Mitt bashing
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 9:06 pm
by bradhusker
mvscal wrote:Jsc810 wrote:It is so funny watching the right wing implode. Nobody is stopping the Romney train, but it is great to see these douchebags try. Their efforts will help produce four more years of Obama, but more importantly, they will more the Republican party to a more central and rational position. Suck it, fundies.
Good god, you're a fucking dumbshit. The next Republican nominated who
isn't a middle of the road, slightly right of center moderate will be the first since Reagan and even he wasn't all that far right.
I never thought i'd do this, BUT, RAAAAAAAAAAACK mvscal.
You are 100 percent correct, Reagan was a slightly right moderate. Which is why I love Romney.
The mainstream media is so TERRIFIED of Romney, because they know that Romney will defeat the messiah Obama.
I am watching CNN with wolf the jew blitzer trying so hard to pimp Newt newt newt, BECAUSE they know that Newt has zero chance of defeating Obama the chosen one. SICK fuckin liberals.
Liberals are so fuckin transparent in their sick devious plans and strategies, right now they are bashing Mitt to high heaven, because deep down, they realize he is a mainstream moderate.
I LOVE IT!!!!!!
Re: Mitt bashing
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:49 pm
by The Seer
mvscal wrote:Mikey wrote:If Reagan ran as a Republican today he'd be heckled as a socialist.
Of course he can't, though, because he's dead.
He could still register and vote democrat, though.
Fuck....that was good.....
but unfortunately accurate
Re: Mitt bashing
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 1:05 pm
by bradhusker
want more proof that the LEFT dems are really really sick and disturbed?
Over in Wisconsin the weird leftys and union thugs are trying to recall their governor Walker?
SO, let me get this straight, When Scott Walker took over as governor, Wisconsin had a budget deficit of 3.6 BILLION?,,, now, they have a surplus of some 200 million?
WOW, liberals are some really sick fucked up individuals, anyone else see this?