T1B

If you've got a business - you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen

- Barry



Now Oblame ya is claiming he was taken out of context.
Yes, he claims that the that he was speaking about was... roads and bridges.

C'mon trupid, if you're going to ride shotgun on the Blame Barry express, try to keep up.

A 49 year old man arrested for inappropriately touching and licking two young girls’ feet is blaming President Obama for being set up.

“I’m being set up by the President Barack Obama and the city and federal government,” the man, Anthony Parri said, after he was charged with sexual abuse and endangering the welfare of a child, according to the Huffington Post.” My family was killed here. My uncle was killed here. This is a set up… they had women following me in Wegmans.”

The alleged separate incidents took place in the Penfield Library in New York. Court papers document that “Parri removed a shoe and fondled the foot, pressing it against his nose and mouth for the purpose of sexual gratification,” according to rochesterhomepage.net.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:C'mon trupid, if you're going to ride shotgun on the Blame Barry express, try to keep up.

Mmmokay, just as soon as I develop a take on the subject, I will.

I always thought "Falseman" to be clever; "Pseudoman" isn't bad either. But I can work with "trupid," and assume your per usualm retarded invective was directed at me.

Is it early stages of Alzheimer's that fails you now, L-TARD, or does the Home limit your Internet access, leaving you to take issue with a disagreement we might have in another thread?

I haven't posted in this thread 'til now, you flaming bag of dumbass.

trev is still awaiting a reply on her fish market take, BTW, if that helps. No doubt she'll run you in that thread, too. Try to keep up, indeed.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:No, it's not the 1950's at all. Why do you have such a skewed version of the facts?.....Oh yeah, your head is regularly packed with total bullshit. Iraq was a great and rich nation despite having a paranoid and brutal dictator. Fuck the Zionazi assholes who insist on attacking nations in the Middle East . It's been an unspeakable disgrace ever since we installed the Shah in Iran after deposing the duly elected secular president. Fuck you.

As for the number of Iraqis murdered by our heinous invasion,
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/iraq

Fuck you!

The Lancet studies have been completely debunked and dismantled time and time again. Only the dimmest and most feeble hacks are still citing it.

http://floppingaces.net/2008/01/04/anot ... the-lance/

Considering that the consistent policy of the U.S. invasion forces has been to NOT TALLY any Iraqi casualties at all, it stands to reason that any attempts to quantify the death and destruction would be similarly smeared and dismissed. Moreover, since the entire "research" of the GOP has been effectively bought by the Koch brothers, it has naturally come to pass that every study or expert panel trotted out by them--to dispute Climate Change, for example--is automatically suspect at best. Usually it's just complete bullshit that only the lowest educated would accept--and this is certainly the typical Tea Bagger (old, white, scared, low educated, and Christer).

Whether a million Iraqis have been murdered, or only 750, 000 is not the issue. Nor is the fact of several million Iraqis rendered homeless refugees. Rather, it is the fact of our having committed a horrific crime which is also undermining our economy. Sure, Rummy and Cheney--and total slime fucks like you--will continue to bray the same jargon about "mushroom clouds" and ever present threats, but the fact is we've been basically hijacked by the military industrial/congressional complex, exactly as Ike warned.

Our annual defense spending has risen more than 100% since 2001, and constitutes more than half of all discretionary government spending. Remember, after the Korean war, Ike cut defense spending by 27%;after Vietnam, Nixon cut it by 29%, and after the Cold War evaporated in 1989, a 20% cut followed. So...why is the current (permanent) abstract "war on terror" sucking up an unprecedented amount of our government's critically tight budget? Why do the GOP stalwarts like Paul Ryan howl hysterically at the suggestion of any cuts in military spending? Are they just insane apocalyptic cowards? Possibly. Corrupt politicians receiving huge payments for their shameless acquiescence? Quite possibly. Or are they rigid idealogues who are bent on repealing all that the New Deal created and informed, regardless of the wreckage their draconian (and easily refuted) plans would cause to the nation? This is fairly obvious.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Whether a million Iraqis have been murdered, or only 750, 000 is not the issue.

Actually it is the issue. Stop lying. Stop presenting absolutely absurd exaggerations and maybe somebody will start taking what you have to say more seriously. As it is, you come across like one of those buffoons from Ancient Aliens who just throw out totally unsupported speculation based on false premises and distorted facts.

Clearly it was the Koch Brothers who, using alien technology, triggered the volcanic eruption which destroyed Pompei.

Typical smear 'n run bullshit from a total fraud.

The facts presented stand undisputed. Especially as concerns the military industrial congressional complex having our economy by the balls--and neither party ready to to stand up to it.

As for our destruction of Iraq and the subsequent further destabilization of the region, this continues even today as 100 or so folks were blown up in a bomb attack. Of course the demented Rummy mindset accepts no responsibility for this catastrophe. Just like simplistic robots like Paul Ryan (and you) want to keep the military machine going and growing. You're sick.

Considering that 9/11 was obviously an inside job, and that the invasion and destruction of Iraq was duplicitous and corrupt, then yes the entire clusterfuck of the Permanent War is entirely the fault of a small but powerful cabal of cornered and coiled race-state fanatics. And while you roll your eyes at such an assertion, remember that lots of good right folks did the same thing right here in the 1930's.

Where's my blooming orange tree?

Sure, starting with the obvious controlled demolition of the towers and WTC 7, the obvious stand down of the most "prepared" air defense system in the world, the fact that a 5' 1" man who completely failed the most basic (cessna) flight training could have overpowered a 6' 3" former marine pilot on flight 77 and performed a mission with maneuvers that would make Chuck Yeager blush, the fact that a 757 cannot fly at full speed fifteen feet off the ground, the fact that all videos of the pentagon attack were impounded and permanently sealed, the fact that former FBI director Mueller admitted under oath that he cannot offer any evidence that any of the alleged hijackers were in fact on any of the planes, and...the list goes on and on and on.

The question is why would anyone believe a word of the official 9/11 Commission Report? Do you similarly believe the Warren Commission Report?

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Sure, starting with the obvious controlled demolition of the towers and WTC 7, the obvious stand down of the most "prepared" air defense system in the world, the fact that a 5' 1" man who completely failed the most basic (cessna) flight training could have overpowered a 6' 3" former marine pilot on flight 77 and performed a mission with maneuvers that would make Chuck Yeager blush, the fact that a 757 cannot fly at full speed fifteen feet off the ground, the fact that all videos of the pentagon attack were impounded and permanently sealed, the fact that former FBI director Mueller admitted under oath that he cannot offer any evidence that any of the alleged hijackers were in fact on any of the planes, and...the list goes on and on and on.

The question is why would anyone believe a word of the official 9/11 Commission Report? Do you similarly believe the Warren Commission Report?

Do you think Muslims are too stupid to have planned and carried out 9/11?

Go fuck yourself.

Wrong, B-juice, no one is suggesting a hijacking of that sort was not possible for Muslims or anyone else--for the WTC at least. But that's not the issue at all. Rather, the obviousness of a controlled demolition at WTC alone should just stop in its tracks any sort of acceptance of the immediately rolled out ready made official report of the New Pearl Harbor. The ludicrous answers provided in the subsequent Popular Mechanics "authoritative" analysis are a joke. And so is your silly act, comrade :wink:

http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/gopm/index.html

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Wrong, B-juice, no one is suggesting a hijacking of that sort was not possible for Muslims or anyone else--for the WTC at least. But that's not the issue at all. Rather, the obviousness of a controlled demolition at WTC alone should just stop in its tracks any sort of acceptance of the immediately rolled out ready made official report of the New Pearl Harbor. The ludicrous answers provided in the subsequent Popular Mechanics "authoritative" analysis are a joke. And so is your silly act, comrade :wink:

http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/gopm/index.html

Your head is so far up your own ass with American exceptionalism you'll follow any screwball lead to the story you want to hear.

You shit on Islamic Holy Land. They got mad and did something about it.
Case closed.

Martyred wrote:You shit on Islamic Holy Land. They got mad and did something about it.

So? We've been taking our daily, morning shit on Canada for years. Kinda makes you guys pussies in the eyes of the Muzzies, doesn't it? Or are you content to beating us in hockey every four years?

88 wrote:

Martyred wrote:You shit on Islamic Holy Land. They got mad and did something about it.
Case closed.

Talk about your wacko conspiracy theories...

OBL said as much. On video.

Martyred wrote:You shit on Islamic Holy Land.

By "shit on" you mean we buy their oil at exorbitant cost making them obscenely wealthy, right? Yeah, what a bunch of dicks we are.

Martyred wrote:

88 wrote:

Martyred wrote:You shit on Islamic Holy Land. They got mad and did something about it.
Case closed.

Talk about your wacko conspiracy theories...

OBL said as much. On video.

Funny about that. you'd think that an extremist who just scored the biggest strike against his enemy would take credit with pride. But Bin Laden of course denied having anything to do with it, and there's no evidence he was involved--or that he was actually killed, etc.

SS, that tape of Bin Laden supposedly talking about the attacks may as well have been made by Ahmed Chalabi, or "curveball" for that matter. It is absolute bullshit from stem to stern. None of his supposed boasts even make sense. Are you really so easily duped?
Just like "Case Closed" by Gerald Posner, the fatuous journalist who claimed to defend the Warren Commission's every conclusion, the so-called "expert" resources for the case against Bin Laden are a complete lie. Do you believe the Warren Commission Report? If you have some serious doubts, then why wouldn't these be extended to the similar ludicrous attempt--the Popular Mechanics piece--to explain blatant defiance of basic physics, incalculable odds on a variety of bewildering coincidences, astonishing lack of forensic investigation, bizarre and unexplained permanent sealing of critical evidence, and so much more? How can anyone possibly believe the official story? Oh that's right. you're a scared totin' libertarian who's sure that the game is up, amigo. :doh:

No, there's a tremendous amount of evidence to at least dismiss the official story. We can't conclude exactly who was behind it, but cui bono certainly applies--and everything points to the ruthless cornered and coiled apartheid state posing as a democracy, etc.

Did you review the provided critique of the Popular Mechanics piece? If so--and if you dispute the piece--try and refute any of its claims. If not, stop trying to simply smear and run.

88 wrote:One of the things I find most funny about you is that you absolutely pillage the Christers for having the faith to believe in something for which there is no evidence, yet you have the audacity to exhibit unbridled faith that something nefarious occurred on 9/11 notwithstanding the complete absence of evidence that would support such a belief.

There is plenty of evidence you stupid hillbilly fuck, YOU just choose to ignore it because you are an ignorant fuck.

I, unlike you, can admit that there is evidence that it was AQ. There just isn't enough evidence that it was AQ for me to believe they did it. See the difference? Of course you don’t because your head is up Bush’s ass.