T1B

Yesterday's oral arguments also had it's share of buffonery - Sotomayor asserting the 10% plan without racial preferences amounts to segregation, for example.

Ah yes, the "wise" Latina. In a normal world she'd be the Dean of Women in a small liberal arts college in the northeast.

ML@Coyote wrote:Anyone else notice that no explanation was ever provided for this statement? Was this actually his closing argument? What am I missing here? I was hoping to see a great legal mind at work. :doh:

He has devolved into a hit and run leg humper of little consequence.

ML@Coyote wrote: What am I missing here? :doh:

That I have a life. Sorry if you are so bored in real life that you have to post such drivel but since I'm here I would be happy to help your senile brain to understand a simple concept.
Real crime is 100% of all crime, hence the name. In these cases the mens rea and actus rea have both been met. This number will never be know by any human as we are not perfect beings, granted I am closer than you but that is a different thread. Crime statistics involve the actus rea being brought to the attention of the cops and convictions where both actus rea and mens rea have been plead or proved. One problem is many people plead under Alfred and many juries convict the wrong person. Another is many crimes are never reported and many reports are false accusations.

Now please get a life or a hobby and quit posting shit about how someone's answer is not fast enough for you you vapid cum pillow.

Moving Sale wrote:

ML@Coyote wrote: What am I missing here? :doh:

That I have a life. Sorry if you are so bored in real life that you have to post such drivel but since I'm here I would be happy to help your senile brain to understand a simple concept.
Real crime is 100% of all crime, hence the name. In these cases the mens rea and actus rea have both been met. This number will never be know by any human as we are not perfect beings, granted I am closer than you but that is a different thread. Crime statistics involve the actus rea being brought to the attention of the cops and convictions where both actus rea and mens rea have been plead or proved. One problem is many people plead under Alfred and many juries convict the wrong person. Another is many crimes are never reported and many reports are false accusations.

Now please get a life or a hobby and quit posting shit about how someone's answer is not fast enough for you you vapid cum pillow.

Before I can respond to this thoughtfully, I will need you to clarify some of your legal terms. For example, what exactly is a "vapid cum pillow?"

Moving Sale wrote:

Find a mirror

"Find a mirror?" Is that seriously the best you can do? Let me guess...you're getting help with this. Tell me, how old is your accomplice? Fifteen? Sixteen? Did you promise him a sixpack of Coors and a pack of Marlboros in return for his assistance? Isn't that against the law?

So this is about you wanting to act like an asshole and not about crime or crime stats.
Gotcha.
If you care to actually comment on crime and crime stats feel free.
My guess is you are a stupid lying fuckhole and don't really care to actually post about crime or crim stats.

Moving Sale wrote:So this is about you wanting to act like an asshole and not about crime or crime stats.
Gotcha.
If you care to actually comment on crime and crime stats feel free.
My guess is you are a stupid lying fuckhole and don't really care to actually post about crime or crim stats.

Okay, here's my question for you. Is a person living in a community with low crime stats safer than he would be living in a community with high crime stats? Keeping in mind that, as you say, "Actual crime has little or nothing to do with crime statistics."

Objection
Assumes facts not in evidence.
A lack of crime does not equal safer and more crime does not equal less safe.
There is lots of crime that has no vic. In addition there are crimes with a victim but the 'victim' is never in danger. Not many of Madoff's vics were in danger of being ruffed up or whatnot.
Care to try again? Since you are so knowledgable in this area and all.

Moving Sale wrote:Objection
Assumes facts not in evidence.
A lack of crime does not equal safer and more crime does not equal less safe.
There is lots of crime that has no vic. In addition there are crimes with a victim but the 'victim' is never in danger. Not many of Madoff's vics were in danger of being ruffed up or whatnot.
Care to try again? Since you are so knowledgable in this area and all.

A lack of crime does not equal safer? Really? More crime does not equal less safe? What fucking planet do you live on? Speaking of other planets, can I ask you another question while we're talking here? Do you also happen to believe in flying saucers and spacemen? Judging by your "stellar" logic and propensity to cling to bizarre notions, I suspect the answer is yes, but I don't want to put words in your mouth.

ML@Coyote wrote: A lack of crime does not equal safer? Really?

Yes and I provided examples you brain dead pile of cum dust.

Moving Sale wrote:

ML@Coyote wrote: A lack of crime does not equal safer? Really?

Yes and I provided examples you brain dead pile of cum dust.

You provided me with a straw man that would make your old law professors wince. Your churlish name-calling only adds a embarassing exclamation point to the yelp of your frustration in having stepped in a pile of your own shit. Clean off your shoes and repent. There's no turning back. Crime is not safe. A lack of crime is safer.

BTW you didn't answer my question about spacemen and flying saucers. It was a serious inquiry. Are you dodging this question for any particular reason? Or perhaps you are from another planet. Is it in our galaxy? What do the women look like there? Do they have sports? Do they like to watch TV? I'm dying to know.

Do you even know what a strawman is and if so how is providing you with an example of crime that is not dangerous a strawman?

Your question about aliens is a fallacy known as a red herring.

Anything else you insipid tard?

Moving Sale wrote:Do you even know what a strawman is and if so how is providing you with an example of crime that is not dangerous a strawman?

Your question about aliens is a fallacy known as a red herring.

Anything else you insipid tard?

My question about flying saucers and spaceships is no red herring, my friend. Rather it goes right to the heart of the matter. In your make-believe Moving Sale world, you tell us that up is down, black is white, hot is cold, crime is safe, and less crime is not safer. Even if I were to accept your straw man Madoff crimes as a part of the discussion, you're going to have a hard time describing his crimes as being "safe." Dude, just come clean about the aliens, okay. Tell us about the voices in your head that have convinced you that your mixed-up universe of ass-backwards theories and adolescent ponderings will hold any water with sane and rational adult human beings. Let's hear the whole story. You'll feel better to get this off your chest.

I already showed you how some crime is not dangerous like selling a gram of pot so you can flail about trying to put words in my mouth or you can take the cock out of your mouth and debate on the merits or fuck the fuck off.

And I have a question for you. Have you stopped fucking the neighborhood boys?

Moving Sale wrote:I already showed you how some crime is not dangerous like selling a gram of pot so you can flail about trying to put words in my mouth or you can take the cock out of your mouth and debate on the merits or fuck the fuck off.

And I have a question for you. Have you stopped fucking the neighborhood boys?

I'm trying to picture you in a courtroom.

That is because you are creepy.

I am Uncle Martin. Seriously, I am Moving Sale’s uncle. I am not from Mars. That space ship in the backyard is something Moving Sale and I built out of plywood and fiberglass for the neighborhood kids to play on. We live in a high crime area, so it’s safe for the children to play unsupervised. No one bothers to keep an eye on them. The more crime the better we like to say. The children like to pretend they’re aliens from outer space. They make up crazy storylines and shoot at each other with pretend ray guns. No, these are not antennae on my head. Your mind is just playing tricks on you. I am just plain old Uncle Martin, nothing more, nothing less. You are getting sleepy…your eyes are getting heavy…when I count to three you will wake up and forget you ever saw these antennae. You will believe everything Moving Sale has to say. Up is down, right is left, cold is hot, and high crime rates are safe. Yes, you must become a believer. Don’t be fooled by the wives tales of the status quo. Don’t be a vapid cum pillow like that snake-in-the-grass ML. Stand up and be counted. Cast your vote in favor of crime!

Not all crime is dangerous and not all crime ends up in crime stats not with standing your red herring/poisoning the well/misdirection fallacy bullshit.
You are an old stupid hack.
Hang up the typewriter and fade a away or step up your fucking game.

Moving Sale wrote:Not all crime is dangerous

Such as your example of selling illicit drugs? Such a noble and peaceful endeavor! Peace, love, dove, baby:

http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2012 ... rs/100299/

The more crime the better.

Papa Willie wrote:

When did Moving Sale sprout a 3rd arm? Is it as useless as the other 2?

ML@Coyote wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:Not all crime is dangerous

Such as your example of selling illicit drugs? Such a noble and peaceful endeavor! Peace, love, dove, baby:

http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2012 ... rs/100299/

The more crime the better.

I said selling a gram was not dangerous and it isn't. It's a contract. Making it illegal doesn't make the contract dangerous. And clearly not all crime is reported so the original post I made is still true and over a page later you still look like a stupid old fuck.
Bring a post that is not fallacy riddled or STFU.

It's just a little coke. No big deal.

Moving Sale wrote:

ML@Coyote wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:Not all crime is dangerous

Such as your example of selling illicit drugs? Such a noble and peaceful endeavor! Peace, love, dove, baby:

http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2012 ... rs/100299/

The more crime the better.

I said selling a gram was not dangerous and it isn't. It's a contract. Making it illegal doesn't make the contract dangerous. And clearly not all crime is reported so the original post I made is still true and over a page later you still look like a stupid old fuck.
Bring a post that is not fallacy riddled or STFU.

Shut up asshole..don't you have to get to this dudes trial?

Moving Sale wrote:

ML@Coyote wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:Not all crime is dangerous

Such as your example of selling illicit drugs? Such a noble and peaceful endeavor! Peace, love, dove, baby:

http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2012 ... rs/100299/

The more crime the better.

I said selling a gram was not dangerous and it isn't. It's a contract. Making it illegal doesn't make the contract dangerous. And clearly not all crime is reported so the original post I made is still true and over a page later you still look like a stupid old fuck.
Bring a post that is not fallacy riddled or STFU.

A contract is not valid for an illegal act. FIrst year law school stuff. And it's all a part of the same picture. All the little drug dealers make the big guys possible. The fact that you don't like a law doesn't make it any less of a law. You defend losers. You are proud of your part in it. It's pathetic.

And true not all crimes are reported. If they were, the stats would even be higher than they are. Your point? That crime is even worse than reported? What a stumblefuck you are. If I gave a shit about your clients, I would feel sorry for them having you as their attorney. But I suspect you all deserve each other.

The idiot hotline is still open. Feel free to bare your soul. Again I ask the question: are you a believer? UFOs? Aliens? It's a broad topic. Where do you stand? Who abducted you? Where are you really from? How many arms do you have? Earthly common sense and mortal intelligence seem to elude your arguments at every turn. I think there's more to this picture than meets the eye.

I said making it illegal doesn't make it dangerous so of course I know it's void.
Why do you hate America so much? Are you really a commie or a nazi? If you want to live in a land of no attys move to china you stupid fuck.

As for crime stat, of course there is more crime than the stats say. Who said otherwise?
Bag on my clients all you want but most of the are 20 IQ points ahead of you?

Are you pushing this alien thing so hard because you are feeling guilty for raping 12 yo boys?

Martyred wrote:ML jock riding

Good show Marty. I'm sure he wouldn't mind if you sucked his cock too.

Moving Sale wrote:I said making it illegal doesn't make it dangerous so of course I know it's void.

Nice spin. The fact remains that illicit drug trade is very dangerous to those involved, as well as innocent bystanders. Like I already said, your pathetic little clients make all the big guys and their relentless carnage possible. The fact that you refuse to see this is revealing.

Why do you hate America so much? Are you really a commie or a nazi?

Not sure exactly where this came from. I say crime stats are relevent, and you say I hate America, i.e. I am a commie or a Nazi. Again, your logic is...well, what the hell exactly is it? Like something from another planet?

If you want to live in a land of no attys move to china you stupid fuck.

It's not attorneys I have a problem with. It's you specifically.

As for crime stat, of course there is more crime than the stats say. Who said otherwise?

You were making a point of it for some reason, as if this fact made the stats irrelevent. You seem to be having trouble following your own arguments.

Bag on my clients all you want but most of the are 20 IQ points ahead of you?

Is that a question? I think the answer is obvious.

Are you pushing this alien thing so hard because you are feeling guilty for raping 12 yo boys?

Why do you keep taking the fifth? A simple answer would put the matter to rest. Well, sort of.

Dammit, Spray...

...you're making me (a little) hungry!

:paul:

Was that pizza from...




...Little Caesars?

Martyred wrote:

sonofabitch!

Here's one that should satisfy Tubby McShitfetish:



Oh yeah, RACK Biggie.

I've never had a sig beneath my posts. This thread presents all sorts of terrific possibilities:

Moving Sale wrote:...you vapid cum pillow.

Moving Sale wrote:Find a mirror.

Moving Sale wrote:A lack of crime does not equal safer and more crime does not equal less safe.

Moving Sale wrote:...there are crimes with a victim but the 'victim' is never in danger.

Moving Sale wrote:...you brain dead pile of cum dust.

Moving Sale wrote:Have you stopped fucking the neighborhood boys?

Moving Sale wrote:I said selling a gram was not dangerous and it isn't. It's a contract.

Moving Sale wrote:Why do you hate America so much? Are you really a commie or a nazi?

Moving Sale wrote:Bag on my clients all you want but most of the are 20 IQ points ahead of you?

Do I have this sig idea down right? Any of these look better than the others? I'm open to suggestions.

Moving Bowels wrote:

I have only defended two people who were charged with child pron and both ended in dropped charges so I have never defended a child pornographer.

You missed this epic one.

ML@Coyote wrote:
It's not attorneys I have a problem with. It's you specifically.

You are a lying Piece of Dogcrap.

You said "You defend Losers." I defend people charged with a crime. You know like the time your Mom got busted with 150 pounds of crack? It was defense attorney that pointed out that it was asscrack and sprung her. Or the time you beat your blowup doll with a baseball bat, you remember that? It was defense attorney that pointed out that a blowup doll is not a real person and sprung you. Do I need to go on? Point is, if you don't like what I do you don't like a vital part of what makes America great. That makes you a Commie of some sort or at least an Anti-American. Either way Go fuck yourself you senile old man.

Moving Sale wrote: You know like the time your Mom got busted with 150 pounds of crack? It was defense attorney that pointed out that it was asscrack and sprung her.

Nice.

Moving Sale wrote:You are a lying Piece of Dogcrap.

You said "You defend Losers." I defend people charged with a crime. You know like the time your Mom got busted with 150 pounds of crack? It was defense attorney that pointed out that it was asscrack and sprung her. Or the time you beat your blowup doll with a baseball bat, you remember that? It was defense attorney that pointed out that a blowup doll is not a real person and sprung you. Do I need to go on? Point is, if you don't like what I do you don't like a vital part of what makes America great. That makes you a Commie of some sort or at least an Anti-American. Either way Go fuck yourself you senile old man.

I'm all for people charged with crimes getting a defense. I'm especially for the guilty ones getting defended by you. I wish every guilty person could get you as their attorney.

You could have just posted a pic of a white flag you old senile fuck.

This headline just in...