Sordid clambake
https://mail.theoneboard.com/board/
Thanks for clearing that up. We figured it was just another one of your bullshit euphemisms like gubmint.smackaholic wrote:FMLA=family medical leave act.
Left Seater wrote:
Fail. I don't like when you do something under the banner of freedom, but It encroaches on my freedom.
Feel "free" to jump off a soup can and kill yourself, you hydrocephalic dolt.Moving Sale wrote:...my freedom to drink and drive safely...
Not my fault that your stupidity is omni-directional.Moving Sale wrote:...my post was not directed at you...
You think freedom is stupid, I get it Commie.Martyred wrote:Not my fault that your stupidity is omni-directional.Moving Sale wrote:...my post was not directed at you...
Moving Sale wrote:Left Seater wrote:
Fail. I don't like when you do something under the banner of freedom, but It encroaches on my freedom.
First off DUI is not nearly as dangerous as most people think it is.
Second I don't want you encroaching on my freedom to drink and drive safely cause some idiot killed your old man.
And can you ever make a post about your life that doesn't reference how much $ you have? Were you scared by poverty or spoiled by privilege as a child?
M Club wrote:I personally thing drinking and driving should be an individual choice since the government has already over-regulated our lives, but then again I'm just a right-wing fringe lunatic so nevermind.
"We" know what it means. "You" don't...because you're a fucking idiot.Screw_Michigan wrote:Thanks for clearing that up. We figured it was just another one of your bullshit euphemisms like gubmint.smackaholic wrote:FMLA=family medical leave act.
Not that we need further confirmation that you are a complete fucking idiot, but this gets pretty close to sheer insanity. Brag about everybody you have "gotten" off, but everybody convicted deserves everything they get.Moving Sale wrote: First off DUI is not nearly as dangerous as most people think it is.
Second I don't want you encroaching on my freedom to drink and drive safely cause some idiot killed your old man.
fsmackaholic wrote:M Club wrote:I personally thing drinking and driving should be an individual choice since the government has already over-regulated our lives, but then again I'm just a right-wing fringe lunatic so nevermind.
:?
what exactly does that mean? Do you think it should be left up to people to decide whether or not they have had too much?
Some of us can make those decisions, some can't. i will agree that government goes way overboard with harassing people that have had just a little to drink, but this doesn't mean you should be allowed to get hammered and drive.
As for it being a matter of individual choice, I will admit that you should have the right to drive as hammered as you want.....on your own private road.
Funny how the drunk driving related deaths have decreased with the implementation of the .08 BAC.H4ever wrote:fsmackaholic wrote:M Club wrote:I personally thing drinking and driving should be an individual choice since the government has already over-regulated our lives, but then again I'm just a right-wing fringe lunatic so nevermind.
:?
what exactly does that mean? Do you think it should be left up to people to decide whether or not they have had too much?
Some of us can make those decisions, some can't. i will agree that government goes way overboard with harassing people that have had just a little to drink, but this doesn't mean you should be allowed to get hammered and drive.
As for it being a matter of individual choice, I will admit that you should have the right to drive as hammered as you want.....on your own private road.
DUI laws are so restrictive (and continuing to tighten due to political pressure), that they are fast becoming a form of prohibition. And we know how that shit worked out. Believe me, I do not condone drunk driving but people's tolerance levels are very different. Some people can drive straight as an arrow at .10 but will be jailed for driving in this condition.
Not disputing that more prohibitive and punitive laws have an impact on the numbers. I mean, by that rationale, why don't we start chopping people's cocks off if they drive within 5 working days since the last time they had a drink? The ladies could lose one tit to keep things fair here.Mace wrote:Funny how the drunk driving related deaths have decreased with the implementation of the .08 BAC.H4ever wrote:[
f
DUI laws are so restrictive (and continuing to tighten due to political pressure), that they are fast becoming a form of prohibition. And we know how that shit worked out. Believe me, I do not condone drunk driving but people's tolerance levels are very different. Some people can drive straight as an arrow at .10 but will be jailed for driving in this condition.
So you're saying there should be regulations to protect the general public? Move to Soviet Russia then, dumbfuck.smackaholic wrote:M Club wrote:I personally thing drinking and driving should be an individual choice since the government has already over-regulated our lives, but then again I'm just a right-wing fringe lunatic so nevermind.
:?
what exactly does that mean? Do you think it should be left up to people to decide whether or not they have had too much?
Some of us can make those decisions, some can't. i will agree that government goes way overboard with harassing people that have had just a little to drink, but this doesn't mean you should be allowed to get hammered and drive.
As for it being a matter of individual choice, I will admit that you should have the right to drive as hammered as you want.....on your own private road.
There should be regulation, but they should be minimal and based in common sense.M Club wrote:So you're saying there should be regulations to protect the general public? Move to Soviet Russia then, dumbfuck.smackaholic wrote:M Club wrote:I personally thing drinking and driving should be an individual choice since the government has already over-regulated our lives, but then again I'm just a right-wing fringe lunatic so nevermind.
:?
what exactly does that mean? Do you think it should be left up to people to decide whether or not they have had too much?
Some of us can make those decisions, some can't. i will agree that government goes way overboard with harassing people that have had just a little to drink, but this doesn't mean you should be allowed to get hammered and drive.
As for it being a matter of individual choice, I will admit that you should have the right to drive as hammered as you want.....on your own private road.
Or not driving after consuming alcoholic beverages.M Club wrote:Common sense would be to stay off the road during bar hours.
When someone eats themselves to death, they don't put anyone but themselves at risk. Not so with drunk driving.H4ever wrote:Not disputing that more prohibitive and punitive laws have an impact on the numbers. I mean, by that rationale, why don't we start chopping people's cocks off if they drive within 5 working days since the last time they had a drink? The ladies could lose one tit to keep things fair here.Mace wrote:Funny how the drunk driving related deaths have decreased with the implementation of the .08 BAC.H4ever wrote:[
f
DUI laws are so restrictive (and continuing to tighten due to political pressure), that they are fast becoming a form of prohibition. And we know how that shit worked out. Believe me, I do not condone drunk driving but people's tolerance levels are very different. Some people can drive straight as an arrow at .10 but will be jailed for driving in this condition.
The point is, it's becoming a form of prohibition. And if we wanna get serious about saving people's lives from irresponsible behavior, let's ban potato chips, doughnuts, and ho-hos to cut down the number of obesity-related deaths. Obesity kills...in a "big" way here in the United States. Let's save some lives. NPAFF? (normal people against fat fucks)
People getting sick more often due to overeating or any other bad habit don't price anyone out of the market. They get priced out by government meddling.M Club wrote:they do by getting sick all the time and pricing the skinny folk out of medical coverage. that and how much of their obesity is due to the 19 beers they just had at the corner bar before driving home?
Mah bad. I forgot there's only a single cause for just about everything.smackaholic wrote:People getting sick more often due to overeating or any other bad habit don't price anyone out of the market. They get priced out by government meddling.M Club wrote:they do by getting sick all the time and pricing the skinny folk out of medical coverage. that and how much of their obesity is due to the 19 beers they just had at the corner bar before driving home?
The whole idea of these things driving up costs is bullshit, because it doesn't take into account these folks reduced lifespans which is a huge help with the medicare/social security actuarial cliff we are headed to. The folks that are the problems are the health nuts who will suck on the SS teat for 30 years and then spend 3 years drooling on themselves in a rest home.
So, smoke'em if ya got'em and go ahead and have that extra twinkie. Do it for your country!
Nice white flag tard.Mace wrote:Or not driving after consuming alcoholic beverages.M Club wrote:Common sense would be to stay off the road during bar hours.
How would we know? There are NO DUI death stats. As for being 'bad' it's not morally bad so wtf are you talking about?Dinsdale wrote: Is DUI bad?
How many people died in drunk-driving related accidents over the weekend nationwide? 50? 100?.
What kind of jackbooted pos are you?Mace wrote:Kill someone when you're driving drunk? Go to jail AND pay accordingly.....to the tune of s $100,000 civil penalty in Iowa, plus all of the fines/costs/attorney fees. Yep, you're broke for the rest of your life, but you took another life, so tough shit.
Yes. You are an ignorant, vapid fuckbucket.Moving Sale wrote:Do you have a take goob42?
Yes.Moving Sale wrote:Got any proof old man?
And you fail again. How does it feel to be wrong so often?Moving Sale wrote: How would we know? There are NO DUI death stats.
Are you kidding? I entered 5,094 items into evidence.Moving Sale wrote:So you got nothing to back up your shit take, gotcha.
Nope, not at all.M Club wrote:Mah bad. I forgot there's only a single cause for just about everything.smackaholic wrote:People getting sick more often due to overeating or any other bad habit don't price anyone out of the market. They get priced out by government meddling.M Club wrote:they do by getting sick all the time and pricing the skinny folk out of medical coverage. that and how much of their obesity is due to the 19 beers they just had at the corner bar before driving home?
The whole idea of these things driving up costs is bullshit, because it doesn't take into account these folks reduced lifespans which is a huge help with the medicare/social security actuarial cliff we are headed to. The folks that are the problems are the health nuts who will suck on the SS teat for 30 years and then spend 3 years drooling on themselves in a rest home.
So, smoke'em if ya got'em and go ahead and have that extra twinkie. Do it for your country!