T1B

You are a cock loving racist fuck who can't read a poll.
Try and pull your head out of your ass before you post again.

TiVO, are you as fukking incoherent in the courtroom as you are in a thread?

Congress needs to tell Petraeus to get his ass to DC yesterday. He can "get his life together" in his spare time. I wonder how the people that lost fathers or husbands during that clusterfukk in benghazi are doing getting their lives together?

Nah, nothing to see here... move along.

Maybe Himmler and Goebbels should have used that one at Nuremberg -- "Sorry, I can't testify -- I'm a little busy getting my life together. Plus, it might make Der Feuhrer look bad, so I'm all good on that testifying thing."

And apparently, some of you clowns actually voted for The Most Transparent Administration In History.

Actually, they are pretty transparent -- truth and ethics don't matter.

Petraeus had this bimbo flown around the world on multiple occasions all on taxpayers dimes. Where are you hawkish small government types now? Why aren't you outraged?

Papa Willie wrote:
fucking around on wives is something you fags get off on more than life itself!

Jealous?

:P

Screw_Michigan wrote:Petraeus had this bimbo flown around the world on multiple occasions all on taxpayers dimes. Where are you hawkish small government types now? Why aren't you outraged?

I didn't realize a dislike of government waste was a partisan issue.

Papa Willie wrote: And Stanfart is NOT #5.

No, but they should be.

Papa Willie wrote: Kinda like Clinton? Why aren't you libs licking his cock? I mean - fucking around on wives is something you fags get off on more than life itself!

Uh, no. Not even close.

Go ahead and tend back to your trough at Sizzler.

smackaholic wrote: Congress needs to tell Petraeus to get his ass to DC yesterday. He can "get his life together" in his spare time. I wonder how the people that lost fathers or husbands during that clusterfukk in benghazi are doing getting their lives together?

Do you suck as bad at gardening as you do at posting? All I said was he can't rotate back if he is no longer in the military and that mvskkkal is a racist. Care to take issue with either of those propositions?

Dinsdale wrote:
Maybe Himmler and Goebbels should have used that one at Nuremberg -- "Sorry, I can't testify -- I'm a little busy getting my life together. Plus, it might make Der Feuhrer look bad, so I'm all good on that testifying thing."

Any other shit analogies you would like to float you yellow bellied, inbred fuckhole?

Moving Sale wrote: All I said was he can't rotate back if he is no longer in the military and that mvskkkal is a racist. Care to take issue with either of those propositions?

You can't read for comprehension either and you're flat fucking wrong about him not being able to "rotate back" (whatever the fuck you think that means).

If he committed an actionable offense while he was on active duty, he can be activated from the retired reserve and be subjected to disciplinary proceedings under the UCMJ. Not likely in his case, but possible under the law. Lieutenant General and General are temporary ranks only. Typically they are allowed to retire in grade but, if their performance is unsat, they may be forced to retire at their permanent rank of Major General.

You might want to shut the fuck up now since you clearly don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Papa Willie wrote:

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Papa Willie wrote: Kinda like Clinton? Why aren't you libs licking his cock? I mean - fucking around on wives is something you fags get off on more than life itself!

Uh, no. Not even close.

Go ahead and tend back to your trough at Sizzler.

First rule of a lib - "GOT to fuck around on the wife - it's what Clinton & MLK Jr. did. That makes it cool!"

First rule of a conservative - "GOT to fuck around on the wife - with another guy. That's what resonates with our base!"

Moving Sale wrote:All I said was he can't rotate back if he is no longer in the military.

Care to share why you think this is relevant?

.
.
.

More bottom feeders getting over on Mewing Fail.

mvscal wrote:
If he committed an actionable offense while he was on active duty, he can be activated from the retired reserve and be subjected to disciplinary proceedings under the UCMJ. Not likely in his case, but possible under the law. Lieutenant General and General are temporary ranks only. Typically they are allowed to retire in grade but, if their performance is unsat, they may be forced to retire at their permanent rank of Major General.

You might want to shut the fuck up now since you clearly don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

So what you are saying is that his situation is different than active duty personal being asked to go back to
afghanistan which is what I said in my first post. Anything else you would like to bitch about for no reason you valid racist cock stroking cumstain?

Ucantreadverywell,
Stick to shit you know something about like lubing up your lift and steam partners.

I don't know, Sam. Might be that mvscal actually is a valid racist cock stroking cumstain.

Not on my iphone I dont you old pissy redneck.

You are both so take your pick you flat headed fuck.

Moving Sale wrote:You are both so take your pick you flat headed fuck.

The midget got a take out without the auto correct making him sound smarter than he really is.

Moving Sale wrote:So what you are saying is that his situation is different than active duty personal being asked to go back to afghanistan which is what I said in my first post.

Still failing at reading comprehension, spelling, syntax and just about every other aspect of the English language. No real surprise.

His situation is irrelevant to the weakness of his excuse for not testifying.

Goober McTuber wrote:I don't know, Sam. Might be that mvscal actually is a valid racist cock stroking cumstain.

No need to get personnel.

mvscal wrote: His situation is irrelevant to the weakness of his excuse for not testifying.

Then why did you compare his situation to someone who might be being told to go back to Afghanistan if it's not relevant you black cock sucking racist fucksofa?

Moving Sale wrote:Then why did you compare his situation to someone who might be being told to go back to Afghanistan

Because, as CENTCOM commander, he deployed thousands of soldiers, airmen, Marines and sailors into combat without regard to their personal situations. I'm sure they would have liked to defer that unwelcome task while they took time to "put their lives back together."

It means that Petreaus is a hypocritical pussy who is too fucking chickenshit to man up and face the music. Is that clear enough for you?

Now fuck off.

Moving Sale wrote:Icantreadverywell.

I am sure this is what you intended to post and "your phone" fucked up yet another flail. You do realize you can disable the autocorrect feature, right?


Still waiting for you to explain the relevance.

Moving Bowels wrote: Any other shit analogies you would like to float you yellow bellied, inbred fuckhole?

Moving Bowels School of Smack....

1. Take the word " fuck", then just add random words to it to create your latest insult i.e.:

Fuckhole
Fuckpop
Fucksofa
Fuck?????? Anyone ??

Then go ahead and drop a mountain man insult "yellow bellied" in there for extra impact ..

Moving Bowels wrote:

mvscal wrote: His situation is irrelevant to the weakness of his excuse for not testifying.

Then why did you compare his situation to someone who might be being told to go back to Afghanistan if it's not relevant you black cock sucking racist fucksofa?

Clear this manner of English up here for us tardling please:

Are you saying mvscal is black and sucks cock, or or you saying he sucks black cock ? Your meaning is getting lost here asshole..

And just what the fuck is a "fucksofa"?

Derron wrote:
Are you saying mvscal is black and sucks cock, or or you saying he sucks black cock ? Your meaning is getting lost here asshole..

You sure are asking a lot of auto-correct if you want this cleared up.

Papa Willie wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

Papa Willie wrote:
First rule of a lib - "GOT to fuck around on the wife - it's what Clinton & MLK Jr. did. That makes it cool!"

First rule of a conservative - "GOT to fuck around on the wife - with another guy. That's what resonates with our base!"

You're the one wearing my sig. :P

Which only reinforces my point, you stupid fat fuck.

mvscal wrote:
Because, as CENTCOM commander, he deployed thousands of soldiers, airmen, Marines and sailors into combat without regard to their personal situations. I'm sure they would have liked to defer that unwelcome task while they took time to "put their lives back".

So it is relevant. Make up your mind yet? I know it is hard for you to decide if you are going to take black cock in your ass or mouth but when posting could you please make up your mind before you pound your cum stained fingers on the keyboard so you won't waste my time again? Thanks.

Ucantsmack,
Would you like to try something better than ftfy in your next post so you don't sound so stupid? Thanks.

Papa Willie wrote:

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Papa Willie wrote: Kinda like Clinton? Why aren't you libs licking his cock? I mean - fucking around on wives is something you fags get off on more than life itself!

Uh, no. Not even close.

Go ahead and tend back to your trough at Sizzler.

First rule of a lib - "GOT to fuck around on the wife - it's what Clinton & MLK Jr. did. That makes it cool!"

Newt Gingrich says you're an idiot.

Derron wrote: And just what the fuck is a "fucksofa"?

Grand strategy, apparently. It's a new term, like mines are IED's.

Mewing Flail wrote:Icantsmack,
Would you like to try something better than ftfy in your next post so you don't sound so stupid? Thanks.

Speaking of stupid, which one of us needs the auto-correct feature enabled to ensure his posts don't have any spelling errors? Which one of us then blames the auto-correct feature for his failures as a poster?

Feel free to answer my question. Or continue to wave your little white flag. You decide.

Diego in Seattle wrote:Newt Gingrich says you're an idiot.

Yeah, you're right. Newt is the right wing hero. It's a shame he didn't run last time as he would have made mincemeat out of Barry in the debates.

Wait, that's right, he did run and failed miserably, because character actuallty does matter to some of us knuckledraggers on the right.

It really is a shame though. Given the ammo he had, the debates would have been a complete bloodbath. Not sure if it would have pulled and libs up off of Barry's lap, but, it would have been fun to watch.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:

Mewing Flail wrote:Icantsmack,
Would you like to try something better than ftfy in your next post so you don't sound so stupid? Thanks.

Speaking of stupid, which one of us needs the auto-correct feature enabled to ensure his posts don't have any spelling errors? Which one of us then blames the auto-correct feature for his failures as a poster?

Feel free to answer my question. Or continue to wave your little white flag. You decide.

So far you have dropped IKYABWAI, ftfy and auto-correct smack. Stick to lifting and steaming as you seem to be way better at that than you are at posting.

You forgot "you're a shit fucking poster who's incapable of backing up her own worthless take" smack.


-- Posted from my iPhone sans any auto-correct fuck-ups. Bitch.

smackaholic wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote:Newt Gingrich says you're an idiot.

Yeah, you're right. Newt is the right wing hero. It's a shame he didn't run last time as he would have made mincemeat out of Barry in the debates.

Wait, that's right, he did run and failed miserably, because character actuallty does matter to some of us knuckledraggers on the right.

The party of Nixon says what?

Diego in Seattle wrote:The party of Nixon says what?

How many people died in Watergate?

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:
-- Posted from my iPhone sans any auto-correct fuck-ups. Bitch.

As I have many times you petty trifling fuck.

mvscal wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote:The party of Nixon says what?

How many people died in Watergate?

About 9000 less than from Bush's lies and incompetence.

Moving Sale wrote:As I have many times you petty trifling fuck.

Link?

Then why mention the iPhone at all? You were trying to blame your shortcomings on the technology you used. Newflash, dipshit: you're a bottom feeder regardless of how you log-in to this site.

And you're a shit fucking poster who's incapable of backing up her own worthless take. Care to take a stab at the simple fucking question posed to you? Bitch.

Diego in Seattle wrote:

smackaholic wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote:Newt Gingrich says you're an idiot.

Yeah, you're right. Newt is the right wing hero. It's a shame he didn't run last time as he would have made mincemeat out of Barry in the debates.

Wait, that's right, he did run and failed miserably, because character actuallty does matter to some of us knuckledraggers on the right.

The party of Nixon says what?

Further proof of my point, thanks.

When republicans do stupid/illegal shit, they get run. When dems do it, we get what we are getting now, excuses or just flat out ignoring.