T1B

smackaholic wrote:
yeah, you are right, bob. if he didn't have a firearm, there is no way a grown ass man, make that grown ass nfl football player could possibly kill her just as dead. I mean..a coffee mug

But...could he have killed himself with the coffee mug? Doubt it. Perhaps by smashing the mug and slashing his neck with a shard, but this takes a special kind of beryllium courage not seen since the taking of Iwo Jima. No, you're wrong and Costas is correct. The NRA is every bit as sleazy and disgusting as the AIPAC contagion. Of course serious gun control is in order in this country. Just look at the morons opposing it.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:
But...could he have killed himself with the coffee mug? Doubt it.

That's the counterpoint you want to cling to? That the murderer could've lived?

Good luck with that.

Well, Jack, I think it stands to reason that if he wasn't about to kill himself with the shard, he wouldn't have pummeled her all the way unto death. Of course you're an inane twerp whose wit resembles a used condom. Go ahead, put this in your sig

R-Jack ...the used condom of the palsied One-Board...

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Well, Jack, I think it stands to reason that if he wasn't about to kill himself with the shard, he wouldn't have pummeled her all the way unto death.

Yeah, because putting 9 bullets into the victim means he wasn't sure about the murder and his heart wasn't really into it.

The point here, moron, is he definitely would have killed her one way or another. Whether is was with a bat, a golf club, a tire iron... whatever.

Who cares if he then would have offed himself?

LTS TRN 2 wrote:But...could he have killed himself with the coffee mug? Doubt it. Perhaps by smashing the mug and slashing his neck with a shard, but this takes a special kind of beryllium courage not seen since the taking of Iwo Jima.

Yes, of course. Nobody ever kills themselves with sharp implements. Completely unheard of...



When you have reached that point in your life, that "special kind of beryllium courage" is what is required to keep going and face the music. Offing your shit self is the easy way out.

Of course serious gun control is in order in this country.

I can't see any good reason to deprive people of their primary means of self-defense. It would make more sense to implement "serious violent criminal control" to me. Which is, of course, the primary intent of the 2nd Amendment in the first place.

Just look at the morons opposing it.

Everyone who supports the Constitution is a moron?

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed

Deal with it, bitch.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Well, Jack, I think it stands to reason that if he wasn't about to kill himself with the shard, he wouldn't have pummeled her all the way unto death. Of course you're an inane twerp whose wit resembles a used condom. Go ahead, put this in your sig

R-Jack ...the used condom of the palsied One-Board...

This is quite possibly the stupidest post in the history of the interwebs.

So, what your saying is that basically, her death was an accident? He emptied a clip into her just to scare her a bit, but, she accidentally died.

If he had just used a baseball bat or kitchen knife he would have just roughed her up a bit and shed be fine.

I thought this might be appropriate for the discussion....

Your chance of being murdered in this country is about .0038, so minuscle it's not even worth considering. I imagine if you stay out of gangs or deal in drugs it drops far less. If you want some cause to get your cooch wet take on drunk driving.

But I forget, the lawyer class finds killing people while drunk behind the wheel of a car acceptable-probably because it yields them a shit pot full of money.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Well, Jack, I think it stands to reason that if he wasn't about to kill himself with the shard, he wouldn't have pummeled her all the way unto death.

Yeah, because putting 9 bullets into the victim means he wasn't sure about the murder and his heart wasn't really into it.

The point here, moron, is he definitely would have killed her one way or another. Whether is was with a bat, a golf club, a tire iron... whatever.

Who cares if he then would have offed himself?

You're close but still blindered. Without the ready gun at hand....yes, he'd show her his hand. Yes, he'd pull his belt slowly and crack it as he strode near. Yes, he'd lay into her her whimpering soft flesh, calling nickel package switch patterns as he sacked her good and proper. But then as the morning spun its welcome he'd recline, relax and think about the game and all the X's and O's of the coming afternoon. But, because the NRA is the bottom bitch of the Military Industrial Complex, and because every Bentley driving gentleman packs a Glock (of course) this otherwise purpled passion Sunday morning coffee apology got exponentially blown out. No gun, no murder.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:
No gun, no murder.

No guns would exponentially lower the chances that someone might shoot you or that you would someday off yourself....


Not In.

Sirfindafold wrote:One limp dick liberal racking another limp dick liberal's meltage.

birds of a feather......

Sirfuckingfool, don't you have about 2,000 or so of these...

...to c&p instead?

Just stick to what you do best. Nothing.

How come Costas didn’t get up his soapbox last Sunday night and decry our drunk driving culture?

Papa Willie wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:How come Costas didn’t get up his soapbox last Sunday night and decry our drunk driving culture?

Because he's a short, faggot little fuck?

Is he also a lawyer?