T1B

mvscal wrote:Saddam was not in compliance with the inspections program.

No one is in compliance with anything.

You can cherry-pick any country you want to turn into dust tomorrow by massaging an inflated casus belli.




I'm sure Equatorial Guinea isn't in "compliance" with something or other.

mvscal wrote:
Have you had you head stuck up your ass for the last nine years? That was the entire reason for the war. Saddam was not in compliance with the inspections program. All we knew for sure is that he was hiding something. Why else would stonewall on the inspections? It was decided that he needed to come clean or get removed by force.

There isn't any "revisionist" history right there.

How about this, can you get back on task and tell us why you hate Norman Schwarzkopf in a nice, tidy, un-convoluted, non coma inducing few sentences? Because thus far, you just look like an uninformed, dumb ass, malcontent.

And don't post any links to other people's thoughts. TIA.

Martyred wrote:I'm sure Equatorial Guinea isn't in "compliance" with something or other.

Is "Equatorial Guinea" not in compliance with numerous Chapter 7 resolutions with military force authorized for non-compliance? A quick yes or no should suffice.

mvscal wrote:...Chapter 7 resolutions...

Martyred wrote:massaging an inflated casus belli.

Maybe they're guilty of putting styrofoam in their recycling bins too...




Can't wait until Lady Gaga sings the national anthem at the Super Bowl while F-16's scream overhead...

Maybe the fake state wanted him out because they really needed a big ol' distraction from their trenchant agenda. Of course it started with the Zionazis pulling off the New Pearl Harbor, and the hysterical rush to invade Iraq was business as usual. Just think, the whole wretched mess is nothing more than a bunch of Russian gangsters manipulating a culture of Christer morons.

(make sure this runs every Easter)....and so the word went forth...