T1B

Papa Willie wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

Papa Willie wrote:Pussies.

Who you talking to, tubby? Most of us don't have 12 inches of blubber to keep us warm.

Most of us don't have 12 inches of cock pounding them in the ass to keep us warm like you do, Mr. Skinny.

Interesting fantasy. How many inches of cock do you have pounding you in the ass?

Should call this thread "The KC Vortex." It's sucking everyone in.

Dinsdale wrote:Should call this thread "The KC Vortex." It's sucking everyone in.

Quite true. In fact, you could say that the IKYABWAI Force is strong in this thread...heh heh!

sin,


The patron saint of KC

Dinsdale wrote:Should call this thread "The KC Vortex." It's sucking everyone in.

I'm not going anywhere near this one...

Papa Willie wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:
Interesting fantasy. How many inches of cock do you have pounding you in the ass?

You're better than IKYABWAI shit, dude. Come on.

I guess I misunderstood. When you said "Most of us don't have 12 inches of cock pounding them in the ass", I thought you were complaining that you had less than 12 inches of cock pounding you in the ass. My bad.

Just eject, dude.... you're making it worse.

That's what I'm here for. To make things worse, I mean.

Dinsdale wrote:Just eject, dude.... you're making it worse.

No, YOU'RE making it worse.

OH NOES!!!!




I've been sucked into the IKYABWAI Vortex...

...the light! Must stay away from the light!

Papa Willie wrote:

BTW: This "Polar Vortex" (yet another term the liberal media has attached itself to to create further alarm among the green faggots) has been around forever.

Funny, I thought it was being used as a pathetic talking point by the knuckledraggers to convince everybody that global warming is a myth.

Papa Willie wrote:
BTW: This "Polar Vortex" (yet another term the liberal media has attached itself to to create further alarm among the green faggots) has been around forever.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1 ... 5/abstract

the polar vortex was first described in the mid 1850's, but have been around much longer than that....a weak polar vortex drives colder temperatures

here's a scientific journal article describing the relationship of a weakened polar vortex to colder air
in the northern hemisphere

http://www.academia.edu/223963/The_asso ... hemisphere

that article was published in april of 2010 in the Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

warning: this is a scientific article and utilizes lots of big words......

Somehow through all of this, Portland was dubbed the Gortex Vortex.

Nice.

KC Scott wrote:Sam & Spray - how is global warming working out for y'all down there?

Implying that cold weather somehow disproves climate change might be funny if it was at all original any more.

Damn it Scott, you forgot about the cows! It's all of those gas blasting bovines that is causing the shift!

Wakey wake!

Mikey wrote:Implying that cold weather somehow disproves climate change might be funny if it was at all original any more.

Implying that cold weather somehow proves climate change might be funny if it was at all original anymore.

Tit/tat.

schmick wrote:the jealousy kills you but hopefully you freeze to death first

He might, he admittedly has lost a lot of weight.

Truman wrote:

Mikey wrote:Implying that cold weather somehow disproves climate change might be funny if it was at all original any more.

Implying that cold weather somehow proves climate change might be funny if it was at all original anymore.

Tit/tat.

Go to love IKYABWAI in its pure, uncut KC form.

Truman wrote:

Mikey wrote:Implying that cold weather somehow disproves climate change might be funny if it was at all original any more.

Implying that cold weather somehow proves climate change might be funny if it was at all original anymore.

Tit/tat.

I never said it proved anything.

More like tit/tit

Nice try, KC Tru.

If I ever open another thread where the word "tit" is used this many times without pics, I'm gonna puch somebody.

BSmack wrote:

Truman wrote:

Mikey wrote:Implying that cold weather somehow disproves climate change might be funny if it was at all original any more.

Implying that cold weather somehow proves climate change might be funny if it was at all original anymore.

Tit/tat.

Go to love IKYABWAI in its pure, uncut KC form.

How do you figure? Or is failure to read with any comprehension the new Rochester meme?

Mikey wrote:

Truman wrote:

Mikey wrote:Implying that cold weather somehow disproves climate change might be funny if it was at all original any more.

Implying that cold weather somehow proves climate change might be funny if it was at all original anymore.

Tit/tat.

I never said it proved anything.

More like tit/tit

Nice try, KC Tru.

Funny, I never said you said it proved anything. You directed, I believe, your reply to Scott. I simply pointed out that the opposite ('sup B) of your comment was true as well.

So the antithesis of a statement has now morphed into neener-neener? Ponderous. I suppose that's how Global Warming became Climate Change...

Python wrote:If I ever open another thread where the word "tit" is used this many times without pics, I'm gonna puch somebody.

would you prefer "teat"?

Sudden Sam wrote:

Sin,

Atlanta and Birmingham

You forgot:

Richmond
Charlotte
Baton Rouge (my personal fav)
Memphis
Little Rock

and a host of others, basically anything south of the Mason-Dixon line.

Sudden Sam wrote:

Sin,

Atlanta and Birmingham