Re: Dumber than Sarah Palin:
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2014 11:12 pm
I already answered your question, you cum-drunk faggot.
Felix asked what you would do as POTUS, or what Obama should do. The only thing you could vomit was:mvscal wrote:A question was asked. It was answered a suggestion of where to start.
You didn't answer the first portion, and you punted with the latter half. I'm sure you'd have Putin quaking in his boots by not saying anything.mvscat wrote:Try not embarrass the nation with your stupidity, trite slogans and empty threats.
Bath House Barry, the Kenyan Faggot, is more apt to look Putin in the belly button with his purple lips wrapped around a Russian rocket and getting a sense of his load.Mikey wrote:He should look Putin in the eye so he can get a sense of his soul.
Moving Sale wrote:And could you also remind us of how deep you sucked Bushs cock prior to his two failed Wars?
Go fuck a porcupine you stupid cum filled doughnut. He was on the WMD bandwagon from day one. He pimped the invasion of both countries until they looked hopeless and then he jumped ship like the rat he is. Now go suck a dick you vapid piece of felched milquetoast.Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:
Gotta be honest. mv was one of the first to hop on the Bush Curb-Stomp Express.
That worked so well in Vietnam.smackaholic wrote:Most everyone was on the bandwagon early on. Where bush fukked up was in thinking he could do it without the Iraqi army. If he had played cards with the existing Iraqi military leadership, that entire thing would have gone much smoother and a surge would not have been necessary. Of course, Barry has fukked it all away by pulling out completely. As for Afghanistan, we should have either stayed the fukk out or made it clear we were there for the long run and would call the shots for as long as it took. The moment Karzi gave us the slightest bit of lip, we should have whacked him and replaced him with another puppet. Rinse, repeat as necessary. Of course, it wouldn't be necessary more than a time or 3.
I supported both actual wars. I was never on board with the nation building plan in Afghanistan. I thought we should have nuked Tora Bora and then left. I also said Petraeus' gameplan would fail spectacularly...and it did.Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:Didn't happen. Gotta be honest. mv was one of the first to hop on the Bush Curb-Stomp Express.Moving Sale wrote:And could you also remind us of how deep you sucked Bushs cock prior to his two failed Wars?
that is not why we failed in vietnam. we failed mostly because we fought it with one hand tied behind our back and blindfolded.BSmack wrote:That worked so well in Vietnam.smackaholic wrote:Most everyone was on the bandwagon early on. Where bush fukked up was in thinking he could do it without the Iraqi army. If he had played cards with the existing Iraqi military leadership, that entire thing would have gone much smoother and a surge would not have been necessary. Of course, Barry has fukked it all away by pulling out completely. As for Afghanistan, we should have either stayed the fukk out or made it clear we were there for the long run and would call the shots for as long as it took. The moment Karzi gave us the slightest bit of lip, we should have whacked him and replaced him with another puppet. Rinse, repeat as necessary. Of course, it wouldn't be necessary more than a time or 3.
Wouldn't that be "Now go vapidly fuck a moose," or "Now go fuck a vapid moose."Moving Sale wrote:Now go fuck a moose.
The point was that whacking Diem did nothing to alter the rules of engagement. Just as whacking Karzai would not have stopped Pakistan from giving aid and comfort to our enemies.smackaholic wrote:that is not why we failed in vietnam. we failed mostly because we fought it with one hand tied behind our back and blindfolded.
Go suck a black cock you vapid no take having mogoloid.FLW Buckeye wrote:Wouldn't that be "Now go vapidly fuck a moose," or "Now go fuck a vapid moose."Moving Sale wrote:Now go fuck a moose.
Grammar nazi judges- could we please get a ruling?
No, just having the right puppet in place is not enough, but, it is a good start. If you are going to go to war, your fukking pimp hand needs to be in top form tactically, strategically and politically.BSmack wrote:The point was that whacking Diem did nothing to alter the rules of engagement. Just as whacking Karzai would not have stopped Pakistan from giving aid and comfort to our enemies.smackaholic wrote:that is not why we failed in vietnam. we failed mostly because we fought it with one hand tied behind our back and blindfolded.
We also didn't have another country giving aid and comfort to our enemies with few, if any repercussions. Talk about not having your pimp hand together, bin Laden was hiding out in Pakistan's West Point and shit all was done about it by the Pakistani government.smackaholic wrote:What we have there now is something akin to Germany 1947, uprisings all over and a nazi running the show. We did not have such a situation because back then, our leaders had balls and brains. We did have former nazis taking care of shit so long as they did exactly what we told them.
Other than the Soviets and Red Chinese?BSmack wrote:We also didn't have another country giving aid and comfort to our enemies with few, if any repercussions.
In 1947 Germany? I think not.mvscal wrote:Other than the Soviets and Red Chinese?BSmack wrote:We also didn't have another country giving aid and comfort to our enemies with few, if any repercussions.
In 1947 the Soviets sure the fukk were meddling with germany. they outright owned one side and would have loved to fukk with us in the other. But, a I said before our pimp hand was still quite functional from the workout it had just been through. Of course, the fact that the german people were civilized made dealing with them a bit easier than the savages in 'stan.BSmack wrote:In 1947 Germany? I think not.mvscal wrote:Other than the Soviets and Red Chinese?BSmack wrote:We also didn't have another country giving aid and comfort to our enemies with few, if any repercussions.
Yeah...civilised...smackaholic wrote:Of course, the fact that the german people were civilized...
Nice dodge pansy.Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:The Soviets were "meddling"?
I'd say the Germans got off easy, if you ask me.
Yeah...civilised...smackaholic wrote:Of course, the fact that the german people were civilized...
So the Berlin Blockade in 1948 just happened out of thin air? No lead up or anything? Is that how it went down?BSmack wrote:In 1947 Germany? I think not.mvscal wrote:Other than the Soviets and Red Chinese?BSmack wrote:We also didn't have another country giving aid and comfort to our enemies with few, if any repercussions.
You're completely full of shit. Please feel free to name on instance where the Soviets gave aid and comfort to members of the former 3rd Riech working against Allied Occupiers. Just one.mvscal wrote:So the Berlin Blockade in 1948 just happened out of thin air? No lead up or anything? Is that how it went down?BSmack wrote:In 1947 Germany? I think not.
Those guys were in custody and not fighting against the western Allies.
FTFYPapa Willie wrote:5. Don't argue cum-drinking or {coin-operated} washers & dryers with Screwy.Screw_Michigan wrote:4. Don't argue weight gain with shutyomouth.
No, they weren't. They were working for the Stasi or can you not read?BSmack wrote:Those guys were in custody and not fighting against the western Allies.
"The Stasi deliberately and systematically recruited Nazi criminals, sometimes those who orchestrated massacres, as informers and agents both in the east and the west," Leide said.
IKYABWAI?Papa Willie wrote:5. Don't argue cum-drinking or washers & dryers with Screwy.Screw_Michigan wrote:4. Don't argue weight gain with shutyomouth.