Page 2 of 2

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 8:13 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Moving Sale wrote:Decriminalization means you can still get a ticket. Legalization means you can't even get a ticket for it. YOU are missing the distinction between decriminalizing weed and only decriminalizing possession of less than a certain amount of weed, but then you are an idiot so it's understandable.

I think everyone on the planet understands the meaning of decriminilisation in the framework of this discussion, as it refers to amounts that lend to the definition of possession and not to amounts that would be interpreted as "intent to traffic".

Everyone...except you, apparently.

Because you need to fabricate the context of decriminilisation into a sharp, pointy stick...to fend off wolves or something.


Keep tilting at tiny windmills, Mini Quixote.

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 8:14 pm
by BSmack
Moving Sale wrote:Decriminalization means you can still get a ticket.
Yes, for small amounts.

http://norml.org/aboutmarijuana/item/st ... iminalized
NORML wrote:The following states have passed laws decriminalizing marijuana. Typically, decriminalization means no prison time or criminal record for first-time possession of a small amount for personal consumption. The conduct is treated like a minor traffic violation.
I would expect a lawyer to understand this. Then again, you're hardly a "real" lawyer. You're more like the lawyer a jizz mopper would refer to one of his "clients."

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 8:19 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
BSmack wrote:You're more like the lawyer a jizz mopper would refer to one of his "clients."
Image


Image

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 8:26 pm
by Moving Sale
Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:
Everyone...except you, apparently.
And every dictionary. So I can listen to a dim sheeple from north Mexico or dictionary writers. Go fuck a moose you stupid bland piece of boring shit.

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 8:31 pm
by Moving Sale
BSmack wrote: I would expect a lawyer to understand this.
I understand that you are as dumb as the idiot who wrote that blurb. So I can listen to some NORMAL blurb or dictionary writers. Go suck off a rabid skunk you stupid lemming.

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 9:08 pm
by mvscal
No real surprise to see Shorty riding the plunger pony once again.

Poor lil fella.

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 9:15 pm
by Smackie Chan
Moving Sale wrote:Use the wrong words enough and they become right. Is that your take you stupid fucking turd?
That was the argument you tried to employ when defending your incorrect use of swarthy.
Decriminalization means you can still get a ticket. Legalization means you can't even get a ticket for it. YOU are missing the distinction between decriminalizing weed and only decriminalizing possession of less than a certain amount of weed
So you're saying decriminalized is not the right word to use when describing the legal status of marijuana possession in Oregon and elsewhere. What would you suggest is the right word?

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 9:16 pm
by Moving Sale
Except every dictionary definition backs me up. Why do you want to lick their balls so bad?

Edit: this is meant for Ofailure not SC.

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 9:34 pm
by Moving Sale
I think I said swarthy's pejorative meaning was in addition to it's definition. I don't think I said it meant something different like "white skinned" or some such BS like dims and his anal horde are trying to do.

There is no one word that I know of for what Oregon did in 1973. There might be one in German but in English you would have to not be a lazy fuck and, god forbid, use a whole phrase.

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 9:37 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
I don't care if you find this funny, but...


Image

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 9:49 pm
by Moving Sale
It's not only not funny it says a lot about what a stupid vapid jock riding fuckstain you are. I'm right and you just CAN'T admit it and that is sad. Sad for you, sad for north Mexico and sad for gray matter everywhere. Get over yourself. Get your shit together and post something less bland than a Matzo ball or at least be factually correct.

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 10:20 pm
by BSmack
Moving Sale wrote:Image

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 10:28 pm
by Moving Sale
Nice white flag asshat.

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 1:13 am
by Moving Sale
You are a fat stupid shit. We get it.

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:06 am
by Moving Sale
Sudden Sam wrote:MS, have you ever even considered admitting you've made a mistake?

Or that you were wrong?
Just the other day I fucked up a post to dims where I misquoted him somehow. I told him I didn't know how I fucked it thus implying that I did indeed fuck it up. Does that count?

Are you implying decriminalization means something other than what I have said it means?

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 3:40 am
by poptart
FACT is, Oregon did decriminalize weed, just as Dinsdale said.

If Moving Flail wanted to debate him, he needed to ask, "Yes, but are you saying they decriminalized weed in ALL quantities?"
And he could hope that Dinsdale would shoot himself in the foot by saying, "Yes, all quantities."
Less than .01% chance Dins would have said that, however, because he surely knows better.

But Moving Flail he didn't ask him to qualify.
He instead came roaring in like a bull in a china shop, declaring, "Oregon did not decriminalize weed in 1973 or any other year."

He was wrong.
Weed WAS decriminalized in Oregon.

Period.
Full stop.


Two pages of M. Flail twisting and humiliating himself further -----> in futile effort to rationalize his failure.

:lol:

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 3:54 am
by Mikey
Moving Sale wrote:

If pot has been decriminalized in Oregon how did a client of mine do time for having 20lbs?
Criminal stupidity.

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 4:02 am
by Moving Sale
Mikey wrote:
Moving Sale wrote:

If pot has been decriminalized in Oregon how did a client of mine do time for having 20lbs?
Criminal stupidity.
Do explain.

Puptent,
I specifically prefaced my point by saying that dims dropping spelling and comma smack and then being fast and loose with the facts was BS. That was the point two pages ago and it's still the point. The Fact that Oregon did not decriminalize pot in 1973 is merely a side note.

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 4:46 am
by poptart
You're lying.

If Oregon did not decriminalize marijuana, how is it that people are caught with weed ----> and yet face no criminal prosecution?

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 6:08 am
by Moving Sale
poptart wrote:You're lying.

If Oregon did not decriminalize marijuana, how is it that people are caught with weed ----> and yet face no criminal prosecution?
Some do some don't. If it was decriminalized nobody would face more than a ticket. Lights yet?

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 8:58 am
by poptart
Moving Bowel wrote:If it was decriminalized nobody would face more than a ticket. Lights yet?
Uhh... no.
You're lying.
You're wrong, and you know it.

People who TRAFFIC marijuana, or have intent to TRAFFIC marijuana, face criminal charges.
People who just possess it, for personal use, do not.

What that means is that it has been decriminalized in Oregon, by the definition which EVERYONE long ago understood.


You should have never entered this thread.


Go into Read Only mode for a long while, failure.

Your act is worn the hell out.

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 1:59 pm
by Moving Sale
Bullshit. People who have more than an oz face criminal charges. That's not decriminalized. My "act" is being right. You are an idiot if you think being right is worn out.

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:21 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Moving Sale wrote:Bullshit. People who have more than an oz face criminal charges. That's not decriminalized.
You honestly do not know the difference between decriminalization vs legalization as it pertains specifically to marijuana...and people actually pay you real money to represent them? :shock:

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:21 pm
by Moving Sale
SS,
I have answered the question more than once but I will do it again, I talked to his Oregon atty and she seemed to have her shit together.

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:25 pm
by Moving Sale
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
Moving Sale wrote:Bullshit. People who have more than an oz face criminal charges. That's not decriminalized.
You honestly do not know the difference between decriminalization vs legalization as it pertains specifically to marijuana...and people actually pay you real money to represent them? :shock:
Actually I do. Decriminalized means you can still get a ticket for it and legalized mean you can't. The possession of more than an oz of pot is still illegal in Oregon and you can go to jail for having 29grams. That's not decriminalized you stupid asshat, but thanks for the water.

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:28 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Yes it is, in accordance with how the term is used by lawmakers. Your personal definition/interpretation of it is irrelevant.

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:47 pm
by Moving Sale
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Yes it is, in accordance with how the term is used by lawmakers. Your personal definition/interpretation of it is irrelevant.
Here is the text.

“Notwithstanding subsection (2) of this section, unlawful possession of marijuana is a violation if the amount possessed is less than one avoirdupois ounce of the dried leaves, stems and flowers of the plant Cannabis family Moraceae. A violation under this subsection is punishable by a fine of not less than $ 500 and not more than $1,000. Fines collected under this subsection shall be forwarded to the Department of Revenue for deposit in the Criminal Fine and Assessment Account established under ORS 137.300.”

It does not contain the word "decriminalization" anywhere. The bill that made pot illegal in Oregon was called the Uniform State Narcotic Drug Act. Does that make pot a Narcotic?
And it's not MY definition. It's the dictionary definition. YOU are the one misusing the word and your only defense is "they did it first."

You are a stupid fucking lemming.

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 3:44 pm
by Felix
Moving Sale wrote:Legalization means you can't even get a ticket for it.
really? tell your client (assuming your defense didn't result in a life sentence for him) to get pulled over in Tacoma carrying 20 lbs and see what happens......

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 6:03 pm
by Moving Sale
Yes really.

Main Entry: le·gal·ize
Pronunciation: \ˈlē-gə-ˌlīz\
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): le·gal·ized; le·gal·iz·ing
Date: circa 1716
transitive verb
: to make legal ; especially : to give legal validity or sanction to
— le·gal·i·za·tion \ˌlē-gə-lə-ˈzā-shən\ noun
— le·gal·iz·er \ˈlē-gə-ˌlī-zər\ noun


As for my client, I walked him in his Cali case so he is out and about. Why don't you just tell me what would happen if he had 20 lbs in Tacoma instead of playing whatever game it is you are playing?

Re: House votes for Pot

Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 6:11 pm
by Dinsdale
Moving Sale wrote:Why don't you just tell me what would happen if he had 20 lbs in Tacoma
You'd get your ass kicked by a bunch of gangbangers and your weed would be stolen.

What do I win?