T1B

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:I was responding to you with the same level of thought and humanity you put into your post.

A brilliant, hand-woven white brushed cotton flag with a thread count of 400. Maybe even 600.

Yea but you are a mvskkkal worshiping, racist asshat, so of course you are going to suck his cock.

Papa Willie wrote: They wouldn't go. You know why? Because fucks would not be given...

Some would some wouldn't.

Moving Sale wrote:

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:I was responding to you with the same level of thought and humanity you put into your post.

A brilliant, hand-woven white brushed cotton flag with a thread count of 400. Maybe even 600.

Yea but you are a mvskkkal worshiping, racist asshat, so of course you are going to suck his cock.

Your white flag raised it's own white flag...

He made an outrages post, I followed in kind. Go fuck a moose, you stupid racist fuck.

Moving Sale wrote:He made an outrages post, I followed in kind. Go fuck a moose, you stupid racist fuck.

You must have a chart on the wall in your playroom that has all the assorted buzz words you use. I am thinking that this morning, you picked a finger of shit out of your semi adult diaper and flung it at that chart, and it hit the square labeled " racist." Gloating in your accuracy, and thinking that you may need some type of sustaining support, you once again immersed your hand in your own pile of human filth, and threw that at the chart, and it landed on "fuck".

Rubbing your shit encrusted hands together, you hurried to the computer, and while possibly stopping to wipe your some, but not all of your own shit off your hands, you mashed out several "racist fuck" takes in a row.

You have now ceased to be even remotely amusing with your multiple "racist fuck" blasts. You do know that nobody really gives a fuck what you call them right ??

But go ahead and keeping flailing away....

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:What about Casey's General Store?

Casey's are ok and getting better now that they have QT to show them how it's done. But they don't and won't compete in the same area for the most part. Same with 7-11's.

Case in point, Springfield MO. Casey's bought out all the QT's, just put different signs up. Seems very strange since Springfield is just up I-44 from Tulsa while Casey's are based in Iowa. I have no idea how and why that happened.

Back to the topic, people who loot and torch their local businesses in moments of chaos are the lowest of scum bags. Some of the very same marching protesters don't have jobs or paychecks now that their employer was shut down.

But who do they blame?

Wags, why are you drooling all over QT's dick? You act like it is the greatest fucking store ever. Aside from cheap gas occasionally, clean restrooms normally, and full buckets of window cleaner with a decent squeegee, there is no real reason to patronize that business. Everything else they offer is either booze, smokes, junk food, overpriced, or a combination of two or more of the latter.

Dave, you forgot good coffee, donuts, fresh brewed iced tea and crushed ice. That, and good employees who seem to actually give a fuck.

Is QuikTrip a particular target of the rioters -----> because it symbolizes... whitey?

Pear-shaped white people, many/most of whom are against income redistribution, waddling in-and-out of the establishment.
Yeah, I've seen that.


:idea:
[dark man thinking]White people luv QT, so let's loot the place. Fukk 'em up, man.[/dark man thinking]
:idea:


Is that it, or is QT just in the wrong place at the wrong time?

Moving Sale got OWNED by everyone in this thread. God, that must hurt.

trev wrote:Moving Sale got OWNED by everyone in this thread. God, that must hurt.

Do tell you drunken tard.

Trev is not a yard. She is a lush. So was Winston Churchill. Trev's grandmother probably wanted to get freaky with Churchill.

Just doing my part to turn this thread away from Missouri stop and robs.

Papa Willie wrote:

Who wants to bet that this story will change?

Any minute now...





Such a niiiiiice boy.

Looks like the Ferguson PD hit paydirt. RACK them for taking out the trash.

Yeah, right, uh huh the cop just reached out through his window to choke a 6'4" 300lbs shitbag.

Facts, video, recordings, etc will not change the direction or velocity of this story.

It really has nothing to do with facts, and is no different than the Trayvon Martin case.

Left Seater wrote:Facts, video, recordings, etc will not change the direction or velocity of this story.

It really has nothing to do with facts, and is no different than the Trayvon Martin case.

He could have been Jack the Ripper and the cops still can't shoot him if his hands are up and he is no threat. We don't know that it went down that way but it sure looks like it or the cops would be telling a different story than the one they are now.

Moving Sale wrote:

Left Seater wrote: Pretty vague answer there MS.

I didn't know how deep you wanted me to go.

When I say parenting classes I mean going into neighborhoods and setting up schools that teach people how to parent. And when I say parenting tutors I mean in house tutors. Neither of those things are being done. And they would be costly.

As far jobs I mean jobs. The Ferguson police dept is 96% white. WTF? Fire half (or what ever % would make the cops the same color as the community) of them and put black people in. Is it Constitutional? Not without an amendment, but something radical needs to be done because we have let this sore fester since 1501.

So you are saying have schools right in the Housing Projects? That was tried in Houston and was a huge failure. I spent a summer doing some volunteer work associated with such an effort.

As for the jobs end of things, yeah you would need an amendment to make one race clearly more important than all others. Would that amendment have a sunset date? 50, 75, 150 years? Without an amendment the Feds are already doing this though, with quotas and hiring preferences for minorities and bidding preferences for minority owned businesses. Rightfully so, courts are striking down quota requirements.

But we both know an amendment of which you speak will never pass, so what else do you suggest?

Left Seater wrote:no different than the Trayvon Martin case.

False, in that Zimmerman stalked and murdered Martin.

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Left Seater wrote:no different than the Trayvon Martin case.

False, in that Zimmerman stalked and murdered Martin.

The kid was shot when he started beating dudes head against the ground.

Murderers do not call 911 first.

Left Seater wrote: But we both know an amendment of which you speak will never pass, so what else do you suggest?

I think I have already said that most of my ideas are not politically viable. There are just too many people who think it's too late and been too long, and too many racist who will fight too hard against it.

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Left Seater wrote:no different than the Trayvon Martin case.

Zimmerman stalked and murdered Martin.

False.

Moving Sale wrote:...if his hands are up and he is no threat.

That's pretty big if at this point. Is no great loss to society anyway. That piece of shit on feet wasn't going to be curing cancer. He was a violent criminal whose career was cut mercifully short.

Left Seater wrote: The kid was shot when he started beating dudes head against the ground.

Murderers do not call 911 first.

Yeah, well when you're getting stalked by an armed man, you defend yourself.

Screw_Michigan wrote:Yeah, well when you're getting stalked by an armed man, you defend yourself.

You don't "defend yourself" by assaulting somebody, you fucking moron.

Screw_Michigan wrote: Yeah, well when you're getting stalked by an armed man, you defend yourself.

FAIL!

If you are unarmed and feel you are being stalked by an armed man, you call 911 while running away from said man as fast as you can. You do not turn and move towards said armed man and attempt to beat him.

Yeah, when seconds matter, the police will be there in minutes.

Hypocrites.

All the more reason not to confront the armed man and to run away.

Screw_Michigan wrote:Yeah, when seconds matter, the police will be there in minutes.

What, exactly, was Traynog defending himself from? Did Zimmerman attack him? Did he brandish a weapon? Did he make any verbal threats?

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Left Seater wrote:no different than the Trayvon Martin case.

False, in that Zimmerman stalked and murdered Martin.

That's what I thought too. That is until the jury said otherwise. Don't like it? Move to China.

Moving Sale wrote:

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Left Seater wrote:no different than the Trayvon Martin case.

False, in that Zimmerman stalked and murdered Martin.

That's what I thought too. That is until the jury said otherwise. Don't like it? Move to China.

Just checking in before Screw tries to use OJ as his rebuttal.

You beat me to it.

Of course some talking head on CNN is interviewing a black community organizer this afternoon and dude only took two minutes of talking about Missouri before he repeated the often misused line of "had George Zimmerman been black and Trayvon white, we all know that he would have been convicted and spending his life in prison."

CNN dude doesn't even blink before accepting such idiotic statements as fact and asks the organizer another question.

Problem is we have actual facts that prove them wrong. Amazing how no one will mention Roderick Scott though. Why let facts get in the way of a good rant.

R-Jack wrote:

Moving Sale wrote: Just checking in before Screw tries to use OJ as his rebuttal.

OJ is likewise not a murderer.

Moving Sale wrote:

R-Jack wrote:

Moving Sale wrote: Just checking in before Screw tries to use OJ as his rebuttal.

OJ is likewise not a murderer.

Likewise are there innocent people on death row?

You are correct. It only works one way. You are not a murderer unless convicted, but even if you are convicted, you still might be innocent.

Left Seater wrote: Amazing how no one will mention Roderick Scott though. Why let facts get in the way of a good rant.

Scott was asleep in his house before the incident not trolling for trouble.
Scott was on his own property, zim was not.
Scott faced three people, zim did not.
Scott saw actual law breaking, zim did not.
Scott was immediately charged with murder.

Pretty weak sauce LS.

Scott saw law breaking on his neighbors property.
Scott did not call 911 himself.
Scott shot and killed before the perp made physical contact.


However, you are missing the point. Many libs and "black leaders" claim if George and Trayvon's race were reversed the verdict would have been different. Facts prove that incorrect. In both cases the juries found murder was not committed, regardless of race.

I think he saw them breaking into his car, but when he got there they were breaking into his neighbor's car.
I never said he called 911, but since you brought it up, he did tell his GF to call.
I never said he did make contact, but since you brought it up the jury appears to have believed Scott's story that the Vic was running at him.

Nobody, you or anybody else, should be comparing the two cases because they are not, as we say in the law biz, on point with eachother. Therefor this can not be used to prove anything about Zim.
As for the Zim verdict, there is no proof that it would have turned out diff with roles reversed. It is probably more likely that a black dude gets convicted, but that is as far as it goes.

Moving Sale wrote: Nobody, you or anybody else, should be comparing the two cases because they are not, as we say in the law biz, on point with eachother.

As for the Zim verdict, there is no proof that it would have turned out diff with roles reversed.

Ok, I agree that you and others know far more about law than I do, but you still made my point.

Libs, media and black community "leaders" will compare the two and claim a different verdict if the roles were reversed and no one calls them on it.

The above linked article wrote:Ferguson Police Chief Thomas Jackson said the officer involved in the shooting -- identified as Darren Wilson -- had gone to the area after a 911 call reporting the robbery. He says a dispatcher gave a description of the suspect, and that Wilson encountered Brown a few minutes before another officer arrived.

The announcement was met with immediate disbelief and anger by community members who insisted Brown wasn't the man seen in a security camera video of the robbery.

Ok that is all fine and good, the community immediately insists that the video isn't of Brown.

Wait, uhhhhh...

The same above linked article wrote:The friend who was with Michael Brown when he was shot and killed by a police officer near St. Louis over the weekend is reportedly confirming that he and Brown had taken part in the theft of cigars from a convenience store that day.

Yet another example of facts not mattering one bit to those who want to cause unrest.

So after more rioting and looting last night, there's a midnight curfew tonight. I'm sure that's going to go over well with the locals and be strictly enforced.... NOT.

If they were really serious about a curfew, it should be at 10 pm or earlier, like at sundown. Nogs wait for cover of darkness to perform their misdeeds, like the chickenshits they truly are.

And now the cops are afraid of anymore negative attention so they'll probably stand back and let them get away with anything.

They had it right in the first place with riot gear.