Re: Does this mean I am a bigot?
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:04 pm
So you wouldn't?Screw_Michigan wrote:She's a cum dumpster in general. Would lack of tatts make her any less of a semen receptacle?
pfft...faggot.
So you wouldn't?Screw_Michigan wrote:She's a cum dumpster in general. Would lack of tatts make her any less of a semen receptacle?
For someone who isn't inked, you sure are defensive about it.Screw_Michigan wrote:I don't have any ink, cunt cookies, and toughen up your vagina. This is a smack board, remember? Also, I agree with Left Seater about visible tatts. GF wants to get one on her forearm or wrist, I actively discourage her against it.
Now go fuck yourself.
Fixed that for me.Screw_Michigan wrote: If she's unattractive, the ink makes her even more unattractive.
They could play tug of war with my cock and I would not be biased as to wear I blasted my frothy load.poptart wrote:If you took 10 random tatted women and put 'em in a tug of war contest with 10 non-tatted women, I would bet on the tatted women.
It's not necessary to explore further than this.
the most reasoned statement within this threadsmackaholic wrote: memo to decent muzzies: we will continue to look at you with a suspect eye until you unfukk your community. the only ones that can stamp out muzzie shitbag terrorist activities are muzzies themselves. so far, you've done a pretty bad job at it.
The OKC bombing didn't have fuck to do with religion, you brainless shit bag.Screw_Michigan wrote:I don't know if you forgot the Oklahoma City bombing, but I haven't.KC Scott wrote: Maybe you've forgot the Marathon Bombers, the Green Nissan Pathfinder in Times Square or Nidal Hasan, but I haven't
mvscal wrote:The OKC bombing didn't have fuck to do with religion, you brainless shit bag.
Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:...and by my people, I mean Canadians!
Is that before or after she punches you in the face and drags your bitch ass off to another T. Hanksgiving?Screw_Michigan wrote: GF wants to get one on her forearm or wrist, I actively discourage her against it.
You thought their "popgun" offense would be no match for Texas' "top 20" defense. Try again, idiot.mvscal wrote:Iowa State lost, dumbfuck.
Didn't happen.If the Texas teams have shown us one thing the last three years it is that their players are mentally weak and easily demoralized. I think after double ass kickings and all the turmoil between the new staff and Mack's players that this Texas team is going to fold like a lawn chair.
Sure, that's like picking a team to win but not cover. "See, they won, but didn't cover, so I was right!"mvscal wrote:Obviously it wasn't...hence the scoreboard. That wasn't even the point, you fucking idiot.
Didn't happen.If the Texas teams have shown us one thing the last three years it is that their players are mentally weak and easily demoralized. I think after double ass kickings and all the turmoil between the new staff and Mack's players that this Texas team is going to fold like a lawn chair.