Page 2 of 2

Re: Does this mean I am a bigot?

Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:04 pm
by Go Coogs'
Screw_Michigan wrote:She's a cum dumpster in general. Would lack of tatts make her any less of a semen receptacle?
So you wouldn't?

pfft...faggot.

Re: Does this mean I am a bigot?

Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:20 pm
by Screw_Michigan
When did I say whether I would or wouldn't?

I know what I certainly wouldn't do, that's fuck your heifer wife.

Re: Does this mean I am a bigot?

Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 9:24 pm
by Jay in Phoenix
Screw_Michigan wrote:I don't have any ink, cunt cookies, and toughen up your vagina. This is a smack board, remember? Also, I agree with Left Seater about visible tatts. GF wants to get one on her forearm or wrist, I actively discourage her against it.

Now go fuck yourself.
For someone who isn't inked, you sure are defensive about it.

As well, we are all aware that this is a smack board, or at least, something that sometimes resembles the concept. When you actually run some smack, let us know. In the meantime, figure out your stance on this and pick a side already. You say women can compliment their appearance by wearing tattoos, dependent upon how attractive they already are, yet you actively discourage your GF from getting one.

Huh?

Sounds like that means your GF is already pig ugly and you don't want to make your suet slurping sow even worse.

Re: Does this mean I am a bigot?

Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 10:49 pm
by R-Jack
Screw_Michigan wrote: If she's unattractive, the ink makes her even more unattractive.
Fixed that for me.

I look at the women with tats thing like Joe Flacco's contract year. You really are betting on yourself on the hotness scale. If you are, you're going to be just fine. If not it's all bad, because an ugly chick with tats approaches "even Dinsdale will pass" territory.

Re: Does this mean I am a bigot?

Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 5:29 am
by poptart
If you took 10 random tatted women and put 'em in a tug of war contest with 10 non-tatted women, I would bet on the tatted women.

It's not necessary to explore further than this.

Re: Does this mean I am a bigot?

Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 11:36 am
by DiT
poptart wrote:If you took 10 random tatted women and put 'em in a tug of war contest with 10 non-tatted women, I would bet on the tatted women.

It's not necessary to explore further than this.
They could play tug of war with my cock and I would not be biased as to wear I blasted my frothy load.

Re: Does this mean I am a bigot?

Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 3:38 pm
by Felix
smackaholic wrote: memo to decent muzzies: we will continue to look at you with a suspect eye until you unfukk your community. the only ones that can stamp out muzzie shitbag terrorist activities are muzzies themselves. so far, you've done a pretty bad job at it.
the most reasoned statement within this thread

btw, have you ever seen what was formerly a good looking tatted up woman who's hit the age of 50?

Image
to me this just screams "skeezer"

Re: Does this mean I am a bigot?

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 4:14 pm
by mvscal
Screw_Michigan wrote:
KC Scott wrote: Maybe you've forgot the Marathon Bombers, the Green Nissan Pathfinder in Times Square or Nidal Hasan, but I haven't
I don't know if you forgot the Oklahoma City bombing, but I haven't.
The OKC bombing didn't have fuck to do with religion, you brainless shit bag.

Re: Does this mean I am a bigot?

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 5:09 pm
by Dr. McCoy
mvscal wrote:The OKC bombing didn't have fuck to do with religion, you brainless shit bag.
Image

Re: Does this mean I am a bigot?

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 8:20 pm
by jiminphilly
Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:...and by my people, I mean Canadians!

I hung out with some Canadians last week while in Vancouver. They're good people. Especially the female ones. :shock:

Re: Does this mean I am a bigot?

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 1:59 pm
by mvscal
Screw_Michigan wrote: GF wants to get one on her forearm or wrist, I actively discourage her against it.
Is that before or after she punches you in the face and drags your bitch ass off to another T. Hanksgiving?

Re: Does this mean I am a bigot?

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 3:39 pm
by Screw_Michigan
It's after Iowa State proves you as wrong as you were about the 2006 midterms. Suck on that, bitch.

Re: Does this mean I am a bigot?

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 3:41 pm
by mvscal
Iowa State lost, dumbfuck.

Re: Does this mean I am a bigot?

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 3:43 pm
by Screw_Michigan
mvscal wrote:Iowa State lost, dumbfuck.
You thought their "popgun" offense would be no match for Texas' "top 20" defense. Try again, idiot.

Re: Does this mean I am a bigot?

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 4:01 pm
by mvscal
Obviously it wasn't...hence the scoreboard. That wasn't even the point, you fucking idiot.
If the Texas teams have shown us one thing the last three years it is that their players are mentally weak and easily demoralized. I think after double ass kickings and all the turmoil between the new staff and Mack's players that this Texas team is going to fold like a lawn chair.
Didn't happen.

Re: Does this mean I am a bigot?

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 4:07 pm
by Derron
Just saying...

Image

Re: Does this mean I am a bigot?

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 4:22 pm
by Screw_Michigan
mvscal wrote:Obviously it wasn't...hence the scoreboard. That wasn't even the point, you fucking idiot.
If the Texas teams have shown us one thing the last three years it is that their players are mentally weak and easily demoralized. I think after double ass kickings and all the turmoil between the new staff and Mack's players that this Texas team is going to fold like a lawn chair.
Didn't happen.
Sure, that's like picking a team to win but not cover. "See, they won, but didn't cover, so I was right!"