T1B

Posted: **Sat May 23, 2015 9:23 pm**

You're reasoning like a ten year-old again. Intellect doesn't exist on its own. It's not some religious concept. And of course all manner of people willfully muzzle and stifle their intellect so as to avoid the unpleasant facts thus presented, Such as--the U.S. government being effectively hijacked on 9/11. As for your lock-step right-wing radio views, even if you don't listen to FOX News, you dutifully echo every single position they present. You are a classic tool of the oligarchy, a simplistic and shallow puppet.

Posted: **Tue May 26, 2015 6:56 am**

One must look...

http://statecrime.org/state-crime-resea ... -cover-up/

Here's an example of news that's not made available in mainstream sources. There's lots more on lots of subjects. Obviously a closed-minded fiercely anti-intellectual sort of knuckle-dragging 'libertarian" simplistic tripe like yourself wouldn't and couldn't begin to actually look--let alone find--anything to stir you from your boring slumber. And what I mean by that is that of course you had no idea of the importance of the event described in the provided link. You're in some tedious coal mine of non-curious and fearful living death--just like your fake (non-changes) guitar playing. Now get back to your FOX and shut up. But if you think you can handle some actual news...
http://wolfstreet.com/

Posted: **Tue May 26, 2015 2:01 pm**

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Indeed, goobs is really redefining "white flag" surrendering. The question remains as to how can someone be so utterly curled in dumb nervous fear that they would so completely abdicate any semblance of a functioning intellect.

So you and Tiny think this Bin Laden guy was completely innocent? Not a terrorist, just a misunderstood religious zealot?

Posted: **Tue May 26, 2015 6:21 pm**

What we know about Bin Laden is that he was never indicted for anything connected to 9/11. No evidence was ever presented. Further, he explicitly denied any involvement--when taking credit would be a tremendous boon to his recruitment ability, etc. In short, he was framed and murdered without any due process. AS far as his religious beliefs and prior activities--both as a terrorist and a CIA operative, this is irrelevant to his being framed. As for your simplistic and almost moronic approach and analysis, you're an embarrassment. You just take Cheney and Rumsfeld's word on his guilt? And of course the clear-eyed assurance of George Stephanopoulos? Or the weird ramblings of O'Reilly and Hannity? Pathetic.

Posted: **Tue May 26, 2015 6:23 pm**

Goober McTuber wrote:
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Indeed, goobs is really redefining "white flag" surrendering. The question remains as to how can someone be so utterly curled in dumb nervous fear that they would so completely abdicate any semblance of a functioning intellect.
So you and Tiny think this Bin Laden guy was completely innocent? Not a terrorist, just a misunderstood religious zealot?

Nice strawman you fat stupid tard

Posted: **Tue May 26, 2015 6:25 pm**

I believe Osama headed up one of the major terror groups of our time. I don't care whether he had anything to do with 9-11. He deserved to die. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

Posted: **Tue May 26, 2015 6:26 pm**

Moving Sale wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Indeed, goobs is really redefining "white flag" surrendering. The question remains as to how can someone be so utterly curled in dumb nervous fear that they would so completely abdicate any semblance of a functioning intellect.
So you and Tiny think this Bin Laden guy was completely innocent? Not a terrorist, just a misunderstood religious zealot?
Nice strawman you fat stupid tard

Answer the question, you blithering minitard.

Posted: **Tue May 26, 2015 7:34 pm**

Goober McTuber wrote:I believe Osama headed up one of the major terror groups of our time. I don't care whether he had anything to do with 9-11. He deserved to die. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

You're like some retarded cat chasing it's tail. Do you really live in such a simplistic bubble? As far as Bin Laden being one of the biggest terrorists in the world, well, if in fact he had nothing to do with 9/11--and there's of course no evidence that he did--than surely there's a much bigger terrorist outfit operating--and they've escaped because Bin Laden was a convenient patsy. And of course that infinitely larger terrorist organization is the neocons and their Zionazi entity. But, what's the point of explaining this to a cat?

Posted: **Tue May 26, 2015 7:47 pm**

We get it. You're a conspiracy-freak nutbag of the highest order. I don't believe you've ever seen a conspiracy that you couldn't fully embrace. I can't imagine the cocktail of medications it must take for you to make it through a day.

BTW, there is this:

"God knows it did not cross our minds to attack the Towers, but after the situation became unbearable—and we witnessed the injustice and tyranny of the American-Israeli alliance against our people in Palestine and Lebanon—I thought about it. And the events that affected me directly were that of 1982 and the events that followed—when America allowed the Israelis to invade Lebanon, helped by the U.S. Sixth Fleet. As I watched the destroyed towers in Lebanon, it occurred to me punish the unjust the same way: to destroy towers in America so it could taste some of what we are tasting and to stop killing our children and women."

— Osama bin Laden, 2004

After his initial denial, Osama bin Laden in 2004 finally claimed responsibility for the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States. The attacks involved the hijacking of four commercial passenger aircraft — United Airlines Flight 93, United Airlines Flight 175, American Airlines Flight 11, and American Airlines Flight 77 — and flying two into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City, New York, and the third into the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, destroying the former, and severely damaging the latter, while the fourth, either intended to target the U.S. Capitol or the White House, crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, with no survivors.

Posted: **Tue May 26, 2015 8:22 pm**

You've posted a quote from the fake "confession video" which was completely debunked.
http://www.mujca.com/hoax.htm

Here is his actual categorical denial--which he never retracted.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/interview- ... 9-11/24697

Moreover, not a single law enforcement agency has been able to produce any evidence as to his guilt. So how does this have anything to do with calling anyone a "conspiracy nut"? In fact the official story--as palsied and weak as it is--is one of an elaborate conspiracy, right? And yet you believe it without any evidence whatsoever? Really?

Posted: **Tue May 26, 2015 8:32 pm**

Sorry, I've seen enough of your bullshit links to be beyond clicking on any of them. Your idea of "debunking" is to present some yahoo with a contrary opinion. Run along, little nutbag.

Posted: **Tue May 26, 2015 9:03 pm**

In an effort to get this thread back on track, I wonder what kind of porn Osama had? Goats? Midgets ('sup MS)? Did he have a George W. Bush blowup doll?

Posted: **Tue May 26, 2015 9:21 pm**

Goober McTuber wrote:In an effort to get this thread back on track, I wonder what kind of porn Osama had? Goats? Midgets ('sup MS)? Did he have a George W. Bush blowup doll?

A Fleshlight with the LTS TRN 2 "mouth attachment"...

Posted: **Tue May 26, 2015 10:33 pm**

Goober McTuber wrote:Sorry, I've seen enough of your bullshit links to be beyond clicking on any of them. Your idea of "debunking" is to present some yahoo with a contrary opinion. Run along, little nutbag.

Where did you get your info? And why do you believe it? For starters, the quote you provide from the debunked "confession tape" is incorrectly dated as 2004. And as for that ludicrous tape, it's so fake it was quickly withdrawn by the CIA or whoever provided it. Same with the "pancake" theory of the WTC collapse--as well as the "overheated core" theory. Both, like the "confession tape" were quietly dismissed. Are you even aware of this? What on earth is your source of information about Bin laden and 9/11? You seem like a twelve year-old as far as your docile naivete and gullibility.

Posted: **Wed May 27, 2015 12:00 am**

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:In an effort to get this thread back on track, I wonder what kind of porn Osama had? Goats? Midgets ('sup MS)? Did he have a George W. Bush blowup doll?

A Fleshlight with the LTS TRN 2 "mouth attachment"...

That looks like the lips of a 14 yo boy Marty. Bet you cum really quick when you use it.

Posted: **Wed May 27, 2015 1:17 am**

You're the MOD that has let this pedo thing go on for years.

Posted: **Wed May 27, 2015 1:07 pm**

You're the moron that started blindly labeling multiple posters as pedos.

Posted: **Wed May 27, 2015 2:13 pm**

Wrong again fatty

Posted: **Wed May 27, 2015 2:23 pm**

No. I said blindly.

T1B

Bin Laden's Bookshelf

Re: Bin Laden's Bookshelf

Re: Bin Laden's Bookshelf

Re: Bin Laden's Bookshelf

Re: Bin Laden's Bookshelf

Re: Bin Laden's Bookshelf

Re: Bin Laden's Bookshelf

Re: Bin Laden's Bookshelf

Re: Bin Laden's Bookshelf

Re: Bin Laden's Bookshelf

Re: Bin Laden's Bookshelf

Re: Bin Laden's Bookshelf

Re: Bin Laden's Bookshelf

Re: Bin Laden's Bookshelf

Re: Bin Laden's Bookshelf

Re: Bin Laden's Bookshelf

Re: Bin Laden's Bookshelf

Re: Bin Laden's Bookshelf

Re: Bin Laden's Bookshelf

Re: Bin Laden's Bookshelf