T1B

My data tells me that about 82% of all statistics are inaccurate, skewed, manipulated, or flat out fabricated.

mvscal wrote: According to the statistics, roughly 30% of molestation victims are boys molested by faggots....

Felix wrote:and exactly where did you get your information?when it comes to child sexual abuse, females make up about 70% of the total crimes committed.

Felix wrote:I work with lots of statistical data

Ohhhhkay, M2. Of course you do.

Maybe next, you can work on that nasty addition stuff, and report back when you figure out what 70 + 30 equals.


Too funny.....

Papa Willie wrote:

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Okay, so by your weird "statistics'," 70% of boy molesters are women? Or straight men? Are you on meds..like State? Your virulent homophobia sounds exactly like Pat Roberston or some similar Christer nutjuob.

Are you seriously too fucking stupid to figure out what he just said?

Okay, go ahead, willers, and let us know what he meant. That is, if, by his "statistics," 30% of molesters are gay men, that means the rest--the remaining 70% majority of molested boys are molested by...???...women?...straight men?...extra-terrestrials?

C'mon, amuse us...try and actually say something beyond a one-sentence playground hiss.

As for babs, his ludicrous revealing on the "debate' was as embarrassing as..well, anything the GOP is rolling out.

How interesting that his seething homophobia (really like the Westboro Baptist preacher on bad acid) is in some blind and writhing denial of his basic ideological heroes all being gay. And who would that be? Well, let's call the roll..

Lindsey Graham

Karl Rove

Grover Nordquist

Ted Cruz

J. Edgar Hoover

Ernst Rohm

George W. Bush

and of course his all in (Koch-sponsered) candidate, Scott Walker..


Sure, they're all BOTTOMS and closeted. Just like babs... :wink:

You're hinting? That is, you'ld like to speak like a real human, but all you can muster is some weird drivel? I gather your actual question--you' have no real comment--is this: what percentage of the war-mongering GOP AIPAC-ass-fucked neocons are "gay"? Okay, fair question. The answer is about ninety percent. This allows for the few who actually pant after cheerleaders and so forth. This does not include babs, who, as we've all noticed, cannot complete a sentence without reference to "cum slurping" or whatever.

Got it? :P

Dinsdale wrote:

mvscal wrote: According to the statistics, roughly 30% of molestation victims are boys molested by faggots....

Felix wrote:and exactly where did you get your information?when it comes to child sexual abuse, females make up about 70% of the total crimes committed.

Maybe next, you can work on that nasty addition stuff, and report back when you figure out what 70 + 30 equals.


Too funny.....

maybe you should think about what your pounding out before you hit the submit button.....if 30% of the molestation victims are by gays, what your impying is that that there are no molestations of the same sex by heterosexuals going on whatsoever....further, your implying there are no instances wherein females are molesting underage boys.....sure you wouldn't like to step back and think about why you're "simple math" doesn't make any sense?

smackaholic wrote:As to whether it is learned/natural behavior, who gives a fukk? My take is that generally, they are born that way, but that as homosexuality becomes more accepted, you will have an increase in those that chose for whatever reason. In the case of dudes, you will have some go that way partly because women are a PITA and partly because they'll get more BJs.

This....



....is further evidence of your obvious lack of a functioning cerebral cortex. Enjoy your gay golden years.

Goober McTuber wrote:Enjoy your gay golden years.

There's such a thing?
:?

I suppose if you paired that up with an AARP card, you'd be set...

I didn't see the debate but I love Moving Sale.

Papa Willie wrote:

LTS TRN 2 wrote:You're hinting? That is, you'ld like to speak like a real human, but all you can muster is some weird drivel? I gather your actual question--you' have no real comment--is this: what percentage of the war-mongering GOP AIPAC-ass-fucked neocons are "gay"? Okay, fair question. The answer is about ninety percent. This allows for the few who actually pant after cheerleaders and so forth. This does not include babs, who, as we've all noticed, cannot complete a sentence without reference to "cum slurping" or whatever.

Got it? :P

Translation:

I didn't figure it out at first, and feel pretty goddamned stupid because of it. Now I'll do my best Pee Wee "I meant to do that" and hope it dies out.

It's pretty clear--that you can't muster an actual take beyond a ten year-old's cawing. Babs insists that 30% of molested kids are boys victimized by gay men. This leaves the entirety of the remaining 70%--both boys and girls--to be molested by?.....hmmm....well, we could assume he's suggesting that straight men are molesting girls and boys, and that straight or gay women are molesting girls and boys...and yet it still comes out as absolute gibberish. That is, have you noticed that he just says outrageous bullshit and then never backs it up. Or, more commonly, passively accepts some outrageous bullshit without actually supporting it? Just an absolute weaselly Koch brothers robot. As for his Westboro-level homophobia (which of course he wouldn't dare reveal in his utterly fake and stupid "debate" performance), it's the hypocrisy that's perhaps most galling. The GOP slimefucks I've listed really are (were) closet gays with toxic agendas.

Papa Willie wrote:You've already smoked cock & died on this one, LTS. Sorry. No matter what you say, it's just not going to change a thing.

He's coming on to you, bro.

Oh great, the bopsie twins are stroking each other. Willers, the cabin-bound alky, and b-juice, the baby-blowing bris clown. Nice, and what's your guys encore?

Do you find this arousing? My posts are "ribbed for your pleasure", you know.

You should clarify that PW...you KNEW he was a complete dumbass.

His head is also ribbed for his own pleasure as it takes its place rather loosely up his own ass.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:Do you find this arousing? My posts are "ribbed for your pleasure", you know.

But b-juice, the whole point is that you haven't made a post. Just tiny little nothings. You've got very little to say, and even less skill at saying it. Same with willers and Jay. Like little kids.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:the bopsie twins

Good grief.

willers at one and a half years old...any wonder as to why he's so fucked up?

Whole lotta math fail, up in this bitch.

The sodomite defenders saying that if gays only commit, 30%, it shows that heteros commit over twice as much, leave out the inconvenient fact that they are a very small minority, certainly under 5%. Now, I'm no mikey, but my limited knowedge of math tells me that if they are 5%, they a 6X more likely to diddle kiddies.

Then somebody, I believe it was goobs says that it is unrealistic to believe that there are no heteros molesting same sex chillins. Uhhh, goobs, if they are diddling same sex kiddies, well, they ain't heteros. No matter how far back in that closet they are, they are not straight.

Sexual and domestic abuse in the gay community is way under-reported.

It's a combination of their own "code of silence" and society's reluctance to turn the microscope on a politically active and politically connected underclass.

Marty, are you trolling? It is so unlike you.

There's no mischief in what I posted.

smackaholic wrote:Then somebody, I believe it was goobs says that it is unrealistic to believe that there are no heteros molesting same sex chillins. Uhhh, goobs, if they are diddling same sex kiddies, well, they ain't heteros. No matter how far back in that closet they are, they are not straight.

Josh Powell would disagree with you.

smackaholic wrote:Whole lotta math fail, up in this bitch.

And you're the one to straighten it out? Good grief.

smackaholic wrote:Then somebody, I believe it was goobs says that it is unrealistic to believe that there are no heteros molesting same sex chillins. Uhhh, goobs, if they are diddling same sex kiddies, well, they ain't heteros. No matter how far back in that closet they are, they are not straight.

You can just feel free to link up where I said that, you braindead fucking mongoloid. Do everyone, and I mean EVERYONE, a favor and stuff that keyboard up your ass.

Who gives a fuck if pedos are classified as homosexual or heterosexual? At the end of the day, they all fall under the same general category of "subhuman pieces of shit."

If you have children, your safest bet is to just keep them away from religious wackos and people who "really enjoy working with children."

OK, it wasn't goobs. It was feelsdix.

My apologies. Now go fukk yourself.

Felix wrote:maybe you should think about what your pounding out before you hit the submit button.....if 30% of the molestation victims are by gays, what your impying is that that there are no molestations of the same sex by heterosexuals going on whatsoever....further, your implying there are no instances wherein females are molesting underage boys.....sure you wouldn't like to step back and think about why you're "simple math" doesn't make any sense?

Diego in Seattle wrote:

smackaholic wrote:Then somebody, I believe it was goobs says that it is unrealistic to believe that there are no heteros molesting same sex chillins. Uhhh, goobs, if they are diddling same sex kiddies, well, they ain't heteros. No matter how far back in that closet they are, they are not straight.

Josh Powell would disagree with you.

If you are a dude, and you are diddling little dudes, you are, by definition, a fag, or at least a switch hitter in addition to being a perv. If you are a dude diddling little girls, you are a heterosexual perv.

smackaholic wrote:OK, it wasn't goobs. It was feelsdix.

My apologies. Now go fukk yourself.

You should probably stick around here, just to make Sirfuckafist feel good about himself.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:

How else am I to get to drive in the carpool lane?

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Who gives a fuck if pedos are classified as homosexual or heterosexual?

Homosexuals seem to care a great deal. They seem to go to great lengths to distance themselves from this other form of deviant sexual behavior with which they are so disproportionately associated. Whenever homos try to normalize their malfunction, they invariably point to some obscure, singular historical reference while blithely ignoring that pederasty forms the basis of classical homosexuality. When that fails, they fall back to the animal kingdom.

"OH, WAIT!!! LOOK!!! DIDJA SEE THAT?!? That giraffe just ass-fucked another dude giraffe and gave him a reach around blow job. See? What did I tell ya? Totally normal..."

mvscal wrote: That giraffe just ass-fucked another dude giraffe and gave him a reach around blow job.

In the animal kingdom, I think that's known as a "rusty gazelle"...

Is that Jerry Sandusky on the left?

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Is that Jerry Sandusky on the left?

It's Smackie.

Wait. This was a live, on-air debate?

OMG. I'm so slow. I figured it was one of these longwinded multipage posts I would never be able to finish reading. Yay for accidental clicks.

I find this fascinating. When I get home I will listen to this.

By the way, being black and I think MVSCal and I do get along, I don't believe he is as racist as you all believe. It is a front, tough dude persona and I do believe he is a tough dude. I respect his service to our country and had no choice but to work with my kind to do a job.

When I talk to him about my race, I find no fault in what he is saying. I would say the same thing but much more worse. I am doing my job counseling young blacks at the universities in my area. I was chosen to do this, about responsibility but I sneak in about getting off the Democrat carrot. Most blacks are bible thumping Conservatives to the core and always have been but Democrats have that carrot of welfare and hint of giving reparations that keep their votes.

It will be interesting if Dr. Carson somehow gets lucky, he won't, and get some momentum. The blacks will vote for him because he would do more for them than the current nog, as people call him here, we have in charge.

Yes, I put Obama on President Cheney's level and that is not good.

Papa Willie wrote:I just wish Arch would post more often.

I will pass on that, but thanks for mentioning me.

Being one of the original gangsters on this site and the other I think us ol' timers should post every so often to ensure that we are actually still living.

mvscal has said he doesn't have a problem with balcks. He has a problem with kneegers. This video shows examples of both. You have the black kids who are very respectful to "the man" and then you have that loud mouth kneeger bitch who gets what is coming to her.

Arch Angel wrote:Most blacks are bible thumping Conservatives to the core and always have been but Democrats have that carrot of welfare and hint of giving reparations that keep their votes.

Jesus was the poster child of bleeding heart liberalism so that makes sense. If he posted on this message board, poptart would call him a faggot.

smackaholic wrote:mvscal has said he doesn't have a problem with balcks. He has a problem with kneegers. This video shows examples of both. You have the black kids who are very respectful to "the man" and then you have that loud mouth kneeger bitch who gets what is coming to her.

You mean the hot chocolate honey in the yellow bikini--upon which the absurdly insane officer is squatting in mounting tumescent thrill? While he's lecturing her on proper civic behavior as it applies to obeying doughnut-brained fascist punks with guns and badges? That soon-to-be rich plaintive? :doh:

Mgo wrote:Jesus was the poster child of bleeding heart liberalism so that makes sense. If he posted on this message board, poptart would call him a faggot.

People sometimes attribute a given political ideology to Jesus Christ.
He came to save people from their affliction under satan's authority.


Matthew 9:32-38
[32] As they went out, behold, they brought to him a dumb man possessed with a devil.
[33] And when the devil was cast out, the dumb spake: and the multitudes marvelled, saying, It was never so seen in Israel.
[34] But the Pharisees said, He casteth out devils through the prince of the devils.
[35] And Jesus went about all the cities and villages, teaching in their synagogues, and preaching the gospel of the kingdom, and healing every sickness and every disease among the people.
[36] But when he saw the multitudes, he was moved with compassion on them, because they fainted, and were scattered abroad, as sheep having no shepherd.
[37] Then saith he unto his disciples, The harvest truly is plenteous, but the labourers are few;
[38] Pray ye therefore the Lord of the harvest, that he will send forth labourers into his harvest.