T1B

88 wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:Why would the % matter when I was talking raw numbers?

Sin,
Logic

Raw numbers of Christians killing Muslims?

Yes raw numbers. Granted it would be hard to exactly pin down so let's do it this way. Do you believe it to be so over say the last 15 years or not?

Moving Sale wrote:

88 wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:Why would the % matter when I was talking raw numbers?

Sin,
Logic

Raw numbers of Christians killing Muslims?

Yes raw numbers. Granted it would be hard to exactly pin down so let's do it this way. Do you believe it to be so over say the last 15 years or not?

Then why did you interject yourself into this since you aren't as smart as poptart?

Moving Sale wrote:

88 wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:Why would the % matter when I was talking raw numbers?

Sin,
Logic

Raw numbers of Christians killing Muslims?

Yes raw numbers. Granted it would be hard to exactly pin down so let's do it this way. Do you believe it to be so over say the last 15 years or not?

How can someone so mind numbingly stupid earn a living as a lawyer?

The bottom line here, is that we go over there and kill the shitstains because they have, and continue to attack us. The fact that we killed more of them because we are technologically superior to them does not change the fact that they are the ones who started this mess.

Are you implying that they would stop if we simply stopped killing them back? You still having trouble grasping the whole worldwide caliphate dealio?

smackaholic wrote:How can someone so mind numbingly stupid earn a living as a lawyer?

I've seen some lawyers who are just that dimb.

You people seem genuinely shocked that the vacuum created by your decades long campaign of extermination of Arab nationalism/secularism...has been filled by Wahhabist lunatics...


hint ~ that was the goal from the beginning

...or you could stop fucking with Assad and let him go all 11th-century-Hadith on these vermin.
There's always that.

From the start of the Syrian civil war, I've thought we should mind our own business and let Assad do whatever it is that Assad does. There are no good/bad cops here and the enemy of our enemy isn't our friend.

Let Allah sort 'em out.

Atomic Punk wrote:Then why did you interject yourself into this since you aren't as smart as poptart?

Whoa, whoa there AP, that was hitting below the belt.

Which is where Midget Fail usually finds himself.

War Wagon wrote:From the start of the Syrian civil war....

There's no "civil war".
Just re-branded Neo-Cons, Samantha Power, the guy with his hand up the Obama puppet, Northrop Grumman, etc...laundering funds intended for their proxy known as ISIS/ISIL.


...and then there's Putin, who ain't having any of that shit...

Jay in Phoenix wrote:

Atomic Punk wrote:Then why did you interject yourself into this since you aren't as smart as poptart?

Whoa, whoa there AP, that was hitting below the belt.

Which is where Midget Fail usually finds himself.

Nice to see you trannies stick together but I don't see you girls refuting anything I said.

Moving Sale wrote:Nice to see you trannies stick together but I don't see you girls refuting anything I said.

What are you babbling about Sale? I said AP was hitting below the belt.

It's not my fault that's where your head is.

Moving Sale wrote:That may be true but it sure shoots down your theory that we should kill them because they are killers.

Yeah....uh, no. It really doesn't.

mvscal wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:That may be true but it sure shoots down your theory that we should kill them because they are killers.

Yeah....uh, no. It really doesn't.

We should kill them because they have flat out stated that they WILL kill us and eventually put us under the control of the caliphate. You do understand what that means, right? You'll be pining for the good ole days when those evil republicans just wanted to stop gays from marrying.

smackaholic wrote: We should kill them because...


...flat...

"AH-HAAA!!! Exhibit A! Proof and DONE!!!"

Sincerely, 'tart

Who are you talking to?

smackaholic wrote: We should kill them because they have flat out stated that they WILL kill us and eventually put us under the control of the caliphate. You do understand what that means, right?

Construction of a sea-wall? Anti-tank ditches? They're a bunch of wankers running around in the desert. If they had a 1-800 number I'd call them the next time Sam recommends a show.

smackaholic wrote:

mvscal wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:That may be true but it sure shoots down your theory that we should kill them because they are killers.

Yeah....uh, no. It really doesn't.

We should kill them because they have flat out stated that they WILL kill us and eventually put us under the control of the caliphate. You do understand what that means, right? You'll be pining for the good ole days when those evil republicans just wanted to stop gays from marrying.

Paranoid much? Geez take a fucking red and calm down.
But don't worry The Donald will pertec you.

Dr_Phibes wrote:...I'd call them the next time Sam recommends a show.

Jay in Phoenix wrote: What are you babbling about Sale? I said AP was hitting below the belt.

It's not my fault that's where your head is.

I was talking about how you two trannies can't refute a word I said. Run along girls.

smackaholic wrote:
The caliphate is coming!!
The caliphate is coming!!




Hide the wimmen and children!!
Put away your Christmas ornaments and menorahs if you value your life!!

I wonder if Derron has any extra room in his compound?

mvscal wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:That may be true but it sure shoots down your theory that we should kill them because they are killers.

Yeah....uh, no. It really doesn't.

Only if you suspend logic.

KC Scott wrote:

smackaholic wrote: We should kill them because they have flat out stated that they WILL kill us and eventually put us under the control of the caliphate. You do understand what that means, right? .

They're going to drive their Toyotas over here and take us down one village at a time?

You wouldn't think it was so funny if you had a friend get his head lopped off by a swarthy gentleman in a balaclava.

H4ever wrote:

mvscal wrote:I think Hitler was on to something. Just picked the wrong religion.

Yep... time to declare a "moratorium" on Islam. Translation: fuck your religion... it's not welcome on American shores or in Europe. Take that shit back to the sandbox and just fucking implode. We will let the messicans run the oil rigs when you and your shit religion are planted.

Quarantine would be a more accurate term. Radical Islam is a plague and all muslims are potential carriers. You don't "defeat" plagues. You contain them and let them burn themselves out. The fuel for this toxic ideology is Saudi and Gulf Emirate money. Everyone knows it.

You declare them state sponsors of terror, seize their real property and other assets, freeze their accounts, cancel their visas, deport their nationals and expel their diplomats. Oh, yes, and also remove the American contractors who operate and maintain their oil infrastructure and defense systems.

Have a nice day and good luck with all the koranimals.

Moving Sale wrote:

Jay in Phoenix wrote: What are you babbling about Sale? I said AP was hitting below the belt.

It's not my fault that's where your head is.

I was talking about how you two trannies can't refute a word I said. Run along girls.

I wasn't trying to refute you, just pointing out the obvious nature of where your little head resides.

So sensitive.

Leave Holic be...he has done quite well for himself since his medaling in the Special Olympics.

KC Scott wrote:

Mikey wrote: Paranoid much? Geez take a fucking red and calm down.
But don't worry The Donald will pertec you.

Holic is a perfect example of the average knee jerk reaction FB American - "We must destroy ISIS before they destroy us"

But before that it's - "We're 19 trillion in debt - balance the budget now!"

and before that - "We must increase military spending because of global threats like ISIS"

and before that........... "Starbucks declared War on Christmas"

So what should we do regarding those cockroaches? The sad part is that crushing them really wouldn't be that fukking expensive if we would take the gloves off. A policy of ruthlessly crushing them any way possible with no regard to collateral damage would get have them on the ropes quickly. You see, militarily speaking they really are a JV squad. But even a JV squad will give you trouble when you have both hands tied behind your back and a blindfold on.

Jay in Phoenix wrote:
I wasn't trying to refute you...

No you were just acting like a little bitch with your purse swinging trannie to friend. What's next? You going to call in KCpurseswingingtranny to join you?

KC Scott wrote:

smackaholic wrote: So what should we do regarding those cockroaches?

All are "allies" who'd have a stake in stabilizing the region

Turkey - 2nd largest standing army in NATO behind US
Saudi Arabia - 175,000 active Duty
Jordan - 100,000
Egypt - 250,000 (est.)
UAE - 70,000
Qatar - 12,000

Outside of them both The Russians and Iranians also seem to want to play.

Estimates of the size of ISIS run 20-30K in Iraq and 40K in Syria

You just don't get it, do you?

Those countries are all part of the problem, not the solution. If we could just take the gloves off and kill everybody in the entire Middle East our troubles would be over. Easy Peasy.

After all if you kill all your enemies, with no regard to "collateral damage", the only people left are your friends. Right?

Moving Sale wrote:

Jay in Phoenix wrote:
I wasn't trying to refute you...

No you were just acting like a little bitch with your purse swinging trannie to friend. What's next? You going to call in KCpurseswingingtranny to join you?

Jebus Christ, is your little shitty diaper in a wad. I was just having fun with you.

Lighten up Francis.

Jay in Phoenix wrote: Jebus Christ, is your little shitty diaper in a wad.

Apparently, yes.

Jay in Phoenix wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:

Jay in Phoenix wrote:
I wasn't trying to refute you...

No you were just acting like a little bitch with your purse swinging trannie to friend. What's next? You going to call in KCpurseswingingtranny to join you?

Jebus Christ, is your little shitty diaper in a wad. I was just having fun with you.

Lighten up Francis.

So... I haven't bothered the midget in at least 4 months now. He has a clear and auditory "lisp" and must be laughed at by people he talks to. Then all I do is ask him why he jumps into something he knows less than poptart. Now the midget is flapping his flailing arms for more negative attention and repeated beat downs. The online law school must be laughing at the money they stole from Losing Sales.

Oh, I need to mention that males that have lisps shouldn't be calling others trannies, faggots, etc.

KC Scott wrote:

smackaholic wrote: So what should we do regarding those cockroaches?

All are "allies" who'd have a stake in stabilizing the region

Turkey - 2nd largest standing army in NATO behind US
Saudi Arabia - 175,000 active Duty
Jordan - 100,000
Egypt - 250,000 (est.)
UAE - 70,000
Qatar - 12,000

Outside of them both The Russians and Iranians also seem to want to play.

Estimates of the size of ISIS run 20-30K in Iraq and 40K in Syria

The turks are assholes. They've been really shitty allies, the Saudis are a big part of the problem also. Jordan has a good dude running the show, but, not so sure about his peeps. Same goes for the rest of them. IMO, we should be working closely with the Kurds and tell the turks, who won't like it much to fukk the fukk off. Maybe work with the Jordanians as well. Show them that being on our side is in their best interest by ruthlessly bombing the fukk out of the bad guys.

Moving Sale wrote:

Left Seater wrote:
Are you saying that due to the military actions in Iraq, Afghanistan, etc Christians have killed more goat herders than they have killed Christians?

Military action in those countries would be included.

Sin,
Statistics

As others have said, the Christians killing of Muslims is a direct result of multiple terrorist attacks. So while your statement is true it means next to nothing.

mvscal wrote:I think Hitler was on to something. Just picked the wrong religion.

i know this is tongue and cheek, but I've been standing up for muslims saying the fundies only represent about 2-3%......
there should be a movement among moderate muslims to put an end to this shit.....but they won't do it for fear of getting their heads lopped off......

I think Christopher Hitchens had it right......



he was taling about an ISIS like group back in 2005....

a bitch slap to a jihadist sympathetic

Rack Chris Hutchens.

KC Scott wrote:And since we still seem to worry a little too much about collateral damage.....

Exactly.

That is where we fukk up. We need to start fighting this the way we fought WWII. All fukking in. Do not deliberately target innocents, but basically act as though the innocents are not there. We need to be absolutely ruthless. We did not win WWII against a far more formidable foe by being nice guys. Everyone says that the Arabs need to take care of the problem. I believe they will take care of the problem when not doing so becomes more painful than standing up to them.

smackaholic wrote:We need to start fighting this the way we fought WWII.

Who is "we"? "We" weren't attacked. The French were attacked as an entirely too predictable result of their policy of importing millions of useless, subhuman savages. Let them deal with it. I haven't seen any reports of them asking for our help, have you?

mvscal wrote:

smackaholic wrote:We need to start fighting this the way we fought WWII.

Who is "we"? "We" weren't attacked. The French were attacked as an entirely too predictable result of their policy of importing millions of useless, subhuman savages. Let them deal with it. I haven't seen any reports of them asking for our help, have you?

You forgot that the caliphate is on our doorstep. They prolly have subs off the Virginia coast and a fleet of dhows supported by Zodiacs ready to invade Connecticut, as we speak.

So what?

Jsc810 wrote:Ah, you're not familiar with or do not understand NATO.

I do. You clearly don't. Which nation just attacked France? Most of the attackers were either French or Belgians with a couple of "Syrian" "refugees" in the mix.