T1B

Mikey wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:No. I posted what was reported here in Madison, because I knew that it didn't align with Dinsdale's table. Yes, I'll admit I'm not some sort of amateur meteorologist, so I simply tracked down the numbers that backed up what I posted. You cock-gobbling simpleton.

This is what you posted, you feeble minded penis gazer.

Goober McTuber wrote:Last Thursday it was 94 degrees here with 94% humidity.

The numbers don't back up what you posted. It was never 94 degrees with 94% humidity.

Oh, damn, I'm so sorry, fatso. The news websites said we had 94 degrees and 94% humidity. So sorry this has caused such grief.

I'll have to admit in one area you are without peer. Absolutely the #1 last word whore in the history of last word whoredom.

RACK that at least, you festering smegma filled pilonidal cyst.

Geez, I didn't mean for (correctly) calling Goods out on bullshit (which it was, and I thought KC Dave recently called everyone out on such bullshit) would cause a geriatric war.

But...

Mikey wrote:BTW, here's your weather for last Thursday.

According to NOAA your highest temperature was 93, and the RH was only 60 then. Pussy.

After spending last summer sampling some of the hottest places the country has to offer -- 93 at 60% is not fucking around. It rarely cracks 60% at the peak afternoon temp anywhere if it's over 90.

Birmingham tried to get foggy at night (at 96% RH). Saw fairly thick fog in Charleston, SC at 75 degrees. Tampa got a little foggy at 80.

But those places are Nome, Alaska compared to the Rio Grande Valley. McAllen, TX... it didn't even seem real. I've visited the Sacramento Delta in July, and it's downright frigid compared to the RGV. It's my understanding that by being right on the Gulf, it keeps the temps down a bit in Brownsville... go upriver a few miles, and it's game on. Went from McAllen to Albuquerque, and the 102 there (30% RH) seemed downright pleasant.

But in my neck of the woods, it started warming up today. Mid 80's, with a little more humidity than is typical. Supposed to inch up all week, into the low 90's. Last couple of summers (I was gone most of last summer) have been hot as fuck -- this year, it's been nice. After an early heat wave, it's been mid/upper 70's, with the occasional light-overcast day (usually don't see many clouds here in summer). Heck, we've even had some very light rain here and there (I think many of you don't realize that west of the Rockies, it rarely rains in summer, except right along the coastline (depending on latitude). Clouds make time sitting on the Columbia (in an open boat) fishing for salmon much more pleasant.

But I have a hunch it's about to get hot for the Dog Days.

Now the Feds are telling workers to work from home if it is too hot to commute. WTF?

This is almost as bad as them saying "non essential" employees should stay home on snow days.

Left Seater wrote:Now the Feds are telling workers to work from home if it is too hot to commute. WTF?

This is almost as bad as them saying "non essential" employees should stay home on snow days.

You have a link to this?

Is the "heat" preventing Google from working in DC too?

...may elect to adjust when they come to work and when they leave in order to avoid commuting during the hottest period of the day. Employees can also ask for annual leave, earned compensatory time or credit hours on a day when severe heat and humidity are threatening their health and welfare.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/feder ... le/2597769

I actually don't see the problem with that. If they don't need to be at a physical office, let 'em work from home. I don't give a fuck.

I'm too busy to look up your latest uproar de jour.

In response to the story, so fucking what? They're not closing offices.

I figured you'd find something better to bunch your panties over, but I guess not.

Papa Willie wrote:

Screw_Michigan wrote:

I love the way you assume that everyone takes this shit as seriously as you do.

R-Jack wrote:I actually don't see the problem with that. If they don't need to be at a physical office, let 'em work from home. I don't give a fuck.

On this we agree. The reason for the suggestion is what struck me as funny. It's too hot so don't come in if you don't want to. Like I said at least they didn't say non essential employees. Hell, any employee that is non-essential should be fired immediately.

Screw_Michigan wrote:I'm too busy to look up your latest uproar de jour.

In response to the story, so fucking what? They're not closing offices.

I figured you'd find something better to bunch your panties over, but I guess not.

Left Seater wrote: On this we agree. The reason for the suggestion is what struck me as funny. It's too hot so don't come in if you don't want to. Like I said at least they didn't say non essential employees. Hell, any employee that is non-essential should be fired immediately.

I know you're playing outraged, fist-waving conservative here but there are specific legal terms to "essential" and "non-essential" personnel.

As TVO would say: Nice white flag.

You know something, fatso? Whoever led you to believe that you're any good at this has done you and this message board a tremendous disservice.

Screw_Michigan wrote:
I know you're playing outraged, fist-waving conservative here but there are specific legal terms to "essential" and "non-essential" personnel.

Great so someone had to go to the trouble of setting a legal definition of the term. That would allow them to debate it in collective bargaining. All the more reason anyone with that designation should be let go yesterday.

Left Seater wrote: Great so someone had to go to the trouble of setting a legal definition of the term. That would allow them to debate it in collective bargaining. All the more reason anyone with that designation should be let go yesterday.

Essential personnel are for continuity of government tasks...except for lawmakers. Why do you have a problem with this?

Where do you detect any anger? Why do you always melt so hard?

Gold burried in the above link. During the shutdown new government regulations dropped from more than 400 a day to 12 a day.

It also says govt basically continued to function with 17% of the workforce not showing up. All the more reason to fire those non essential employees yesterday.

Mikey wrote:

Papa Willie wrote:Goobs is not well rehearsed in the science of meteorology.

/s/
Everybody

No, but he's pretty good at cultivating the over-the-hill early 80s bartender mystique.

Another hayta of goobs groovy basement bar. He's just mad that he doesn't have a basement. Does anyone in Cali have a basement?

Mikey wrote:
No, but he's pretty good at cultivating the over-the-hill early 80s bartender mystique.

The early 1980's...or Goobs' early 80's?
They were both so long ago.

:|

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:

Mikey wrote:
No, but he's pretty good at cultivating the over-the-hill early 80s bartender mystique.

The early 1980's...or Goobs' early 80's?

:|

Same thing.

smackaholic wrote:

Mikey wrote:

Papa Willie wrote:Goobs is not well rehearsed in the science of meteorology.

/s/
Everybody

No, but he's pretty good at cultivating the over-the-hill early 80s bartender mystique.

Another hayta of goobs groovy basement bar. He's just mad that he doesn't have a basement. Does anyone in Cali have a basement?

Mikey's just jealous because I have everything he wishes he had: intelligence, a full head of hair, a clear view of my shoes and a sense of humor.

Hey, tubby - you shouldn't post on the internet anymore.

Papa Willie wrote:

You look like you've lost some weight, but you also look quite a bit older now.

Alright, tards. Enough with the GIFs.

Screw_Michigan wrote:Alright, tards. Enough with the GIFs.

LtR: The Board, Screwey

Screw_Michigan wrote:Alright, tards. Enough with the GIFs.