Re: Trump Asks Russia To Hack Shrillary's Emails
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 11:18 pm
Let's turd, for once is on to something. How the Shillary campaign can be stupid enough to try to make something out of Trump's making a joke is ridiculous. It's as if the Russkies are just sitting on their hands waiting for an invite to cause mischief. But then most of their talking points are braindead to someone with half a brain. I am reffing to the BLM asskissing. Question for the libs here, do you think they have a legit arguement? Do you believe cops hunt them for fun? Do you think any one of your sorry white asses wouldn't receive the same or worse from a cop if you acted as they do?Mikey wrote:Actually, they're not.LTS TRN 2 wrote:That is, when Hillary's camp screams treason, they're tacitly admitting that indeed the (leaked) e-mails did contain sensitive information.
To claim that Hillary's storage of emails on a private server is treasonous while not doing the same about Bush Administration members who also stored emails on a private server is rich.Left Seater wrote:For the Killary camp to claim treason on anything other than her actions in multiple situation is rich.
Saying you have yuge, tremendous, outstanding plans will only go so far.smackaholic wrote:What 88 said. Remember when that fat bitch and Barry DPed Mittens right on the stage? Mittens laid there and didn't even ask for a reach around. Trump will be different.
Yeah always.88 wrote: The moderator always lobs softball questions at the lib and gores the repute.
And they should. WTF does that have to do with the link you tried to use to prove your stupid point? Look fuckhead, judges judge. Justices decide Constitutionality. Why do you think your own link calls The Chief Justice a Justice and all district judges judges. You are stupid beyond belief, no wonder you are sucking trumpcock.88 wrote:Nice white flag 88trumpsClinton Playbook wrote:You just spew shit and don't even care if has any truth associated with it at all. And then you move on to the next lie.
You should spend your days trying to get RBG to get on board with your insanity. She is blowing holes in it with her own quotes:Moving Fail wrote:And just in case you forgot the last one was you calling RBG a judge.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote:On reflection, my recent remarks in response to press inquiries were ill-advised and I regret making them. Judges should avoid commenting on a candidate for public office.
He'll ask for a reach-around?smackaholic wrote:What 88 said. Remember when that fat bitch and Barry DPed Mittens right on the stage? Mittens laid there and didn't even ask for a reach around. Trump will be different.
I'm not sure I would go that far. It's going to be difficult for her to get past her issues when Trump will press the moderator to do so.BSmack wrote:Hillary will rope a dope the orange mummy. He doesn't stand a chance.
Papa Willie wrote:Moving Sale wrote:
Trump is currently attacking a gold star mother. He's a sociopathic loon. And Hillary will put him on display. She just needs to let Trump be Trump. The rest will take care of itself.MuchoBulls wrote:I'm not sure I would go that far. It's going to be difficult for her to get past her issues when Trump will press the moderator to do so.BSmack wrote:Hillary will rope a dope the orange mummy. He doesn't stand a chance.
Yet she claimed she was a judge... so the nasty old Constitution-hating biddy doesn't even know what her job is?Moving Sale wrote:The canons you linked to specifically do not name her as a judge so they don't apply to her.
Moving Sale wrote:
Stop lying, you brainless cum puddle.BSmack wrote: Trump is currently attacking a gold star mother.
You mean the gold star mother whose husband has apparent ties to the Muslim Brotherhood? Trump asked why she wasn't allowed to speak, which raises a good question.BSmack wrote:Trump is currently attacking a gold star mother. He's a sociopathic loon. And Hillary will put him on display. She just needs to let Trump be Trump. The rest will take care of itself.MuchoBulls wrote:I'm not sure I would go that far. It's going to be difficult for her to get past her issues when Trump will press the moderator to do so.BSmack wrote:Hillary will rope a dope the orange mummy. He doesn't stand a chance.
Ooooo. "Vicious" "attack."MuchoBulls wrote:Trump asked why she wasn't allowed to speak, which raises a good question.
Did I stutter?Dinsdale wrote:Yet she claimed she was a judge... so the nasty old Constitution-hating biddy doesn't even know what her job is?Moving Sale wrote:The canons you linked to specifically do not name her as a judge so they don't apply to her.
Because some brain dead Trumpista claimed he was without any actual proof?MuchoBulls wrote: You mean the gold star mother whose husband has apparent ties to the Muslim Brotherhood?
You really don't follow along very well, do you?Trump asked why she wasn't allowed to speak, which raises a good question.
Except she has spoken before. And even a little bit of research should have uncovered that fact. All Trump had to do was say that he respects his son's sacrifice but that he disagrees with him on the policy. Trump does that an Khan goes awah. But no, Trump can't do that. And now he's losing votes from his own party.MuchoBulls wrote:You mean the gold star mother whose husband has apparent ties to the Muslim Brotherhood? Trump asked why she wasn't allowed to speak, which raises a good question.
Did she speak at the convention? His comment was pertaining to that.BSmack wrote:Except she has spoken before. And even a little bit of research should have uncovered that fact. All Trump had to do was say that he respects his son's sacrifice but that he disagrees with him on the policy. Trump does that an Khan goes awah. But no, Trump can't do that. And now he's losing votes from his own party.MuchoBulls wrote:You mean the gold star mother whose husband has apparent ties to the Muslim Brotherhood? Trump asked why she wasn't allowed to speak, which raises a good question.
That's exactly what he said, fuckwad.BSmack wrote: All Trump had to do was say that he respects his son's sacrifice but that he disagrees with him on the policy.
Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
Captain Khan, killed 12 years ago, was a hero, but this is about RADICAL ISLAMIC TERROR and the weakness of our "leaders" to eradicate it!
After being called out on his initial comeback. You don't follow along much better than MuchoBullshit.mvscal wrote:That's exactly what he said, fuckwad.BSmack wrote: All Trump had to do was say that he respects his son's sacrifice but that he disagrees with him on the policy.
Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
Captain Khan, killed 12 years ago, was a hero, but this is about RADICAL ISLAMIC TERROR and the weakness of our "leaders" to eradicate it!
Or Shillary calling her a liar. Now that is an actual "attack" and one made all the more disgusting since it was her own negligence and incompetence which was directly responsible Sean Smith's death.MuchoBulls wrote:So Trump asking why Mrs. Khan was not able to speak at the convention, is me not following along?
Trump has many faults, but what he brought up regarding Mrs. Khan was a good point. I cannot say that I am surprised at how easily offended the media and liberals in general get. It's the same liberals who were totally ok with Chris Matthews' blatant and erroneous attack on Pat Smith at the RNC.
COLORADO SPRINGS, Colorado (AP) — Less than four years ago, the Republican Party tapped a few respected party officials to help the GOP find its way forward. This week, one of them says she's leaving the party — driven out by Donald Trump.
While not a household name, Sally Bradshaw's decision to leave the GOP rocked those who make politics their profession. The longtime aide to former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush was one of the five senior Republican strategists tasked with identifying the party's shortcomings and recommending ways it could win the White House after its losing 2012 presidential campaign.
Now, she says, she'll vote for Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton if the race in her home state of Florida appears close come Election Day.
"Sally is representative of an important segment of our party, and that is college-educated women, where Donald Trump is losing by disastrous margins," said Ari Fleischer, who worked with Bradshaw on the GOP project and was a senior adviser to President George W. Bush. "Trump has moved in exactly the opposite direction from our recommendations on how to make the party more inclusive."
Fleischer still supports Trump over Clinton. But Bradshaw is among a group of top Republican operatives, messengers, national committee members and donors who continue to decry Trump's tactics, highlighting almost daily — with three months until Election Day — the rifts created by the billionaire and his takeover of the party.
This past weekend, the billionaire industrialist Charles Koch (coke) told hundreds of donors that make up his political network that Trump does not embrace, nor will he fight for, free market principles.
That's one reason Koch's network, which has the deepest pockets in conservative politics, is ignoring the presidential contest this year and focusing its fundraising wealth on races for Congress. Donors and elected officials gathering at a Koch event in Colorado said they accepted the Koch brothers' decision, even if it hurts the GOP's White House chances.
Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin, among the high-profile Republicans on hand, refused to endorse Trump and referenced now defunct political parties, such as the Whigs, when asked about the health of the modern-day GOP.
"The party is not really what matters. It's the principles," Bevin told The Associated Press.
Another of those in attendance, House Speaker Paul Ryan, didn't even mention his party's presidential nominee during his speech to the group. Yet he referenced an election he called "personality contest" devoid of specific goals or principles.
Liberals and those on the political left are hardly fully united around Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, whose convention was interrupted on occasion by supporters of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.
But after beating Sanders in the primaries, Clinton took steps to win over Sanders and his supporters — including agreeing to changes to the party's platform. Trump has shown little such inclination, pushing ahead instead with the approach and policy proposals that proved successful in the GOP primary.
Among the key recommendations of the post-2014 report that Bradshaw helped write was for the party to be more inclusive to racial and ethnic minorities, specifically Latino voters. One of Trump's defining policies is his call to build a wall on the U.S. border with Mexico, and forcibly deport the millions of people — many of whom are Hispanic — living in the country illegally.
Bradshaw told The Associated Press her decision to change her voter registration in her home state of Florida was "a personal decision," with the tipping point being Trump's criticism of the Muslim mother of a U.S. soldier killed in Iraq in 2004. In an email to CNN, Bradshaw wrote that the GOP was "at a crossroads and have nominated a total narcissist — a misogynist — a bigot."
Her decision to leave the party isn't "a good sign, given the role she's played at the national level with the RNC and the high esteem in which she's held," said Virginia Republican Chris Jankowski, among the nation's leading GOP legislative campaign strategists.
Another member of the panel that examined Mitt Romney's 2012 loss is Henry Barbour, a Republican National Committee member from Mississippi.
In a message to the AP, he joined the many Republicans who called on Trump to apologize to the family of the late Capt. Humayun Khan, a suggestion the billionaire has rejected to date.
Like Fleischer, he does not plan to follow Bradshaw out of the party, but insisted that Trump must work harder to unify it.
"If we are to gain anything by this, Donald Trump must show he wants to unite Americans so he can win in November and the best way to do this would be to apologize," Barbour said. "There's no excuse, particularly for his comments about Mrs. Khan."
...and scrolling right along. Nobody gives a fuck about a butt hurt Bushie.Goober McTuber wrote:While not a household name,
mvscal wrote:Or Shillary calling her a liar. Now that is an actual "attack" and one made all the more disgusting since it was her own negligence and incompetence which was directly responsible Sean Smith's death.MuchoBulls wrote:So Trump asking why Mrs. Khan was not able to speak at the convention, is me not following along?
Trump has many faults, but what he brought up regarding Mrs. Khan was a good point. I cannot say that I am surprised at how easily offended the media and liberals in general get. It's the same liberals who were totally ok with Chris Matthews' blatant and erroneous attack on Pat Smith at the RNC.
Right. "She was one of the five senior Republican strategists tasked with identifying the party's shortcomings and recommending ways it could win the White House after its losing 2012 presidential campaign."mvscal wrote:...and scrolling right along. Nobody gives a fuck about a butt hurt Bushie.Goober McTuber wrote:While not a household name,