T1B

KC Scott wrote:
It's no wonder your such a mess

:doh:

Eject son, "your" just embarrassing yourself.
Even if you don't realize it.

E I E I O

I'm sure Trump will be all over these jobs, right? Especially as they sell his shitty foreign made clothes.

LORD TRUMP! BRING THESE JOBS BACK!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/bus ... 7d85c3b4d7

Macy’s delivers disappointing holiday season, plans to cut more than 10,000 jobs

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Left Seater wrote: You and or the Dems or Fact Check can roll out facts all you want. That won't play nearly as well as one TV commercial with a balck single mother looking at the camera saying "Trump saved my job from moving to Mexico."

This is the second time you've said this. When can we expect to see this commercial? 2020?

"Uh, Captain Seater, sir, this altimeter here says we're flying at 300 feet. Don't you think we need a little more altitude to get over that big hill coming up?"

"Don't worry Billy. Remember, facts don't matter and I say we're flying at 20,000. No problem. The TV viewing public eats this kind of shit up."

Let's definitely Bucmonkey this shit Dims...

Apples and ceiling fans there Mikey.

Dinsdale wrote:Speaking of Trump and whatnot, I C&Ped this letter from my local news site, as it appears.

Can anyone here who paid attention in third grade figure out why I'm laughing so much?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8Gv0H-vPoDc[/youtube]

Sin,
Cal Poly Alumni (Alumnus?)

We need to force the Frogs to make their Champagne in California.
No Champagne made in France for US consumption with out BIG border tax!!

Mikey wrote:We need to force the Frogs to make their Champagne in California.
No Champagne made in France for US consumption with out BIG border tax!!

That would be government picking winners and losers.

Now, if you had said "sparkling wine" instead of "champagne," and "America" instead of "California," I'd be game.

OK I'm good with "America" instead of California. But why should France have a monopoly on champagne?
It's a free market. We should be able to call our sparkling wine anything we want and let the market decide the winners and losers.

If they want to bring it in from France when they could be making it here, slap a 45% tariff on the fucker. Most people wouldn't be able to tell the difference between a bottle of Cristal and a $20 Cali bottle anyway. I probably couldn't to be honest, though I can't claim ever to have tried any $200+ sparkling wines.

Mikey wrote:OK I'm good with "America" instead of California. But why should France have a monopoly on champagne?
It's a free market. We should be able to call our sparkling wine anything we want and let the market decide the winners and losers.

Why? I dunno -- maybe an international trade agreement (that took almost a century to hammer out). But Cali came out the winner there.

If they want to bring it in from France when they could be making it here, slap a 45% tariff on the fucker. Most people wouldn't be able to tell the difference between a bottle of Cristal and a $20 Cali bottle anyway. I probably couldn't to be honest, though I can't claim ever to have tried any $200+ sparkling wines.

I've had some decent sparkling wines -- they all taste like crap to me, and make me puke. Fortunately, the large winery where "my" winery works out of put all the stupid sparkling winemaking shit out in the storage barn... since it was never any good, anyway. The new motto: "want sparkling wine? Argyle* is right up the road, go see them."

* -- They rack up some gaudy scores on the sparklers in the magazines.

Dinsdale wrote:

Mikey wrote:We need to force the Frogs to make their Champagne in California.
No Champagne made in France for US consumption with out BIG border tax!!

That would be government picking winners and losers.

We can't have any of that!

Sincerely,
Carrier