T1B

For those of you who missed the earlier lesson, or who like Rooster have your head so far up your ass you can no longer see daylight...

How to tell a Peaceful Protest from Not a Peaceful Protest

Peaceful Protest




Not a Peaceful Protest






Peaceful Protest





Not a Peaceful Protest






Peaceful Protest





Not a Peaceful Protest






Peaceful Protest




Not a Peaceful Protest




Are you at least starting to get it, you ignorant Nazi fuck?

I've been around the block a few times and understand racism comes in all colors and ethnicities. In this case its the hated KKK.

i remember as a kid back in the early 70's walking in Washington DC with my father, we turned a corner and ran into a KKK rally (white sheets and all), and we walked briskly past. The one thing that stands out in my memory now, nobody was there except DC police. They were basically being ignored, and didn't even make the news, something that i think was a good idea. Counter demonstrators are giving them what they want, publicity.

Mikey wrote:

"Nice car. Does it come in purple?"

Sincerely, KC $cott

Mikey wrote:For those of you who missed the earlier lesson, or who like Rooster have your head so far up your ass you can no longer see daylight...

How to tell a Peaceful Protest from Not a Peaceful Protest

Peaceful Protest



Are you at least starting to get it, you ignorant Nazi fuck?

If carrying weapons is a sign of a non peaceful protest, then why is Ghandi and his supporters carrying quarter staves and Bo sticks? You really know how to kick your own ass, Mikey. Well done!

Mikey wrote: Not a Peaceful Protest

What exactly makes this not peaceful, besides you saying it isn't?

I see shields, eye protection and helmets. All defensive gear. Looks like a bunch of dudes who are expecting to be attacked by SJW assholes and their ilk.

Why didn't you use actual "not a peaceful protest such as BLM assholes burning down their hood or blocking highways?

88 wrote:

Screw_Michigan wrote:

88 wrote:A left wing whacko ambushes Republican members of Congress. He does not represent Bernie and the left.

He doesn't. I know in your fantasy land he does, but in reality, he does not.

Of course he doesn't. And neither does the moron who rammed his car into a crowd represent anything other than said moron (unless there is evidence he carried out the attack with support from others, which I have not yet seen).

You are unhinged, per usualm. I hope you get your head wired right before you fuck your life up.

One disturbed man, out of hundreds of missions of registered Dems or liberal sympathizers, shot up the GOP softball practice.

On the other hand, a man who traveled from Toledo to Charlottesville to participate in a Trump rally with thousands of other Trump supporters murdered and maimed over 10 citizens in a terrorist attack.

I pray for our nation and especially you that you learn to discern the difference.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote: "Nice car. Does it come in purple?"

Sincerely, KC $cott

Everything I have seen about this on mainstream media shows the problems and violence begins with the counter protestors. CNN had a report that said the initial 45 minutes were peaceful and the the counter protestors started throwing things at the KKK. It went downhill from there.

The mayor, governor and others sure are working overtime to change that narrative.

Dangerous nutters come in both the R and D flavor.

C'mon, folks.






RACK me for post #100, btw.

All I see is a lot of hate from both sides. Once again, people stooping down to there level suits the degenerate KKK just fine. Ignore, ignore, ignore.

Just imagine if the KKK was ignored in this case. Nobody would have been hurt, and the klan's demonstration wouldn't have made the news. Which is what it deserved.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Joe in PB wrote: Just imagine if the KKK was ignored in this case. Nobody would have been hurt, and the klan's demonstration wouldn't have made the news. Which is what it deserved.

Pretty much

Nice product placement by the Chrysler Corporation.

Mikey wrote:

Joe in PB wrote: Just imagine if the KKK was ignored in this case. Nobody would have been hurt, and the klan's demonstration wouldn't have made the news. Which is what it deserved.

Pretty much

Whoa, whoa, whoa. That definitely was not the attitude you were displaying earlier in this thread. You were all aggro on the white supremacists showing up with helmets and stuff, but now after getting your ass handed to you by nearly everyone, you meekly say, "Pretty much"?

What a pussy.

Tell you what, show us another picture of Ghandi walking in his peaceful protest with a weapon in his hand, why don't you? So, you know, you can make your point even more clear.

I'm still waiting for the media and all the talking heads to acknowledge that the violence was started by the Left and their Antifa blackshirts. Of course, that'll never happen, especially since the official narrative is now it's all the fault of those big, bad racists on the alt-Right.

I could accept that the alt-Right get their rightful share of the blame as long as the Left was pointed out as being complicit in this whole episode, but as it stands right now, they're coming out of this smelling like roses-- again.

The fix is in.

Robert E Lee's statue is lost in all of this. His monument is a reminder of where we came from. He was hero in the Mexican-American war and was torn on joining the Union vs the Confederacy. His loyalty lied with his home state; not necessarily his stance on slavery. And when the time came to cash in on his successes after surrendering to Grant, he chose to run a small college and live out the rest of his days modestly without ever politicizing anything. He significantly grew the Washington College's attendance while President. Yes, Lee fought on the wrong side, but he's a great part of our history. If we keep succumbing to these statues being torn down of confederate leaders, then we are essentially throwing bleach on our history. And the $$$ being spent in litigation by the taxpayers money to tear down these statues (I believe New Orleans spent $600k and Charlottesville $400k) is ridiculous.

If we're going to do this, then everything memorializing Andrew Jackson and Marten Van Buren needs to be burned into ashes.



Sent from Screwey's Lint Filter

Rooster wrote:I'm still waiting for the media and all the talking heads to acknowledge that the violence was started by the Left and their Antifa blackshirts. Of course, that'll never happen, especially since the official narrative is now it's all the fault of those big, bad racists on the alt-Right.

I could accept that the alt-Right get their rightful share of the blame as long as the Left was pointed out as being complicit in this whole episode, but as it stands right now, they're coming out of this smelling like roses-- again.

The fix is in.

Everything I've read says that "clashes broke out". Not that one group attacked another. Maybe you might want to link up some credible evidence. The right wingnut organizer doesn't even blame the counterprotesters.

But the organizer of the "Unite the Right" rally, Jason Kessler, issued a statement blaming the violence on law enforcement and local officials. "The blame for today's (Saturday's) violence lies primarily with Charlottesville government officials and the police officers who failed to maintain law and order, protect the First Amendment rights of rally participants, and provide for their safety," Kessler said.

Rooster wrote:

Mikey wrote:

Joe in PB wrote: Just imagine if the KKK was ignored in this case. Nobody would have been hurt, and the klan's demonstration wouldn't have made the news. Which is what it deserved.

Pretty much

Whoa, whoa, whoa. That definitely was not the attitude you were displaying earlier in this thread. You were all aggro on the white supremacists showing up with helmets and stuff, but now after getting your ass handed to you by nearly everyone, you meekly say, "Pretty much"?

What a pussy.

Tell you what, show us another picture of Ghandi walking in his peaceful protest with a weapon in his hand, why don't you? So, you know, you can make your point even more clear.

Bullshit.

The alt-right Nazi fucktards came ready for violence, expecting violence and hoping for violence. For you or anybody else to claim that they showed up for a "peaceful protest" is a complete pantload of crap.
They were hoping for a fight and they got what they wanted - lots of attention. In fact, people got killed and the blood is on them.

I never claimed that the counter protesters were there for a peaceful march. Fact is, a lot of them were looking for a fight too, but don't tell me they started this. If your Nazi buddies had stayed home none of this would have happened. They were the organizers and the instigators. I happen to agree with Joe's statement that it's best just to ignore the assholes, but there are people who are too offended to let it slide. If somebody wearing a swastika armband came up to me and snapped off a Nazi salute I'd probably punch them in the face too. You may not remember this, but our fathers and grandfathers spend some time shooting Nazis.

Seig Heil brotha.

Rooster wrote:I'm still waiting for the media and all the talking heads to acknowledge that the violence was started by the Left and their Antifa blackshirts.

Why would they acknowledge something that's true only in what's left of your and the rest of your Nazi fucktard friends' oxycontin addled brains?

GFY

Mikey wrote:

Rooster wrote:I'm still waiting for the media and all the talking heads to acknowledge that the violence was started by the Left and their Antifa blackshirts.

Why would they acknowledge something that's true only in what's left of your and the rest of your Nazi fucktard friends' oxycontin addled brains?

GFY

The reports-- the ones that don't just lump everything together by saying "the clashes occurred" --have the fascist Antifa starting the fights by throwing stuff at the KKK/neo-Nazis. However, feel free to defend your Leftist brothers tooth and nail as you please, comrade.

By the way, I've enjoyed watching you ignore and avoid discussing holding weaponry after bringing it up and illustrating your point with pictures. It's a beautiful thing to behold seeing you dodge your own posts.

Rooster wrote:By the way, I've enjoyed watching you ignore and avoid discussing holding weaponry after bringing it up and illustrating your point with pictures. It's a beautiful thing to behold seeing you dodge your own posts.

You might want to get your eyes checked. I see one, maybe two people in that picture holding some kind of stick. If they were going into a fight it would probably have been against a platoon of Limeys sporting Enfields with bayonets fixed. Must have been pretty intimidating to see all those skinny barefoot dudes coming at you on foot.

I'll have to admit, though, all those Negroes holding hands, 500,000 pot smoking hippies and the guy threatening to gum up the tank tracks with his lower intestine are pretty violent images.

Like I said, GFY you racist Nazi fucktard. You and your ilk are part of the problem.

Go Coogs' wrote:Yes, Lee fought on the wrong side.

That was really all you needed to say. I would also be willing to agree with you on the Andrew Jackson thing. He was a genocidial maniac who plunged the country into economic ruin. He definitely should not be on the $20 bill.

BSmack wrote:

Go Coogs' wrote:Yes, Lee fought on the wrong side.

That was really all you needed to say. I would also be willing to agree with you on the Andrew Jackson thing. He was a genocidial maniac who plunged the country into economic ruin. He definitely should not be on the $20 bill.

Thomas Jefferson was against slavery; however, he was unwilling to part ways with them when he started mounting debt.


Sent from Screwey's Lint Filter

George Washington owned slaves. 'Nuff said. BURN IT ALL DOWN TO THE GROUND!
/s/
Mikey the SJW

88 wrote:Good lord. You people are deranged. Using your logic, do we now have to ban all tributes to FDR since he put Japanese Americans in prison camps during WWII?

That's exactly what I'm saying. You can't isolate the offensiveness of confederate monuments and demand their immediate removal without looking at ALL permanent historical tributes and their offensiveness towards others.


Sent from Screwey's Lint Filter

Rooster wrote:

Mikey wrote:

Rooster wrote:I'm still waiting for the media and all the talking heads to acknowledge that the violence was started by the Left and their Antifa blackshirts.

Why would they acknowledge something that's true only in what's left of your and the rest of your Nazi fucktard friends' oxycontin addled brains?

GFY

The reports-- the ones that don't just lump everything together by saying "the clashes occurred" --have the fascist Antifa starting the fights by throwing stuff at the KKK/neo-Nazis. However, feel free to defend your Leftist brothers tooth and nail as you please, comrade.

Which reports?

Okay...I'll save people a LOT of time on this case.

There are many videos of this event. In nearly every video it shows the dude had a reason to fear for his life. Even before he plows into the crowd there are people surrounding and attacking his vehicle. After the event there is CLEAR and OBVIOUS evidence they threathened his life with sticks and clubs. He was DEFINETETELY in FEAR for his life.

NO WAY the jury is 12-0 against him.

Not Guilty!
Hung Jury!

Sorry libtards and ANTIFA ......you lose again....just like Trayvon....just like Michael Gentle Giant Fergi....just like every other Obongo lives matter.....


NOT GUILTY!

Rooster wrote:George Washington owned slaves. 'Nuff said. BURN IT ALL DOWN TO THE GROUND!
/s/
Mikey the SJW

You need to work on your reading comprehension there Cletus.

Elkcip wrote:Okay...I'll save people a LOT of time on this case.

There are many videos of this event. In nearly every video it shows the dude had a reason to fear for his life. Even before he plows into the crowd there are people surrounding and attacking his vehicle. After the event there is CLEAR and OBVIOUS evidence they threathened his life with sticks and clubs. He was DEFINETETELY in FEAR for his life.

NO WAY the jury is 12-0 against him.

Not Guilty!
Hung Jury!

Sorry libtards and ANTIFA ......you lose again....just like Trayvon....just like Michael Gentle Giant Fergi....just like every other Obongo lives matter.....


NOT GUILTY!

Can somebody please off this shit troll.

Rooster is bad enough without having to put up with this shitstain on the tighty whities of the interwebs.

Mikey wrote:

Elkcip wrote:Okay...I'll save people a LOT of time on this case.

There are many videos of this event. In nearly every video it shows the dude had a reason to fear for his life. Even before he plows into the crowd there are people surrounding and attacking his vehicle. After the event there is CLEAR and OBVIOUS evidence they threathened his life with sticks and clubs. He was DEFINETETELY in FEAR for his life.

NO WAY the jury is 12-0 against him.

Not Guilty!
Hung Jury!

Sorry libtards and ANTIFA ......you lose again....just like Trayvon....just like Michael Gentle Giant Fergi....just like every other Obongo lives matter.....


NOT GUILTY!

Can somebody please off this shit troll.

Rooster is bad enough without having to put up with this shitstain on the tighty whities of the interwebs.

Poor Mikey...Can't handle the truth.

Get back to me in a year when the jury deadlocks.

No way 12-0 verdict, hippie, libtard LOOOOOOSSSSER!

Papa Willie wrote:

Softball Bat wrote:Dangerous nutters come in both the R and D flavor.

Very true.

Something neat has popped up (SS pointed this out on .net):
http://dcwhispers.com/breaking-charlots ... 60R9JIZ.97

http://lawnewz.com/exclusive/exclusive- ... lle-rally/

That's a bit odd, isn't it?

Rumors abound!!!

CNN?

FAKE NEWS!!!

SAD!!

Elkcip wrote:

Not Guilty!


Good luck finding 12 ANTIFA on one jury. Watch the video......they are beating on his car. Self Defense....FEAR....NOT GUILTY!

I suspect the Challenger pilot's defense will be just that. He will say the mob attacked him and his car and that his only option was to haul ass and that it is unfortunate the filthy hippies didn't get out of the way. And a smart defense attorney would show ample video footage of ANTIFA/BLM/etc assholes doing that very thing. There are plenty of examples of those peaceful hippies beating the fukk out of people. He could claim he was in fear of his life. Hopefully more video footage will become available that will prove/disprove this claim. I am sure it is out there. The problem is, it is likely on a snowflake's phone and they may not be likely to come forward with evidence that helps the dude in the challenger.

Worst/best case is he goes down on some level of manslaughter.

smackaholic wrote:I suspect the Challenger pilot's defense will be just that. He will say the mob attacked him and his car and that his only option was to haul ass and that it is unfortunate the filthy hippies didn't get out of the way. And a smart defense attorney would show ample video footage of ANTIFA/BLM/etc assholes doing that very thing. There are plenty of examples of those peaceful hippies beating the fukk out of people. He could claim he was in fear of his life. Hopefully more video footage will become available that will prove/disprove this claim. I am sure it is out there. The problem is, it is likely on a snowflake's phone and they may not be likely to come forward with evidence that helps the dude in the challenger.

Worst/best case is he goes down on some level of manslaughter.

I have seen over 10 videos of ANTIFA and hippies threathing his life with clubs and bats. All the videos of the ANTIFA attacking is more than ample evidence to prove he was in fear of his life. There is NO jury outside of HARLem or Southcentral LA that will find 12 out of 12 jurors to find him guilty.

This is a HUNG jury....just like all the JUSTIFIFY cop shooting of violent black criminals.

HANG JURY!
NOT GUILTY!

pik

kle

Jesus. Fucking. Christ. OTST. Again.