T1B

Does anyone ever win this argument? Any chance y'all don't know what eath other are going to type before they do it? Round and round, going no where.

Diego in Seattle wrote:common sense gun control laws.

Is there any party line stock phrase you won't spout?

Why don't you go ahead and list these "common sense gun control laws"?

Dinsdale wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote:common sense gun control laws.

Is there any party line stock phrase you won't spout?

Why don't you go ahead and list these "common sense gun control laws"?

How about NOT this one?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/tr ... al-n727221

MsCJ wrote:

Dinsdale wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote:common sense gun control laws.

Is there any party line stock phrase you won't spout?

Why don't you go ahead and list these "common sense gun control laws"?

How about NOT this one?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/tr ... al-n727221

Or this one:

"we could go into [gun control policy], but it's a little bit too soon."
(Trump on Texas massacre)

I guess the "too soon" clock resets after each mass shooting.

MsCJ wrote:

Dinsdale wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote:common sense gun control laws.

Is there any party line stock phrase you won't spout?

Why don't you go ahead and list these "common sense gun control laws"?

How about NOT this one?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/tr ... al-n727221

So, a person's medical records are no longer private?

And crack a book sometime -- a person who has been diagnosed with a mental illness is MUCH less likely to commit a violent crime, but much more likely to be a victim of one.

So, a person who statistically is much less likely to commit a violent crime should have their Constitutional rights revoked... why?


So far, we've got one example of a "common sense" FAIL. That's kind of the exact opposite of "common sense."

Mikey wrote:
Or this one:

"we could go into [gun control policy], but it's a little bit too soon."
(Trump on Texas massacre)

It is too soon to talk about it. The shooter is white.

Dinsdale wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote:common sense gun control laws.

Is there any party line stock phrase you won't spout?

Why don't you go ahead and list these "common sense gun control laws"?

Our lisping Representative and snaggy pussy eating Governor within less than 12 hours of the event all made references the need for additional measures to prevent these tragedies. Never once mentioning guns of course to avoid search engine hits, but clearly looking to advance their gun control agenda. The Dems will not be satisfied until every last gun is banned and seized and the populace completely disarmed and the 2A eliminated from the Constitution.

Dude convicted of multiple violent offenses was able to purchase an assault rifle with no red flags.

Derron says don't talk about gun control.

OK

Dinsdale wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote:common sense gun control laws.

Is there any party line stock phrase you won't spout?

Why don't you go ahead and list these "common sense gun control laws"?

If the cops can have it, so can I. There, that wasn't so hard.

Fractured the skull of his infant son.... sure he can buy guns. Guns for everyone.

schmick wrote:There is no such thing as a common sense gun law. People, who want to commit crimes, don't obey laws

So we should eliminate traffic laws regarding speed?

Perhaps even laws on murder?

Dumbfuck.

Diego in Seattle wrote:

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Left Seater wrote:Weinstein donated to the GOP and GOP candidates? Link?

I never made such an accusation. Suckaholic said the church was a "gun free zone." Waiting for the proof....

Left Behinder failed in the logic department.

I was referring to the GOP sucking at the teat of those who block common sense gun control laws.

Only you can follow your logic. You scream Trump/GOP in every thread so most of us started tuning you out long ago.

But let’s hear your idea of “common sense” gun control. Pretty sure that won’t be any sort of consensus.

Heard on the radio that the shooter was a 26 year old veteran. I wonder if he had PTSD or was just a douce bag loser?

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

8 dead in NY...stop import of muzzies, deport all muzzies, build that fucking wall (within 24 hours of event). Mass shooting x 2 in the past 3 months, it's just American mental illness...too soon to comment...spot on el president Trump, bravo...

Joe in PB wrote:Heard on the radio that the shooter was a 26 year old veteran. I wonder if he had PTSD or was just a douce bag loser?

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

And I heard that he assaulted his wife and his child and got a dishonorable discharge after a year in the pokey. I'd say he was a schmick (douchebag loser).

Hard to believe someone convicted of domestic violence could buy or keep firearms. Seems he must have fell through cracks of existing laws.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

MsCJ wrote:Fractured the skull of his infant son.... sure he can buy guns. Guns for everyone.

Why is the mother fucker not in jail for that ??

Joe in PB wrote:Hard to believe someone convicted of domestic violence could buy or keep firearms. Seems he must have fell through cracks of existing laws.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

The USAF failed to inform the FBI of his transgressions, which should have barred him from legally acquiring the weapons.

Papa Willie wrote:https://www.yahoo.com/news/texas-gunman ... 42829.html

Atheist Liberal. We've got a few of those here, don't we?

I see the word Atheist in your article but nothing about Liberal. Fake news much?

Mikey wrote:

Papa Willie wrote:https://www.yahoo.com/news/texas-gunman ... 42829.html

Atheist Liberal. We've got a few of those here, don't we?

I see the word Atheist in your article but nothing about Liberal. Fake news much?

Actually the guy was known to be quite religious. But carry on.

Seems to me that the fact that the guy threatened to kill his mother-in-law probably would be the motive. Funny thing is mother-in-law wasn't at church that day. Rack that backsliding woman for doing the right thing.

But you're the one that decided to single out one group with no solid basis in fact. I think we can all agree that you're a fat fucking retard.

Diego in Seattle wrote:

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Left Seater wrote:Weinstein donated to the GOP and GOP candidates? Link?

I never made such an accusation. Suckaholic said the church was a "gun free zone." Waiting for the proof....

Left Behinder failed in the logic department.

I was referring to the GOP sucking at the teat of those who block common sense gun control laws.

So who did "those who block common sense gun control laws" allegedly rape, you kiddy-diddling fucktard?

Totally sucks that Wags had to die while a complete waste of carbon like you continues to fuck up a perfectly good message board. Just kill yourself, you fucking pederast.

Truman wrote: Totally sucks that Wags had to die while a complete waste of carbon like you continues to fuck up a perfectly good message board. Just kill yourself, you fucking pederast.

Truman wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote:Left Behinder failed in the logic department.

I was referring to the GOP sucking at the teat of those who block common sense gun control laws.

So who did "those who block common sense gun control laws" allegedly rape

Apparently you learned reading comprehension at the same school where Trump learned spelling.

Totally sucks that Wags had to die

Thoughts & prayers.

Papa Willie wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:But you're the one that decided to single out one group with no solid basis in fact. I think we can all agree that you're a fat fucking retard.

Liberals like you are the worst terrorists on earth. Look at what you do in Chicago every day.

I'm pretty sure he doesn't like in Chicago. Is he lobbing semen bombs into Chiraq?

Screw_Michigan wrote: When will White America stand up against white on white violence?

You really suck at this message board thing.

There are all sorts of white people upset over this white on white crime. What you don’t see is white’s not discussing this and instead focusing on some killing of white people by a balck person.

Yes, because police murdering balck people isn't worth discussing.

Idiot.

Left Seater wrote: There are all sorts of white people upset over this white on white crime.

Other than a few sobs and prayers? Not really. Look at your GOP leaders. Look at the fucking orange pedo bear.

"Mental illness...that's a shame."

Papa Willie wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:But you're the one that decided to single out one group with no solid basis in fact. I think we can all agree that you're a fat fucking retard.

Liberals like you are the worst terrorists on earth. Look at what you do in Chicago every day.

I published the work of a guy who has certainly done more investigative work than you or anybody else has in here. Other than laughing at my fat ass, what have you done?

You are one totally whack motherfucker.

Wow, lots of research to back his common sense take. Rack 88.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

So 15 dead unarmed black guys. They are about 15% of the population. Where are the 70 dead unarmed white guys?
And please name one thing your NPR guy changed his mind on, since you failed to do it in your post. Not sure why you didn't provide the one thing that matters in the subject.

A few paragraphs into your article: "The study did not say whether the most egregious examples — those at the heart of the nation’s debate on police shootings — are free of racial bias."

So it didn't study the one thing you said was discussed to death. You REALLY suck at this thinking thing.

Joe in PB wrote:Wow, lots of research to back his common sense take. Rack 88.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

You are probably even dumber than he is, if that is possible.

Joe struggles at wiping his ass, don't discount the depths of his stupidity.

So your take is that all police are bad or the majority of perpetrators who were shot were obeying police commands?

Yeah I guess expecting a logical view from you is a little too much to ask.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

And Screwy the ANIFA tard chimes in with his usual bullshit.

Two turds in a pot.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

No that's not my take you stupid fuck. Do you even know HOW to read?

No one is saying there aren't bad police, what we're saying is a majority are good. That the injust shootings are few and far between, and have been blown out of porportion by the media.

How about police shootings, are all those defunct of racial bias?

We all know the answer to that, and it is not no.



Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Defunct of racial bias?

Does that mean that there's like a funky smell or something?