T1B

Jay wrote:Hell, he also insists that there are no satellites in orbit around the Earth, but can't explain how satellite t.v. or smart phones work.

I turn my phone or t.v. -----> ON.

There is no video of a rocket going from land to space and there are no pics or videos of satellites in space.

Rooster wrote:This guy makes the claim that Flat Earthers are a bunch of doofuses.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/04/21/flat- ... d-a-fraud/

Why are his ramblings relevant?

Is there something within that piece that proves the ridiculous globe?


Nope.

Papa Willie wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

Papa Willie wrote: Goober is filling the board up with tears again.


Sent from my iPhone using Tubbytalk

I see a little bit of humor went right over your fat, misshapen head.

Oh no - we saw you coughing the balls out of your little mouth. Tears, Goobs, tears. The crying variety.

You have a very rich fantasy life. Props.

Thanks for proving my point, fatso.

Softball Bat wrote: Is there something within that piece that proves the ridiculous globe?

GPS or Global Positioning System, have you ever used it? Google Maps or Waze, I use both quite often for directions when traveling in North America, and have used GPS in Europe and Asia. I've also used it for positioning while backpacking Denali National Park in Alaska, where there were only animal trails and streams to hike on. It is fairly precise and has always performed well, and is based on the earth being a globe. Oh yeah, many of those smart bombs and cruise missiles that we've seen on CNN etc., that are so accurate, use GPS.

Papa Willie wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

I wrote that Oprah was having a seizure? Fascinating. Have you ever contributed anything remotely interesting at any of the dozens hundreds of message boards you have visited?

GPS or Global Positioning System, have you ever used it? Google Maps or Waze, I use both quite often for directions when traveling in North America, and have used GPS in Europe and Asia. I've also used it for positioning while backpacking Denali National Park in Alaska, where there were only animal trails and streams to hike on. It is fairly precise and has always performed well, and is based on the earth being a globe. Oh yeah, many of those smart bombs and cruise missiles that we've seen on CNN etc., that are so accurate, use GPS.

How does GPS prove the earth is a globe?

How do you know they use satellites?


The ISS has supposedly been circling the earth 16 times a day for 20 years.

It has gone around the earth approximately 116,800 times.

There are supposedly over 4,000 satellites orbiting the earth.

And yet...

We have not a single photo of any satellite in space.

We also have exactly NO video of a rocket ever going from land to space.

What we have are a lot of fantastical tales.


You can being thinking any decade now.

GPS mapping shows the earth as a globe, and the positioning is almost exact everywhere. It is also used world wide in every country.

Believe what you will pops, but maybe your scrutiny might be better served asking yourself who wrote the Old and New Testiments, and who are the main beneficiaries?

Governments aren't alone in bending the truth for their benefit.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

No need to bother with the GPS. A flat earth GPS would function just fine with 3 or 4 ground transmitters.

What he can’t explain are seasons, time zones, tides and many other phenomena which are perfectly explained by the known system.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't have to explain everything because I don't have a model that I point to and claim to be FACT.
What I do is research things.

You can look up those things you listed and see what flat earth proponents say about them.

None of those things are perfectly by the "known system," because the heliocentric model is preposterous and utterly ridiculous.


Water (and atmosphere - lol) will not stick to the outside of a ball, let alone a ball that is spinning and moving in multiple directions.
There is no science to show that this happens.

It is a JOKE.


The ISS is also laffably ridiculous.
Nobody could possibly live in it and it could never have been assembled.

Use a critical mind for a change and really think about some of these things.

Softball Bat wrote: What I do is research things.

Link? You keep claiming this to be fact, yet you dodge everything that supports a globe model. If you were a man of your word you would book a vacation to take a Southern Polar flight and or a flight from NZ to S America. At a minimum you would reach out to those that have and get their first hand accounts.

Softball Bat wrote:Use a critical mind for a change and really think about some of these things.

More do what I say, not what I do. Fail.

Softball Bat wrote: There is no video of a rocket going from land to space and there are no pics or videos of satellites in space.

Left Seater wrote:You keep claiming this to be fact, yet you dodge everything that supports a globe model. If you were a man of your word...

Amazing.

You chide me for "not being a man of my word," yet precede the statement with a total lie.

lol


Dude, I have put up SO many lengthy posts giving "flat earth" explanations for things that globe enthusiasts use to claim their ridiculous model is true.
I have done it for a couple of years now.
I have actually spent a lot of time and energy doing so.

I don't have all of the answers -- and when I don't, I simply say so.


The flights DO NOT prove your globe.

If you somehow think they do, enjoy it.

Derron wrote:

Softball Bat wrote: There is no video of a rocket going from land to space and there are no pics or videos of satellites in space.

Well sure, Derron...

Get busy and post the video and/or pics any time.





#chipmunk

Just because you have spent hours cutting and pasting things here doesn’t mean you have researched things. It just means you have spent hours cutting and pasting things.

And while S pole flight might not prove a globe they certainly disprove your idiotic ice wall theory. But instead of researching these things yourself you just claim not to have all the answers and ignore what supports a globe model.

Lie to yourself all you want but that isn’t research.

^^^^^this.

The heliocentric model is supported by countless pieces of observable data.

pop's flat earf is supported by a book written thousands of years ago which has been translated multiple times. There is no observable data beyond "water lays flat".

BTW, it doesn't. It curves very slowly, giving the appearance of being flat. And water does not "stick to the globe". It lays upon it thanks to some magical sourcery called gravity.

Now do us all a favor and test the gravity thing out by jumping off the tallest building in Seoul.

smackaholic wrote:It curves very slowly, giving the appearance of being flat. And water does not "stick to the globe". It lays upon it thanks to some magical sourcery called gravity.

Basic observation of water shows us that it seeks its level and lays flat.

If you're telling me it is a FACT that it curves, show me the scientific formula for that.
At what point does it bend and what amount of force applied to it is necessary to make it bend at the rate you claim it bends?

Then show me an example of that really happening.


Are you high?

Water clings to the outside of a ball?

Show me a scientific demonstration of this ever happening.




#nope

Papa Willie wrote:Jesus, dude. Do you have to stick your flat shit in every thread? It's really old at this point.

Your shits are probably quite global.

The whole gravity thing and how it works still eludes you I see. I’m done trying to explain it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If spray put on a fe more pounds, he would likely have ponds form on him because of his gravitational field.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There's no such thing as gravity. The earth sucks.

Softball Bat wrote:
If you're telling me it is a FACT that it curves, show me the scientific formula for that.

What like your 8 inches per mile squared formula that you swear by? Do you even know basic math?

Softball Bat wrote:At what point does it bend and what amount of force applied to it is necessary to make it bend?

Water bends all the time. Sorry you chose to ignore this.

Softball Bat wrote:Then show me an example of that really happening.

How strange, water is curving. That can't be in your world. Water has to be flat.

So Bat, the 1986 nonstop flight around the world by Dick Rutan didn't actually happen? Or did he just skirt the edge of the map where the sea serpents live?

Papa Willie wrote:Jesus, dude. Do you have to stick your flat shit in every thread? It's really old at this point.

I didn't bring it in to the thread.

You really need to learn how to pay attention.

smackaholic wrote:The whole gravity thing and how it works still eludes you I see. I’m done trying to explain it.

LOL

Did you actually try.

You didn't (and can't) explain jack shit.


So yeah, leave.



Bye...

Nice stupid pics, Lefty -- which explain nothing.

"Here!! Here are pics of water bending. See, yep, it'll curl around the outside of a ball and stay there!!"

LMAO!

poptart wrote:If you're telling me it is a FACT that it curves, show me the scientific formula for that.
At what point does it bend and what amount of force applied to it is necessary to make it bend at the rate you claim it bends?

Then show me an example of that really happening.

#tool

Rooster wrote:So Bat, the 1986 nonstop flight around the world by Dick Rutan didn't actually happen? Or did he just skirt the edge of the map where the sea serpents live?

Link it and I will comment.

Softball Bat wrote:I turn my phone or t.v. -----> ON.

There is no video of a rocket going from land to space and there are no pics or videos of satellites in space.

Are you seriously going with THAT as an answer? Obtuse much?

So, you turn on the t.v. or phone. Great. So where does that "satellite" signal come from that enables you to use them?

Don't hurt your tiny brain working this out.

Of course you ignore the proof that water curves after claiming it doesn’t.

Is there anything you won’t spin out of?

Softball Bat wrote:

Rooster wrote:So Bat, the 1986 nonstop flight around the world by Dick Rutan didn't actually happen? Or did he just skirt the edge of the map where the sea serpents live?

Link it and I will comment.

https://airandspace.si.edu/collection-o ... an-voyager

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:

Reading Activities for Struggling Readers

He must be right. He's not a scientist.

Papa Willie wrote:

Mikey wrote:He must be right. He's not a scientist.

He's also not trying to make money off of it.

He's not? Looks like he's trying to make money by taking the other side.
Of course, that's a lot more legit.

I really don't get what's wrong with scientists making money from doing science. It's their job.
Don't you make money by doing your job (assuming you have one)? Does that make you a phony in your field?

If scientists had to work for free, then no science would get done at all. I guess that would be fine with you, Trump, Pruitt, and ole softball bat.

Zactly, Spray. I have no objection to scientists earning a living, but in order to fund the projects they work on they apply for grants, which I understand is a brutal and cutthroat business. It pushes these people to produce results that are desired by their financial masters to keep the taps open and the money flowing. It may not be overt or bootlickingly obvious in the results, but the money queers the results. When the financial master is the government it automatically incurs a political penalty that should make all of us question the results, particularly when the administration advocates a position which places our economy in jeopardy— something that is endemic to a green oriented Democrat like Obama.

I don’t have an answer to fix the problem, but one thing I do know is that we shouldn’t make policy decisions on spurious results derived from highly questionable “science.”

Rooster wrote:...the financial master is the government...

The "financial master" is not, nor has it ever been the government. It's the central banks.
Your government doesn't even print it's own money. When was the last time any member of a board of the central banks ran for public election?

You don't even know who your real enemy is.

Left Seater wrote:Of course you ignore the proof that water curves after claiming it doesn’t.

Is there anything you won’t spin out of?

Link me up to where I ever said that water never curves.
Of course it does.

You show pics of water splashing (bending) and water bending under pressure in a tube.
Then you take that and somehow jump to the asinine conclusion that, "Yep, see there... bending water. So of course it also bends and sticks to the outside of a ball, too. You're dumb, poptart!"

LMAO!

You are grasping.
BADLY.

poptart wrote:If you're telling me it is a FACT that it curves, show me the scientific formula for that.
At what point does it bend and what amount of force applied to it is necessary to make it bend at the rate you claim it bends?

Then show me an example of that really happening.

#tool

Jay in Phoenix wrote:

Softball Bat wrote:I turn my phone or t.v. -----> ON.

There is no video of a rocket going from land to space and there are no pics or videos of satellites in space.

Are you seriously going with THAT as an answer? Obtuse much?

So, you turn on the t.v. or phone. Great. So where does that "satellite" signal come from that enables you to use them?

Don't hurt your tiny brain working this out.

Read smackaholic's simple post about it.

Ot not.

At this point no one is going to show you anything that you won't immediately dismiss out of hand.
We get it.
You're a believer.


Can we just stop this already, before T1B drops to single-digit membership?

Rooster wrote:

Softball Bat wrote:

Rooster wrote:So Bat, the 1986 nonstop flight around the world by Dick Rutan didn't actually happen? Or did he just skirt the edge of the map where the sea serpents live?

Link it and I will comment.

https://airandspace.si.edu/collection-o ... an-voyager

Is this your proof of the globe?

If so, you need to get up to speed on this topic.


If someone crossed the South Pole (N-S), going from one end of Antarctica to the other, it would be pretty damn hard to still make a case for a flat earth.

But what you have posted proves exactly nothing.