T1B

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Joe in PB wrote:That is no longer the case with Internet and media outlets spewing hatred on a daily basis.

LOL, yeah, blame the interwebs and the librural media.

Don't blame the white supremacist in chief or anything.

Which has most influence on society? The answer is the Internet and media outlets.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Joe in PB wrote:Let's be honest, very little good comes from social media. It is one of the leading causes of child suicide because bullying now can go on all day and most of the night.

Another negative is all the racism associated with social media. There was a time 20-30 years ago when it seemed racism was starting to be minimalized, not eliminated, but definitely less than in the 50s/60s. That is no longer the case with Internet and media outlets spewing hatred on a daily basis.

Imo kids should be banned from using social media & smart phones (except for calls), until they're 18. There is just too much negativity and adult topics for kids to be kids.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

There is a school of thought that says the old racial detente stipulated that blacks would get various advantages in hiring and such as long as whites were not spuriously charged with racism. That epitaph, “racist,” was considered to be the, um, ace of spades or the nuclear bomb of socially derogatory labels. All that changed and came to a head with the election of Obama and his elevation of such luminaries as Al Sharpton and Louis Farrakhan to new heights of political prominence. This brought about their cries of racism against anything and everything white on a daily basis resulting in the complete cheapening on the term.

The end result is an end to racial harmony— such as it was —and a far more direct and poisonous tone when it comes to race relations. Whites are all collectively KKK members and secret Nazi sympathizers. Blacks are immediately thought to be BLM supporters and advocates of neo-segregation and reparations.

For me and mine, we just mock all of it. I call my better half The White System of Institutionalized Oppression when she asks me to take out the trash and she calls me an outdated cog in the Patriarchal Machine when I wonder when dinner is going to be served.

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Papa Willie wrote: Roseanne apologized as well, or didn't you hear?

Nobody cares. She's been saying baldly racist, anti-semitic shit for years.

So what’s the big deal? She’s no different than Keith Olberman or Joy Behar or Jemelle Hill or any number of baldly racist, anti-Semitic proggs clogging the airwaves for years. At least she kind of apologized sort of. It’s a step further than any of those others I named ever did.

Joe in PB wrote: Which has most influence on society? The answer is the Internet and media outlets.

Wrong.

Rooster wrote: So what’s the big deal? She’s no different than Keith Olberman or Joy Behar or Jemelle Hill or any number of baldly racist, anti-Semitic proggs clogging the airwaves for years. At least she kind of apologized sort of. It’s a step further than any of those others I named ever did.

Jemele Hill apologized.

She was also right.

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Papa Willie wrote: Roseanne apologized as well, or didn't you hear?

Nobody cares. She's been saying baldly racist, anti-semitic shit for years.

Firstly, she's Jewish.

Secondly, Rosanne was pushing a progressive, "liberal" narrative decades before this current crop of witch-burning, Khmer Rouge, Ministry Of Love fanatics was born.
In your zeal to drive the monster into the burning windmill, you immolate your own...or any other luckless bystander you deem to not be a true "fellow traveller".
This is why the actual Left despises you. There's no dialectic...it's strictly quasi-religious "purity spiralling".

Rosanne the "conservative"? Oh, okay...

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Rooster wrote: So what’s the big deal? She’s no different than Keith Olberman or Joy Behar or Jemelle Hill or any number of baldly racist, anti-Semitic proggs clogging the airwaves for years. At least she kind of apologized sort of. It’s a step further than any of those others I named ever did.

Jemele Hill apologized.

She was also right.

She apologized for saying what she did on the air, not for running afoul of the thought police. Her attitudes and beliefs haven’t changed— which is the crux of this discussion.

Rooster wrote:All that changed and came to a head with the election of Obama and his elevation of such luminaries as Al Sharpton and Louis Farrakhan to new heights of political prominence.

Shut the fuck up, idiot. You make the internet dumber by just having a wifi connection.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Papa Willie wrote: Roseanne apologized as well, or didn't you hear?

Nobody cares. She's been saying baldly racist, anti-semitic shit for years.

Firstly, she's Jewish.

Secondly, Rosanne was pushing a progressive, "liberal" narrative decades before this current crop of witch-burning, Khmer Rouge, Ministry Of Love fanatics was born.
In your zeal to drive the monster into the burning windmill, you immolate your own...or any other luckless bystander you deem to not be a true "fellow traveller".
This is why the actual Left despises you. There's no dialectic...it's strictly quasi-religious "purity spiralling".

Rosanne the "conservative"? Oh, okay...

BANG on the money with that comment. The Proggressive PC line and all that comes with it isn’t so much a political stance so much as it is the new secular religion that is deemed acceptable to cross the barrier between government and private life.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:

Rooster wrote:All that changed and came to a head with the election of Obama and his elevation of such luminaries as Al Sharpton and Louis Farrakhan to new heights of political prominence.

Shut the fuck up, idiot. You make the internet dumber by just having a wifi connection.

Oh? So when Sharpton became Obama’s go-to guy for racial advice (which included many, many White House visits), that didn’t affect or change Sharpton’s stature within the black community then, right?

Perhaps you should disconnect from the internet yourself, your last comment excepted... idiot.

Rooster wrote:...Sharpton became Obama’s go-to guy for racial advice...

Whatever you're smoking...



...don't bogart it, bro.... :o

Here ya go, Marty:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/03/ ... -melchior/

Full disclosure: I haven’t read this article in a couple of years, but I either subconsciously used the term “go-to” guy (or man as the article states) or this has been the common phrase concerning Sharpton and I just regurgitated it. Either way, my point remains the same— there is a school of thought concerning race relations that places Obama at the epicenter of the seismic shift in black and white racial relationships. To wit:

http://thefederalist.com/2018/05/18/rac ... erica-far/

BSmack wrote:

Left Seater wrote:Just imagine for a second the uproar from the media, the thought police, the left side of this board if anyone used the same word about Bill Clinton's daughter or Obama's daughters.

Just shut the fuck up. They have been raked over the coals for their looks by conservitards for years. Don't pretend you don't know.

Nice whataboutism. Since others did it first it is ok. Weak sauce. But, but, but he was mean first is so 2nd grade.

Hey Screwey,

Is the Congressional Black Caucus racist? If they aren't, why are the supporting a White Male over a black female in MA? If it isn't racist then why is it ok for them to support a white male over a black female?

88 wrote:

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Rooster wrote: So what’s the big deal? She’s no different than Keith Olberman or Joy Behar or Jemelle Hill or any number of baldly racist, anti-Semitic proggs clogging the airwaves for years. At least she kind of apologized sort of. It’s a step further than any of those others I named ever did.

Jemele Hill apologized.

She was also right.

No she didn’t. And she’s almost as pathetic as you.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/ear ... 45ddf8d21f

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the ... 110dd1b085

Left Seater wrote:Meanwhile Samantha Bee slams the President's daughter and little is said. One advertiser has already yanked their ads though.

I think plenty has been said about it.

Sally Field wrote:I like Samantha Bee a lot, but she is flat wrong to call Ivanka a cunt.

Cunts are powerful, beautiful, nurturing and honest.

In other scandalous news concerning Roseanne Barr, a report is out that she <gasp!> forced a staffer to grill her some burgers in the sun! It’s like she’s a character straight from Gone With the Wind! Whip in hand, shotgun in its scabbard, she rides a horse around looking for lazy slaves to punish for not singing “Swing Lo’“ loud enough and not picking cotton fast enough.

Burgers! In the sun!

http://www.foxnews.com/food-drink/2018/ ... laims.html

Rooster wrote:In other scandalous news concerning Roseanne Barr, a report is out that she <gasp!> forced a staffer to grill her some burgers in the sun! It’s like she’s a character straight from Gone With the Wind! Whip in hand, shotgun in its scabbard, she rides a horse around looking for lazy slaves to punish for not singing “Swing Lo’“ loud enough and not picking cotton fast enough.

Burgers! In the sun!

http://www.foxnews.com/food-drink/2018/ ... laims.html

That's some breaking news right there. From the 90's. Moron.

Papa Willie wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/ear ... 45ddf8d21f

https://twitter.com/callumborchers?ref_ ... r%5Eauthor



Now watch - he won't be able to figure this out...

Yeah, I understand you don't like his viewpoint. Now stop giggling and refute anything that he said.

Papa Willie wrote:He's as biased as a box of your pig's shit.

Goober McTuber wrote:Yeah, I understand you don't like his viewpoint. Now stop giggling and refute anything that he said.

Take your time, fatboy.

Papa Willie wrote:He's as biased as a box of your pig's shit.

Well? We're waiting.

Is that what passes as journalism?

Papa Willie wrote:LOOK AT HIS FUCKING TWITTER PAGE

I checked out his Twitter page. A whole lot of "He's a mean guy. He's probably hiding something."


...and not a lot on foreign or domestic policy critique.

Goober McTuber wrote:

Papa Willie wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/ear ... 45ddf8d21f

https://twitter.com/callumborchers?ref_ ... r%5Eauthor



Now watch - he won't be able to figure this out...

Yeah, I understand you don't like his viewpoint. Now stop giggling and refute anything that he said.

Simple enough. The guy uses the term “intersection” to describe what he does when discussing the media and politics. “Intersectionality” is the latest buzzword in Progressive groupthink, thus negating anything he might have to say on the matter. If he weren’t a clone of every other Leftist talking head, he’d avoid using such terms, if for no other reason than his own credibility.

Rooster wrote:...Leftist...

Please stop referring to these mentally ill freaks as "leftists".

Uncle Joe would've dumped a Tokarev round into the back of their skulls, followed by a quick boot into an irrigation ditch.



red, not rainbow

On a more positive note...

$874 CDN round-trip to Ho Chi Minh City?

What a bargain!

Oh "Lady X"...imagine it. You and I...strolling hand in hand down the bomb cratered sidewalks of General Giap Blvd...it would be so romantic...



:cry:




...one day...

Ahh, love. Is there a more romantic time to walk hand in hand with your beloved other than during the Fall of Saigon, err, I mean Fall in Saigon?

Rooster wrote:Ahh, love. Is there a more romantic time to walk hand in hand with your beloved other than during the Fall of Saigon, err, I mean Fall in Saigon?

Alas, my hopes are probably dashed, as it's unlikely she'll ever leave her abusive husband...

:cry:


...and if that piece of shit mvscal gets any bright ideas about muscling in on my gal...why...I got a rough surprise waiting for him... :x :x :x

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:
...and if that piece of shit mvscal gets any bright ideas about muscling in on my gal...why...I got a rough surprise waiting for him... :x :x :x

Who's your gal? Lillian Vernon? Katy?

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:
...and if that piece of shit mvscal gets any bright ideas about muscling in on my gal...why...I got a rough surprise waiting for him... :x :x :x

Who's your gal? Lillian Vernon? Katy?

Blondiebabe.

Papa Willie wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

Papa Willie wrote:He's as biased as a box of your pig's shit.

Goober McTuber wrote:Yeah, I understand you don't like his viewpoint. Now stop giggling and refute anything that he said.

Take your time, fatboy.

LOOK AT HIS FUCKING TWITTER PAGE, DUMBASS!!!!!!! Good FUCK, you are stupid. I wouldn't expect Screwdie to figure it out!

Nice meltdown.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:On a more positive note...

$874 CDN round-trip to Ho Chi Minh City?

What a bargain!

Where's this place called "Our Help?" Must be somewhere in Canada, eh?
Must be a real dump if they'll fly you there for free.

Also, you could pay for almost four round trips to Ho Chi Minh City for the price of one to Hanoi, and they're only 1,000 miles apart by road.
That coastal highway through Hue must be a bitch.

Lots of UXO along the road. Seriously.