T1B

Papa Willie wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

You finally, finally came up with one that's funny. Blind pigs and acorns.

(That's seriously one of the most fucked up things I've ever seen!)

Now back to bickering.

My first thought was, "now there's Meltspray's dream date."

Goober McTuber wrote:
My first thought was, "now there's Meltspray's dream date."

Goober McTuber wrote:

Joe in PB wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote: Stupid fucktard is a good description of me or anyone willing to comment on peoples takes on leaving the Democratic party, without listening to their takes.

FTFU.

Thanks for confirming my premise, now back to your blind pig & acorns.....

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tardtalk

I give about as much credence to their "takes" as I do to yours. Totally contrived bullshit. Go ahead and link up 6 more stupid videos that I won't watch, you slack-jawed fuckwit.

Logic fail. If you don't care about my takes, why are you here? I don't follow you around to see the the latest CNN garbage you post. Slack jawed fuckwit is obviously a much better description of you, something you validate with each and every ignorant post here.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Joe in PB wrote:Logic fail. If you don't care about my takes, why are you here?

Talk about a logic fail. The reason people come here is to read your "takes"? Are you fucking high?

Of course my takes of wanting a moderate government are outrageous, and your takes of having your head up your ass are solid.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Your "takes" are a solid amalgam of bullshit. Your "takes" in this particular thread are numerous videos of dubious origin that nobody wants to watch. Kindly go fuck yourself.

You should want to watch them. Each one expresses perfectly some aspect of how Joe feels.
And that's important.

I think Joe feels that Kansas City is lovely this time of year.

What I think is the Democratic party listens to members about as well as you guys do, so good luck with that.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Joe in PB wrote:What I think is the Democratic party listens to members about as well as you guys do, so good luck with that.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Let us know when you find an actual bonafide member.

In the meantime, here's a story about a "member" that's probably much more interesting to you. At least it seems to be to a certain Republican Congressional candidate.

Joe, your R's are in command of the government.
Presidency, house and senate majorities.

So why are you obsessing over the Dim party?


Oh... because your R's have been given a golden opportunity and are -----> shitting the bed.

Because on illegal immigration, the Democrats are wrong.

Softball Bat wrote:Joe, your R's are in command of the government.
Presidency, house and senate majorities.

So why are you obsessing over the Dim party?


Oh... because your R's have been given a golden opportunity and are -----> shitting the bed.

Not exactly the party of personal responsibility, eh?

Gosh, after reading this, man, the Libs on here are a bunch of whining ass pussies. Hildabeast lost, let it go. If the orange hair, fake tan, uncouth idiot in office beats you, you should put a gun to your head and pull the trigger, which is everyone one of you Dems on here should do. Fucking idiots.

Your party suck, period.

Screw_Michigan wrote:
Not exactly the party of personal responsibility, eh?

Valid point. Maybe they should take the view of the Dem party and it’s supporters like you who don’t even believe in personal responsibility.

I don't agree with everything Trump says or does, but he is our President, and I do believe he is trying to make our country better. The unemployment rate is certainly better, and overall things are better than when George W or Obama were president.

I had great hope that Obama would bring the country together, but in his second term he seemed bent on tearing the country apart, and the Democratic party is continuing to do so now that he is out of office.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Joe in PB wrote:The unemployment rate is certainly better

The unemployment rate is bullshit

Sincerely,

GOPers 2012-2016

Screw_Michigan wrote:
The unemployment rate is bullshit

Sincerely,

GOPers 2012-2016

You got something correct. The way unemployment is calculated is crap.

That said when comparing these same piles of crap (ie apples to apples) the current pile of crap is a bit better.

Papa Willie wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

Joe in PB wrote:What I think is the Democratic party listens to members about as well as you guys do, so good luck with that.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Let us know when you find an actual bonafide member.

In the meantime, here's a story about a "member" that's probably much more interesting to you. At least it seems to be to a certain Republican Congressional candidate.

https://twitter.com/EliBWatkins?ref_src ... r%5Eauthor

Take a look at the author of that article, fag. Tell us what you think.

Just what I thought when I posted it. That Joe Blows would be interested.

I don't need unemployment numbers to know it is lower, much lower. I've received more Indeed and LinkedIn queries the last year and a half than in all of Obama's tenure as President.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Joe in PB wrote:I don't need unemployment numbers to know it is lower, much lower. I've received more Indeed and LinkedIn queries the last year and a half than in all of Obama's tenure as President.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Italktoomuch

Now there's some solid fucking evidence. Idiot.

Papa Willie wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

Joe in PB wrote:I don't need unemployment numbers to know it is lower, much lower. I've received more Indeed and LinkedIn queries the last year and a half than in all of Obama's tenure as President.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Italktoomuch

Now there's some solid fucking evidence. Idiot.

What don't you understand, Mr. Senility? Both Joe & I are agreeing that the numbers are wrong now. Can you admit they were wrong during King Coon's tenure?

I know the numbers are cooked, Mr. Meltaway. But not in the direction your fellow tard was suggesting. And I was mocking him offering anecdotes as evidence. Way to look as stupid as Joe Blows.

So you also believe that the posted unemployment numbers are high? That unemployment is actually even lower? You do realize that you just made an idiot of yourself?

Papa Willie wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:So you also believe that the posted unemployment numbers are high? That unemployment is actually even lower? You do realize that you just made an idiot of yourself?

Did you not even look at my link?

What link?

Answer the questions, Melty. So you also believe that the posted unemployment numbers are high? That unemployment is actually even lower? You do realize that you just made an idiot of yourself?

#WalkingAway is what you should be doing from this thread. YHKYOFA.

Last Word Whore...


...meet...


...Fractionally Applicable GIF Rejoinder.

Fuck off, you ankle-nibbling gadfly. Meltspray needs to answer these questions.

Goober McTuber wrote:Fuck off RACK you, you ankle-nibbling gadfly you awesome dude that makes this board readable. Meltspray needs to answer these questions I tip the kid that brings my liquor store orders an extra $5 if he lets me hold his feet while I get him to do sit ups with no shirt on.

ftfy, you incontinent, old failure

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:Fuck off RACK you, you ankle-nibbling gadfly you awesome dude that makes this board readable. Meltspray needs to answer these questions I tip the kid that brings my liquor store orders an extra $5 if he lets me hold his feet while I get him to do sit ups with no shirt on.

ftfy, you incontinent, old failure

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:ftfy, you incontinent, old failure

That fat bastard does not need you to prop him up on this board, just in real life. He totally stepped on his dick and he needs to come correct.

Answer the questions, Meltspray. So you also believe that the posted unemployment numbers are high? That unemployment is actually even lower?

I think unemployment has actually gone negative.

After all, Blow in PB keeps getting inquiries from Linkedin and Indeed.


I was sort of wondering about Glassdoor, Lensa, VirtualVocations, Trending Jobs, Ladders and the KC Manpurse Connection. No inquiries from those organizations?

Mikey wrote:I think unemployment has actually gone negative.

That must be why I am working so hard.

So goobs is asking for proof unemployment is lower, because the official numbers are not accurate. Even though using the same metrics as Obama did shows improvement.

Bitching in every thread does not mean you're smarter, quite the opposite is true when you have nothing to contribute. Thanks for confirming what I've been saying all along, that you're an ignorant, bitter, tard.



Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Joe in PB wrote:So goobs is asking for proof unemployment is lower, because the official numbers are not accurate. Even though using the same metrics as Obama did shows improvement.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

I'm asking for proof that unemployment is lower than the posted numbers, you freakishly stupid fuck. I think everyone in this thread agrees on two things. That the posted unemployment numbers have gotten better, and that their methodology is flawed. Despite the flawed methodology, I do believe that employment is lower now than it was a year ago. You seemed to be suggesting that unemployment is lower than the posted numbers. Based on your "evidence".

....and the corporate tax cut has boosted GDP, and employment, something that would not have happened if a Democrat was sitting in the Oval Office.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Joe in PB wrote:....and the corporate tax cut has boosted GDP, and employment, something that would not have happened if a Democrat was sitting in the Oval Office.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Which was nothing to do with what I said.

I think unemployment is lower than when Obama was President, I never said it was lower than the metrics that everyone agrees are not accurate.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Joe in PB wrote:I think unemployment is lower than when Obama was President, I never said it was lower than the metrics that everyone agrees are not accurate.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Now see, when you originally responded to the idea that the numbers are not totally accurate and said they were lower, much lower, I thought you were suggesting that reality was even lower that the calculations. And I repeatedly stated that if that's what you were saying, it was wrong. You never denied saying that I had misinterpreted your remarks until just now. But I have always agreed with your statement above.