Re: GOP's 2018 campaign platform
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 11:49 pm
So I presume that Russia nonsense has run out of gas, huh?
So you can guarantee that no criminals will enter the US legally ??Screw_Michigan wrote:Our already-established system is designed to filter them out.Derron wrote: So what would you propose we do to make sure there are no felonoius type criminals, terrorists or other individuals that would disturb the peace and security of the US ??
You don't have to take it. In fact you should refuse to take it and just let the government keep that 10% of your money. That would be the thing to do, since you have no problem with the tax rates. But you will take the tax cut and you and Screwed in the Ass, and Gobbles McCocks will still cocksucker the administration for every thing you feel it is doing wrong.Mikey wrote:Yeah, I can't wait to see that 10% tax cut coming my way next week. That will be money in the bank, so to speak.
How is Don's 10% middle class tax cut going to come next week, Derron?Derron wrote:You don't have to take it. In fact you should refuse to take it and just let the government keep that 10% of your money. That would be the thing to do, since you have no problem with the tax rates. But you will take the tax cut and you and Screwed in the Ass, and Gobbles McCocks will still cocksucker the administration for every thing you feel it is doing wrong.Mikey wrote:Yeah, I can't wait to see that 10% tax cut coming my way next week. That will be money in the bank, so to speak.
10% is a start and since my property taxes all went up 3% every year, and will continue to do so, they still get the money somewhere.
Didn’t say I wouldn’t take it you shit slinging fucking moron.Derron wrote:You don't have to take it. In fact you should refuse to take it and just let the government keep that 10% of your money. That would be the thing to do, since you have no problem with the tax rates. But you will take the tax cut and you and Screwed in the Ass, and Gobbles McCocks will still cocksucker the administration for every thing you feel it is doing wrong.Mikey wrote:Yeah, I can't wait to see that 10% tax cut coming my way next week. That will be money in the bank, so to speak.
10% is a start and since my property taxes all went up 3% every year, and will continue to do so, they still get the money somewhere.
I can't guarantee anything you brain dead mongoloid but I imagine that DHS is pretty good at filtering out the criminals.Derron wrote: So you can guarantee that no criminals will enter the US legally ??
I prefer Obummer's approach---not sending back the good guys.What about those illegal aliens that commit crimes after they enter the US ?
You imagine they are ?? What about the criminals that come in illegally then ??Screw_Michigan wrote: but I imagine that DHS is pretty good at filtering out the criminals.
That's cool...as long as they enter legally its all good.I prefer Obummer's approach---not sending back the good guys.
I have no fucking idea if it will happen or not. If it does great, that saves a bit of money for a short period of time, before the locals and their own level or corruption get any kind of a net gain. If not then the usual game is always on, Make money pay taxes. We do what we can. Fully fund IRAs and Roth's too. Deduct what you can.Mikey wrote:
You think it will really happen? No doubt you’re actually anticipating it.
Derron wrote:I have no fucking idea if it will happen or not.
We could to see if any of them are carrying bone saws.Derron wrote: So you can guarantee that no criminals will enter the US legally ??.
Says the guy who’s whole family sucks from the gov teet.Derron wrote:I have no fucking idea if it will happen or not. If it does great, that saves a bit of money for a short period of time, before the locals and their own level or corruption get any kind of a net gain. If not then the usual game is always on, Make money pay taxes. We do what we can. Fully fund IRAs and Roth's too. Deduct what you can.Mikey wrote:
You think it will really happen? No doubt you’re actually anticipating it.
I need some kind of game like your energy racket to fuck the tax payers somehow.
Hitting the crack pipe long and hard I see. Fucking idiot.Kierland wrote:Says the guy who’s whole family sucks from the gov teet.Derron wrote:I have no fucking idea if it will happen or not. If it does great, that saves a bit of money for a short period of time, before the locals and their own level or corruption get any kind of a net gain. If not then the usual game is always on, Make money pay taxes. We do what we can. Fully fund IRAs and Roth's too. Deduct what you can.Mikey wrote:
You think it will really happen? No doubt you’re actually anticipating it.
I need some kind of game like your energy racket to fuck the tax payers somehow.
The fucking moron also appears to believe that the same people ("they") who are giving him a 10% federal tax cut are also raising his property taxes. What a buffoon.Softball Bat wrote:How is Don's 10% middle class tax cut going to come next week, Derron?Derron wrote:You don't have to take it. In fact you should refuse to take it and just let the government keep that 10% of your money. That would be the thing to do, since you have no problem with the tax rates. But you will take the tax cut and you and Screwed in the Ass, and Gobbles McCocks will still cocksucker the administration for every thing you feel it is doing wrong.Mikey wrote:Yeah, I can't wait to see that 10% tax cut coming my way next week. That will be money in the bank, so to speak.
10% is a start and since my property taxes all went up 3% every year, and will continue to do so, they still get the money somewhere.
Tell us about it.
GO...
I see you are already drunk this morning you senile alcoholic fuck. Since your reading comprehension skills are that of a chronic drunk, you cannot understand the concept of taxation as a whole of your income. Of course local taxes are different and levied by different agencies / entities. Taxes are taxes. Drop a little here, raise a bit over there.Gobbles McCocks wrote:
The fucking moron also appears to believe that the same people ("they") who are giving him a 10% federal tax cut are also raising his property taxes. What a buffoon.
Other than pulling washed up pols away from the trough, what would this solve?BSmack wrote:You want to cut spending? Lifetime ban on lobbying for all federal elected officials, Senate appointees and all career bureaucrats in decision making positions. Five year ban for anyone else in Federal positions. Also, publicly financed elections. No more bribery errr campaign contributions.Left Seater wrote:I voted for The Don instead of Her because I believed he would be much better for my wallet. Tax cuts for me individually and for my business say that that was a correct vote. Now if we could just get Congress to cut spending across the board.
Just apologize for your horrific writing skills and call it a day, dumbfuck.Derron wrote:I see you are already drunk this morning you senile alcoholic fuck. Since your reading comprehension skills are that of a chronic drunk, you cannot understand the concept of taxation as a whole of your income. Of course local taxes are different and levied by different agencies / entities. Taxes are taxes. Drop a little here, raise a bit over there.Gobbles McCocks wrote:
The fucking moron also appears to believe that the same people ("they") who are giving him a 10% federal tax cut are also raising his property taxes. What a buffoon.
Goober McTuber wrote:Just apologize for your horrific writing skills and call it a day, dumbfuck.Derron wrote:I see you are already drunk this morning you senile alcoholic fuck. Since your reading comprehension skills are that of a chronic drunk, you cannot understand the concept of taxation as a whole of your income. Of course local taxes are different and levied by different agencies / entities. Taxes are taxes. Drop a little here, raise a bit over there.Gobbles McCocks wrote:
The fucking moron also appears to believe that the same people ("they") who are giving him a 10% federal tax cut are also raising his property taxes. What a buffoon.
schmick wrote: All federal politicians must have military service before running for any federal office (congressional rep, Senate, president...)
So if I am too drunk to make it to work, I don't have to go fuck myself? Just apologize for your horrific writing skills and call it a day, dumbfuck.Derron wrote:Goober McTuber wrote:Just apologize for your horrific writing skills and call it a day, dumbfuck.
My bad, I only dropped two drunk references in there when I should have had at least 4. Go fuck yourself if your are not too drunk to make it work.
In theory, I agree with you.schmick wrote: If you're going to have the power to send the men and women of the US armed forces in to harms way, then you should have had the experience of walking in their boots in your lifetime.
Screw_Michigan wrote:
We should welcome them with open arms.
We are a nation of immigrants.. but we are a nation of laws. Our nation is rightly disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering our country…
“Illegal immigrants take jobs from citizens or legal immigrants, they impose burdens on our taxpayers…
“That is why we are doubling the number of border guards, deporting more illegal immigrants than ever before, cracking down on illegal hiring, barring benefits to illegal aliens, and we will do more to speed the deportation of illegal immigrants arrested for crimes…
“It is wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws that has occurred in the last few years.. .and we must do more to stop it.
Of course i am.Papa Willie wrote:So Mikey, Queerland & Screwdy - are each of you doing everything you possibly can to pay as MUCH in taxes as you possibly can? If not - why?
That, my friends, is a bald faced lie. For you to be telling the truth, you’d have to give every penny of your income to the government, withholding nothing from the IRS. Why? Because there is no prohibition against giving money beyond your required taxes, something you obviously are not willing to do. There is a distinct difference between the words “can,” “should,” and “must” particularly when discussing the semantics of paying taxes. You, Screwy, can pay more than what you owe, but whether you should is a different issue from what you must pay. Your attempt at self righteous virtue signaling is a failure.Screw_Michigan wrote:Of course i am.Papa Willie wrote:So Mikey, Queerland & Screwdy - are each of you doing everything you possibly can to pay as MUCH in taxes as you possibly can? If not - why?
That's actually one of the dumbest questions I've ever seen, but I'll answer it anyway. I pay all the taxes I owe and nothing more. I don't use any any illegal or dishonest schemes to get out of paying.Papa Willie wrote:So Mikey, Queerland & Screwdy - are each of you doing everything you possibly can to pay as MUCH in taxes as you possibly can? If not - why?
Why don't you answer the question?Papa Willie wrote:The left always cries about dropping tax rates. When it comes down to reality, they don’t want to pay anymore than anybody else would. At least the ones not on welfare.Mikey wrote:That's actually one of the dumbest questions I've ever seen, but I'll answer it anyway. I pay all the taxes I owe and nothing more. I don't use any any illegal or dishonest schemes to get out of paying.Papa Willie wrote:So Mikey, Queerland & Screwdy - are each of you doing everything you possibly can to pay as MUCH in taxes as you possibly can? If not - why?
If I paid as MUCH as I possibly could, I wouldn't have anything left. Why would I do that? Why would you think that I would want to?
I do contribute money to some organizations that I believe are doing worthwhile work.
What about you? Do you contribute to anything but the dumbing down of humanity?
Do you think all taxes should be voluntary, which you apparently do, and why?
National sales tax. Reduce the IRS down to a tiny entity. Everybody pays something. The more you spend, the more you pay.
I've said it before -- abolish the IRS. We do a census every 10 years. I'll use my state as an example: Oregon accounts for about 1.5% of the US population. Whatever the federal budget is, Oregon should be on the hook to pony up 1.5% of it. One check for 4.3 million people. The people of [insert state name] can vote to raise that money however they see fit.Papa Willie wrote:National sales tax. Reduce the IRS down to a tiny entity.
Check your math.Dinsdale wrote:I've said it before -- abolish the IRS. We do a census every 10 years. I'll use my state as an example: Oregon accounts for about 1.5% of the US population. Whatever the federal budget is, Oregon should be on the hook to pony up 1.5% of it. One check for 4.3 million people. The people of [insert state name] can vote to raise that money however they see fit.Papa Willie wrote:National sales tax. Reduce the IRS down to a tiny entity.
Yeah, under that plan, Mississippi bears more burden per capita than Idaho. Tough shit.
Saves billions in collection expenses.
It disproportionately penalizes the poor.Papa Willie wrote:National sales tax. Reduce the IRS down to a tiny entity. Everybody pays something. The more you spend, the more you pay.
I'm glad to see your affection for things flat doesn't extend to taxation.Softball Bat wrote:It disproportionately penalizes the poor.Papa Willie wrote:National sales tax. Reduce the IRS down to a tiny entity. Everybody pays something. The more you spend, the more you pay.
Filthy rich people don't care if they are taxed a bit more on things they buy -- because money isn't an issue for them.
But a poor person feels the pain each time he is taxed on a purchase.
He only cares about his grammar.Mikey wrote:Check your math.Dinsdale wrote:I've said it before -- abolish the IRS. We do a census every 10 years. I'll use my state as an example: Oregon accounts for about 1.5% of the US population. Whatever the federal budget is, Oregon should be on the hook to pony up 1.5% of it. One check for 4.3 million people. The people of [insert state name] can vote to raise that money however they see fit.Papa Willie wrote:National sales tax. Reduce the IRS down to a tiny entity.
Yeah, under that plan, Mississippi bears more burden per capita than Idaho. Tough shit.
Saves billions in collection expenses.
Do the poor not use the services provided by government? Should they get a pass on paying their fair share?Softball Bat wrote:It disproportionately penalizes the poor.Papa Willie wrote:National sales tax. Reduce the IRS down to a tiny entity. Everybody pays something. The more you spend, the more you pay.
Filthy rich people don't care if they are taxed a bit more on things they buy -- because money isn't an issue for them.
But a poor person feels the pain each time he is taxed on a purchase.