Anyone going to the natty?

It's the 19th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

User avatar
FiatLux
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 4230
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 8:51 am
Location: San Francisco--The edge of the western world

Re: Anyone going to the natty?

Post by FiatLux »

Porky's not very bright.


But, this goes without saying
User avatar
FiatLux
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 4230
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 8:51 am
Location: San Francisco--The edge of the western world

Re: Anyone going to the natty?

Post by FiatLux »

I love watching Porky...melt


Too funny
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 21096
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: Anyone going to the natty?

Post by Screw_Michigan »

Melty will be talking about 2018 BBOTY in June because that's all he's got as a tedious, takeless loser.

Screwball: Alabama doesn't travel
Melty: S-E-C! S-E-C!
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Anyone going to the natty?

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Papa Willie wrote:How’d the SEC do against the B1G this season?

Screwdy made a feelings comment. I just supplied numbers. You seem to rely on feelings a lot as well.
If you had to convince a court room that the SEC does well in road games outside of the southeast, do you think it would be a good idea to provide generic SOS figures and overall records against other conferences predominantly including home games? Think about that.

No smack. I'm trying to help you improve your basic brain functions, logic, reading comprehension, etc. You can win the internet arguments you covet so much if you follow the nuances of the conversation and provide relevant data instead of getting angry and emotional and throwing out random links that have nothing to do with the topic at hand.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Anyone going to the natty?

Post by Goober McTuber »

Papa Willie wrote:
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
Papa Willie wrote:I couldn't resist.

Since the BCS era began in 1998, HERE are the records of conferences vs. other conferences.

SEC: 234-191
ACC: 220-253
Big 10: 198-203
Big 12: 172-176
Pac 12: 168-144

The SEC against other conferences:
ACC: 101-80
Big 10: 48-34
Big 12: 47-35
Pac 12: 19-15

What were you saying again, Screwdy? Don't you hate it when stats overcome feelings?
You are highly inept at a) following the specific topic of a debate and b) providing relevant evidence pertaining to said debate.

Just something I've noticed.
How’d the SEC do against the B1G this season?

Screwdy made a feelings comment. I just supplied numbers. You seem to rely on feelings a lot as well.
I also rely on feelings. And I have a feeling that you're every bit as retarded in real life as you appear to be on this board.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Anyone going to the natty?

Post by Goober McTuber »

Papa Willie wrote:
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
Papa Willie wrote:How’d the SEC do against the B1G this season?

Screwdy made a feelings comment. I just supplied numbers. You seem to rely on feelings a lot as well.
If you had to convince a court room that the SEC does well in road games outside of the southeast, do you think it would be a good idea to provide generic SOS figures and overall records against other conferences predominantly including home games? Think about that.

No smack. I'm trying to help you improve your basic brain functions, logic, reading comprehension, etc. You can win the internet arguments you covet so much if you follow the nuances of the conversation and provide relevant data instead of getting angry and emotional and throwing out random links that have nothing to do with the topic at hand.
Well - at least your team beat Purdue by 10... It took Wisconsin 3 ot's to win by a FG! :lol:
Nice strawman, Melty. Keep reminding everyone how retarded you really are. :mrgreen:
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Anyone going to the natty?

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Road games, melty. He was referring specifically and exclusively to road games. For the umpteenth billion time, try to keep up.

Granted, I'm guessing the SEC has a pretty good track record in those games too because training young black men to run and throw a ball around is your greatest contribution to this country.
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21748
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Anyone going to the natty?

Post by smackaholic »

I think I understand the problem now.

When SEC has to travel, they chain all those balck boys together and make them fly in the luggage hold. It kinda traumatizes them a little.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Post Reply