Page 2 of 2

Re: Anyone going to the natty?

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:42 am
by FiatLux
Porky's not very bright.


But, this goes without saying

Re: Anyone going to the natty?

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:53 am
by FiatLux
I love watching Porky...melt


Too funny

Re: Anyone going to the natty?

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 1:01 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Melty will be talking about 2018 BBOTY in June because that's all he's got as a tedious, takeless loser.

Screwball: Alabama doesn't travel
Melty: S-E-C! S-E-C!

Re: Anyone going to the natty?

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 7:00 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Papa Willie wrote:How’d the SEC do against the B1G this season?

Screwdy made a feelings comment. I just supplied numbers. You seem to rely on feelings a lot as well.
If you had to convince a court room that the SEC does well in road games outside of the southeast, do you think it would be a good idea to provide generic SOS figures and overall records against other conferences predominantly including home games? Think about that.

No smack. I'm trying to help you improve your basic brain functions, logic, reading comprehension, etc. You can win the internet arguments you covet so much if you follow the nuances of the conversation and provide relevant data instead of getting angry and emotional and throwing out random links that have nothing to do with the topic at hand.

Re: Anyone going to the natty?

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 7:23 pm
by Goober McTuber
Papa Willie wrote:
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
Papa Willie wrote:I couldn't resist.

Since the BCS era began in 1998, HERE are the records of conferences vs. other conferences.

SEC: 234-191
ACC: 220-253
Big 10: 198-203
Big 12: 172-176
Pac 12: 168-144

The SEC against other conferences:
ACC: 101-80
Big 10: 48-34
Big 12: 47-35
Pac 12: 19-15

What were you saying again, Screwdy? Don't you hate it when stats overcome feelings?
You are highly inept at a) following the specific topic of a debate and b) providing relevant evidence pertaining to said debate.

Just something I've noticed.
How’d the SEC do against the B1G this season?

Screwdy made a feelings comment. I just supplied numbers. You seem to rely on feelings a lot as well.
I also rely on feelings. And I have a feeling that you're every bit as retarded in real life as you appear to be on this board.

Re: Anyone going to the natty?

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:00 pm
by Goober McTuber
Papa Willie wrote:
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
Papa Willie wrote:How’d the SEC do against the B1G this season?

Screwdy made a feelings comment. I just supplied numbers. You seem to rely on feelings a lot as well.
If you had to convince a court room that the SEC does well in road games outside of the southeast, do you think it would be a good idea to provide generic SOS figures and overall records against other conferences predominantly including home games? Think about that.

No smack. I'm trying to help you improve your basic brain functions, logic, reading comprehension, etc. You can win the internet arguments you covet so much if you follow the nuances of the conversation and provide relevant data instead of getting angry and emotional and throwing out random links that have nothing to do with the topic at hand.
Well - at least your team beat Purdue by 10... It took Wisconsin 3 ot's to win by a FG! :lol:
Nice strawman, Melty. Keep reminding everyone how retarded you really are. :mrgreen:

Re: Anyone going to the natty?

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 9:26 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Road games, melty. He was referring specifically and exclusively to road games. For the umpteenth billion time, try to keep up.

Granted, I'm guessing the SEC has a pretty good track record in those games too because training young black men to run and throw a ball around is your greatest contribution to this country.

Re: Anyone going to the natty?

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 1:26 pm
by smackaholic
I think I understand the problem now.

When SEC has to travel, they chain all those balck boys together and make them fly in the luggage hold. It kinda traumatizes them a little.