Sordid clambake
https://mail.theoneboard.com/board/
Yes, we already know where you are kneeling.EAD wrote:Any conservative worth his or her salt, would be kissing his ring.
I didn't vote for Barry.EAD wrote:How the fuck can ANYONE who voted for the Chicago community street pimp EVER bring up spending or our national debt?
Tell you what.Softball Bat wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2019 2:25 amI didn't vote for Barry.EAD wrote:How the fuck can ANYONE who voted for the Chicago community street pimp EVER bring up spending or our national debt?
FACT is, Donald has accelerated the deficit and debt problem.
Bigly.
Suck and swallow that, girlfriend.
You are a fraud,
And a very dumb one.
Know your facts, 'tard.EAD wrote:But to match barry the Chicago community street hustler, he'd have to reach 12 trillion.
White House wants direct control over where cars are made
Jenny Leonard, Bloomberg NewsPublished 6:02 p.m. ET Oct. 29, 2019 | Updated 11:00 p.m. ET Oct. 29, 2019
The Trump administration wants to dictate how and where global auto companies make cars and parts to secure duty-free treatment under the new NAFTA — in its most direct intervention yet to manage trade and production, according to people familiar with the effort.
The issue is being discussed between Trump administration officials, congressional staff and domestic and foreign automakers in the context of the legislation that lawmakers will vote on for the trade deal to take effect. The White House wants specific language that would allow it to unilaterally administer the production rules for companies.
The U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, signed by President Donald Trump and his counterparts in November 2018, is still awaiting approval from the U.S. Congress. The White House has touted the new production rules for the auto sector as one area of the deal that’s most beneficial to America.
But the companies, lawmakers and even the U.S. International Trade Commission in an economic analysis have cautioned that the rules are so strict that they would result in higher car prices and lost sales.
The push comes amid Trump’s tariff-led assault on supply chains that run through China. It illustrates how much his administration has drifted from Republicans’ free-market ways and is willing to employ the sort of coercive tools used in command economies like China to force domestic production.
It’s also happening as the president’s tariffs on steel, aluminum and imported components from China have contributed to a slowdown in American manufacturing that has begun to cause the loss of factory jobs in some politically important swing states going into Trump’s 2020 reelection bid.
The negotiations over auto rules are taking place in parallel to discussions U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer is having with House Democrats on changes the lawmakers are seeking to the new NAFTA, or USMCA.
Officials from Lighthizer’s office for months have been meeting with auto industry executives to talk through the firms’ transition plans. Those would allow for a grace period of as many as five years before they have to comply fully with the new rules in order to ship products across North American borders duty-free.
The agreement the three countries signed refers to these transition plans as an “alternative staging regime” that each nation can apply on a producer-by-producer basis, giving USTR wide discretion to treat one company better than another.
People familiar with the discussions say the language gives the White House a chance to abuse the transition-plan approval process to pressure companies into making politically expedient investments. To avoid an opaque process ripe for meddling by politicians, auto companies and Congress are asking USTR to commit to uniform rules so they can plan accordingly and don’t have to fear retribution for opening a plant in Mexico, for instance, instead of the United States.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2019 12:27 pm More Trump "conservatism." Of course he wants to abuse the transition-plan approval process to pressure companies into making politically expedient investments. That's what the Trump family crime syndicate does. Abuses this democracy or its own political purposes.
Impeachment cannot come soon enough.
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/busin ... /40480703/
White House wants direct control over where cars are made
Jenny Leonard, Bloomberg NewsPublished 6:02 p.m. ET Oct. 29, 2019 | Updated 11:00 p.m. ET Oct. 29, 2019
The Trump administration wants to dictate how and where global auto companies make cars and parts to secure duty-free treatment under the new NAFTA — in its most direct intervention yet to manage trade and production, according to people familiar with the effort.
The issue is being discussed between Trump administration officials, congressional staff and domestic and foreign automakers in the context of the legislation that lawmakers will vote on for the trade deal to take effect. The White House wants specific language that would allow it to unilaterally administer the production rules for companies.
The U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, signed by President Donald Trump and his counterparts in November 2018, is still awaiting approval from the U.S. Congress. The White House has touted the new production rules for the auto sector as one area of the deal that’s most beneficial to America.
But the companies, lawmakers and even the U.S. International Trade Commission in an economic analysis have cautioned that the rules are so strict that they would result in higher car prices and lost sales.
The push comes amid Trump’s tariff-led assault on supply chains that run through China. It illustrates how much his administration has drifted from Republicans’ free-market ways and is willing to employ the sort of coercive tools used in command economies like China to force domestic production.
It’s also happening as the president’s tariffs on steel, aluminum and imported components from China have contributed to a slowdown in American manufacturing that has begun to cause the loss of factory jobs in some politically important swing states going into Trump’s 2020 reelection bid.
The negotiations over auto rules are taking place in parallel to discussions U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer is having with House Democrats on changes the lawmakers are seeking to the new NAFTA, or USMCA.
Officials from Lighthizer’s office for months have been meeting with auto industry executives to talk through the firms’ transition plans. Those would allow for a grace period of as many as five years before they have to comply fully with the new rules in order to ship products across North American borders duty-free.
The agreement the three countries signed refers to these transition plans as an “alternative staging regime” that each nation can apply on a producer-by-producer basis, giving USTR wide discretion to treat one company better than another.
People familiar with the discussions say the language gives the White House a chance to abuse the transition-plan approval process to pressure companies into making politically expedient investments. To avoid an opaque process ripe for meddling by politicians, auto companies and Congress are asking USTR to commit to uniform rules so they can plan accordingly and don’t have to fear retribution for opening a plant in Mexico, for instance, instead of the United States.
Debating is easy if all you do is lie.
Where's your math of 8.4 trillion coming from?Softball Bat wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2019 6:15 amKnow your facts, 'tard.EAD wrote:But to match barry the Chicago community street hustler, he'd have to reach 12 trillion.
Barry added 8.5 trillion in new debt, and that was HORRIFIC.
Your Don is on pace to eclipse that (if he were to be in office for 8 years).
Donald is a conservative fraud, you fucking goofball.
April 3, 2016...
Donald Trump: “We’ve got to get rid of the $19 trillion in debt.”
Bob Woodward: “How long would that take?”
Trump: “I think I could do it fairly quickly, because of the fact the numbers…”
Woodward: “What’s fairly quickly?”
Trump: “Well, I would say over a period of eight years. And I’ll tell you why.”
Woodward: “Would you ever be open to tax increases as part of that, to solve the problem?”
Trump: “I don’t think I’ll need to. The power is trade. Our deals are so bad.”
Woodward: “That would be $2 trillion a year.”
Trump: “No, but I’m renegotiating all of our deals, Bob. The big trade deals that we’re doing so badly on. With China, $505 billion this year in trade. We’re losing with everybody.”
LMAO!
