Page 2 of 4
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:21 am
by Smackie Chan
EAP wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:18 amHow am I full of shit?
For me to comment on that would be speculation, since I have no idea how you ended up being full of shit. Could be genetics, could be environmental, or a combination of both.
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:30 am
by EAP
Smackie Chan wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:21 am
EAP wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:18 amHow am I full of shit?
For me to comment on that would be speculation, since I have no idea how you ended up being full of shit. Could be genetics, could be environmental, or a combination of both.
As far as genetics goes, German on both sides going way back.
So A+ there.
How long have you been into history and politics?
I find that the majority of the under 30 crowd is extremely ignorant about both history and politics.
There are exceptions, but the younger generation is getting worse in general.
In history and politics that is.
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:33 am
by Kierland
Yes we get it. You don’t want people on your lawn you fucking echo chamber pawn piece.
The process stinks.
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:34 am
by Ban Kierfag
Smackie worked for the govt in Wash DC
Smackie was part of the DEEP STATE SWAMP!
He looks like Jerry Garcia from the Grateful Dead.
Long Hair pot smoking deep state commie hippie!
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:37 am
by Kierland
Attack Attack Attack!
Trust the process!
Trust the attacks will provide cover and noise.
More noise!
Sin,
88noisemakers
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:44 am
by EAP
Ban Kierfag wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:34 am
Smackie worked for the govt in Wash DC
Smackie was part of the DEEP STATE SWAMP!
He looks like Jerry Garcia from the Grateful Dead.
Long Hair pot smoking deep state commie hippie!
Thanks for the heads up!!!
Imagine?
Pot head red diaper doper babies trying to debate anyone with a pulse.
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:53 am
by Softball Bat
EAD wrote:How long have you been into history and politics?
I find that the majority of the under 30 crowd is extremely ignorant about both history and politics.
Smackie was 30... about 30 years ago.
You are a flailing dumbshit.
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:56 am
by EAP
Softball Bat wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:53 am
EAD wrote:How long have you been into history and politics?
I find that the majority of the under 30 crowd is extremely ignorant about both history and politics.
Smackie was 30... about 30 years ago.
You are a flailing dumbshit.
So he's 60 now? And hasn't acquired any wisdom in all his years?
Sounds like Phil Donahue.
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:57 am
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Softball Bat wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 1:53 am
You are a flailing dumbshit.
Shut up, you Marxist-Leninist!
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 2:07 am
by Softball Bat
This is Trump's base.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 2:10 am
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
poptart, why do you love communism so much?
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 2:46 am
by Softball Bat
.088 wrote:This one is going to get very ugly by the time Horowitz, Barr, Durham and the American voting public get done with it.
Wait until your father gets home?
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 2:52 am
by EAP
88 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 2:22 am
Kierland wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2019 11:39 pm
The investigation is the thing of value. It doesn’t need to even find any corruption.
I know you don’t actually do any courtroom work, but I can tell you, investigation are not free. And they don’t do it for free if they don’t find anything either.
If the DOJ wants to investigate they can use the proper channels just like the treaty YOU posted said they should. That’s what the treaty is for, so this illegal shit doesn’t happen.
Any other spin you would like to put on it 88Adolphs?
You are an idiot. First of all, the President of the United States is in complete charge of the executive branch of the U.S. government. The President determines what the proper channels are for that branch, which includes the DOJ and all of the other subordinate agencies. The President can use anyone the President deems appropriate to carry out the Constitutional duty of faithfully executing the laws of the country. Period. There are no limits or restrictions on the channels the President can use. If you are aware of restrictions, please post them. I'll go ahead and link you up to the Constitution:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/index.html Let me know where you find the part about the President's limitations on the use of specific DOJ channels.
Second, I do actual courtroom work. Been doing it for 27+ years. Mostly in federal courts all across the country. I know what investigations cost.
Mueller blew $25M on behalf of the DNC. Who's getting impeached for that shit?
The USAG/DOJ can use any channels the President authorizes it to use to pursue justice unless it runs afoul of the Constitution, the rules established by the courts and/or violates a federal statute the Congress has the authority to enact on the activities carried out by the Executive Branch. Obama's administration is going to get stuck like a pig for lying to a FISA court and abusing the wiretap laws. Trump did nothing like that.
You are pissing into a jet engine, dog. Just eject. This one is going to get very ugly by the time Horowitz, Barr, Durham and the American voting public get done with it.
88.
I don't usually suck up to anyone.
It's not in my DNA.
But fuck it.
That was the best take I've EVER read in my entire fucking life.
And I've been at this longer than many in here have been alive.
There is no response to this perfection you just posted.
Kierland should just fall down dead after this take.
You are 100% correct on lying to the FISA court judge and the illegal wiretap afterward.
To this day the entire left wing media still denies this.
88.
I'm in sheer awe of you
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:12 am
by Screw_Michigan
EAP wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 2:52 am
88.
I don't usually suck up to anyone.
It's not in my DNA.
But fuck it.
That was the best take I've EVER read in my entire fucking life.
And I've been at this longer than many in here have been alive.
There is no response to this perfection you just posted.
Kierland should just fall down dead after this take.
You are 100% correct on lying to the FISA court judge and the illegal wiretap afterward.
To this day the entire left wing media still denies this.
88.
I'm in sheer awe of you
Of course you suck up to everyone. You are a bootlicker just like your hero the orange mobster. You believe in blind loyalty to an organized crime family that is wiping its ass with the constitution and breaking laws as it breathes.
You enablers deserved to be incarcerated along with the Trump family.
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:36 am
by Kierland
88bootlickers,
First you said: What crime?
When I showed you the crime.
You said: I was crazy if I thought it was a crime.
When I pointed out Faux news even said it was a crime.
You said: It was ok because of the treaty.
When showed you the treaty didn’t apply you unleashed the trolls and disappeared for a month.
When I brought it up again it was the guidelines don’t fit.
I didn’t buy that so now it’s the orange menace can do whatever he wants.
To back this up you provide the whole USC. Ok smart guy hook us up with the “Pres is God” clause you Brownshirted twat.
And why didn’t you just say that on 9-26? Did you marching orders change?
At least now we finally have you on record as a dyed in the wool authoritarian nazi fuckhole.
Congrats on finally owning your jackboots.
And don’t forget to bring 44 up again even though I think he should be in jail for War Crimes.
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:36 am
by EAP
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:12 am
EAP wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 2:52 am
88.
I don't usually suck up to anyone.
It's not in my DNA.
But fuck it.
That was the best take I've EVER read in my entire fucking life.
And I've been at this longer than many in here have been alive.
There is no response to this perfection you just posted.
Kierland should just fall down dead after this take.
You are 100% correct on lying to the FISA court judge and the illegal wiretap afterward.
To this day the entire left wing media still denies this.
88.
I'm in sheer awe of you
Of course you suck up to everyone. You are a bootlicker just like your hero the orange mobster. You believe in blind loyalty to an organized crime family that is wiping its ass with the constitution and breaking laws as it breathes.
You enablers deserved to be incarcerated along with the Trump family.
I thought you were one of the smart one's in here.
When Obama famously violated the constitutional rights of the catholic nuns and it went all the way to the supreme court?
Wouldn't you say that Obama was wiping his ass with the constitution?
The supreme court unanimously did you dirty little cunt.
To make matters worse, Obama taught constitutional law!
Which means he KNOWINGLY violated the constitutional rights of the little sisters of the poor, but wiped his ass with our constitution anyway.
The fact that you don't know about this? Speaks volumes about what you are.
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:41 am
by Kierland
88 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 2:22 am
The USAG/DOJ can use any channels the President authorizes it to use to pursue justice unless it runs afoul of the Constitution, the rules established by the courts and/or violates a federal statute the Congress has the authority to enact on the activities carried out by the Executive Branch.
It did run afoul of a statute. 58-30121.
Unless you can show me where 30121 says the orange menace is above that law.
Suck a dick you fucking nazi.
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:42 am
by Kierland
EAP wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:36 am
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:12 am
EAP wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 2:52 am
88.
I don't usually suck up to anyone.
It's not in my DNA.
But fuck it.
That was the best take I've EVER read in my entire fucking life.
And I've been at this longer than many in here have been alive.
There is no response to this perfection you just posted.
Kierland should just fall down dead after this take.
You are 100% correct on lying to the FISA court judge and the illegal wiretap afterward.
To this day the entire left wing media still denies this.
88.
I'm in sheer awe of you
Of course you suck up to everyone. You are a bootlicker just like your hero the orange mobster. You believe in blind loyalty to an organized crime family that is wiping its ass with the constitution and breaking laws as it breathes.
You enablers deserved to be incarcerated along with the Trump family.
I thought you were one of the smart one's in here.
When Obama famously violated the constitutional rights of the catholic nuns and it went all the way to the supreme court?
Wouldn't you say that Obama was wiping his ass with the constitution?
The supreme court unanimously did you dirty little cunt.
To make matters worse, Obama taught constitutional law!
Which means he KNOWINGLY violated the constitutional rights of the little sisters of the poor, but wiped his ass with our constitution anyway.
The fact that you don't know about this? Speaks volumes about what you are.
Trust the process.
Blaming the Black Guy is part of the process.
Was he even born in the US?
Sin,
88ovens
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:43 am
by EAP
Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:36 am
88bootlickers,
First you said: What crime?
When I showed you the crime.
You said: I was crazy if I thought it was a crime.
When I pointed out Faux news even said it was a crime.
You said: It was ok because of the treaty.
When showed you the treaty didn’t apply you unleashed the trolls and disappeared for a month.
When I brought it up again it was the guidelines don’t fit.
I didn’t buy that so now it’s the orange menace can do whatever he wants.
To back this up you provide the whole USC. Ok smart guy hook us up with the “Pres is God” clause you Brownshirted twat.
And why didn’t you just say that on 9-26? Did you marching orders change?
At least now we finally have you on record as a dyed in the wool authoritarian nazi fuckhole.
Congrats on finally owning your jackboots.
And don’t forget to bring 44 up again even though I think he should be in jail for War Crimes.
As for you?
You wouldn't know an authoritarian nazi socialist even while he was sodomizing you with Beto O'Rourke's nazi socialist cock.
88 ass raped you in epic fashion.
Yet you still come back for more.
Sandusky would've loved you at penn st.
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:45 am
by EAP
Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:42 am
EAP wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:36 am
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:12 am
Of course you suck up to everyone. You are a bootlicker just like your hero the orange mobster. You believe in blind loyalty to an organized crime family that is wiping its ass with the constitution and breaking laws as it breathes.
You enablers deserved to be incarcerated along with the Trump family.
I thought you were one of the smart one's in here.
When Obama famously violated the constitutional rights of the catholic nuns and it went all the way to the supreme court?
Wouldn't you say that Obama was wiping his ass with the constitution?
The supreme court unanimously did you dirty little cunt.
To make matters worse, Obama taught constitutional law!
Which means he KNOWINGLY violated the constitutional rights of the little sisters of the poor, but wiped his ass with our constitution anyway.
The fact that you don't know about this? Speaks volumes about what you are.
Trust the process.
Blaming the Black Guy is part of the process.
Was he even born in the US?
Sin,
88ovens
Buwahahaha.
You're just process.
NO substance whatsoever.
Carry on "shit on your dick" disciple.
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:47 am
by Screw_Michigan
Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:42 am
Trust the process.
Blaming the Black Guy is part of the process.
Was he even born in the US?
Sin,
88ovens
The Trump Administration's propaganda MO from his 2015 candidacy announcement was to flood the zone with disinformation. 88 couldn't hack it in the marketplace of ideas anymore so he had to recruit Pikkkle and his moronic inbred cousins to flood the zone here.
RIP a once great board...and American democracy.
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:53 am
by Kierland
EAP wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:43 am
Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:36 am
88bootlickers,
First you said: What crime?
When I showed you the crime.
You said: I was crazy if I thought it was a crime.
When I pointed out Faux news even said it was a crime.
You said: It was ok because of the treaty.
When showed you the treaty didn’t apply you unleashed the trolls and disappeared for a month.
When I brought it up again it was the guidelines don’t fit.
I didn’t buy that so now it’s the orange menace can do whatever he wants.
To back this up you provide the whole USC. Ok smart guy hook us up with the “Pres is God” clause you Brownshirted twat.
And why didn’t you just say that on 9-26? Did you marching orders change?
At least now we finally have you on record as a dyed in the wool authoritarian nazi fuckhole.
Congrats on finally owning your jackboots.
And don’t forget to bring 44 up again even though I think he should be in jail for War Crimes.
As for you?
You wouldn't know an authoritarian nazi socialist even while he was sodomizing you with Beto O'Rourke's nazi socialist cock.
88 ass raped you in epic fashion.
Yet you still come back for more.
Sandusky would've loved you at penn st.
Noise. More noise.
Trust the process.
Scream ‘bode.
Sin,
88morons
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:55 am
by Kierland
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:47 am
The Trump Administration's propaganda MO from his 2015 candidacy announcement was to flood the zone with information. 88 couldn't hack it in the marketplace of ideas anymore so he had to recruit Pikkkle and his moronic inbred cousins to flood the zone here.
RIP a once great board...and American democracy.
Flood the zone.
I like it.
Consider it stolen.
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:07 am
by EAP
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:47 am
Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:42 am
Trust the process.
Blaming the Black Guy is part of the process.
Was he even born in the US?
Sin,
88ovens
The Trump Administration's propaganda MO from his 2015 candidacy announcement was to flood the zone with information. 88 couldn't hack it in the marketplace of ideas anymore so he had to recruit Pikkkle and his moronic inbred cousins to flood the zone here.
RIP a once great board...and American democracy.
You are posting utter nonsense and pure shit.
88 just posted pure facts and rock solid wisdom.
You and kierland shot back with vague generalities and msnbc talking points.
What kind of alternate universe are you and kierland sodomizing one another in?
88 OWNS BOTH you TROLLS!
YOU GOT THAT?
To a lesser extent, I ALSO OWN YOU GUTTER RATS.
OUR constitutional republic is under attack by YOUR left wing government control socialist party.
Trump was put in power to save the republic. Save our constitution and our liberty.
As usual, 88 is 100% correct.
You ass clown cocksuckers have been punked ass fucked so many times, that you make petey bootyfudge look like an ass virgin.
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:26 am
by Kierland
We have now entered the pimp thy master phase of the process.
Call me a god.
Pimp the shit out of ALL my posts.
Attack Attack Attack my opposition.
Pimp me/Love me.
Drink the kool aid.
Sin,
88Davidians
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:44 am
by EAP
Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:26 am
We have now entered the pimp thy master phase of the process.
Call me a god.
Pimp the shit out of ALL my posts.
Attack Attack Attack my opposition.
Pimp me/Love me.
Drink the kool aid.
Sin,
88Davidians
This phase highlights your deep delusional state.
Any clinical psychologist on this board worth his salt, may feel the need to have you "baker acted".
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:01 am
by Kierland
What does Floriduh have to do with this?
How dumb are you?
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:12 am
by EAP
Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:01 am
What does Floriduh have to do with this?
How dumb are you?
Your posts highlight the need for you to be held under observation.
Each state has different ways of going about this.
It's a process.
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:26 am
by Kierland
Attack Attack Attack.
Projection is a great tool.
Use it whenever you can.
Sin,
88floodgates
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:30 am
by EAP
Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:26 am
Attack Attack Attack.
Projection is a great tool.
Use it whenever you can.
Sin,
88floodgates
Let me get this straight
88 bludgeoned you, so you stick around after hours to take your frustrations out on me?
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:32 am
by Kierland
Pimp me.
Love me.
Call me god.
Sin,
88LRonHubbards
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:36 am
by EAP
Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:32 am
Pimp me.
Love me.
Call me god.
Sin,
88LRonHubbards
Pimp
Love
God
Sounds like mayor Pete bootyfudge and you engaged in sodomy.
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 6:06 am
by Kierland
Attack the opposition.
Don’t discuss facts.
Sin,
88trolls
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 6:37 am
by Softball Bat
EAD wrote:OUR constitutional republic is under attack by YOUR left wing government control socialist party.
![Image](https://duckduckgrayduck.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/india-slap.gif)
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 7:19 am
by EAP
Softball Bat wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 6:37 am
EAD wrote:OUR constitutional republic is under attack by YOUR left wing government control socialist party.
And I was correct.
Beto O'Rourke publicly violates the bill of rights every time he speaks.
You denying that, speaks volumes about what you are.
The other socialists running for president are afraid to say what Beto says, because they know it will kill their own chances as well.
You are just a low IQ voter who will vote for any of them.
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 8:31 am
by Softball Bat
EAD wrote:You are just a low IQ voter who will vote for any of them.
I will not be voting for any Dim who is currently running.
Nope.
Is there anything you are
not wrong about?
lol
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 9:03 am
by Softball Bat
Softball Bat wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 8:31 am
EAD wrote:You are just a low IQ voter who will vote for any of them.
I will not be voting for any Dim who is currently running.
Nope.
Is there anything you are
not wrong about?
lol
I voted for Bush in 2000.
I voted for nobody in 2004.
Fool me once...
I was looking at Ron Paul in 2008 but did not vote for him.
Am glad I did not.
In 2015 I saw Donald Trump as the only potential person I might vote for in 2016.
It didn't take too long for me to put that idea in the shitter.
Nearly a year in advance of the 2016 election I correctly predicted that Donald would win.
I predicted (over 2 years ago), as Jsc has also, that Donald will not finish his first term.
So yeah...
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 12:18 pm
by smackaholic
Is an investigation into democrat efforts to sink The Good Ship Trump before it ever got elected a "thing of value", politically speaking?
Of course it is.
Does this mean that things which could hurt someone politically be immune to investigation?
Of course not. Everyone agrees that political meddling by foreign governments is a bad thing. At least that is what the dems have been shouting since the Russian collusion narrative got started.
Regarding that collusion, the exhaustive investigation found nothing.
Well, that's not actually right. It did find that the entire ball got rolling due to very questionable tactics. Tactics that started on the democrat side, but of course this was ignored by Mueller, because anything other than Trump, was of no interest.
But it is of interest to Trump. And it will be gotten to the bottom of. And if finding this out involves Ukraine, so be it.
In the end, you should be asking what is worse, foreign governments meddling in our affairs, or Americans, using government ties, meddling in the election process?
The former is a given. It is like the sun coming up. Everyone does it. The latter is, by far, more dangerous.
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:46 pm
by Kierland
88 says:
You did nothing of the sort. Former Municipal Court Judge Andrew Napolitano said it was a crime. And he has no fucking clue what he's talking about, just like you.
And where did he say it? Right out of the gate you start with a lie. Municipal Court? Link please. (You are probably lying about that too, but I will give you the benefit of the doubt for now.)
I showed how he does make sense, you just one lined your "legal analysis" on the matter with no application of the facts to the law involved.
English, motherfucker. Learn to speak it. And again, you did nothing of the sort. The President asked the Ukrainian President to cooperate in an investigation being conducted by the USAG. That is within the purview of the treaty.
What? Because I missed an "I" in my post? That is the level of tard that you have fallen to?
It's not within the treaty as I pointed out, but you have no problem lying so here we are. Two responses from you, two lies.
I allowed new users to register for the board and took a two-week vacation to Utah and California wine country. I suspected Pikkkle might use that opportunity to post. I do not know who EAP is. You need meds.
Always attack the opposition right? Never just stick to the facts. You conveniently opened the floodgates right when things were heating up in Wash and disappeared for three weeks. Nothing to see here, move along.
Pathetic.
They don't. And you have no fucking response to it except the piss puddle under your chair.
Then hook us up with some actual legal analysis of the subject, if you know how.
My response was- I don't need it, I can read the statute. If YOU think the guidelines help you why don't you use them in some legal analysis instead of just doing a discovery dump of the whole link?
That old Constitution is just a beyotch for you fascists, isn't it? Instead of following it, you'd rather have one party in the House of Representatives conduct a secret investigation in the basement and then announce to the supposedly self-governed they serve that the last election didn't count. Such a jack-booted fraud.
That is rich. In a post where you pimp the USC you call it's procedures on impeachment an overturning of an election and then lie about what the House has done. They have not said anything, but that the inquiry has started. So now you have lied three times in one post.
If you would like to point out the part of the USC where Don the Con doesn't have to follow 58-30121 I'm listening, in fact I have been waiting since 9-26 for you to put SOME legal analysis into one of your posts.
Why didn't you bring up your whack interpretation of 58 USC 30121 when discussing Joe Biden's activities in Ukraine? If requesting cooperation in an ongoing investigation of election fraud is a "thing of value", then isn't demanding the end of an ongoing investigation into family corruption also a "thing of value" too? Saving money having to defend yourself and your son has value in your warped interpretation of the law.
Now we are onto lie number 4. I have said many times if you want to take them both down go ahead.
You are a buffoon.
And you can't read.
His corrupt use of the powers of the office of POTUS in an attempt to hold onto power for the DNC should make every American sick to their stomach. Elect a Chicago Democrat and you get Chicago Democrat slime in DC.
Nice deflection, but I have no love for 44 and will say it AGAIN: he should be in prison for War Crimes.
Bottom line is you think Don the Con can break 58-3012 and not be impeached. You think he can shoot your son and not be held to account for 8 years, while memories fade and evidence is degrading, thus increasing the likelihood of acquittal. You lie constantly in your posts and never marry facts to law. I doubt you even know what legal analysis is. You are a Hack.
Re: Eric Ciaramella.
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2019 3:50 pm
by Kierland
smackaholic wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2019 12:18 pm
In the end, you should be asking what is worse, foreign governments meddling in our affairs, or Americans, using government ties, meddling in the election process?
The former is a given. It is like the sun coming up. Everyone does it. The latter is, by far, more dangerous.
Every one calls world leaders and asks for dirt on political rivals in exchange for releasing $400 million, that Congress appropriated for the work leader's country, while the Russians are crawling up the world leader's ass.
Happens everyday. Nothing to see here, Move along.