T1B

Papa Willie wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:51 pm

Kierland wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:25 pm Tiny
Stupid
Yellow
Tweaker

You know - if you took your own life, you would definitely be happier...

You have to cut the stupid little mother fucker some slack. He can keep this shit set up on his cut and paste and inflate his post count. Same shit, just a word or two changed here and there. With a limited vocabulary like that, makes him think he is actually getting over.

Derron wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 4:05 pm

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:16 am Politicizing everything is your obsession, not mine.

EAP is a Screwy troll ??

The content and presentation will always out them.

I was actually sort of thinking the same thing. If true then a pretty classic troll.

Mikey wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 2:04 am

Derron wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 4:05 pm EAP is a Screwy troll ??

I was actually sort of thinking the same thing. If true then a pretty classic troll.

The password to this troll should be upheld as sacrosanct.

Always turn it into something about them.
Always.
Never about the topic at hand.
Trust the process.

Sin,
88idiots

Papa Willie wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 5:46 am The board

Papa Willie wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 5:46 am

Kierland, who is currently on your ignore list, made this post.

The board is readable again...

Fat
Yellow
Tard

Kierland wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 6:41 am

Papa Willie wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 5:46 am

Kierland, who is currently on your ignore list, made this post.

The board is readable again...

Fat
Yellow
Tard

I have you on ignore and can’t read any of your posts but, to set the record straight, I’m not fat.

Sin
PW

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 3:02 pm

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:43 amSo you deny actual corruption within academia as well?

Because there is indeed massive amounts of corruption within academia and the scientific community.

They control every single aspect,
From the current talking points to the narratives they choose to pursue.

Please list the specific research and data that's been corrupted, and the name(s) of those responsible within the climate science community. I'll wait.

You show me where the 97% of mainstream scientists openly discuss the forthcoming "ice age" and it's role in their hoax.

I'll save you the trouble. You won't find a word.

And THAT my low IQ left wing board member, is prima facie evidence of this hoax.

At the very very least, it raises serious concerns about their overall narrative.

On a planet that is nearly 5 billion years old, ice ages are part of the climate change.
The planet goes from extreme cold to extreme warming time and time again.

Do you have any fuckin clue what an ice age means to humanity?
Or are you a part of the leftist cockroach community with nothing to worry about?

Papa Willie wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:51 pm

Kierland wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:25 pm Tiny
Stupid
Yellow
Tweaker

You know - if you took your own life, you would definitely be happier...

That's not cool, man. Kierland hasn't done anything to warrant multiple people to tell him to off himself. Be one thing if it was just back and forth smack talk, but it isn't for him.

Can you make a blues song instead?

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 1:28 pm

Papa Willie wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:51 pm

Kierland wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:25 pm Tiny
Stupid
Yellow
Tweaker

You know - if you took your own life, you would definitely be happier...

That's not cool, man. Kierland hasn't done anything to warrant multiple people to tell him to off himself. Be one thing if it was just back and forth smack talk, but it isn't for him.

Can you make a blues song instead?

"Gonna see miss Liza, gonna go to Mississippi,
Gonna see miss Liza, gonna go to Mississippi......

Or how bout'

Farewell and adieu to you fair spanish ladies.
Farewell and adieu to you ladies of spain....

Here's one kierland would know.

Young man there's no need to feel down,
I said young man, pick yourself off the ground,
I said young man 'cause you're in a new town,
There's no need to be unhappy.

Young man, there's a place you can go.
I said young man, when you're short on your dough.
You can stay there, and I'm sure you will find, many dicks of all kinds,

It's fun to stay at the YMCA
it's fun to stay at the YMCA

They have everything for you men to enjoy,
You can hang out with all the boys

It's fun to stay at the YMCA
it's fun to stay at the YMCA

You can get yourself clean.
You can have a good meal.
You can do whatever the fuck you feel.

Young man, you better fuckin' listen to me.

EAP wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 1:22 pm Do you have any fuckin clue what an ice age means to humanity?
Or are you a part of the leftist cockroach community with nothing to worry about?

Pause. You claimed corruption. Mgo asked for an example. You can't turn it around on him by demanding he provide the counter-examples first.

I hate phone-posting. I don't know how to use it most efficiently, and my inability to share URLs is an embarassing bit of tech ignorance.

However, both of you should go to the discussion page for

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists who disagree with the scientific consensus on global warming

if you're really interested in what self-appointed gatekeepers on both sides are debating, and why. The list isn't as important as the criteria for inclusion, and why even that isn't enough. I agree with the minority 'Keep' side, btw.

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 8:03 pmYou list specifically where scientists explain that the earth will no longer enter into periods of ice age, and their empirical evidence for this.

You won't find it.

What's that?

I can't quite hear you.

Let me get a little closer.



Huh? What's that, you say? You've got nothing?

Yeah, that's what I thought.

EAP wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 1:59 pm

https://youtu.be/6DpVYKuSfnY

I'm floored. There's so much fucking subtext in that 2:45 clip. I miss that version of Woody Allen, but also hate him for what he does and the multiple messages he merges together. It swiftly moves from comedy to condemnation. The man is a snake, and the brilliance is that he intended to show that.

The second song is about miscegenation versus national purity. Sex as a whip of control (the Navy 's enlisted and impressed) towards citizens; sex as a weapon of chaos (the forced abandonment of war brides and war children) towards enemy nations and enemy ideologies.

The third song is about the good works of a Christian organization and the subtext of homosexual desire for shelter and acceptance.

I wanted a real blues song, though. If Tarkus can't, can you?

Papa Willie wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 3:04 pm https://www.yahoo.com/news/temperatures ... 42091.html

Now find an article where record cold temperatures are being blamed on global warming...

It's a British beach, but everyone is covered up like a Muslim. Where are the bikinis and speedos?

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 2:29 pm

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 8:03 pmYou list specifically where scientists explain that the earth will no longer enter into periods of ice age, and their empirical evidence for this.

You won't find it.

What's that?

I can't quite hear you.

Let me get a little closer.



Huh? What's that, you say? You've got nothing?

Yeah, that's what I thought.

Oh, so the only way you'll take me seriously is if I link you up to
Empirical evidence?

My studying politics and history longer than you've been alive, isn't quite good enough for you?

You are one tough customer.

You should take him at his word MGO.
What could go wrong?

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 2:35 pm

EAP wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 1:59 pm

https://youtu.be/6DpVYKuSfnY

I'm floored. There's so much fucking subtext in that 2:45 clip. I miss that version of Woody Allen, but also hate him for what he does and the multiple messages he merges together. It swiftly moves from comedy to condemnation. The man is a snake, and the brilliance is that he intended to show that.

The second song is about miscegenation versus national purity. Sex as a whip of control (the Navy 's enlisted and impressed) towards citizens; sex as a weapon of chaos (the forced abandonment of war brides and war children) towards enemy nations and enemy ideologies.

The third song is about the good works of a Christian organization and the subtext of homosexual desire for shelter and acceptance.

I wanted a real blues song, though. If Tarkus can't, can you?

Wow. Your extensive musical knowledge has me deeply humbled.

EAP wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 8:06 pmMy studying politics and history longer than you've been alive, isn't quite good enough for you?

In a conversation about science? No, it isn't. Honestly you sound woefully uneducated on this matter. I'd be happy to forward you some reading material from highly respected independent sources. Hell I might even have some of the papers I wrote for Environmental Science on a hard drive somewhere that I could shoot over, just so you can familiarize yourself with the fundamental basics of the issue. Are you prepared to turn Savage off long enough to pick up a book? Help me, help you.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:22 am
"Barbara! The left wing socialists are calling my bluff! Bring me the Encyclopedia Brittanicas! I need to learn stuff!"

The irony is that computer is way too old to be functional with a cordless USB mouse.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 11:39 pm

EAP wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 8:06 pmMy studying politics and history longer than you've been alive, isn't quite good enough for you?

In a conversation about science? No, it isn't. Honestly you sound woefully uneducated on this matter. I'd be happy to forward you some reading material from highly respected independent sources. Hell I might even have some of the papers I wrote for Environmental Science on a hard drive somewhere that I could shoot over, just so you can familiarize yourself with the fundamental basics of the issue. Are you prepared to turn Savage off long enough to pick up a book? Help me, help you.

Ok. But please tell me your research includes the multiple ice ages in the past, AND the multiple ice ages that are forthcoming.

Because if the research you are forwarding has nothing on that?
How is it to be taken seriously?
Because that would mean that 97% of the scientific community believes that the planet will not go through another ice age.
Which begs the question, where's the evidence for this?

Papa Willie wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 12:49 amPLEASE explain this graph to me:

Who said climate doesn't naturally change over a 600 million year period? Do you know what the concern, at the most base level, actually is?

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 2:07 am Do you know what the concern, at the most base level, actually is?

Wolftard had to put on a comfy sweater today, so everything is fine.

TAKE THAT, science!

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 11:39 pm I'd be happy to forward you some reading material from highly respected independent sources. Hell I might even have some of the papers I wrote for Environmental Science on a hard drive somewhere that I could shoot over, just so you can familiarize yourself with the fundamental basics of the issue. Are you prepared to turn Savage off long enough to pick up a book? Help me, help you.

Publish and be damned? Do it.

What's the cliff notes of the cliff notes?

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 2:07 am

Papa Willie wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 12:49 amPLEASE explain this graph to me:

Who said climate doesn't naturally change over a 600 million year period? Do you know what the concern, at the most base level, actually is?

Is it true Wisconsin used to be magnetic north pole?

Also, what is the base level concern?

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 2:46 am

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 2:07 am Do you know what the concern, at the most base level, actually is?

Wolftard had to put on a comfy sweater today, so everything is fine.

TAKE THAT, science!

Big O deserves to be as comfy as he wants.

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 2:00 pm

EAP wrote: ↑Wed Nov 13, 2019 1:22 pm Do you have any fuckin clue what an ice age means to humanity?
Or are you a part of the leftist cockroach community with nothing to worry about?

Pause. You claimed corruption. Mgo asked for an example. You can't turn it around on him by demanding he provide the counter-examples first.

I hate phone-posting. I don't know how to use it most efficiently, and my inability to share URLs is an embarassing bit of tech ignorance.

However, both of you should go to the discussion page for

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists who disagree with the scientific consensus on global warming

if you're really interested in what self-appointed gatekeepers on both sides are debating, and why. The list isn't as important as the criteria for inclusion, and why even that isn't enough. I agree with the minority 'Keep' side, btw.

I suffer from that same tech ignorance! We are part of that minority that exhibits tremendous insight and clarity,
And therefore shouldn't be brushed aside by these tech snobs.

Isn't it curious how the extreme climate changes of our planet,
ie. The ice ages, have been purposely minimized and left out of the mainstream dialogue?

I'm firmly rooted in the idea that earth's ice ages DO NOT fit their theories, computer models and overall narratives.
It's the BIG FAT scientific elephant in the room which no one wants to address.
What say you?

There are a number of things the chicken little brigade wants to ignore.

First and foremost, more CO2 makes everything grow better. It also allows them to be more efficent with water. This is ACTUAL settled science.

The world is greener than it was 50 years ago, by a good bit actually, thanks to man-made CO2 fertilization.

More people are killed by cold than heat. Always have, always will.

Dig up your algore predictions from 20 years ago. How'd they work out?

Temps increases have more or less stalled over the last 20 years. The doomsayers will point to "hottest month in history" data, because this period was .003 degrees warmer than ever before. They will ignore that their predictions were that it would be 2.003 degrees warmer.

smackaholic wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 2:21 pm There are a number of things the chicken little brigade wants to ignore.

First and foremost, more CO2 makes everything grow better. It also allows them to be more efficent with water. This is ACTUAL settled science.

The world is greener than it was 50 years ago, by a good bit actually, thanks to man-made CO2 fertilization.

More people are killed by cold than heat. Always have, always will.

Dig up your algore predictions from 20 years ago. How'd they work out?

Temps increases have more or less stalled over the last 20 years. The doomsayers will point to "hottest month in history" data, because this period was .003 degrees warmer than ever before. They will ignore that their predictions were that it would be 2.003 degrees warmer.

Keep posting sheer genius like that, and you'll be the chairman of this board quicker than kierland can drop his pants in San Francisco to LEGALLY defecate in front of women children and dogs.

Papa Willie wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 5:05 pm

EAP wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 2:35 pm

smackaholic wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 2:21 pm There are a number of things the chicken little brigade wants to ignore.

First and foremost, more CO2 makes everything grow better. It also allows them to be more efficent with water. This is ACTUAL settled science.

The world is greener than it was 50 years ago, by a good bit actually, thanks to man-made CO2 fertilization.

More people are killed by cold than heat. Always have, always will.

Dig up your algore predictions from 20 years ago. How'd they work out?

Temps increases have more or less stalled over the last 20 years. The doomsayers will point to "hottest month in history" data, because this period was .003 degrees warmer than ever before. They will ignore that their predictions were that it would be 2.003 degrees warmer.

Keep posting sheer genius like that, and you'll be the chairman of this board quicker than kierland can drop his pants in San Francisco to LEGALLY defecate in front of women children and dogs.

He already does that. He’s just too small for anybody to notice...

Papa Willie wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 4:07 am

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 2:07 am

Papa Willie wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 12:49 amPLEASE explain this graph to me:

Who said climate doesn't naturally change over a 600 million year period? Do you know what the concern, at the most base level, actually is?

Then you certainly see where there have been FAR more radical changes in our climate than what we're seeing now - just in 600 million years. You'll also note that CO2 and temperature levels are FAR below the average for that time period as well. Right?

So the answer to my question is...no. Got it.

BTW I'm pretty sure we went over all this in detail in one of the prior threads on this subject. Rehashing the same points over and over won't change anyone's mind. Then again, if we stopped doing that, then I guess this board would cease to exist.

Papa Willie wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:59 pm

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 9:51 pm

Papa Willie wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 4:07 am

Then you certainly see where there have been FAR more radical changes in our climate than what we're seeing now - just in 600 million years. You'll also note that CO2 and temperature levels are FAR below the average for that time period as well. Right?

So the answer to my question is...no. Got it.

BTW I'm pretty sure we went over all this in detail in one of the prior threads on this subject. Rehashing the same points over and over won't change anyone's mind. Then again, if we stopped doing that, then I guess this board would cease to exist.

I don't know if I've ever even talked with you about this. Why not go back to the beginning?


Don't you see how our temperatures and CO2 levels are WAAAAAAAAY below the average right now? Mgo - we're not important. Our silly little 80 years here just don't make a fuck - certainly not compared to 4 1/2 billion years.

Take a look back into the 70's and look what all of these esteemed scientists were saying back then:
http://www.populartechnology.net/2013/0 ... rmism.html

So were they all wrong then, and now they're all right? Don't be a sheep, dude. You're too smart for that.

Papa, It's way way way to late for that these leftists are sheep till the end.

They are so brainwashed by leftist propaganda in academia the press and yes, science, that nothing can bring them back to reality.

Leftism is a religion.
It's a disease.
It's a bonafide mental disorder.

They are part of the mob mentally, which is deeply rooted in instability and deep seated insecurities.
The mob is their security blanket.

EAP wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:20 pm Leftism is a religion.
It's a disease.
It's a bonafide mental disorder.

This is Porky's new idol.


Too funny!

Innocent Bystander wrote:[
The planet is not just between Ice Ages, it's between pole flips.

I think we can handle pole flips.

https://youtu.be/svSbBnuD-bg

BSmack wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:33 pm pole flips.

Dr_Phibes wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:43 pm

Obviously, some Reagan conservative boomer is giving environmentalists the bird...

"Global warming? See that white stuff? Does that spell global warming? Huuurrrrr..."

Spray, you understand guitar playing real well. I wouldn't attempt to debate you on the finer points of that. The same holds true here. You (and EAP) need to express that you have even a rudimentary understanding of the issue of climate change in order to seriously engage me. I'll give you a hint. It's about the rate of change. All you're doing so far is bringing up the non-scientific Rush Limbaugh-type talking points. I have zero interest in going there. If you want to get me going then you need to stop boring me.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 2:46 am

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 2:07 am Do you know what the concern, at the most base level, actually is?

Wolftard had to put on a comfy sweater today, so everything is fine.

TAKE THAT, science!

Wolfy is off limits. He's earned that sweater and more.

BSmack wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:33 pm

Innocent Bystander wrote:[
The planet is not just between Ice Ages, it's between pole flips.

I think we can handle pole flips.

https://youtu.be/svSbBnuD-bg

And that's why pole dancing should be added to women's and men's gymnastics. Except men already perform pole dancing tricks.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 4:37 am Spray, you understand guitar playing real well. I wouldn't attempt to debate you on the finer points of that. The same holds true here. You (and EAP) need to express that you have even a rudimentary understanding of the issue of climate change in order to seriously engage me. I'll give you a hint. It's about the rate of change. All you're doing so far is bringing up the non-scientific Rush Limbaugh-type talking points. I have zero interest in going there. If you want to get me going then you need to stop boring me.

90% of us don't so just spit it out. You might find, you all are not really disagreeing with each other.