T1B

Posted: **Sat Nov 16, 2019 3:16 am**

mvscal wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 3:07 am
Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 4:55 pmWhy did he fire her now?
He fired her six months ago. I know it comes as a shock to the halfwits here, but the President sets foreign policy not the bureaucrats at the State Dept. and if those bureaucrats aren't on board with his program or worse, actively obstruct it, they get fired. Actually, in her case she was reassigned to a cushy gig and Georgetown University.

If he can fire her for any reason or no reason, and no one is disputing she was a political appointment in the first place (it was a CV gig and not a real gig), then why are we supposed to give a fuck?

Was she a whistleblower? or something else happened?

On the other hand, exactly what is his policy?

And what is she asking in return to make her whole?

Posted: **Sat Nov 16, 2019 3:20 am**

IB wrote:On the other hand, exactly what is his policy?

His policy is to do anything and everything necessary to keep his fat ass out of jail.

Need any other help?

Posted: **Sat Nov 16, 2019 3:35 am**

Posted: **Sat Nov 16, 2019 4:56 am**

mvscal wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 3:07 am
Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 4:55 pmWhy did he fire her now?
He fired her six months ago. I know it comes as a shock to the halfwits here, but the President sets foreign policy not the bureaucrats at the State Dept. and if those bureaucrats aren't on board with his program or worse, actively obstruct it, they get fired. Actually, in her case she was reassigned to a cushy gig and Georgetown University.

He can’t fire her to cook 2020 and he knows it, which is why he violated 18USC1512(b)(1) and (2) today.
Now run back to hellokitty.net you pathetic racist tard.

Posted: **Sat Nov 16, 2019 6:04 am**

88nazis,
Way to delete your post you yellow fuck:
Here is what it said btw:

Trump tampered with a witness as effectively as you tampered with a brain cell. Moron.
President Trump Retweeted

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Everywhere Marie Yovanovitch went turned bad. She started off in Somalia, how did that go? Then fast forward to Ukraine, where the new Ukrainian President spoke unfavorably about her in my second phone call with him. It is a U.S. President’s absolute right to appoint ambassadors.
10:01 AM · Nov 15, 2019·Twitter for iPhone
You work for the Gestapo. Shine those jackboots, thug.

What the fuck are you blathering about now you projecting nazi fuck.
It certainly wasn’t any kind of legal analysis of 1512.
Here let me help you out since I actually practice law for a living.
Saying everywhere she went turned bad and referencing a call he released makes other people think he might fuck with them too, which makes them not want to testify.
I would cite chapter and verse but you are not here to actually debate the topic, you are just here to fling poo.

—-
Trust the process.
Noise and light.
Never actually analyze anything.
Fling shit like a zoo animal.

Sin,
88Brownshirts

Posted: **Sat Nov 16, 2019 6:10 am**

Blah blah blah.
Try legal analysis next time you fucking POS.

Posted: **Sat Nov 16, 2019 6:28 am**

88 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 6:08 am Maybe in the traffic courts you frequent, before judges with PE degrees, that sort of logic is enough to spring a J-walker from the gallows of a $50 fine. But in real courtrooms, where I spend my time, your brand of stupid is relegated to handing out water to the attorneys who cross the bar. So weak (and whack).

If you can make out an impeachment from a tweet, you are the greatest GOD there ever was. But you can't, and that means you still have to play the abject fraud you have played on this board for the past 15 years. Know your role, loser. So sad. I bet your parents are real proud.

With this one response, you castrated kierland with the precision of a highly skilled surgeon, rendering him IMPOTENT for life.

Posted: **Sat Nov 16, 2019 6:32 am**

Love me.
Call me god.
Trust the process.
Cookies and cake at the victory party later on.

Sin,
88nazis

Posted: **Sat Nov 16, 2019 6:38 am**

You are one stupid lying yellow racist nazi fascist fuck

Posted: **Sat Nov 16, 2019 6:45 am**

Do tell.

——
Attack Attack Attack.
Smear Lie Cheat.
Trust the process.
Noise and light.

Sin,
88yellowdogs

Posted: **Sat Nov 16, 2019 7:25 am**

.088 wrote:I bet your parents are real proud.

Posted: **Sat Nov 16, 2019 10:22 pm**

L45B wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 6:38 am You are one stupid lying yellow racist nazi fascist fuck

You are 100% correct sir.
And the irony is that he's been programmed from a very young age to be stupid.

He doesn't understand how things work.
The left loves indoctrinated sheep who've been lied to since birth.

All the sadistic psychopath fascists were indeed government control socialists.
From Stalin to Mao to Hitler to Lenin,
To Chavez and Mussolini, pol pot to Castro. The list is a who's who of socialists!
See, communism and socialism are both government control.
The modern day left in our country is exactly that,
Government control.
And as such, they are incompatible with our Bill of rights and our liberty.

This isn't rocket science folks.
Unless you're indoctrinated and congenitally stupid.

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 12:38 am**

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 3:16 am then why are we supposed to give a fuck?

Fair question. The answer is Orange Man Bad. He fired err reassigned her, therefore he must be impeached.

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 12:42 am**

mvscal wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 12:38 am
Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 3:16 am then why are we supposed to give a fuck?
Fair question. The answer is Orange Man Bad. He fired err reassigned her, therefore he must be impeached.

Way to address all the crimes I analyzed.

——
Flood the zone.
Even racist pedos are welcomed.
Trust the process.

Sin,
88yellowdogs

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 12:44 am**

mvscal wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 12:38 am
Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 3:16 am then why are we supposed to give a fuck?
Fair question. The answer is Orange Man Bad. He fired err reassigned her, therefore he must be impeached.

He is being impeached for firing Yovanovitch?

Really?

Link?

#Trumptard

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 12:55 am**

mvscal wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 12:38 am Fair question. The answer is Orange Man Bad.

You don't say...

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 12:59 am**

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 3:16 am what is his policy?

His policy, which he clearly articulated during his campaign, is to de-escalate tension with Russia and foster a closer strategic and economic relationship with them if possible. The benefits are tremendous. Russia has abundant natural resources, but is comparatively backwards technologically speaking. It is a potentially very lucrative economic export market for American products. Such a relationship would strengthen American industry and the blue collar joes who work in those industries. It would also drive a wedge between Chinese-Russian cooperation.

Needless to say, there are very powerful interests who want absolutely nothing to do with that program. Vulture "capitalists" and their pet political maggots like the Bushes, Clintons, Kerrys, Obamas, Romneys, Pelosis and their European counterparts. Those crypto-fascist scum are just the tip of the iceberg. These shitbags have made a fortune with smash and grab jobs in Iraq, Libya and Ukraine. They tried and failed in Syria and Egypt. Has there ever been any sort of real accounting of all the trillions in aid money that poured into those shitholes? How about the billion dollars in palletized cash we sent to Iran? Where did all of that go?

Oh, look!!! Orange Man Bad!!! Hate, deflect, deny...

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 1:01 am**

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 12:44 am
mvscal wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 12:38 am
Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 3:16 am then why are we supposed to give a fuck?
Fair question. The answer is Orange Man Bad. He fired err reassigned her, therefore he must be impeached.
He is being impeached for firing Yovanovitch?

Why else would they call her to testify in this "impeachment inquiry"? She certainly isn't a witness to anything.

Of course, you are extraordinarily stupid so this would need to be explained to you. I understand. I'm here to help.

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 1:12 am**

mvscal wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 12:59 am Russia has abundant natural resources, but is comparatively backwards technologically speaking.

Eat Yuri Gagarin's dick, bro.

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 1:38 am**

mvscal" wrote:Why else would they call her to testify in this "impeachment inquiry"?

She provided context, background into the situation.

Donald was clearly unhinged over it.

The President of the United States is out on Twitter, denigrating in real time a citizen who is testifying?

Are you freaking kidding me?

LMAO!

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 2:20 am**

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 1:38 am
mvscal" wrote:Why else would they call her to testify in this "impeachment inquiry"?
She provided context, background into the situation.

I see. Background. Into the situation. Hmm. Well, the "situation" which is the subject of this "inquiry" occurred several months after her departure. Her disagreement with Trump's foreign policy direction is entirely irrelevant. She works for him. There is no such thing as an "unoffical channel" if POTUS is on the other end of the horn. He sets policy. State Dept. executes policy. Questions?

The President of the United States is out on Twitter, denigrating in real time a citizen who is testifying?

Denigrating? Such a harsh word. I would say that he was providing context, background into the situation.

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 2:21 am**

88 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 2:02 ammvscal =

...and by extension...Marty.

C'mon 88, I know I've been hard-chargin' lately, but you gotta give it up for ol' Shlomart...

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 2:24 am**

...because after the smoke clears, you and I know we're really just friends.

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 2:26 am**

*DISCLAIMER: Not actually friends. This offer void in Ohio and Ontario. Please consult a physician if discomfort lingers.

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 2:44 am**

mvscal wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 2:20 am
Softball Bat wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 1:38 am
mvscal" wrote:Why else would they call her to testify in this "impeachment inquiry"?
She provided context, background into the situation.
I see. Background. Into the situation. Hmm. Well, the "situation" which is the subject of this "inquiry" occurred several months after her departure. Her disagreement with Trump's foreign policy direction is entirely irrelevant. She works for him. There is no such thing as an "unoffical channel" if POTUS is on the other end of the horn. He sets policy. State Dept. executes policy. Questions?

The President of the United States is out on Twitter, denigrating in real time a citizen who is testifying?
Denigrating? Such a harsh word. I would say that he was providing context, background into the situation.

The old, he can do what he wants defense. You can take your one branch of government and shove it up your ass.

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 2:47 am**

88 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 2:02 ammvscal =

You really are a little bitch.

—-
Trust the process.
Trump will be king.

Sin,
88ovens

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 2:49 am**

MVSCAL =

SO
MUCH
$$$$$$$

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 2:53 am**

Trust the process.
Noise and light.
Make people gods.

Sin,
88ovens

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 3:00 am**

The president extorted a US ally with congresionally approprated funding provided to help this ally defend itself in a war against one of the US' main adversaries so this ally would start a bullshit investigation into his main political foes for the 2020 election. Totally legal, acceptable, and in good practice!

You remain a tiny dick, misinformed piece of shit. Nice job having your name here autocorrect from pedophile. Quite the legacy.

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 3:13 am**

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 3:00 am ...to help this ally defend itself in a war against one of the US' main adversaries...

Seriously fuck off, dude.

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 3:16 am**

That message isn't just from me, it's from every country on the planet that your war machine isn't currently grinding into dust, just so Buzzfeed and Vox editors can be snippy about the "bad orange dictator".

So fuck you and your killing apparatus.

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 3:19 am**

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 3:00 am The president extorted a US ally with congresionally approprated funding provided to help this ally defend itself in a war against one of the US' main adversaries so this ally would start a bullshit investigation into his main political foes for the 2020 election. Totally legal, acceptable, and in good practice!

You remain a tiny dick, misinformed piece of shit. Nice job having your name here autocorrect from mvscal. Quite the legacy.

I normally don't castigate fellow board members, BUT everything you just said is a GOT DAMN lie.
I'm gonna call your parents and have them take you out back behind the woodshed.

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 3:25 am**

EAP wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 3:19 am
I normally don't castigate fellow board members, BUT everything you just said is a GOT DAMN lie.

Easy there...you two serve the same master, after all.

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 3:39 am**

MS wrote:The old, he can do what he wants defense.

lol

Yeah...

These Trumptards are laffably transparent.

They love the authoritarian, so long as it is their authoritarian.

#psyche

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 3:48 am**

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 3:00 am The president extorted a US ally with congresionally approprated funding provided to help this ally defend itself in a war against one of the US' main adversaries so this ally would start a bullshit investigation into his main political foes for the 2020 election. Totally legal, acceptable, and in good practice!

Legal and ethical are two different things -- Clinton Body Count 101. Or Israel.

Still, that sounds more like the Trump I've come to expect.

What's missing is: did the Bidens fuck up in the first place, or were their own actions legal/ethical? or does it matter? Was Trump a maverick, or did he have precedent to fall back on from prior campaigns?

Trump's behavior is unprofessional. Is it impeachment worthy, though?

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 4:19 am**

Blah blah blah. Run the process eh?
I clearly laid out his crimes. Felonies are impeachable.

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 6:13 am**

mvscal wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 12:59 am
Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Sat Nov 16, 2019 3:16 am what is his policy?
His policy, which he clearly articulated during his campaign, is to de-escalate tension with Russia and foster a closer strategic and economic relationship with them if possible. The benefits are tremendous. Russia has abundant natural resources, but is comparatively backwards technologically speaking. It is a potentially very lucrative economic export market for American products. Such a relationship would strengthen American industry and the blue collar joes who work in those industries. It would also drive a wedge between Chinese-Russian cooperation.

Needless to say, there are very powerful interests who want absolutely nothing to do with that program. Vulture "capitalists" and their pet political maggots like the Bushes, Clintons, Kerrys, Obamas, Romneys, Pelosis and their European counterparts. Those crypto-fascist scum are just the tip of the iceberg. These shitbags have made a fortune with smash and grab jobs in Iraq, Libya and Ukraine. They tried and failed in Syria and Egypt. Has there ever been any sort of real accounting of all the trillions in aid money that poured into those shitholes? How about the billion dollars in palletized cash we sent to Iran? Where did all of that go?

Oh, look!!! Orange Man Bad!!! Hate, deflect, deny...

One of the best takes ever!

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 7:25 am**

Do the echo chamber thing.
Noise and lights.
Trust the process.

Sin,
88nazis

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 7:41 am**

Bitch was grating and it was not even funny watching the other liberal women slobbering all over her.

She provided nothing but adding to the laughing stock that is congress.

Posted: **Sun Nov 17, 2019 8:16 am**

Why was she fired?

And if she is a big nothing, why was Donald degrading her on Twitter as she testified?

What is Rudy's position at the State Department?

T1B

Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!

Re: Shut Up Beotch!