The Big Pickle wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2020 7:47 pm
I wonder if Mvscal would have fukkked her at Ft Hood.
mvscal is a pothead. I figure when you're mellow, everything that is consensual is a fine idea.
Would you have fucked Ketchum?
mvscal isn't a pothead...where in the fukkk do you come up with that lie?
Secondly...noope...I wouldn't have thought about fukkking Alex Ketchum...
No way in hell...NOPE! NOT A CHANCE!
But slap....he would fukk "it"
Why not? He looks like a hapa chick, he's obviously easy, and men give the best blowjobs. All of the positives, none of the negatives. And he can actually pass Army physical fitness standards unlike the majority of real women, so you won't have to worry about him in the field.
mvscal hates roided up badgemonkeys because of drug laws; he is a gourmand of delicious edibles. he knows his military history shit. he's a pothead. it is what it is. ask him.
Re: Rate this 82nd Airborne Female Paratrooper
Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2020 8:31 pm
by The Big Pickle
Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2020 8:27 pm
mvscal hate juiceed up badgemonkeys because of drug laws; he is a gourmand of delicious edibles. he knows his military history shit. he's a pothead. it is what it is. ask him.
I hope Mvscal comes here and will answer your post....
Add a liquid silk dispenser, and the turkey baster will be a thing of the past.
Re: Rate this 82nd Airborne Female Paratrooper
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2020 9:51 pm
by mvscal
Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2020 8:27 pmmvscal hates roided up badgemonkeys because of drug laws; he is a gourmand of delicious edibles. he knows his military history shit. he's a pothead. it is what it is. ask him.
I started the Amazing World of Juiced up Badgemonkeys years ago because of the lack of accountability for their violent fuckups. It had nothing to do with drug laws.
mvscal wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2020 9:51 pm
I started the Amazing World of Juiced up Badgemonkeys years ago because of the lack of accountability for their violent fuckups. It had nothing to do with drug laws.
mvscal wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2020 9:51 pm
I started the Amazing World of Juiced up Badgemonkeys years ago because of the lack of accountability for their violent fuckups. It had nothing to do with drug laws.
I would forfeit 3 months pay to be allowed 5 minutes to hump her ass. FUCK!
So are these dudes:
Another 'Chad to Stacy' classic (not able to post civvies photo):
In the end, live your best life. Be who you want to be. Just don't sell out the country while doing it.
Re: Rate this 82nd Airborne Female Paratrooper
Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2020 5:24 am
by Innocent Bystander
schmick wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 5:04 am
Our tax dollars at work placating the insane
There's a kind of poetry to it, though. If women warriors are bulldykes, then why not men warriors as sissies/fa.g.gots?
I agree with you about placating, but it goes the other direction as well. If some guy wants to wear high heels and makeup, he should be able to follow his bliss without being forced to believe by professionals that he's a real live woman and needs to be chemically (or literally) castrated for enjoying being pretty.
The only thing I'm concerned about is clandestine bioweapon experimentation on troops to turn them that way. But what can we do anyway?
At the end of the day, mental illness is still mental illness.
However,
As a Reagan conservative who holds liberty sacrosanct, I say live and let live.
Live and let live of course, just don''t allow them in to the military or have tax payers fund their selective medical procedures.
You make a great point. We need the best of the best in our military. Sharp minds. Mental illness is indeed a liability.
Re: Rate this 82nd Airborne Female Paratrooper
Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2020 1:09 pm
by smackaholic
The military has been selective in who it takes forever. Those that had any condition that might get in the way of the mission were not taken.
It is also part of the reason females weren't a part of a unit. It is partly because they don't have the ability to perform the mission, but also because throwing a skirt or two into a group has a habit of turning best buddies into mortal enemies. It is simply a recipe for drama where there is already plenty of drama to go around.
This is why gays were traditionally banded. Trannies are basically fags, but worse, because they are pursuing something they will never achieve. They are confused, depressed fags. It makes zero sense to put them into a military unit of any kind.
Re: Rate this 82nd Airborne Female Paratrooper
Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2020 2:31 pm
by EAP
smackaholic wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 1:09 pm
The military has been selective in who it takes forever. Those that had any condition that might get in the way of the mission were not taken.
It is also part of the reason females weren't a part of a unit. It is partly because they don't have the ability to perform the mission, but also because throwing a skirt or two into a group has a habit of turning best buddies into mortal enemies. It is simply a recipe for drama where there is already plenty of drama to go around.
This is why gays were traditionally banded. Trannies are basically fags, but worse, because they are pursuing something they will never achieve. They are confused, depressed fags. It makes zero sense to put them into a military unit of any kind.
HALL OF FAME POST.
You sir are a very wise man.
Re: Rate this 82nd Airborne Female Paratrooper
Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2020 2:42 pm
by ML@Coyote
I used to agree with this wholeheartedly; however, I was put in a difficult group situation with a homosexual among us and I learned that people are just people despite their sexual leanings. After a while (and it did take a while), I got along with this guy just fine. I think you should give more credit to men/women and their ability to act like mature adults in serious situations.
ML
Re: Rate this 82nd Airborne Female Paratrooper
Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2020 3:30 pm
by smackaholic
I understand what you are saying ML and my point pertains more to mixing women in with combat units than homos. The homo thing becomes more of a concern if you have multiple turd burglars.
You can teach people to get along, but you will never teach them to ignore biological instinct. Anywhere in the animal world, humans included, when there is a female to fight over, she will be fought over.
In a country of 300+ millions, we can afford to be very picky. I am recently retired from the Navy reserve. Fortunately when I was on active duty, combatant ships were still all male. I had friends who had served on non-combatants with co-ed crews and they said it was a fukking nightmare. Today, that nightmare has moved to all ships. The result is a diminished capability. Period.
Re: Rate this 82nd Airborne Female Paratrooper
Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2020 3:44 pm
by smackaholic
ML@Coyote wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 2:42 pm
I used to agree with this wholeheartedly; however, I was put in a difficult group situation with a homosexual among us and I learned that people are just people despite their sexual leanings. After a while (and it did take a while), I got along with this guy just fine. I think you should give more credit to men/women and their ability to act like mature adults in serious situations.
ML
Was your "difficult group situation" a military unit?
I seriously doubt it.
It was likely a work or social group where you are together for a few hours at a time, then you go have a beer, while Bryan goes and sucks a dick. And as you said, even in such situations, it was difficult. A military unit is totally different.
Re: Rate this 82nd Airborne Female Paratrooper
Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2020 3:57 pm
by ML@Coyote
No, it was not a military unit, but it was intense and personal, but not life threatening. I'd really like to hear from some guys who've been with women and/or queers in military units and hear their experiences. One of my son's friends is in the Army, so I'll ask him next time I see him. Do you have any first hand experience with this?
Re: Rate this 82nd Airborne Female Paratrooper
Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2020 8:19 pm
by EAP
ML@Coyote wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 3:57 pm
No, it was not a military unit, but it was intense and personal, but not life threatening. I'd really like to hear from some guys who've been with women and/or queers in military units and hear their experiences. One of my son's friends is in the Army, so I'll ask him next time I see him. Do you have any first hand experience with this?
There are corrupt left wing psychologists who explain that transgender people are not mentally ill.
They may be perfectly fine and salt of the earth folks.
But deep down, there's an inner conflict that is going on whether you want to acknowledge it or not.
These corrupt left wing psychologists should be removed from practice ASAP.
Same thing with left wing socialist professors who've allowed their political ideologies into the classroom.
Re: Rate this 82nd Airborne Female Paratrooper
Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2020 9:06 pm
by ML@Coyote
EAP wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 8:19 pm
There are corrupt left wing psychologists who explain that transgender people are not mentally ill.
They may be perfectly fine and salt of the earth folks.
But deep down, there's an inner conflict that is going on whether you want to acknowledge it or not.
These corrupt left wing psychologists should be removed from practice ASAP.
Same thing with left wing socialist professors who've allowed their political ideologies into the classroom.
First, just because people disagree with you, it does not make them corrupt. Second, yes, deep down there is a serious conflict within transgenders. I don't think anyone disputes that. I guess the question is whether this aspect of their personality diminishes their ability to serve in the military. How they behave and how they get along with others is critical. If it is a problem, then they should not be allowed to serve. But if it isn't, they ought to be able to take part and contribute. Honestly, I know only one person currently in the military, and I don't know how he feels about it. But I have texted him and asked him, and hope to get an answer from him. My own experiences outside of the military tell me that it may not be as big of a problem as some people perceive it to be. But I could be completely wrong.
As to left wing professors allowing their political agendas to dominate their classrooms, I agree this is a problem. It has been a problem for a long time. Same problem exists with the news media. But I'm not sure this relates to whether transgenders can function well in the military. Or maybe I missed your point?
EAP wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 8:19 pm
There are corrupt left wing psychologists who explain that transgender people are not mentally ill.
They may be perfectly fine and salt of the earth folks.
But deep down, there's an inner conflict that is going on whether you want to acknowledge it or not.
These corrupt left wing psychologists should be removed from practice ASAP.
Same thing with left wing socialist professors who've allowed their political ideologies into the classroom.
First, just because people disagree with you, it does not make them corrupt. Second, yes, deep down there is a serious conflict within transgenders. I don't think anyone disputes that. I guess the question is whether this aspect of their personality diminishes their ability to serve in the military. How they behave and how they get along with others is critical. If it is a problem, then they should not be allowed to serve. But if it isn't, they ought to be able to take part and contribute. Honestly, I know only one person currently in the military, and I don't know how he feels about it. But I have texted him and asked him, and hope to get an answer from him. My own experiences outside of the military tell me that it may not be as big of a problem as some people perceive it to be. But I could be completely wrong.
As to left wing professors allowing their political agendas to dominate their classrooms, I agree this is a problem. It has been a problem for a long time. Same problem exists with the news media. But I'm not sure this relates to whether transgenders can function well in the military. Or maybe I missed your point?
First, I want to thank you for your candor. It's very refreshing and comforting in this left wing bastion of despair.
You're 100% correct. Each individual should be judged solely on their capacity to serve with honor and dignity.
As for leftist professors, they are indeed scumbags who've allowed their political ideologies into the classroom, which has done immeasurable damage to academia over the past decades.
The news media has been thoroughly destroyed.
Just remember, the soviet socialists and the nazi socialists controlled the press and academia.
That's the modus operandi of the left wing socialists. Once they gain control of the press and academia, they've got the people right where they want them.
When they gain control of congress with these mentally unstable leftists like A O C and ilhan omar and Rashida Tlaib, etc....THEN the senate, executive branch and finally the supreme court? KISS your bill of rights goodbye.
Turn out the lights on liberty.
Re: Rate this 82nd Airborne Female Paratrooper
Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2020 11:42 pm
by ML@Coyote
Texted my son's friend in the Army. He said it didn't bother him that there were gays, women, etc in the military. That's just one guy's opinion, but he's the only one I know to ask.
Re: Rate this 82nd Airborne Female Paratrooper
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2020 12:15 am
by Kierland
Thanks for the data point. We will add it to the pile.
Re: Rate this 82nd Airborne Female Paratrooper
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2020 12:49 am
by mvscal
ML@Coyote wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 2:42 pm
I used to agree with this wholeheartedly; however, I was put in a difficult group situation with a homosexual among us and I learned that people are just people despite their sexual leanings. After a while (and it did take a while), I got along with this guy just fine. I think you should give more credit to men/women and their ability to act like mature adults in serious situations.
ML
There is a huge difference between homos and trannies. Homosexuality is based on desire. Transgenders are based on mental delusion.
A dude can decide that he might like to chug a cock and lick a hairy beanbag. He can make that happen. All he has to do is hook up with a like minded deviant and...voila! He's a real life, genuine 24 karat faggot off to join Stanley and Alan for appletinis at the gay bar.
The tranny, on the other hand, can dress in women's clothes, take female hormones, get reassignment surgery and, after all of that is said and done, guess what? He's not a woman. He's a pitifully deluded man in heels with a boob job and mutilated junk. He can never be anything more than a pathetic mockery of a real woman. It's truly sad and nothing to be encouraged or celebrated.
ML@Coyote wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 2:42 pm
I used to agree with this wholeheartedly; however, I was put in a difficult group situation with a homosexual among us and I learned that people are just people despite their sexual leanings. After a while (and it did take a while), I got along with this guy just fine. I think you should give more credit to men/women and their ability to act like mature adults in serious situations.
ML
There is a huge difference between homos and trannies. Homosexuality is based on desire. Transgenders are based on mental delusion.
A dude can decide that he might like to chug a cock and lick a hairy beanbag. He can make that happen. All he has to do is hook up with a like minded deviant and...voila! He's a real life, genuine 24 karat faggot off to join Stanley and Alan for appletinis at the gay bar.
The tranny, on the other hand, can dress in women's clothes, take female hormones, get reassignment surgery and, after all of that is said and done, guess what? He's not a woman. He's a pitifully deluded man in heels with a boob job and mutilated junk. He can never be anything more than a pathetic mockery of a real woman. It's truly sad and nothing to be encouraged or celebrated.
That'll rack.
The people that want to play along with their delusion, especially when the sufferer is young, should be shot.
Re: Rate this 82nd Airborne Female Paratrooper
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2020 1:08 am
by smackaholic
ML,
No first hand experience. I got off active duty 30 years ago, in a few months. After being out completely for about 11.5 years, I enlisted in the reserves (2 weeks before 9/11. How's that for timing?). I have served with women in the reserves. No issues to speak of, but the reserves is different.
I have heard from those that recently got off active duty that there were issues. They dealt with them, but that is besides the point. The military, especially during wartime can be a very stressful evironment. Any potential issues that can be avoided, should be. The military screens for all manner of possible issues. Took ADD meds in junior high? It could make you ineligible for service, or at a minimum disqualify you from particular jobs. Got a full sleeve tat? The Marine Corps doesn't need you.
The trouble is that some look at the military as a jobs program and are concerned with women having equal access.
While the military is a great start for many, myself included, that is not its primary purpose. The primary purpose of the military is to fukk enemies up and break their shit. All decisions regarding staffing should have this primary purpose in mind. Making units co-ed, at a minimum increases logistical headaches. And logistics win/lose wars. Beyond that there is the whole sexual distraction issue. You can not train this out of 22 year olds.
Re: Rate this 82nd Airborne Female Paratrooper
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2020 1:17 am
by Kierland
mvscal wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 12:49 am
The tranny, on the other hand, can dress in women's clothes, take female hormones, get reassignment surgery and, after all of that is said and done, guess what? He's not a woman. He's a pitifully deluded man in heels with a boob job and mutilated junk. He can never be anything more than a pathetic mockery of a real woman. It's truly sad and nothing to be encouraged or celebrated.
So you have no problem with gay cross dressers, just people who think they are women. Gotcha. What if the person is a tranny that wants to be a tranny and hates women?
Re: Rate this 82nd Airborne Female Paratrooper
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2020 1:24 am
by Kierland
“While the military is a great start for many, myself included, that is not its primary purpose. The primary purpose of the military is to fukk enemies up and break their shit. All decisions regarding staffing should have this primary purpose in mind. Making units co-ed, at a minimum increases logistical headaches. And logistics win/lose wars. Beyond that there is the whole sexual distraction issue. You can not train this out of 22 year olds.”
Just STFU. The reason for our military is to rain bombs on people from a bunker in New Mexico (which you can do in boxers, panties or even commando) and do other such mercenary work for big biz. We don’t lose wars because some unit had a tranny, we lose wars cause the evil fucks that pick them don’t care if we win as long as we blow shit up and therefore need more bombs.
Fuckin war mongers.
Re: Rate this 82nd Airborne Female Paratrooper
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2020 1:38 am
by smackaholic
You watch too many movie, dumbfukk. War is still an ugly business, dependent on thousands of people working together efficiently. Let's say you have an infantry company. Corporal Bob used to bone PFC Suzy, until PFC Rico Suave reported on board and took over these duties. Now give them all automatic weapons and drop them Shitholeistan. What could go wrong?
Re: Rate this 82nd Airborne Female Paratrooper
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2020 1:47 am
by Left Seater
Even dumber is his New Mexico comment. But it is what he does.
Re: Rate this 82nd Airborne Female Paratrooper
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2020 2:26 am
by Kierland
smackaholic wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 1:38 am
You watch too many movie, dumbfukk. War is still an ugly business, dependent on thousands of people working together efficiently. Let's say you have an infantry company. Corporal Bob used to bone PFC Suzy, until PFC Rico Suave reported on board and took over these duties. Now give them all automatic weapons and drop them Shitholeistan. What could go wrong?
And yet with the best toys and no trannies they lost in Asian twice. Then with don’t ask they got bogged down in the desert at least twice. Why the fuck do you think that is? Blaming 7 stalemates in the desert on trannies is the height of ignorance. So of course it’s right up your alley.
Re: Rate this 82nd Airborne Female Paratrooper
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2020 2:33 am
by Kierland
Left Seater wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 1:47 am
Even dumber is his New Mexico comment. But it is what he does.
Reminds me of muslims calling American soldiers 'Israelis'....world police on the one hand, Israel's buttboys on the other.
