T1B

Eat A Penis is an idiot.
Part of the process apparently.

How about Nancy dramatically tearing up the SOTU speech at the end?

Good to see her dome is now part of the Trump Real Estate empire.

I think we’ll see that moment a time or two in campaign ads.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

smackaholic wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 10:40 am How about Nancy dramatically tearing up the SOTU speech at the end?

It was pretty stupid of her. Didn't accomplish anything.

smackaholic wrote:How about Nancy dramatically tearing up the SOTU speech at the end?

She decided to take a huge dump on norms and probity.

Isn't it just shocking to see one of our elected leaders go that route?



LMAO!

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 12:45 pm

smackaholic wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 10:40 am How about Nancy dramatically tearing up the SOTU speech at the end?

It was pretty stupid of her. Didn't accomplish anything.

It felt like she took a page from college sports, and went for the highlight reel footage.

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 1:46 pm

smackaholic wrote:How about Nancy dramatically tearing up the SOTU speech at the end?

She decided to take a huge dump on norms and probity.

Isn't it just shocking to see one of our elected leaders go that route?



LMAO!

2nd

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 1:52 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 12:45 pm

smackaholic wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 10:40 am How about Nancy dramatically tearing up the SOTU speech at the end?

It was pretty stupid of her. Didn't accomplish anything.

It felt like she took a page from college sports, and went for the highlight reel footage.

She's had breast augmentation,
Her face is new, she's in the gym. She's a G I L F.
She needs to have the left wing ideology fucked out of her, real hard, and by a Reagan conservative like me, who holds liberty, her tits ass and pussy sacrosanct,

She is right of center but nice try you process running tard.

Kierland wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 3:30 pm She is right of center but nice try you process running tard.

There you go again, posting shit like a patient in a Bellevue padded cell.
She's a San Francisco left wing freak, who represents the most extreme left wing sociopaths in the country.

You can keep typing it but I have her record on war and torture and taxes and whatnot on my side.

Kierland wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 3:36 pm You can keep typing it but I have her record on war and torture and taxes and whatnot on my side.

You got a slight problem though skippy,
People evolve or in her case, devolve.
Sure she used to be slightly left of center, back when you were giving BJ's in middle school.

Today. She's hard left. Representing the most extreme leftists in the country.
People who think dropping pants and shitting in public is absolutely normal.

Are you ok?

Again you can lie but that doesn’t move her to the left.
I get that you have been spoon feed lies that you now believe, but again it doesn’t make them true.

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 1:46 pm

smackaholic wrote:How about Nancy dramatically tearing up the SOTU speech at the end?

She decided to take a huge dump on norms and probity.

Isn't it just shocking to see one of our elected leaders go that route?



LMAO!

Trump gave the Presidential Medal of Freedom to one of our nation's biggest shitbags not named shutyomouth but Nancy's the one who really fucked up here.

They deserve each other. Both are stains on our country.


But Trump giving an entertainer a Presidential medal of freedom is about as dumb as the Nobel Society giving Obama and nominating Greta for a Peace Prize.

You didn’t call out those huge misses for some reason.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 8:25 pm But Trump giving an entertainer a Presidential medal of freedom is about as dumb as the Nobel Society giving Obama and nominating Greta for a Peace Prize.

You didn’t call out those huge misses for some reason.

Let me see here, which of those awards come from the White House?

You must have taken an extra large helping of your stupid pills today.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 8:56 pm You must have taken an extra large helping of your stupid pills today.

Today ?


Good one.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 7:00 pm

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 1:46 pm

smackaholic wrote:How about Nancy dramatically tearing up the SOTU speech at the end?

She decided to take a huge dump on norms and probity.

Isn't it just shocking to see one of our elected leaders go that route?



LMAO!

Trump gave the Presidential Medal of Freedom to one of our nation's biggest shitbags not named shutyomouth but Nancy's the one who really fucked up here.

The medal of freedom to a guy who spent 35 years fighting for liberty and freedom. Giving back to countless charities.
Makes you look like a panty waste.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 8:56 pm

Left Seater wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 8:25 pm But Trump giving an entertainer a Presidential medal of freedom is about as dumb as the Nobel Society giving Obama and nominating Greta for a Peace Prize.

You didn’t call out those huge misses for some reason.

Let me see here, which of those awards come from the White House?

You must have taken an extra large helping of your stupid pills today.

No. You've overdosed on stupid pills a long time ago. Rush Limbaugh gives to countless charities which ultimately help the poor and sick.
Rush Limbaugh spent the last 35 years fighting for liberty and our Bill of rights. Fighting against the left wing socialists who trample on our liberty.
He makes you look like a dirty toilet in San Francisco.

EAP wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 9:04 pm The medal of freedom to a guy who spent 35 years fighting for liberty and freedom.

Link ?


The Fat pig... NEVER served in the military.

The State wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 9:07 pm

EAP wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 9:04 pm The medal of freedom to a guy who spent 35 years fighting for liberty and freedom.

Link ?


The Fat pig... NEVER served in the military.

Military? What does that have to do with civilians protecting our bill of rights by exposing the left wing socialists who attack our Bill of rights?

Bringing attention day after day for 35 years, to the government control socialists who violate our liberty and freedom, is WORTHY of the medal of freedom.

It's poetic justice.

The guy exposes left wing bullshit propaganda on CNN and msnbc and the press for decades.
Rush exposes the massive propaganda of CNN and msnbc and the press.
That ALONE is worthy of the medal for freedom.
These fake news outlets just settled a lawsuit for 475 million dollars for libel and slander against two minor children!
Rush has brought these vile corrupt media outlets to light.
Fake news like CNN and msnbc are the enemy of liberty.
The nazi socialists and the Soviet socialists also controlled the press and academia.

Rush exposes the left wing socialists who also have corrupted the press and academia.

For that reason alone he deserves a medal for freedom.

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 5:22 am
Multiple people have attested that Trump withheld congressionally appropriated funds unless Ukraine made a public announcement that they were investigating Biden.

None of whom had any direct, first hand knowledge of any such thing.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 8:56 pm

Left Seater wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 8:25 pm But Trump giving an entertainer a Presidential medal of freedom is about as dumb as the Nobel Society giving Obama and nominating Greta for a Peace Prize.

You didn’t call out those huge misses for some reason.

Let me see here, which of those awards come from the White House?

You must have taken an extra large helping of your stupid pills today.

I didn’t claim they came from the same place tardling. I clearly make the distinction, but compare the stupidity of both. That you want to circle back for more and call me stupid shows your lack of reading comp or the severity of your TDS.

mvscal wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 11:13 pm None of whom had any direct, first hand knowledge of any such thing.

Yeah, Trump blocked the ones who do from testifying and Senate GOPtards didn't want to hear from them anyway.

You of course remain a pitifully ignorant sack of shit.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 11:58 pm I didn’t claim they came from the same place tardling. I clearly make the distinction, but compare the stupidity of both. That you want to circle back for more and call me stupid shows your lack of reading comp or the severity of your TDS.

The only derangement going on here is the submoron playing what about.

Ok submoron.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 12:10 am

mvscal wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 11:13 pm None of whom had any direct, first hand knowledge of any such thing.

Yeah, Trump blocked the ones who do from testifying and Senate GOPtards didn't want to hear from them anyway.

You of course remain a pitifully ignorant sack of shit.

Yep.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 12:10 am
Yeah, Trump blocked the ones who do from testifying and Senate GOPtards didn't want to hear from them anyway.

So why not force their testimony via the courts? This is on Nancy and the Dems. Had they not rushed the process they could have had the courts compel their testimony. They didn’t do that for some reason and then expected the Senate to do it. Fucked up logic right there for sure.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 2:28 am

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 12:10 am
Yeah, Trump blocked the ones who do from testifying and Senate GOPtards didn't want to hear from them anyway.

So why not force their testimony via the courts?

Because it would be tied up in court for years.

Are you really this stupid ???




https://thehill.com/regulation/court-ba ... nances-are

In April of last year, the House Oversight and Reform Committee issued a subpoena for the president's personal financial records

Wrong. It only took 3 months for the SCOTUS to rule in previous impeachment cases:

Following an April 1974 subpoena from the Judiciary Committee, edited transcripts of 42 taped White House conversations relevant to the Watergate cover-up were made public by the president. But the committee pressed for the audio tapes themselves, and subsequently issued subpoenas for additional tapes, all of which Nixon refused. That same month he also refused to comply with a subpoena from special prosecutor Leon Jaworski for 64 Watergate-related tapes. Ultimately, on July 24, 1974, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision against the president, ordering him to comply.

You prove yourself to be a complete idiot yet again, and the stupidest person on this board. Color no one surprised.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 2:37 am Wrong. It only took 3 months for the SCOTUS to rule in previous impeachment cases:

Following an April 1974 subpoena from the Judiciary Committee, edited transcripts of 42 taped White House conversations relevant to the Watergate cover-up were made public by the president. But the committee pressed for the audio tapes themselves, and subsequently issued subpoenas for additional tapes, all of which Nixon refused. That same month he also refused to comply with a subpoena from special prosecutor Leon Jaworski for 64 Watergate-related tapes. Ultimately, on July 24, 1974, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision against the president, ordering him to comply.

You prove yourself to be a complete idiot yet again, and the stupidest person on this board. Color no one surprised.

That's because Nixon didn't appeal it... you fucking moron.

Hell, he had enough character to leave office before he was impeached.

And I use character loosely when mentioning Nixon.

Your shortbus stupidity reaches new heights.

Who was Nixon going to appeal the SCOTUS’ decision too? Take your time tard.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 2:48 am Your shortbus stupidity reaches new heights.

Who was Nixon going to appeal the SCOTUS’ decision too? Take your time tard.

You must of missed the part where I said he stepped down.

You're good at leaving out the facts... aren't you.

Bright you are not.

The State wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 2:58 am

Left Seater wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 2:48 am Your shortbus stupidity reaches new heights.

Who was Nixon going to appeal the SCOTUS’ decision too? Take your time tard.

You must of missed the part where I said he stepped down.

You're good at leaving out the facts... aren't you.

Bright you are not.

And do you know why he stepped down cocksucker?

Because it was Bi-partisan!
He had no choice. He saw the writing on the wall.

History will record that this was strictly partisan.

You dumb fuck.

m2 wrote:Hell, he had enough character to leave office before he was impeached.

That's right.

There was still a foundation of basic decency in the country.


Now?

pfft...



Donald (and his lapdog GOP) is a national embarrassment.

The State wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 2:40 am
That's because Nixon didn't appeal it

Again tardling, to what body was Nixon going to appeal the SCOTUS’ decision?

You claim the court process would take years. I pointed out it only took 3 months for the SCOTUS to rule on Impeachment matters previously.

Good God you are stupid. But by all means please keep posting as it provides plenty of laughs here in the ready room.

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:58 am

m2 wrote:Hell, he had enough character to leave office before he was impeached.

That's right.

There was still a foundation of basic decency in the country.


Now?

pfft...



Donald (and his lapdog GOP) is a national embarrassment.

Your left wing socialist party led by pelosi Pelosi Schumer Schiff and Nadler IS the JOKE of the country and an embarrassing example of incompetence and corruption.

The DOJ is almost ready to expose the criminal corruption of the previous administration.
Did you forget about that?
Indictments are forthcoming.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 1:33 pm

The State wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 2:40 am
That's because Nixon didn't appeal it

Again tardling, to what body was Nixon going to appeal the SCOTUS’ decision?

You claim the court process would take years. I pointed out it only took 3 months for the SCOTUS to rule on Impeachment matters previously.

Good God you are stupid. But by all means please keep posting as it provides plenty of laughs here in the ready room.

Plus, Nixon was up against a full bi partisan impeachment.
Trump's was partisan and corrupt.

Complete apples to oranges.

It nice to see you all think OJ did not kill his wife or her boyfriend.

Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:50 pm It nice to see you all think OJ did not kill his wife or her boyfriend.

Don't lump me in there. O J was guilty as hell

The reason why he got off was because the defense was allowed to pick an all low IQ jury.
And, move the venue from Brentwood to LA

Ironic because a true jury of his peers would've been in Brentwood, and not in LA.

That Chinese judge should've been removed from the bench.

Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 3:50 pm It nice to see you all think OJ did not kill his wife or her boyfriend.

Nicole was a cokehead, and Ron was an aspiring sugar baby who was probably gay.

I'd buy Ron as a high class d-boy, that night -- not a flesh dildo.

OJ didn't do it. He just knew who did.