Re: Overturned
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2022 11:46 pm
This is correct. Know who is not? Rumps, that's who.Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Mon Jun 27, 2022 11:46 pm Medical doctors, more specifically OB-GYN doctors.
The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is a United States law that recognizesMS wrote:Fuck off you pious POS. It’s her body you fucking tyrant.
There is nothing extreme about saying people should have bodily autonomy you tightassed zealot.
And that law says people can’t do shit to her body without consequences, thanks for making my point.Softball Bat wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 12:09 amThe Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is a United States law that recognizesMS wrote:Fuck off you pious POS. It’s her body you fucking tyrant.
an embryo or fetus in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any
of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species
Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unborn_Vi ... olence_Act
It is not only her body.
Cause it’s NONE of your business Karen!!!Go Coogs' wrote: ↑Mon Jun 27, 2022 11:05 pm Do you even know what morality is, jackass? What makes my morality shitty if I take issue with someone having five abortions and didn’t take proper action after 2? You say it’s her body, her choice. But there are other people involved in that situation.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The law says there are two victims.Kierland wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 12:18 amAnd that law says people can’t do shit to her body without consequences, thanks for making my point.poptart wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 12:09 amThe Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is a United States law that recognizesMS wrote:Fuck off you pious POS. It’s her body you fucking tyrant.
an embryo or fetus in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any
of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species
Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unborn_Vi ... olence_Act
It is not only her body.
Ironic you’re addressing 1/2 a person, no wonder he can’t comprehend.Softball Bat wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 12:27 amthere are two victims.
Two human members.
You know this.
38 states, representing probably 20% of the US population.Softball Bat wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 4:05 am 38 states recognize fetal homicide -- and about 2/3 of these apply the principle throughout the period of prenatal development.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foeticide
The mother is not just making a "my body" choice, MS -- and you know this.
Are you hittin' the bong tonight?Mikey wrote:38 states, representing probably 20% of the US population.
I assume you’re responding to my post. So prove that I’m wrong. It should be pretty easy with Google.
I was referring quite specifically to the unborn child within the woman. And again I ask--where is any concern for that living human being, a complete and unique individual? Who will defend the living yet unborn?
So why aren't laws reflecting that by requiring sperm donors to begin child support payments at the same stage that abortions are banned?Softball Bat wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 4:05 am 38 states recognize fetal homicide -- and about 2/3 of these apply the principle throughout the period of prenatal development.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foeticide
The mother is not just making a "my body" choice, MS -- and you know this.
Yes, like Mikey said, those states represent 20% of the nation's population.Softball Bat wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 4:45 am Currently, at least 38 states have fetal homicide laws: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin.
https://www.ncsl.org/research/health/fe ... -laws.aspx
That is all one big lie, scientifically as well as a actually. You don’t give a shit about zygotes and fetuses any more than you do about born kids. You are just a misogynistic control freak Karen.LTS TRN 2 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 6:16 amI was referring quite specifically to the unborn child within the woman. And again I ask--where is any concern for that living human being, a complete and unique individual? Who will defend the living yet unborn?
And why are you insisting they NOT be protected?
What are you? :wink:
I know you are stupid but what part of “I don’t give a fuck if you can find two dumb laws” don’t you get? You are saying if some dude fucks with a preggers and kills the fetus that’s bad so that means it’s ok for YOU to fuck with her too. That is beyond patriarchal BS and toxic misogyny and squarely in lala land. You have serious personal issues I get that, keep them to yourself.Softball Bat wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 4:05 am 38 states recognize fetal homicide -- and about 2/3 of these apply the principle throughout the period of prenatal development.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foeticide
The mother is not just making a "my body" choice, MS -- and you know this.
Not very good at math, are you.Softball Bat wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 4:45 am Currently, at least 38 states have fetal homicide laws: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin.
https://www.ncsl.org/research/health/fe ... -laws.aspx
The 38 states listed make up, in your estimation, about what percentage of the U.S. population?Mikey wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 2:30 pmNot very good at math, are you.poptart wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 4:45 am Currently, at least 38 states have fetal homicide laws: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin.
https://www.ncsl.org/research/health/fe ... -laws.aspxBig surprise.
You do realize that “fetal homicide” and abortion are not the same thing. Don’t you? Otherwise California would not be on your list.
No…I guess I can’t make that assumption either. Again, not too surprised.
There be dragons…
You are twisting yourself into a pretzel.MS wrote:I know you are stupid but what part of “I don’t give a fuck if you can find two dumb laws” don’t you get? You are saying if some dude fucks with a preggers and kills the fetus that’s bad so that means it’s ok for YOU to fuck with her too. That is beyond patriarchal BS and toxic misogyny and squarely in lala land. You have serious personal issues I get that, keep them to yourself.
Have you ever met someone who ate a fertilized egg? You might be the biggest moron on this board.Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 10:56 am
So should people who eat eggs be prosecuted for animal abuse?
I realize that they are most definitely the very same thing to the life in the womb.Mikey wrote:You do realize that “fetal homicide” and abortion are not the same thing. Don’t you?
L45B wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 3:09 pmHave you ever met someone who ate a fertilized egg? You might be the biggest moron on this board.Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 10:56 am
So should people who eat eggs be prosecuted for animal abuse?
Fuck you are an idiot. I just explained to you your bootstrap. You do know what bootstrapping is right?Softball Bat wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 2:59 pmYou are twisting yourself into a pretzel.MS wrote:I know you are stupid but what part of “I don’t give a fuck if you can find two dumb laws” don’t you get? You are saying if some dude fucks with a preggers and kills the fetus that’s bad so that means it’s ok for YOU to fuck with her too. That is beyond patriarchal BS and toxic misogyny and squarely in lala land. You have serious personal issues I get that, keep them to yourself.
You said, "Fuck off you pious POS. It’s her body you fucking tyrant."
I simply noted that 38 states have fetal homicide laws, and so it is painfully (for you) obvious that snuffing out a life in the womb is not a simple matter of -----> "her body."
The "child in utero" is a "legal victim" in fetal homicide, and is, by law considered to be "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development in the womb."
There are two bodies.
We all know this, anyway.
Says the shit spamming tard.Papa Willie wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 11:35 pmThey're not vapid, and they're highly intelligent.LTS TRN 2 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 10:12 pm The pro-choice folks aren't merely infantile and annoying, they're deranged and genuinely aberrated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REgFU7r ... e=emb_logo
/S/
Roach