T1B

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Wed Sep 14, 2022 11:28 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Wed Sep 14, 2022 10:57 pm

Kierland wrote: ↑Wed Sep 14, 2022 10:45 pm And as I mentioned twice, he started out innocent and was never found to be otherwise, hence he is still innocent.

This is nonsense and you know it.

The jury did not find him innocent. They found him not guilty.

MS knows this.

And you know he started out innocent so he is still presumed innocent. Being obtuse isn’t helping your case.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Wed Sep 14, 2022 10:57 pm

Kierland wrote: ↑Wed Sep 14, 2022 10:45 pm And as I mentioned twice, he started out innocent and was never found to be otherwise, hence he is still innocent.

This is nonsense and you know it.

So your take is he wasn’t presumed innocent? Or what?

LTS wrote:There are loose claims that he'd left early

Who claimed OJ's kid left work early on the night of the murders?

To be honest, what you briefly described does not sound like "an airtight alibi."

I'm not saying son of OJ did (or didn't) do the killing, but... I'm just sayin'.

Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 12:32 am So your take is he wasn’t presumed innocent?

Correct. He was found not guilty by a jury of his peers.

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 12:34 am

LTS wrote:There are loose claims that he'd left early

Who claimed OJ's kid left work early on the night of the murders?

To be honest, what you briefly described does not sound like "an airtight alibi."

I'm not saying son of OJ did (or didn't) do the killing, but... I'm just sayin'.

The BBC gumshoe who can't seem to understand how a time card works makes some lame insinuations. But it's total bullshit from jump street--for the basic reason I've stated--that the LAPD found the blood in his home without any idea where he was that night. If OJ had an actual alibi the LAPD would be literally finished--kaput. Do you understand? Or are you in Eddie Haskell mode? The scandal of having planted evidence in his home when he had a solid alibi would be unprecedented and never ending.

But of course they didn't plant anything, and of course OJ didn't have an alibi or simply "lose" his $600 shoes--whose print was found at the scene.

The very questioning of OJ's obvious guilt is itself fake--and you know it. And for that matter one would be far more honest and on solid ground to question the actual properties of the entity we call the "moon." :wink:

I did not watch the BBC video (yet), but the theory I saw elsewhere was that OJ came up to Nicole's house right at the time when his son was committing the murders.
Then OJ got tangled up in the mess that was occurring, and this explains the cut on his finger, his (and Nicole and Ron's) blood being in various locations.
This also explains OJ's behavior in the hours and days after the murders.

I'm not saying that is or isn't so, I'm just saying that is a theory I saw elsewhere.

Well that's an absurd scenario on every level. There was no motive for such a sudden barbaric attack, and there was no reason for OJ to drop in on Nicole. Though if she in fact teased him at the school performance of their daughter that afternoon--intimating that she was going to get royally fucked that evening by a hunky waiter--well the coked to the gills Juice might very well have paid a homicidal visit. But of course the son theory doesn't explain anything at all about OJ's behavior at any point following the murders. "Tangled up in the mess"? What sort of clunky language is that? Sometimes I think you're acting stupid as can be, but other times it appears that you really are dumber than a bucket of sand. :grin:

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 12:53 am

Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 12:32 am So your take is he wasn’t presumed innocent?

Correct. He was found not guilty by a jury of his peers.

So you don’t believe in innocent until proven guilty. That explains a lot about you.

Literally every shitty take Turd had was covered in the vid and Turd just lies and lies about it. Again they “found” the blood after he was already interviewed.

Kid had no alibi, plenty of motive and a history of knife attacks.

You're drowning in your own gargled piss fest..

Nice white flag.

Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 8:47 am So you don’t believe in innocent until proven guilty. That explains a lot about you.

Oh...OK. These explain a lot about you:

* The earf is flat
* OJ was found innocent
* 9/11 was an inside job

Did I miss anything?

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Sep 16, 2022 4:59 pm

Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 8:47 am So you don’t believe in innocent until proven guilty. That explains a lot about you.

Oh...OK. These explain a lot about you:

* The earf is flat
* OJ was found innocent
* 9/11 was an inside job

Did I miss anything?

I never said the erf was flat.
OJ WAS found NG.
Science says hydrocarbon fire doesn’t melt steel.

Do you have any OTHER stupid takes?

Kierland wrote: ↑Fri Sep 16, 2022 8:05 pm OJ WAS found NG.

Correct. He was NOT found innocent.

You deserve a medal.

OJ was promptly found GUILTY in the subsequent civil trial. And as for the acquittal in the farcical criminal trial, the shameless race-hustling was on full display for all to see. I maintain that anyone who claims OJ to be innocent is in fact lying just to be a contrarian punk--like Squirm Worm--or is just bored and dull. And you know who you are.

LTS TRN 2 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 16, 2022 10:28 pm I maintain that anyone who claims OJ to be innocent is in fact lying just to be a contrarian punk--like Squirm Worm--or is just bored and dull. And you know who you are.

He is indeed trolling

Exactly. And lost in the twaddle is the bizarre murder case in Vegas--with the cartoon villain perp smirking in his initial court appearance.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Sep 16, 2022 9:36 pm

Kierland wrote: ↑Fri Sep 16, 2022 8:05 pm OJ WAS found NG.

Correct. He was NOT found innocent.

You deserve a medal.

He was already innocent. What changed, besides a NG verdict.
Care to refute anything about the actual evidence?

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Sep 16, 2022 10:32 pm

LTS TRN 2 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 16, 2022 10:28 pm I maintain that anyone who claims OJ to be innocent is in fact lying just to be a contrarian punk--like Squirm Worm--or is just bored and dull. And you know who you are.

He is indeed trolling

Easy way for you to not have to actually defend anything.

The similarities are interesting. The smirking perp in Vegas, Telles, also stabbed his victim at night in front of his home after taking him by surprise. In both cases the perp knew the victim quite well. In both cases the DNA evidence from the bloody knife attack was key in zeroing in on the Real Killer.

The similarities stop there, however, because while both victims were white, the race card could only be played in OJ's case--and this shameless wallowing in race-hustling by Johnnie Cockroach certainly included the specter of the Rodney King "reparation" riots of just two years before.