Re: Weekend Roll Call 11-26-22
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2022 9:53 pm
Ah the old “the DSM says she has to be 14 for you to be pedo” defense.
You are a disgusting POS……. Pedo.
Page 2 of 2
Re: Weekend Roll Call 11-26-22
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2022 9:58 pm
Re: Weekend Roll Call 11-26-22
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2022 10:03 pm
You use slurs because you are lazy and words are hard for you.
Re: Weekend Roll Call 11-26-22
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2022 10:06 pm
So to recap: Donnie thinks grown men fucking a 15yo is not DSM pedophilia so it doesn’t count and that trying to overthrow the government isn’t naziism because it didn’t happen in the 40’s.
Any other scum you want to defend assface?
Any other scum you want to defend assface?
Re: Weekend Roll Call 11-26-22
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2022 10:07 pm
Oh waahhhhh you got smacked on a smack board.Donnie Baker wrote: ↑Mon Nov 28, 2022 10:03 pm You use slurs because you are lazy and words are hard for you.
What a pathetic cunt.
Re: Weekend Roll Call 11-26-22
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2022 10:09 pm
It's good that you are not condoning what he did, because being complicit applies to adults.Donnie wrote:I'm not condoning what Thad did but she was very, very complicit in the escape.
Tad Cummins was dealing with a child, and that is why he got 20 years in the slam.
What we had in that thread was a bunch of .net losers, dissatisfied with their own lives, and their own f@t, nagging wives, living vicariously through pedo Tad Cummins.
Watching the daily news feeds of the saga, .net loser would daydream about what it would be like to ditch his worn out wife, and pitiful life, and run off with a 15 year old girl.
Yes, because (paraphrasing takes from the thread) "In some cultures it is perfectly fine to bang a 15 year old, and anyway, she wanted it this way."
The .net goons and loons imagined how great it would be to get 15 year old tail on a daily basis, and they eagerly watched and commented on Tad's actions.
Living vicariously through the pedo, the.net freaks were very excited (obviously) about the story, and they imagined that the unfolding scenarios was great, but that if they were in Tad's shoes they would be a bit smarter, so as to not end up getting caught.
The .net thread was a psychological study on a couple of different levels.
Not only was .net loser living vicariously through the criminal hero, .net loser also showed his vapid,sheep-like nature.
Once a couple of degenerates decided to jock pedo Tad, then a whole herd went bah-bah-bah and jumped right in to peck out disgusting takes on the very sordid happenings.
It was a crime against a child.
Re: Weekend Roll Call 11-26-22
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2022 10:58 pm
Softball Bat wrote: ↑Mon Nov 28, 2022 10:09 pm It's good that you are not condoning what he did, because being complicit applies to adults.
Tad Cummins was dealing with a child, and that is why he got 20 years in the slam.
What we had in that thread was a bunch of .net losers, dissatisfied with their own lives, and their own f@t, nagging wives, living vicariously through pedo Tad Cummins.
Watching the daily news feeds of the saga, .net loser would daydream about what it would be like to ditch his worn out wife, and pitiful life, and run off with a 15 year old girl.
Yes, because (paraphrasing takes from the thread) "In some cultures it is perfectly fine to bang a 15 year old, and anyway, she wanted it this way."
The .net goons and loons imagined how great it would be to get 15 year old tail on a daily basis, and they eagerly watched and commented on Tad's actions.
Living vicariously through the pedo, the.net freaks were very excited (obviously) about the story, and they imagined that the unfolding scenarios was great, but that if they were in Tad's shoes they would be a bit smarter, so as to not end up getting caught.
The .net thread was a psychological study on a couple of different levels.
Not only was .net loser living vicariously through the criminal hero, .net loser also showed his vapid,sheep-like nature.
Once a couple of degenerates decided to jock pedo Tad, then a whole herd went bah-bah-bah and jumped right in to peck out disgusting takes on the very sordid happenings.
It was a crime against a child.
Re: Weekend Roll Call 11-26-22
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2022 11:48 pm
Thad...wait Tad? Okay, Tad... got what that law says he deserved. I have no argument against that because the Court knew more about the case than I did. We might be splitting hairs over the complicit part but I don't believe juveniles are always innocent just because they're juveniles. She could have escaped and she didn't. Staying with him doesn't mean she carries the same level of guilt or anything but it's not nothing.Softball Bat wrote: ↑Mon Nov 28, 2022 10:09 pmIt's good that you are not condoning what he did, because being complicit applies to adults.Donnie wrote:I'm not condoning what Thad did but she was very, very complicit in the escape.
Tad Cummins was dealing with a child, and that is why he got 20 years in the slam.
Re: Weekend Roll Call 11-26-22
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2022 12:42 am
Re: Weekend Roll Call 11-26-22
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2022 1:09 am
Here is a shovel pedo, keep digging. Her guilt was zero, just like you are a zero.Donnie Baker wrote: ↑Mon Nov 28, 2022 11:48 pmThad...wait Tad? Okay, Tad... got what that law says he deserved. I have no argument against that because the Court knew more about the case than I did. We might be splitting hairs over the complicit part but I don't believe juveniles are always innocent just because they're juveniles. She could have escaped and she didn't. Staying with him doesn't mean she carries the same level of guilt or anything but it's not nothing.Softball Bat wrote: ↑Mon Nov 28, 2022 10:09 pmIt's good that you are not condoning what he did, because being complicit applies to adults.Donnie wrote:I'm not condoning what Thad did but she was very, very complicit in the escape.
Tad Cummins was dealing with a child, and that is why he got 20 years in the slam.
Now fuck off pedo.
Re: Weekend Roll Call 11-26-22
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2022 1:11 am
Re: Weekend Roll Call 11-26-22
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2022 2:34 am
Elizabeth Thomas was a child, so Tad needed to have permission from her parents to take her.Donnie wrote:We might be splitting hairs over the complicit part but I don't believe juveniles are always innocent just because they're juveniles. She could have escaped and she didn't. Staying with him doesn't mean she carries the same level of guilt or anything but it's not nothing.
"May I please take Elizabeth, Mr. Thomas? And by the way, I will also be fvcking her daily."
Re: Weekend Roll Call 11-26-22
Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2022 11:50 am
Nobody at Stucknut had anything to say about what happened with .net.Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Nov 26, 2022 1:46 pmRack your investigative reporting! Hopefully you'll learn something and share it with us.
Seven replies, mostly inconsequential gibberish.
Re: Weekend Roll Call 11-26-22
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 6:40 pm
"Stucknut" sounds awfully homosexual. I'm sure it isn't gay at all and you going there during a discussion about sexual deviancy are completely coincidental.