T1B

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2024 10:22 pm I thought no photographs were permitted in Section 60 of ANC?

https://www.alamy.com/president-joe-bid ... 71134.html

It's a news photograph, you fucking idiot, not a political photograph. Rub your two brain cells together and think about why one might be permitted while the other might not. But then again, that's why you endorse and embrace Dump's gross version of fascism.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 2:18 amIt's a news photograph, you fucking idiot, not a political photograph. Rub your two brain cells together and think about why one might be permitted while the other might not. But then again, that's why you endorse and embrace Dump's gross version of fascism.

A photo is a photo, moron. It becomes political when it is used for political purposes, which Trump did not do.

The propaganda swilling dolts on this board have made foolish and false statements that Trump committed a felony at Arlington. Put up or shut up.

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 2:41 am https://x.com/DonaldElect/status/182824 ... rTqPg&s=19

183 followers. You really nailed him, Diego.

The family of MSG Andrew Christian Marckesano was not contacted to obtain permission to photograph his grave.

And taking photos of graves for political purposes w/o permission is definitely a crime.

But go ahead and continue defending 5-deferment Dump.

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 2:54 am The family of MSG Andrew Christian Marckesano was not contacted to obtain permission to photograph his grave.

And taking photos of graves for political purposes w/o permission is definitely a crime.

But go ahead and continue defending 5-deferment Dump.

Post the statute, Diego, Esq.

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 3:09 am

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 2:54 am The family of MSG Andrew Christian Marckesano was not contacted to obtain permission to photograph his grave.

And taking photos of graves for political purposes w/o permission is definitely a crime.

But go ahead and continue defending 5-deferment Dump.

Post the statute, Diego, Esq.

I already did, illiterate dumbfuck.

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 3:48 am

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 3:09 am

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 2:54 am The family of MSG Andrew Christian Marckesano was not contacted to obtain permission to photograph his grave.

And taking photos of graves for political purposes w/o permission is definitely a crime.

But go ahead and continue defending 5-deferment Dump.

Post the statute, Diego, Esq.

I already did, illiterate dumbfuck.

No you didn't, you uninformed, highly-programmed progressive propaganda swallower. You posted a regulation, which is not a statute:

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2024 8:49 pm 32 CFR § 553.32(c) Memorial services and ceremonies at Army National Military Cemeteries will not include partisan political activities.

Because you are too stupid to understand the difference, I'll give you some help. A regulation is enacted by an Agency (part of the Executive branch) and not by Congress (the Legislative branch), which enacts statutes. And since you probably never read it, I'll post the regulation you cited in its entirety below:

§ 553.32 Conduct of memorial services and ceremonies.

(a) The Executive Director shall ensure the sanctity of public and private memorial and ceremonial events.

(b) All memorial services and ceremonies within Army National Military Cemeteries, other than official ceremonies, shall be purely memorial in purpose and may be dedicated only to:

(1) The memory of all those interred, inurned, or memorialized in Army National Military Cemeteries;

(2) The memory of all those who died in the military service of the United States while serving during a particular conflict or while serving in a particular military unit or units; or

(3) The memory of the individual or individuals to be interred, inurned, or memorialized at the particular site at which the service or ceremony is held.

(c) Memorial services and ceremonies at Army National Military Cemeteries will not include partisan political activities.

(d) Private memorial services may be closed to the media and public as determined by the decedent's primary next of kin.

(e) Public memorial services and public wreath-laying ceremonies shall be open to all members of the public to observe.

Notice how the regulation fails to provide any statement whatsoever that a violation of the regulation constitutes a crime? Furthermore, notice how it says that "Memorial services and ceremonies" will not include "partisan political activities"? A photograph taken at a soldier's graveside is not a "memorial service and ceremony" and is not a "partisan political activity".

You have stage V TDS. You are incapable of reason. The next time you receive your daily programming from your prog masters, take a breath, think about what they are shoving down your throat, investigate whether there is any truth at all in it, and then post, if you feel you must. Otherwise, you'll just continue to Charlottesville this board daily like Screwy.

I have to hold my nose to defend the man, but…

At least Trump met the families. They seem to be quite happy.

That is beside the point, Sam.

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 1:02 pm You have stage V TDS. You are incapable of reason. The next time you receive your daily programming from your prog masters, take a breath, think about what they are shoving down your throat, investigate whether there is any truth at all in it, and then post, if you feel you must. Otherwise, you'll just continue to Charlottesville this board daily like Screwy.

None of this changes the fact that Blump is, and has been since his Oprah interviews in the 80s, a racist xenophobic homophobic yellow Nazi Socialist.

His policies from 7.74 years ago are the reason these soldiers died, are the reason why we have record inflation and unless we stop him, we are on the verge of WWIII.

I heard there will also be a bloodbath.

But Trump wanted an Afghanistan pull out too! And, maybe, possibly, or history can revision, he would've completely fucked up the withdrawal like the inept Biden admin...at least that is ASSUMABLE because he wanted the same thing!

How do the lefties remember how to breathe?

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 1:08 pm That is beside the point, Sam.

That’s gonna be tough for the left to spin.

But I’m certain they’ll try.

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 1:02 pm

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 3:48 am

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 3:09 am

Post the statute, Diego, Esq.

I already did, illiterate dumbfuck.

No you didn't, you uninformed, highly-programmed progressive propaganda swallower. You posted a regulation, which is not a statute:

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2024 8:49 pm 32 CFR § 553.32(c) Memorial services and ceremonies at Army National Military Cemeteries will not include partisan political activities.

Because you are too stupid to understand the difference, I'll give you some help. A regulation is enacted by an Agency (part of the Executive branch) and not by Congress (the Legislative branch), which enacts statutes. And since you probably never read it, I'll post the regulation you cited in its entirety below:

§ 553.32 Conduct of memorial services and ceremonies.

(a) The Executive Director shall ensure the sanctity of public and private memorial and ceremonial events.

(b) All memorial services and ceremonies within Army National Military Cemeteries, other than official ceremonies, shall be purely memorial in purpose and may be dedicated only to:

(1) The memory of all those interred, inurned, or memorialized in Army National Military Cemeteries;

(2) The memory of all those who died in the military service of the United States while serving during a particular conflict or while serving in a particular military unit or units; or

(3) The memory of the individual or individuals to be interred, inurned, or memorialized at the particular site at which the service or ceremony is held.

(c) Memorial services and ceremonies at Army National Military Cemeteries will not include partisan political activities.

(d) Private memorial services may be closed to the media and public as determined by the decedent's primary next of kin.

(e) Public memorial services and public wreath-laying ceremonies shall be open to all members of the public to observe.

Notice how the regulation fails to provide any statement whatsoever that a violation of the regulation constitutes a crime? Furthermore, notice how it says that "Memorial services and ceremonies" will not include "partisan political activities"? A photograph taken at a soldier's graveside is not a "memorial service and ceremony" and is not a "partisan political activity".

You have stage V TDS. You are incapable of reason. The next time you receive your daily programming from your prog masters, take a breath, think about what they are shoving down your throat, investigate whether there is any truth at all in it, and then post, if you feel you must. Otherwise, you'll just continue to Charlottesville this board daily like Screwy.

You are the most pedantic pile of human excrement posting at this board. What the fuck do you think this video is, a public service announcement?

https://www.tiktok.com/@realdonaldtrump ... mqzStM419C

A handout for visitors on “Rules Governing Conduct” for Arlington National Cemetery clearly prohibits “political campaign or election-related activities within the cemeteries.” In a statement to NPR on Wednesday about the incident, the cemetery stressed that: “Federal law prohibits political campaign or election-related activities within Army National Military Cemeteries, to include photographers, content creators or any other persons attending for purposes, or in direct support of a partisan political candidate’s campaign.”

You remain awful, narcissistic, fascist pile of human waste who will stoop to new lows to defend your fascist hero. Fuck you.

88 knows it's over and he's melting.

I think we all remember the background of how 88 ended up picking his nic for the board.

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 1:06 pm I have to hold my nose to defend the man, but…

At least Trump met the families. They seem to be quite happy.

Did you hear the families talk at the RNC Convention? It was amazing. Trump met with the families for 6 hours. Joe Biden and/or Kamala Harris have not even said the names of the dead out loud. That's all you really need to know about leadership.

Trump is the real Commander in Chief. Even lefties know it and it chafes their perineums.

The guy is a fucking felon. Hello? That's not hyperbole, that's not "fake news", that's real. He's got many more felony charges pending

He's also a fraud, and owes New York about a half billion in penalties.

He's also been found liable for sexual assault and defamation, and owes the victim nearly $100 million.

And yeah, there is the constant lying about a stolen election, and his unprecedented failure to participate in a peaceful transfer of power.

This is far from an exhaustive list. You wouldn't hire such a person to cut the grass at your house. It remains inconceivable to me how you and so many others want him in the most important and powerful office in the world.

FiatLux wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 4:35 pm 88 knows it's over and he's melting.

I think we all remember the background of how 88 ended up picking his nic for the board.

get real. That's a reference to 1988, the year he found his parchment in a Cracker Jack box.

The question is whether the left will accept an election defeat? They seem unhinged beyond belief. Screwy says having your picture taken is a crime, a felony no less. The handout and stuff.

Surely you will agree that the greater concern is that trump will again not accept an election defeat.

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 5:39 pm The question is whether the left will accept an election defeat? They seem unhinged beyond belief. Screwy says having your picture taken is a crime, a felony no less. The handout and stuff.

Every accusation Dump & his cult followers make is an admission of guilt.

HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 4:58 pm Joe Biden and/or Kamala Harris have not even said the names of the dead out loud. That's all you really need to know about leadership.

Come on now! I’m sure they said the name of the drug-addled career criminal who shoved a gun in the belly of a pregnant woman as he robbed her, though. They’ve been great leaders.

HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 4:58 pm

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 1:06 pm I have to hold my nose to defend the man, but…

At least Trump met the families. They seem to be quite happy.

Joe Biden and/or Kamala Harris have not even said the names of the dead out loud

They also haven’t called our fallen soldiers “suckers” and “losers,” or claimed that an award he gave to one of his biggest doners is “much better” than the Congressional Medal of Honor.

So there is that.

Trump is the real Commander in Chief. Even lefties know it and it chafes their perineums.

Please explain how Trump is “the real Commander in Chief.”
This should be interesting.

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 5:39 pm The question is whether the left will accept an election defeat? They seem unhinged beyond belief.

Projecting much?

Roux wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 7:45 pm He is such a pathetic and disgusting piece of shit.

The Daily Boulder?? Good God

The never-ending attempts at "gotcha" are growing tiresome.

People just want a strong border and strong economy - something your candidate can't, and will never, deliver.

There's nothing gotcha about it.

It is just more evidence as to what a vile and disgusting shit stain he is, and who is absolutely inappropriate for public service.

To compare and contrast with:

Still waiting for Dump to release the video that he says he has that exonerates him....

Roux wrote: ↑Fri Aug 30, 2024 8:47 pm There's nothing gotcha about it.

It is just more evidence as to what a vile and disgusting shit stain he is, and who is absolutely inappropriate for public service.

To compare and contrast with:

Trump’s sign would say “The Bucks Stop Here.”

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 12:14 pm Still waiting for Dump to release the video that he says he has that exonerates him....

I'd like to see that too. I'd also like to see video of the "altercation" that every news organization is reporting occurred. Depending upon which outlet you read, a U.S. Army cemetery worker was "brushed aside" or "pushed aside" or "violently attacked" or "assaulted" by a Trump aide. That seems like something that should have been caught on tape too.

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 7:31 pm I'd like to see that too. I'd also like to see video of the "altercation" that every news organization is reporting occurred. Depending upon which outlet you read, a U.S. Army cemetery worker was "brushed aside" or "pushed aside" or "violently attacked" or "assaulted" by a Trump aide. That seems like something that should have been caught on tape too.

Yeah, who should we believe? Serial liars like Dump and his henchmen or the US Army? Choose carefully...

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2024 10:58 pm And your WAB argument falls flat when one considers that this is a pic of the CinC, taken in April/2021. The next election after this photo was taken is the one we'll be voting in in this November. Thus, Biden wasn't part of an active political campaign.

What utter bullshit!

These fukkers are in active political campaign mode from the moment they start running their lack of cognitive function renders it pointless.

Either you can take pics at ANC or you can't. There is a long history of Presidents doing it. Until now, no one thought twice about it.

smackaholic wrote: ↑Mon Sep 02, 2024 12:40 pm What utter bullshit!

These fukkers are in active political campaign mode from the moment they start running their lack of cognitive function renders it pointless.

Either you can take pics at ANC or you can't. There is a long history of Presidents doing it. Until now, no one thought twice about it.

Once again, another Dump ball licker intentionally confuses the difference between a news photo and campaign staff shooting photos and video at the cemetery. Unsurprising considering your lack of mental fortitude, but just keep it up. Normal, freedom loving American see the fascist bullshit you're excusing, using dead soldiers as campaign props against the law, and they will shitcan you and your orange god emperor in November.

Roux wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 12:39 am

Lets take these one at a time.

Dealing with the Taliban- You deal with who is in charge. By that point, that was the Taliban.

Drawing down forces- It's what you do when you leave, right? Can we agree that everyone was sick of Afghanistan at that point and wanted out?

Releasing Taliban- Once again. They were the ones running the show. Should we have taken them all home with us? Maybe put them in Gitmo?

Inviting Taliban to Camp David- See above.

Set an April 1 exit date- It was a plan. Plans are good, right? But he handed over the keys on Jan 20. It was all Biden's after that. Trying to say we were stuck with the plan is bullshit. Biden tore up every other plan of Trump's on day one.

Didn't brief Biden. - Probably blame enough on both sides here. Besides, the military leaders running the show were still there.

Shut down every airbase but one- Uhhh, we were leaving, remember. When you do that you consolidate your forces to one, very large, well equipped, defendable position. And you stay there to keep an eye on things. That was TBOM's plan. We'd likely still be there in control of all our assets had he been re-elected. He also told those Taliban leaders he knew who they were and where their families were and he was counting on them to not act up.

Had we kept that very large, very well equipped base, we'd have a way of slapping them when they start fukking up. And they will fukk up.

But china says thanks for the base.

Still waiting for HPG to explain how Trump is “the real Commander in Chief.”

smackaholic wrote: ↑Mon Sep 02, 2024 12:58 pm

Let’s take these one at a time.

…

Releasing Taliban- Once again. They were the ones running the show. Should we have taken them all home with us? Maybe put them in Gitmo?

Wow. You did a pretty good pretzel imitation with all of these. But this one in particular exhibits enough hypermobility to allow head insertion completely into rectum.

You think releasing 5,000 enemy fighters to attack our forces on the way out was somehow a good idea? Because they supposedly were “in charge?” Like maybe they’d be so pleased that they would switch sides or something? Do you think that one option might have been to leave them where they were?

Good God.

Mikey wrote: ↑Mon Sep 02, 2024 1:12 pm

smackaholic wrote: ↑Mon Sep 02, 2024 12:58 pm

Let’s take these one at a time.

…

Releasing Taliban- Once again. They were the ones running the show. Should we have taken them all home with us? Maybe put them in Gitmo?

Wow. You did a pretty good pretzel imitation with all of these. But this one in particular exhibits enough hypermobility to allow head insertion completely into rectum.

You think releasing 5,000 enemy fighters to attack our forces on the way out was somehow a good idea? Because they supposedly were “in charge?” Like maybe they’d be so pleased that they would switch sides or something? Do you think that one option might have been to leave them where they were?

Good God.

Who was guarding these dickheads? If it was Americans, they were leaving. If it was Afghans,they'd have been releas'ed'?

What would have been the best thing to do?

smackaholic wrote: ↑Mon Sep 02, 2024 6:32 pm

Mikey wrote: ↑Mon Sep 02, 2024 1:12 pm

smackaholic wrote: ↑Mon Sep 02, 2024 12:58 pm

Let’s take these one at a time.

…

Releasing Taliban- Once again. They were the ones running the show. Should we have taken them all home with us? Maybe put them in Gitmo?

Wow. You did a pretty good pretzel imitation with all of these. But this one in particular exhibits enough hypermobility to allow head insertion completely into rectum.

You think releasing 5,000 enemy fighters to attack our forces on the way out was somehow a good idea? Because they supposedly were “in charge?” Like maybe they’d be so pleased that they would switch sides or something? Do you think that one option might have been to leave them where they were?

Good God.

Who was guarding these dickheads? If it was Americans, they were leaving. If it was Afghans,they'd have been releas'ed'?

What would have been the best thing to do?

I don’t know what all the options were, but releasing them to go and arm up and kill American soldiers would not be at the top of the list.

And your Greatest Dealmaker in the World got played by those fuckers, big time. They didn’t live up to any of their side of the “deal.” And Trump had promised to rain holy hell on them if they didn’t. But did he? Uh uh. Imagine…who would ever think of reneging on a deal made in good faith?